Der Stürmer

The official blog of the site "Der Stürmer" –

Category: Speeches & Lectures

The Illustrated Protocols of Zion

by David Duke

This is a video preview of Dr. David Duke’s new book, The Illustrated Protocols of Zion is an historical and literary valuation of the original Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.

He presents the case that Protocols of Zion could well be titled the Protocols of „Zionism“ in that it predicts many of the horrific wars and conflicts right down to the issues in the Israel or „Zion“ of today and associated with Zionist power and influence that goes far beyond the borders of Israel.

In this video and his book upon which it is based, he shows that many of the most radical claims of the Protocols are today proclaimed by Zionists themselves around the world. such as domination of media, banking, and extensive power and influence in America, the EU and in many governments around the world.

He quotes leading and influential Zionists and Zionist media in showing that many of the most important underlying themes can be documented in historical and contemporary terms.

Dr. Duke points out its true history. He argues that the Protocols is obviously not the secret meeting of earlocked „Elders of Zion“ anymore than 1984 is a true account of Big Brother or Oceania.

He examines it as dystopian literature that is amazingly prescient and predictive since its publishing well over a century ago.

This video and the powerful underlying book The Illustrated Protocols of Zion are essential materials to understanding the Zionist issue from all perspectives.

A Phd in History, Dr. Duke shows how vital assertions of the Protocols can be historically and contemporaneously documented and that many of the most shocking claims of the Protocols can be found in even more extreme expression by modern Zionism.

Lies and the History Channel

Source: American Dissident Voices broadcast of February 5, 2000

by Dr. William L. Pierce

The biggest threat to our people – the biggest obstacle to our survival and progress – is the Jewish control of the mass media of news and entertainment. I’ve said that to you many times. Today I want to talk about some very specific examples of the way in which this threat works. Last month a special television documentary program began airing on the History Channel, which is a subsidiary of A&E Television Networks. The “A&E” stands for “arts and entertainment.” The name of the program is “Nazi America: A Secret History.” It purports to be a serious history of the growth of the Nazi movement in America, starting with the German-American Bund and its precursor organizations in the 1930s and taking us right up to the present

I don’t have the time to view many television programs except the national and international news each day, primarily to see what the party line is: that is, to see what “spin” the Jews are putting on the news. This History Channel documentary was of special interest to me, however, because I was part of it. Beyond the fact that I’m in the program, I knew intimately another person who was given major coverage in the program, and I have detailed knowledge of several other persons and events covered by the program. So when I viewed the program I paid careful attention and took notes. What I noted generally about the program is that in addition to the standard slant, which they put on everything they produce, there were a number of very clear-cut and blatant lies: lies of both omission and commission. And it occurred to me that these lies are so clear and so easily refuted by anyone who knows the facts that I should share them with you. They provide useful clues to Jewish motives – and also perhaps an antidote to other Jewish lies.

One other thing about this particular History Channel program: it will be shown more than once. You can keep your eyes open for it and watch it the next time it is shown, keeping in mind the facts I’ll share with you today. If you’re really serious about what’s happening to America, you can even order a copy of the tape from the History Channel and then study it yourself the way I did. It’ll cost you $29.95, but the lesson is worth it.

The first thing to note is the general slant of the program. That slant is to lump together everyone the Jews consider a threat to their own plans for America as a “Nazi” and then to portray Nazis as dangerous subversives and terrorists who need to be locked up in order for the country to be safe. Nazis are portrayed as weird and unpleasant people, strange and dangerous people, not at all like you and me. The purpose behind this is not just lingering Jewish hatred for the German Nazis, who put a real crimp in the Jews’ plans for Europe 60 years ago. It is a current concern of the Jews that too many people are speaking out against them today, and too many people are listening, especially with the Internet not yet subject to Jewish censorship. The Jews’ aim is first to demonize the people who don’t like them and then to outlaw them, cut them off from contact with the public, keep them from speaking out.

So let’s look at the specifics. The first part of the program deals with 1930s organizations such as Friends of the New Germany and the German-American Bund, which tried to counter the Jews’ hate-propaganda against Germany in America, to build unity among German-Americans, to help Americans generally understand what Adolf Hitler was doing in his rebuilding of Germany, and to a lesser extent to propagate Hitler’s National Socialist ideas in America.

And I should tell you now that this part of the program on the German-American Bund, just like all the rest of the program, is chock full of errors which are the result of ignorance and sloppy research more than malice. For example, the program states that Hitler’s Mein Kampf was published in 1924 and that Hitler was appointed chancellor of Germany in 1932. Both dates are incorrect, as anyone can determine by reference to an encyclopedia. In 1924 Hitler was in prison for revolutionary activity and was just beginning to write Mein Kampf. And he didn’t become chancellor until 1933. I point out these errors simply to remind you that the controlled media very often are wrong in their facts even when they’re not consciously lying, but they present those facts in an apodictic way, and few Americans question them.

In its treatment of the Bund, however, the program goes beyond sloppiness in its errors and turns to deliberate deceit. It talks, for example, about New York Congressman Samuel Dickstein’s investigation and harassment of the Bund and his labeling of it as a subversive organization. What the people who wrote the program certainly knew but neglected to tell the audience was that Congressman Dickstein was also a Soviet espionage agent – not just a communist or communist sympathizer like so many of his fellow Jews, but a secret agent actually on the payroll of the Soviet NKVD. So in the 1930s what we had was a Jewish-Soviet espionage agent pretending to be an American patriot denouncing what he called the “un-American” influence of the Bund. Dickstein’s role as an NKVD agent was revealed as old NKVD archives were opened following the collapse of communist power and the breakup of the Soviet Union in the early 1990s. But there wasn’t a word of that in the History Channel program. Dickstein was represented simply as a concerned congressman. But because he was a congressman and a Jew, both the Roosevelt administration and the Jewish media collaborated with him in railroading the Bund’s chairman, Fritz Kuhn, into prison on a trumped-up embezzlement charge in 1939.

Not revealing Dickstein’s employment by the NKVD was a lie of omission. A really outrageous lie of commission occurs a little later in the program when it moves into the postwar period and focuses on George Lincoln Rockwell, the World War Two Navy flier and combat veteran who organized the National Socialist White People’s Party in the 1960s. The program shows news footage of some of Rockwell’s public meetings in Washington, while the program’s narrator comments that Rockwell – quote – “added gays and Catholics to his list of threats to the future of the White race.” – end quote – Then, between scenes of Rockwell speaking, a headline fills the screen. It reads, and I quote: “Hate-Document Bared: ‘I will kill every Jew, Catholic and Negro.’” – end quote – The clear implication is that this statement about killing every Jew, Catholic, and Negro was made by Rockwell. But it wasn’t. It was pure invention by the people who made this program.

I knew Rockwell quite well and worked with him closely on the production of a magazine for a year before his murder in 1967. He was totally removed from any sectarian bickering between Catholics and Protestants and accepted them on an equal basis. He had a number of practicing Catholics in his organization. This Jewish trick of trying to divide Catholics from Protestants has been used before, but in Rockwell’s case it is especially inappropriate. Furthermore, Rockwell never made a statement about killing all homosexuals, although he certainly disapproved of homosexuality.

The deliberate deceit continues as the program moves into the period after Rockwell’s death. The narrator announces that Rockwell’s organization floundered after his death. . . until the next Nazi leader came forward. Frank Collin emerged from Rockwell’s shadow in 1970 . . . . I’m using the narrator’s exact words here. The clear implication is that Frank Collin, a short, dark, hook-nosed, little man with a flair for theatrics, was Rockwell’s successor. There is no mention at all of Rockwell’s actual successor, a man named Matt Koehl.

And there is no mention that Collin was a Jew. Not only was he a Jew, but he was a poseur and an exhibitionist, pretending to be a National Socialist leader while putting on a media sideshow which attracted to him a small group of losers and misfits who liked to wear uniforms and strut around in public. While the media focused on Collin, whose sole claim to fame was the uproar he generated when he announced that he intended to march his uniformed freak show through Skokie, Illinois, a Jewish suburb of Chicago, Rockwell’s real successor was left without access to the media.

At the end of the Collin episode, the narrator does reveal to us that Collin was convicted and sent to prison in 1979 for sexually molesting little boys, but we are left with the impression that this smirking, prancing, child-molesting little Jew was a real National Socialist, the successor of George Lincoln Rockwell. That’s the image of a National Socialist, the image of a “Nazi,” that the writers of this program deliberately and deceitfully plant in the public mind.

Actually, Collin was exposed as a Jew in the Chicago press back in the 1970s. Interviews with his parents were published in the newspapers. But that was more than 20 years ago, and the folks at the History Channel figured that the public has forgotten about that. And Frank Collin is not the only Jew trotted out as a “Nazi” by this program which is supposed to tell us about the history of Nazis in America. The Columbine killers, Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris, also are represented as “Nazis,” although they are not named directly in the program. Instead, as images flash across the screen, we hear the narrator naming a series of people involved in recent killings, and the narrator tells us, one at a time, that they are Nazis.

James Burmeister, an 82nd Airborne soldier at Fort Bragg, who shot a convicted Black drug dealer in Fayetteville, North Carolina, in December 1995, is described as a “Nazi,” although there has never been any evidence presented in this regard. Certainly, he was not a member of any National Socialist group, or that fact would have been brought out at his trial. Then there is John King, convicted in the dragging murder of a Black in Jasper, Texas, in 1998. King also is described by the narrator as a “Nazi,” although again there is no evidence to suggest this. What we do know about King is that he acquired a burning hatred for Blacks after being gang-raped by them while in prison.

Perhaps we are supposed to assume that everyone who doesn’t like Blacks is a “Nazi” – perhaps even everyone who is not Politically Correct. One of those in this series of supposed “Nazis” is Benjamin Smith, who killed a Black and a Korean in drive-by shootings in Illinois last year. Another is the apparently deranged Buford Furrow, who shot a Filipino postman in California last year after wounding several Jews in a Jewish community center. So far as we know, none of these killers was a “Nazi” in the sense of having a serious belief in National Socialism and belonging to a National Socialist group.

So the way the program worked the Jewish Columbine killer Dylan Klebold into this series was to have the narrator recite a series of names of killers while their faces flashed on the screen and assert in each case that the killer is or was a “Nazi.” It went like this: James Burmeister (face), John King (face), the Columbine killers (no face), Benjamin Smith (face), Buford Furrow (face). Clever aren’t they? They know how to lie without actually lying. Even a reasonably intelligent and perceptive viewer will be tricked by this technique, unless he happens to know the facts. The facts, of course, are that Dylan Klebold was a Jew, and both he and his partner were outspoken anti-racists. But the average couch potato certainly doesn’t know that, and so he falls into the trap of believing that the perpetrators of the worst school massacre in U.S. history were “Nazis.”

Timothy McVeigh also is represented in the program as a “Nazi” and the Oklahoma City bombing as an act of Nazi terrorism. The narrator tells us: “McVeigh was a . . . neo-Nazi . . . .” There is no evidence to suggest that he was or is. What we know about him is that he hated the Clinton government and decided after the government burned all of those women and children to death in the Branch Davidian church in Waco that he would send the government a message. We also know that he read one of my books, The Turner Diaries. If everybody who has read The Turner Diaries is a Nazi, then the media Jews really have a problem on their hands, because the number of readers is now somewhere close to half a million. But really, that’s like saying that everyone who reads the New Testament is a Christian, and everyone who reads the Old Testament is a Jew, and everyone who reads the Koran is a Moslem.

A Nazi – a National Socialist – is a person who holds a very specific set of beliefs, a person who accepts the doctrine set forth in Hitler’s Mein Kampf, just as a Christian is a person who accepts the teachings of Jesus and the claims made in the New Testament about his miraculous origin and his resurrection, and a communist is a person who believes the economic and social doctrines of the Jew Karl Marx. This History Channel program starts with real Nazis – the leaders of the Bund – continues with another real Nazi of a different sort – George Lincoln Rockwell – and then cleverly ties these real Nazis into a series of Jewish child molesters, antisocial freaks and exhibitionists of various sorts, and people who have committed racial killings or acts of terrorism. And it’s all done very smoothly, in a very slick way, a very Jewish way.

The aim, of course, is not only to persuade viewers that Nazis are very unpleasant people – as if more than 60 years of anti-German propaganda films from Hollywood haven’t already done that – but also to persuade us that Nazis are dangerous, and we need to do something about them. We need new laws to protect ourselves from these dangerous Nazis.

You might wonder why they don’t just tell us the truth about Nazis and let the chips fall where they may. Why not just tell us that Nazis don’t believe in equality, that Nazis don’t believe in multiculturalism and enforced diversity, that Nazis don’t believe that men and women are the same? Why not just tell us that Nazis don’t approve of homosexuality? Why not just tell us that Nazis aren’t democrats, that Nazis believe in self-sufficiency and self-discipline and personal honor and a natural hierarchy? Why not just tell us that Nazis are racists, and they don’t like Jews? That should be enough, if all of the Jewish television propaganda about equality and diversity and democracy has had the desired effect. That should be enough to make every Politically Correct viewer hate Nazis. Why do they feel it’s necessary to lie to us and try to make us believe that Nazis are people like the Jewish child molester Frank Collin and the Jewish mass murderer Dylan Klebold? Why do they feel it’s necessary to try to make us believe that everyone who has tattoos and doesn’t like Blacks is a Nazi? Why do they feel that it’s necessary to lie to us by telling us that Nazis want to kill Catholics? Are they afraid that all of their anti-German hate propaganda and all of their Political Correctness propaganda haven’t “taken”?

I’ll tell you what they’re afraid of. They’re afraid of the truth. Listen to the part of this History Channel program which is about me – that’s about 90 minutes into the program – and what they’ll tell you is that all of the violence and strife in America during the past few decades is the result of people reading my books, of people listening to the ideas I talk about. If I hadn’t written The Turner Diaries, if I didn’t have a radio broadcast every week, if I weren’t on the Internet, they’ll have you believe, there wouldn’t have been an Oklahoma City bombing and a dragging in Jasper, Texas, and a Columbine High School massacre, and we’d all be getting along and loving one another in multicultural comfort and security.

And then they very slyly tell you: Pierce is protected by his right to free speech, and they say it in a way that means, Pierce was able to get away with putting people up to all of this violent activity because he hides behind the First Amendment. What we need, they suggest, are new laws to keep Pierce from hiding behind the First Amendment. And you know, there are a lot of couch potatoes out there, a lot of women of both sexes, who believe that.

I get hate mail every day from people who ask me, “Aren’t you ashamed for causing all of those people to die in Oklahoma City?” Others blame me for the Columbine High School massacre. Really. They don’t blame the Clinton government. They don’t blame the liberals for making a pigsty of America. They don’t blame the people who force the races together and generate racial hatred by doing it. That would require independent thinking. No, they blame me, and they nod their heads wisely and agree with the History Channel narrator that we need new laws to keep people like Pierce from causing violence.

The Jews and their hangers-on are afraid of the truth getting to large numbers of people, especially through new media such as the Internet, and they do want to put a stop to it. That’s why they tell the sort of lies that this History Channel program is full of. They want to scare the couch potatoes. And I want to make sure that the independent thinkers see those lies and understand that they are lies and also understand why they’re being told.

If you want to help me with this work, then this History Channel program, “Nazi America: A Secret History,” is a tool that you can use too. Talk to people you know about the lies in it. Help people to understand the poisonous and destructive way in which the Jews use their control of our mass media. Help people to understand that they’re not being educated when they watch the History Channel; they’re being brainwashed; they’re being lied to. And talk about the details.

I don’t know about you, but I’m always skeptical when someone waves his arms and makes a general statement. I want the specifics. I want the details. I want the facts, so that I can make up my own mind. Anyway, that’s why I’ve spent so much time today talking with you about this one History Channel program. It dealt with a subject that I happen to know something about, so I could spot the lies and tell you about them. But there are literally thousands of other programs out there which also are full of lies. When you spot one, don’t keep quiet about it. Speak out. Tell other people. And let me know about it too.

* * *

David Duke & Mark Collett – The Lies of TPUSA and Anti White Pro Zionist Conservatives

The Giant Gold Robbery


by Dr. William Pierce

Free Speech – October 1997 – Volume III, Number 10

I‘ve mentioned the Jewish program of extortion against Switzerland before, but this is such a fascinating subject I just can’t stay away from it. Almost every day the Jews outreach themselves in setting new records for arrogance, deceit, and greed. It’s really breathtaking to watch them.

For the sake of review, the whole thing started last year when a group of Jews, looking around for a new way to milk more money from the “Holocaust,” hit on the idea of announcing that Swiss bankers were keeping money that had been deposited by Jews before or during the Second World War who had then died or been killed during the war. Like most clever swindles, this one contained a grain of truth. Among the dormant accounts in Swiss banks there are some which did belong to Jews who died during the war. Every bank in the world accumulates dormant accounts, and some of these accounts undoubtedly were opened by Jews.

Now, the Swiss bankers have standard procedures for dealing with their depositors and for handling dormant accounts, and those procedures have nothing at all to do with the ethnicity of the depositor. Jewish depositors are and always have been treated just like everyone else. The same efforts are made to contact the owners of dormant accounts, regardless of whether those owners are Jews or Gentiles. And regardless of what you think about bankers as a whole, Swiss bankers are generally recognized as especially reputable – as bankers who are especially careful to play by the rules. That’s one of the reasons Swiss banks are so highly regarded around the world.

If a group of Tibetans or Laplanders had begun raising a fuss about dormant accounts their grandfathers had opened in Swiss banks, the Swiss bankers would have dealt with them in the standard manner: the bankers would have said to them, just show us some proof that you are the legitimate heirs of depositors who have died, and we will give you any money in the accounts, and that would have been it. No one would have expected more than that, and no special media attention would have been given to the Tibetans or Laplanders.

In fact, before this particular swindle was launched last year, Jews, along with people of just about every other race and nationality on the planet, had claimed and been awarded dormant accounts in the standard way, without any special difficulty.

But the Jews who launched this scheme weren’t interested in having dormant accounts handled in the standard way. They were interested in blackmail and extortion on a grand scale. And they had reason to believe that they could get away it, while the Tibetans and Laplanders obviously couldn’t. That reason was the control of the news and entertainment media by their fellow Jews.

The first act in the scheme went like this: The schemers got together with some of their buddies in the media, and front-page articles appeared simultaneously in newspapers all over the world to the effect that Swiss bankers were unscrupulously holding onto as much as $7 billion which belonged to the heirs of so-called “Holocaust” victims. The members of the Jewish group wanted the Swiss bankers to turn this money over to them. The Swiss responded, as one might have expected, with denials and outrage. The president of Switzerland denounced the Jewish demands as an extortion attempt. And had only Tibetans or Laplanders been involved, that’s where the affair would have ended. But instead, the Jewish media shifted into second gear and counterattacked, feigning outrage themselves over the charge of extortion. How could a bunch of nice, Jewish boys possibly be involved in extortion – especially when the magic word “Holocaust” had been invoked to sanctify their claim for money?

Then the Swiss made their first big mistake: they apologized for accusing the Jews of extortion. They explained their procedure for claiming dormant accounts. They hired public relations firms. They said that there couldn’t possibly be $7 billion in dormant accounts belonging to “Holocaust” victims, but that there might be some money and that they would make another examination of their dormant accounts. They announced that as a charitable act they would donate $180 million to the Jews, not from dormant accounts but from their own general funds, just for the sake of goodwill.

The Swiss didn’t understand the Jewish mentality. They didn’t understand that Jews aren’t people you can live with. With Jews there’s no compromising. The Jews correctly viewed the Swiss apology and the Swiss offer of a charitable donation to “Holocaust” survivors as signs of weakness, and so they stepped up their demands. They got one of their step’n’fetchit Gentile politicians involved, New York Senator Alphonse D’Amato, who is chairman of the Senate Banking Committee and who has made a career out of doing favors for the Jews. And they began escalating their demands and their threats.

And the Swiss kept making mistakes. They kept apologizing and backtracking and trying to placate the Jews. Aside from their reputation for honesty, the big thing Swiss banks had going for them was their reputation for confidentiality. A person could put his money in a Swiss bank account and reasonably expect that no one would ever learn about it if he didn’t announce the fact himself. Last month, in an attempt to prove to the world that they weren’t hiding any Jewish money, Swiss bankers compromised their reputation for confidentiality by publishing a list of the names of the account-holders for all 1,756 accounts they could find which had been dormant since the end of the Second World War. These accounts contained a total of approximately $40 million.

Do you think this pleased the Jews a bit? They scrutinized the list, and the first thing they noted was that fewer than ten per cent of the names on it were Jewish. They didn’t say much about this, however, except in their own Jewish community newspapers, because it tended to deflate the fable they had concocted of the Swiss bankers hoarding the savings of many thousands of Jewish “Holocaust” victims totaling billions of dollars. Instead they began screaming that, based on a similarity of names, eight of the 1,756 accounts on the list might belong to people who had been connected in one way or another with the German government during the war. There were names on the list which were the same as or similar to a former vice-president of the Reichstag, Hitler’s official photographer, the wife of a top SS official, and five others. “Oy, veh! You’ve been doing business with Nazis!” the Jews shrieked.

The Swiss reminded the Jews that Switzerland had been a neutral country during the war and that Swiss banks had customers from both sides of the conflict. Reminding everyone of that was another mistake for the poor Swiss. The Jews, Senator D’Amato, and the rest of the Jews’ camp followers began moaning that the Swiss really had sympathized with the Germans, that they had wanted the Germans to win and had helped the German war effort by trading with Germany.

Now, that’s another one of those little grains of truth in this whole fabric of lies the Jews have constructed. A great many Swiss, especially in the German-speaking parts of the country, were pro-German. And of course, they did carry on trade with both the Germans and their allies as well as with the allies of the Jews, such as the United States and the Soviet Union. The Jews seized on the fact of Swiss trade with the Germans and began beating the Swiss on the heads with that. The gold the Germans gave the Swiss in return for manufactured products during the war probably had been confiscated from Jews, they screamed. Some of it probably was gold teeth extracted from Jewish concentration camp victims. “Give it back! Give it back to us!” The Swiss responded by apologizing for having remained neutral during the war and by donating another $100 million to the fund for “Holocaust” victims they already had set up.

That’s nowhere enough to satisfy one Jewish leader, Avraham Burg, the head of Israel’s Jewish Agency. (That’s actually its name: the Jewish Agency.) Burg has demanded for the Jews not only all the gold which had gone to Switzerland from Germany during the war to pay for manufactured goods, but also gold which the victorious Allies confiscated from Germany at the end of the war and have been doling out ever since to various countries occupied by the Germans during the war to compensate these countries for their wartime losses. Burg claims that this gold once belonged to Jews, and he has demanded that all of the vaults holding this gold be sealed until it is officially turned over to Jews. He has demanded – and I quote him exactly – “that the corrupt division and distribution of Jewish spoils from World War II to world governments must immediately be ceased, and every last cent must be returned to Jewish hands.”

Isn’t that interesting wording? “[E]very last cent must be returned to Jewish hands.” Not necessarily to the hands of the Jews Burg claims originally owned the gold, since it would be impossible to determine who those Jews were, but just “to Jewish hands.” Just get it away from the Gentiles and put it into Jewish hands. The Jews will figure out what to do with it.

Imagine how that demand would sound if, instead of Jews, Lutherans or Baptists were claiming the gold. During the war the Soviet government forced millions of ethnic Germans – the so-called “Volga Germans” – off the land they had owned for 150 years, since being invited to Russia by Catherine the Great, and deported them to Siberia. After the war the communist and democratic victors forced millions of other ethnic Germans off their land in eastern Germany in a huge and murderous “ethnic cleansing” program, to which the western Allies consented.

Most of these plundered and dispossessed Germans were Lutherans, and what was stolen from them dwarfs any claim the Jews have made. Imagine the Lutheran church demanding today that it be compensated for everything that had been stolen from those plundered Germans during and after the war. We would laugh at the absurdity of the church’s claim. The fact that Avraham Burg and his fellow Jews make such a claim today tells us something about their mentality, about their ethnocentricity and sense of racial solidarity, about their “us against them” attitude toward the world, as well as about their greed for gold. And it tells us about the folly of thinking of Jews as merely people with a different religion, who become anything other than Jews when they change their religion.

The reason that Avraham Burg can confidently make such demands, while no Lutheran spokesman dares do the same, is based on the fact of Jewish media control. The Jews have spent 60 years, since before the Second World War, using the media to complain about their mistreatment by the Germans, the Poles, the Ukrainians, the Latvians, the Lithuanians, the Hungarians, the Croatians, and so on. After the war they poured such a deluge of pro-Jewish propaganda out of Hollywood that most Americans today think of Jews as being the principal victims of the Second World War. Almost no one has heard about what Jewish Communism did to the Russians, the Ukrainians, the Poles, and the other European peoples unfortunate enough to be ruled by Communists before, during, or after the Second World War. Almost no one has heard about the mass murder of millions of German civilians after the war. In fact, most Americans can’t even give a good estimate of the number of Americans who died in combat during the war. But everybody has heard about the grossly inflated figure of “six million” Jews supposedly killed in gas chambers by the Germans and then converted into soap, lampshades, and gold dental fillings.

This incessant Jewish “Holocaust” propaganda has got most people, including the Swiss, buffaloed. It has given the Jews a special status, a martyr status. Most people are afraid to criticize them or contradict them. But even the Swiss bankers and politicians who aren’t fooled by the Jewish “Holocaust” exaggerations are afraid of the power of the Jewish media. They understand that the U.S. government is practically under the Jews’ control. They understand that American politicians who are in the Jews’ pockets, like Senator D’Amato, can cause them a lot of trouble. They understand that the Jews have enough political power through their media control to persuade the U. S. government to go along with a boycott of Switzerland if they demand one. And so instead of standing up to the Jews the Swiss keep on apologizing and trying to buy the Jewish blackmailers off. And the Jews continue to see this as weakness, and so they keep on pushing. They keep on demanding more.

And, hey, don’t think that’s because the Jews are greedy! They’re not really interested in the gold, but only in the principle of the thing, they assure us. Israel Singer, the secretary of the World Jewish Congress, one of the groups applying pressure to the Swiss, has announced, “This is not about money. It is about justice.” Right.

This business of demanding reparations for things which allegedly happened 50 or 60 years ago does bring up some interesting principles. The descendants of our Black slaves in this country are a bit slower at spotting opportunities than the Jews are, but even they can recognize a profitable principle when they see one. They’re beginning to talk about the reparations that White people owe them for slavery. They might want to add up all of the man-hours their slave ancestors worked, multiply that by, say, $5 an hour, add interest at six per cent since the Emancipation Proclamation of 1863, and present us with the bill. Why not?

And what about the Indians and the real estate they can claim we owe them for? Why should it be only the Jews who can get away with making such claims – and with collecting on them? They’ve already extorted $55 billion in reparations from the German people since 1948. Suppose the Germans started figuring up what is owed to them? Or suppose the Scots presented a bill to the English? Or suppose the English presented a bill to the people of Normandy? Why is it only the Jews who are entitled to go back into history and add up their carefully nursed grievances and present a bill to the rest of the world?

The latest concession they’ve blackmailed the Swiss into is a $5 billion so-called “solidarity fund” to be used to compensate “victims of poverty, war, and genocide.” A panel, a majority of whose members are Jews, is to decide how to dole out this money after it is collected from the Swiss people. If the Swiss are prompt in coughing up this money, then the Jews say they will not organize an international boycott of Switzerland.

Fortunately for the Swiss, they have at least one patriot among their politicians. He is a 56-year-old industrialist and member of the Swiss parliament, Christoph Blocher, and he is telling the Swiss people that they ought not to give in to this blackmail. He is telling his people that they owe nothing to the Jews and they ought to pay them nothing. And he is gaining strong support from Swiss voters. We’ll see what happens next year, when the Swiss vote on whether or not to let the Jews take them to the cleaners for another $5 billion.

So far the Jews have been so pleased with the way the Swiss are caving in to their demands for gold that they’re talking about similar claims against Sweden, Portugal, Spain, and Turkey. Hey, why not? When you’ve got the whole world buffaloed with “Holocaust” baloney, why not go for everything you can get?

If you really want to get some insight into the Jewish mentality, go to any big library – or to the Internet – and start collecting news clippings on these Jewish claims for reparations. Study the details. Try to see the big picture. Make some of the comparisons I’ve hinted at today: comparisons of the way the Jews look at their history to the way in which other races, other nations, look at their own histories. It will amaze you. It will take your breath away. And it will convince you that it’s time for the world to do something about getting this Jewish monkey off its back.

Bolshevism – Jewish Sub-Humanity

Translated from the Third Reich SS Original:

Bolschewismus – jüdisches Untermenschentum

Table of Contents


Chapter One: Russia up to the October Revolution

Chapter Two: The Jew – an Enteral Parasite and Destroyer

Chapter Three: Jewish Heads and Jews in the Soviet Union

Chapter Four: Industrialization

Chapter Five: The Worker in the Soviet Union

Chapter Six: The Path of the Russian Peasant

Chapter Seven: The Soviet Family

Chapter Eight: Terror and Forced Labour

Chapter Nine: Final Observation


The present work recognizes the Jew as the genuine carrier of Bolshevism.

In a short overview, it is supposed to show the Jewish roots of Bolshevism and portray its devastating effects on the whole life of Russian man.

Only when one remembers what world-encompassing and folk-decaying goals Jewish Bolshevism strives for, can one measure the danger that the Soviet Union, as the visible expression of Jewish sub-humanity, means for Europe and the world.

Illustrations are intentionally omitted, for every SS-man and policeman recognizes from his own experiences or from the pictorial reports of the Weekly Newsreels and publications the type of the Jew-Bolshevik and his “works”.

Chapter One

Russia up to the October Revolution


The Russian Mixture of Folks and Races

The most diverse folks and races swept across Russia’s wide regions through the millennia. The shapeless and formless mass of Alpine men of Slavic language, incapable of any state formation, received their first state order from the Vikings. Daring travellers of Nordic blood were the ones who created significant empires from the centres of Nowgorod and Kiev. It almost seemed that the huge space in the east would be organized and led by Europe. But the Nordic blood soon trickled away.

Storm from the East

From the east the world of the steppe surged, Asia’s nomadic world, against the Slavic folk mixture. It was nothing productive that Asia sent. The two-hundred-year Tartar rule over Russia ate deep into the Slavic blood and completed a transformation of Alpine man. And so does a Slav, Johann Peisker, characterize the Russian:

“There is first the Slavic slave would has fallen below the animal, then the Nordic conqueror disciplined in body and spirit, and finally the wild son of the steppe, the Turko-Tartar, the beast. Each of us has something of these contradictory characters. Hence we lack the inner balance, hence our fickleness, our indiscretion. ”

Byzantine Church

This disunity of the racial foundation was covered over by the rigid Byzantine church, which apparently drew everything into its orbit. And as the Roman church raised the claim to world domination, so did Russia’s church also believe it could present a claim to world improvement.

Slavic Ability to Suffer

Slavic ability to suffer, the destructive flame up of the steppe portion in Russian blood and the orthodox sense of mission, form an essential prerequisite for the later breakthrough of Bolshevism in Russia.

The structure of Russia is reflected in the tremendous social injustice that characterizes old Russia. Before the World War over 80% of the Russian population were peasants. They were subordinated to a thin feudal ruling class, which had the unlimited possession of the people. This chasm was never overcome; it produced great tension between the mass of the folk and the ruling class and a despotic bearing of the ruling class.

Call toward the west

Certainly, there was no lack of attempts to absorb European culture, to turn Russia’s face toward the west. But these attempts remain episodes. The non-European racial elements were stronger, so that the spiritual Europeanization did not succeed.

But where the bearers of the ruling class were inspired by Europe’s spirit, the psychological indiscipline of Alpine man is again observed. The unlimited despotism swung around to a radical, social guilt-consciousness (Tolstoy); in political regard, however, a terrorism emerged that only knew destruction. The result is the terrorist, whose activity is summoned up in the slogan: “Revolt! Murder! Shoot!”

But new life seemed to develop in one very important sector of life in Russia. The Russian Minister Stolypin (he was born in Dresden!) tried to establish a Russian peasantry based on the European principle of private property. A class of peasants proud to own their own property was supposed to bear the future rejuvenation of the Russian agrarian state. But Stolypin did not have time for his plans to ripen. In 1912 he was shot dead by a Jew in a theatre in Kiev.

Shots Against the Strengthening Peasantry

The shots against Stolypin immediately illuminate the situation. The Jew murdered the creator of a strong peasantry! With sure instinct, this rootles, destructive spirit of Jewry struck with the murder the bulwark that offered the greatest resistance against any revolution, but most of all against that Jewish claim to power. The shots against Stolypin show the Jewish wirepuller who stands behind the revolutionary movements of pre-war Russia as well. But this assassination of Stolypin reveals even more: The Jew who fired was not only a terrorist, he simultaneously stood in the service of the Russian secret police, with the assignment to protect the Czar! That was always “work” of the Jews: He appears in the guise of the good citizen against the revolution and at the same time destroys everything that could hinder the revolution.

Even in pre-war Russia, Jewry played a leading role in the revolutionary movements. In regard to economics he almost totally controlled the lumber trade, grain export and money- lending to Russian landowners. Among the peasant population, however, the Jew raged as owner of the village taverns and alcohol trader. The Czar regime, which had sometimes sternly intervened against the Jewish subversion, was supposed to be overthrown at any price.

The Russian defeat in the World War of 1914 – 1918 opened the gates to the destructive forces. The Jews’ hour had struck. With the October Revolution of 1917, Russia ceased to exist. Even today we no longer speak of Russia. With complete right. The red wave of 1917 cast up all the elements of destruction, rootlessness and Jewish poison that had accumulated in Russia. In addition, new bands of booty-hungry Jews from all countries poured in, ready to gain a position of power here, from which Judah’s world domination was supposed to be achieved. Hence the new name as well: USSR, Union of Socialist Soviet Republics. Here there were no longer any folks, any Russia; here there were just Soviet Republics, onto which one new Soviet territory after another was supposed to be added, until the goal was achieved: the World Soviet Union.

Chapter Two

The Jew – an Eternal Parasite and Destroyer


A large portion of the bourgeois world saw in Bolshevism a world-view, which was at first unconditionally damned. But when it was later shown that the Bolshevik could also appear in tuxedo abroad, many were ready to accept him as a Russian fact. A skilful propaganda also helped to deceive the world.

Work of the Eternal Jew

The mask is off. Behind it, visible to all, stands the eternal Jew. Rightly, one thus does not view Bolshevism as a manifestation of the modern period, ft is instead the product of Jewish thought – it is as old as Jewry itself. From the Old Testament to the Talmud, from the “financial geniuses ” of the kings and rulers, from the great revolutions of the world and the communist manifesto of Mardochai-Marx to the newest “creations” of the Jewish race, a line runs to the Jew’s single goal: the establishment of Jewish world domination. Only the methods and disguise change, which adapt to the various times and respective situation.

What does the Old Testament say?

‘‘You will rule over many folks, but none should rule over you. ” And further: Jahwe, the Jew god, obviously knows about the industriousness of his “chosen people for he promises: “to give it great and fat cities, which it has not built, and houses full of goods, which it has not filled, and dug wells, which it has not dug, and vineyards and olive gardens, which it has not planted. ”


It is completely clear that the productive folks, who are supposed to build all that, will not voluntarily leave the places of their work and effort, so that the Jew can come and live a splendid life. In such cases as well, the Jews follow the commands of their gruesome god: they murder, plunder and burn down whatever opposes them.

As parasite-folk the Jew emerges already in dark prehistory. Theft, swindle, robbery and murder against non-Jews and the contamination of the blood of other folks is the work of the “chosen people”, a work which visibly rests on the blessing of their god Jahwe. The Jew has never built anything. Destruction was always his work.

Into the most prosperous cities he came as haggler and trader. As soon as he had money and economic influence, he knew how to acquire power as well. He subverted from the inside out the host folk until it was ripe for a revolution, which was supposed to deliver power to him. “The revolution is Judah’s star, which has lit the darkness over Israel’s heads and will light even more”, so judges the Jewish historian H. Graetz in his “History of the Jews”.

Revolution at any Price

Hence revolution at any price! In Europe’s states it was first supposedly to enable democracy, and from this springboard to then proceed to the Bolshevik dictatorship. Only in so-called democracy did the Jew find the opportunity – under the cloak of “freedom of opinion” – to infect economy, culture and politics with Jewish thought.

Here he can agitate the folk against each other under the disguise of irresponsible parliamentarianism. The domination of the press enables him to direct “public opinion”. Any feeling of duty and consciousness of responsibility is labelled ridiculous. He whips up the lowest instincts of the dregs of the folks. He incites desire and agitates the masses’ thirst for destruction under the pretence of a life of paradise. He directs the masses against the racially valuable groups of the folks and destroys all moral feeling.

When the folk has then through self-annihilation and civil war been robbed of its leading strata, he crushes the leaderless folk-masses through the most bloody terror and erects his Jewish dictatorship.

“Rule of the Proletariat!”

Where is the “rule of the proletariat” that the Jew Mardochai has presented so much to the betrayed workers of the world? The worker has only changed the master. He has become the slave of purely Jewish exploitation.

That is the great crime of Marx: He tore the worker from any folkish life foundation, degraded him to an international proletarian, who supposedly only had his chains to lose and a world to gain. He took the soul from work and promised the proletarian the destruction of international capital.

Thus a Jew, who himself shuns nothing so much as honest work, wants to lead the workers to a more beautiful life. A Jew wants to lead the struggle against international capital, which lies in Jewish hands and is directed by Jews! The Jew against the Jew! Here at the decisive point he shows himself again as the great master of the lie.

International capitalism itself is only one of the Jewish means to destroy national economies, to agitate the folks into wars, to achieve power. The names of the great international bank houses, the names of the stock market brokers and the great industrial concerns show their bearers as members of the “chosen people”. The Jewish-capitalist world press then also praises their brothers on the other side, the slave-holders of the USSR, as founders of the most modem state of the world.

New Front for Judah!

Marx only organized a new fi-ont for Judah, when he wanted to create from the leader-less masses of the workers a core troop that was supposed to pave the way to domination for the Jew with armed force. In the dawning machine age he preaches class hatred, in other words the self-mutilation of a folk, not in order to alleviate the needs of the workers, rather to present the chasm as necessary and inalterable.

It had to become doubly fateful for a folk, when the existing social chasm was compounded by the lack of a strong, racially uniform leadership stratum. So the Jew skilfully exploited the disunity in the blood of Russian man. Russia’s unrestrained element and its Jewish parasites were the best soil from which the Bolshevik seed could sprout.

Chapter Three

Jewish Heads and Jews in the Soviet Union


But who provided the money for the Bolshevik revolution in Russia? Certainly only the people whose interests were served in this revolution!

Merchants of Death

Above all others stands the American Jew Jakob Schiff, who brought together a whole circle of other Jews like Warburg, Guggenheim, Loeb & Co., Kahn, Kuhn etc. into the “financial general staff’ of the Bolsheviks.

On April 4, 1919, the “Jewish Chronicle”, the official organ of English Jewry, stated it was noteworthy that so many Jews were also Bolsheviks. The reason was supposedly that the ideals of Bolshevism were identical with many of the highest ideals of Jewry.

The Jew Cohan summed it up on April 12, 1919 in the magazine “77ze Communist”:

“ We can say without exaggeration that that great Bolshevik revolution was indeed fulfilled only with help of the Jews. The Jews were the ones who led the Russian folk to the new dawn of the international. They are the ones who not only managed the affairs of the Soviets and today still manage them, rather this leadership will in the future certainly lie in their hands as well. The red five-pointed star, once the symbol of Jewry and Zionism, is today the symbol of Bolshevism, the symbol that promises victory. ”

The Jews had indeed won a great victory for themselves in Russia in 1917. The great destroyer Lenin, who allowed his Tartar blood portion to fully manifest itself, was already surrounded by Jews.

“Strategist” Trotsky

His closest advisor was the Jew Bronstein-Trotsky, who was later overthrown. This Jew became infamous when he had everyone who would not bow to his military dictatorship massacred. He considered himself a great strategist and attributed to himself the suppression of the counterrevolution led by generals loyal to the Czar. But he neither made the plans for the struggle nor won any battle through his personal bravery. He sat, as the Jews are accustomed, behind the front, had Russian officers fight, later stood them against the wall, and so wished to harvest cheap glory.

Devil Stalin

After Lenin’s death another non-Jew, but by his whole essence a Jew by choice, became the executor of Jewish plans: the terrorist and criminal Stalin.

In short, his past looks like this: 1905 robbery of a money transport in Tiflis. Result: 700,000 Rubles, 34 dead. Head of the Caucasus Bolsheviks, illegal propaganda activity. From 1908 to 1917 he is banished to Siberia six times, but could flee each time. He possesses a limitless hunger for power and lives out of wedlock with the daughter of the Jew Kaganowitsch. He finally destroys the Russian peasantry through his forced collectivization. Through persecution and murder he eliminates all his opponents and knows how to remain in power to the present. His speeches are written by the Jew Kaganowitsch.

When he is worried for himself, the blood of others must flow. One wave of murders follows the other. His lust for murders leads to a limitless fear for his own life. He has himself guarded by a number of GPU agents, it is a consequential rise from highwayman to the head of the Jewish-Bolshevik Soviet state.

And again – Jews!

Stalin’s right hand is the above-mentioned, full-blooded Jew Kaganowitsch. He is the driving force behind the placement of Jews in the important posts. He has brought four of his brothers into the highest state offices. He masters the ruthless extermination of all those who believe that Russians actually belong in the leading positions.

However, he has made the Russian creature Jeschow the head of the personnel department of the central committee. And Jeschow faithfully put into the practice the Jewish personnel policy of his boss and master and placed numerous Jews in leading positions.

Stalin’s instrument to remain in power is the GPU. It has probably discarded its original name, “Tscheka”, because it has become all too infamous abroad. Founded by the Polish sadist Dscherschinski, who primarily uses Jews as helpers and executioners; the Jews Menschinski and Jagoda were then its head.

Organized Mass Murder

Jagoda came up with the idea to use the GPU’s prisoners for state construction. When Leningrad was supposed to be connected to the Artic Sea, hundreds of thousands of workers were used. Jagoda provided these workers. Arrests followed arrests, and soon 2.5 million “political criminals” worked on the construction of the canal. During the three year construction period hundreds of thousands of innocent people perished.

Jagoda made the GPU a state within the state; but one day he became too powerful for Stalin and had to take the path that so many of his innocent victims had taken.

His successor was the already mentioned Jeschow, who proceeded with an energy and passion his predecessors would have envied. He was the one who carried out the great purge in the army, to which officers of all branches fell victim.

Whether Jeschow’s successors in the leadership of the GPU were named Beria or whatever, all of them were Jews or Jew- subservient criminals.

The Hungarian Jew Bela Khun was a worthy member of these Jewish sub-humans. He is responsible for the atrocity in 1919 Hungary, financed the 1919 Munich communist crimes and proved himself as the infamous mass butcher in the Crimea to Stalin, who found in him a useful helper for other shameful deeds.

As Stalin’s instrument of murder, the GPU, was dominated by Jews, so are also all the other spheres of public life in the Soviet paradise. Fourteen Jews sit in the Soviet cabinet. Molotow is married to a Jewess, whose family connections reach to New York high finance. Litwinow-Finkelstein and Maiski are named as examples of Jewish emissaries abroad.

The government wares economy is totally dominated by Jews. The Peoples Commissary for Armament Industry, formed in February 1939, is occupied by Hebrews in all 52 key positions. In the sphere of the Peoples Commissary for Light Industry 58 Jews are directors of industrial works, 56 plant department heads, 32 senior engineers and 18 union chairmen.

All responsible functionaries for finance are Jews, and so it goes down into all the branches of banking in the Soviet Union.

In the Soviet press they have always had the say. Chief of the news concern “lass” is naturally a Jew, I. S. Chawison, and all the other leading posts are occupied accordingly. “Iswestija” and “Prawda”, the official organs of the Soviet government and the communist party, are swarming with Jews. It is the same in the rest of the Soviet press.

Soviet science is in its full breadth Jewish infected. In 1940 alone 699 Jews were confirmed as university lecturers, 174 as scientific coworkers, 202 as professors. Art in all its branches is just as Jewized.

’’Invention” of Bolshevism

The Jew Mardochai-Marx hatched Marxism and put it into sparse principles; Jews put its bloodless constructions into practice in the Soviet Union and call that Bolshevism; Jews transformed the dictatorship of the proletariat into the dictatorship of Judah, without which the Bolshevik system cannot be understood.

That occasionally Jews also fall victim to the ongoing show trials has incorrectly been interpreted as a sign of a growing insight. But it is only a power struggle within the Jewish clique itself and within the Bolshevik apparatus of bureaucrats.

The Jewish clique around Stalin dominates with its cohorts a folk of 180 million. But how is it for the Russian worker, the Russian peasant, for whom the Bolshevik revolution promised a radiant future?

Chapter Four



Slogan: World Conflagration!

The Jewish-Bolshevik revolution was won. The country was in an inconceivable condition of disorganization. In the Kremlin, Lenin waited for the world revolution. But the hope for the instigated revolts in the west remained unfulfilled. It gradually became clear to the Jewish rulers that world domination could only be achieved through a new world conflagration.

Russia is an agrarian state. Although it already had a medal industry in its western portion, concentrated at a few points, it played an insignificant role compared to agriculture. That was supposed to change. The industries of the great economic powers in the west were supposed to be caught up with and surpassed. At the centre of planning stood heavy industry. It was above all supposed to arm the Red Army for the coming war of world revolution. The entire economy of the Soviet Union served this one goal alone.

Five Year Plans

A hurried industrialization started. Five year plans with production goals were set up. Industrial giants emerged. Record figures were proclaimed in statistics to the amazed world.

And what was the reality?

“We all sit here together and instead of dealing with the really sad actual conditions in our economy or making arrangements for their improvement, we occupy ourselves with lying to each other. The most shameful part is that we all know that everybody lies, that all of us hence know that we lie to each other. ”

(Albrecht, The Betrayed Socialism, page 189, henceforth quoted as Albrecht…)

This statement does not come from a journalist, rather a Peoples Commissar for Agriculture, as a member of the control commission, objectively relates the conditions.

In the years 1928/1929 those violent men had increasingly gained influence, who had come to power in the provinces in the revolutionary war. As Jewish mercenaries they were unencumbered by serious expertise and recognized no personal responsibility. Gradually they had come into the central positions of the communist party. They were the champions of all gigantic plans. Every resistance against these incompetents was declared sabotage.

Huge expansions of plans set in. In arbitrary confusion, industrial works of the greatest magnitude were undertaken, even before the existence of a sufficient raw materials basis was proven.

Vast quantities of construction material was uselessly wasted, because these plants could not be completed, since the alleged local sources of raw materials never existed.

Or gigantic energy plants were built in inaccessible, far off regions whose output of energy could not be put to use for years. Often systematic work was inconceivable, because the skilled workers were simply lacking. Complicated machines were purchased in all the lands of the earth; when they arrived, they were immediately ruined by untrained work forces.

“Half-finished industrial buildings, countless machine cemeteries, huge mountains of reject wares, countless complaints from the populace about delivered inferior industrial products… That is the final result, this economic chaos. ” (Albrecht, page 198)

This bureaucratic planned economy, together with the Bolshevik fantasies about the future, produced an untruthful effect manipulation. The figures of works were “would-be figures”. Today’s shortcoming was supposed to be bridged over by the possibilities of tomorrow. The really achieved production figures also say nothing, for all the rejects are included in the numbers. Even in 1940 the reject production for the machinery works was put at over two billion rubles.

No wonder, for the slogan suffocating any responsibility was: the state bears the economic risk. Everything belongs to the state, everything is paid for by the state. Nothing is my property, I never engage in independent economic activity. The compulsion to fulfil the plan led to the factory director producing randomly. Whether the products were sold or could be used, did not interest him.

Also typical of the Soviet system is the blind worship of technology. Only what is big and massive, about which one can brag, is important.

And one must nonetheless view this incurable chaos as in part a manifestation of transition, in part as typical of the industries that do not primarily work for armament. The rich natural resources, the undreamed possibilities offered by the huge, undeveloped space, and the slave whip of the Jewish overseers have despite everything enabled an armament industry that produces tremendous quantities of arms of every kind. The millions of dead and the populace’s hunger existence did not count.

The whole USSR

”is nothing hut a huge weapons factory at the cost of the living standard of the people. A weapons factory against Europe. ”

(Adolf Hitler in his great speech of October 3, 1941)

Shortcomings Everywhere

One of the greatest shortcomings of the Soviet economy was that it totally lacked the type of industrious, resident foreman who concerned himself with everything. Bolshevism had done everything to create a rootless mass without any bond. An atmosphere of distrust and suspicion was intentionally cultivated, which dominated everything. In such a climate, however, industriousness and eagerness do not thrive.

Finally, foreign lands were supposed to help. Specialists came. For several years foreign firms obtained permission to erect factories. But it was soon discovered that the foreign experts failed as soon as they were forced to maintain themselves as individuals against the mass activity.

“The uniform pace of the human mass in the Soviet operations simply does not allow the individual to swim against the current. ” (Albrecht, page 220)

The great sacrifices that Bolshevism demanded from the workers could never come to complete effect, because the burn out of this economic system again devours very large portions of the productive work achievement. For example, for years one complains in the Soviet press about the numerically proven overload of the rails. This overload is to a very substantial degree caused by so-called cross-transports. Namely, because the same wares that are transported from district A to district B are at the same time transported from district B to district A. According to the calculations of experts, roughly 50% of the transports on Soviet rails could be completely forgone. That includes, for example, coal transport across more than 1000 to 4000 kilometers, during which more coal is burned than transported.

Bolshevik economy is an economy without responsibility toward the folk, without really creative forces. The assignment of the functionary replaces the responsibility of the entrepreneur. An infinite quantity of labor is wasted in this economy.

But despite then inconceivable mis-management, despite all the mountains of rejects, despite the many senseless facades, two decades of exploitation of the rich natural resources and the squeezing of the vast human resources have created an armaments industry that produced many thousands of planes, tens of thousands of tanks and guns, which fills the arsenals with weapons of every kind, from the gas shell to the dum-dum bullet.

Chapter Five

The Worker in the Soviet Union


The Soviet Union has been industrialized at a crazy tempo in the last 10 to 15 years. But this tempo has been purchased with the misery, with the tears and the death of millions of people.

Slogan of the Social State

The worker is supposed to simultaneously create for himself and beyond that for the entire populace of his “proletarian fatherland” a joyous and happy life. Supposedly, the Soviet worker knows no need, no exploitation; for everything he produces, is produced “voluntarily’’. He is supposedly the beneficiary of his full work production. The profit that in capitalist lands goes into the pockets of the entrepreneurs does not exist in the Soviet Union, one says. It is supposed to have been dissolved into higher and more just wages and in a welfare system unmatched anywhere in the world.

That is the phraseology of Bolshevik camouflage tactics.

The awakening after the first intoxication with freedom was terrible. Even Lenin had to admit, “that the dictatorship of the proletariat has brought misery and deprivation to the ruling class such as is unknown in history. Starvation drives the people, wherever they may flee. Never has the working class suffered so as in the first years of its dictatorship.” (Lenin. Collected Works, Volume 18, page 128) But these realizations did not improve the situation of the worker, who in the Moscow state of compulsion was supposed to achieve the plans of the Jewish clique in the Kremlin under painful deprivations.

Jewish Deception

Jewish propaganda understood masterfully how to deceive the mass of workers. It awakened the idea that only a temporary exertion with renunciation of personal wishes was required in order to overcome all need. It created a barrier around the Soviet Union that the worker could not scale. They were lied to and told that the worker outside the Soviet Union had it much worse, that he waited for liberation through Bolshevism. Hatred was instilled against the allegedly anti-worker foreign world, and from this hatred and hope for better days the worker was whipped up to ever greater exertion.

Not he was the master as the so-called constitution proclaimed, rather Jewry dictated his working conditions.


Previously, one had portrayed record work as an infernal invention of the capitalists; only created in order to exploit the worker. After Bolshevism had consolidated its power through a brutal system of terror, it disregarded the interests of the workers and pitilessly exploited the work force. One such means of incentive was the Stachanow-System.

In August 1935 one had the until then totally unknown miner Stachanow, who possessed extraordinary physical strength, taken to a coal mine in the Donez base, after thorough preparation with drugs. Stachanow then, not doing any side work, achieved a record accomplishment such as had never before been registered. Instead of an average accomplishment of seven tons of coal, on this record day he allegedly achieved a record accomplishment of 109 tons. Later he collapsed physically.

Immediately, the Soviet propaganda apparatus went into gear, praised this record accomplishment as a very decisive event and demanded that it be made the foundation of work in mining. Wages were reduced and the work quota greatly increased. The workers also soon recognized the deception, and instead of the hoped for increase of productivity, the planned figures were not even close to met. The same ruthlessness shows itself in terms of work protection. Probably no worker in the world must work without any safety features on machines or in the mines like the worker in the Soviet Union. So accidents are frequent. A French miner portrays the conditions in a mine as follows:

“During our visit, we openly admit it, we became afraid. The shaft ceilings are porous and ruptured. The woodwork is extremely bad. In our opinion the danger was so great that we did not dare to go to the demolition spot. I can guarantee that in France not a single miner would work under such conditions. ”

(From Cleber Legay, “A French Coal-Miner with the Russians ”)

Most Crude Exploitation Methods

Originally, it was bragged to the world that the seven hour work day was one of the greatest achievements of the Bolshevik dictatorship. But the Jews hold the reins tighter here. The worker must work 10 to 14 hours a day without receiving higher wages for overtime.

Forced Labour

The Soviet worker fully stands under the law of forced labour. If he loses his work place for the most slight violation, he no longer gets food cards and must leave his residence. The “famous” asylums for the homeless, simple board huts, are then his refuge.

Indeed, a small percentage earns something decent under the Stachanow-System, but the number of these workers is extremely tiny compared to the great mass. According to Stalin ’s own figures, the monthly wage of the worker in the year 1938 averaged 287 rubles, which at best corresponds to the purchasing power of a German wage of 60 to 70 Reichsmark. But even in times of peace, the availability of wares was so small that even this small purchasing power could not be used.

A Pair of Shoes = 200 Rubles

Stalin certainly did not underestimate the monthly wage. However, when a pair of leather shoes costs about 200 rubles and a suit of inferior quality 400 to 600 rubles, the average worker is eliminated as a buyer for such wares. He must cover his need in the government stores, which only deliver the basic life necessities on ration cards and at high prices, and those wares are mostly of the worst quality.

But the worker has the unions as the representatives of his interests; however

“these unions are not at all in the position and do not consider it their task to somehow lighten the difficult work and hard life conditions of their members. They are totally indifferent to the welfare and problems of the worker. ’’ (Albrecht, page 69)


The Bolshevik rulers use them in order to fulfil the production tasks of the plants. Since all positions in the unions are occupied with reliable people, who above all are also closely watched by the GPU, nobody needs to worry that the real mood of the workers will reach the public through the unions. A union member does, however, have one right. In meetings he can without basis denounce people who have somehow made themselves unpopular. No wonder, when under these conditions nobody years for a leading position in the plant, when indeed a downright flight from leading positions of responsibility has set in, since any superior is lost after such a denunciation, if he does not have powerful friends.

Informants Everywhere

The GPU also works close together with these unions. A precise file is kept on every member of the union. If somebody has a reason to keep silent about something in his past, perhaps because he was previously an entrepreneur, priest or officer, then that gets out at some occasion and it is noted in the file. During the great purges of the economy, which are conducted again and again at certain intervals, it is then easy to send these people as enemies of the state to the forced labour camps of the GPU.

The Soviet unions are hence auxiliary organs for the GPU. For all the lands of the world, Bolshevism promotes the strike, the occupation of plants and the terrorization of those willing to work as weapons of the proletariat’s class struggle. Only

“the use of such means of struggle within Soviet territory is never allowed to be considered. ” (Albrecht, page 79)

None of all the promises of the Jewish rulers has come about. The happy life is led by the bureaucrat, the Jew, at the cost of the worker. The Soviet worker is the lowest paid of all the workers of the world and must life under the most miserable conditions. He has become, like the peasant, the slave of international Jewry, which has harnessed him to the wagon of the Jewish world revolution.

Chapter Six

The Path of the Russian Peasant


All the riches of this world empire belong to the folk, the soil above all, whatever it bears or holds, as well as all the fruits of work: that is what stands in the constitution of the Soviet state.

The reality, however, looks somewhat different. With his lying slogan “All land to the peasant”, Lenin had in 1917 ignited peasant revolts throughout the countryside.

The peasant in Russia, in his vast majority, had always been a land-hungry, poor wretch. Now he grabbed. Government lands and estate hands were taken into possession and divided up.

Raped Peasantry

“Normal” peasant goods were supposed to be spared from socialization. But what were “normal peasant goods?” One person considered 20 “morgen” [12 to 18 acres] of fertile land to already constitute a large holding, but not another person. Lenin used this ambiguity to achieve his purpose: it promoted confusion among the peasants. Suddenly, according to the size of the holding, in the village the distinction was made between small leasers and dwarf farmers, landless servants and “kulaks” [kulak = former large farmers destroyed by the collectivization], which left a broad field open for arbitrariness.

Hatred and envy spread among the peasants. The lazy looked with envious eyes at the capable. Each took what he could take. It came to bloody fighting.

So the order in the countryside was destroyed in order to gain control over the peasant, for Lenin did not have the intention to create a strong small farmer. On the contrary, he saw “in the domination of the small peasant economy the greatest danger for the coming communist ideal”. His slogan “All land to the peasant” was only supposed to keep the peasants quiet during the fighting against the white armies.

For what would have come of the Bolshevik revolution in Russia, if a strong, free peasantry had risen against Bolshevism and its Jewish helpers?

Therefore, the struggle of the Jew, who has always and in essence been an opponent of any being settled, sought the destruction of the peasantry.

Next to Lenin, Trotsky was a bitter enemy of the peasants. He knew that the safety of the supply of his later world revolution armies would be in the hands of the peasants just as had been the case with the civil war troops. During the civil war, the peasants had hidden their horses, cattle and grain supplies in inaccessible forests. Furthermore, many fields were left uncultivated. The land began to feel hunger.

Trotsky’s “Liberation of the Peasants”

In 1918 Trotsky unleashed his armed bands against the village. They were supposed to get grain and “secure for the city” meat and other foodstuffs. These methods were a complete success. Burning and murdering, the bands of scum swept across the land and even robbed the poorest peasant comrade of his last bread.

And this is the report of a Russian peasant about such a forced collection:

“But then, I clearly remember this July morning, the Bolshevik pest suddenly came and with it several killers. They broke into our village. A few Bolsheviks, former convicts, immediately formed a village council and, with the help of Jewish scoundrels, in the shortest time cleaned out the farms and stalls. Nothing remained to us, not a horse, not a steer, not a pig and not a single hen; they stole everything, even our beds and our few possessions. Three big, strong fellows, who had resisted the Soviets during the pillaging of their farms, were murdered in a bestial manner. “We will sell your goods in the interest of the state, you will get the money for it later! ” they howled at us mockingly. We never received a ruble for our hard earned goods. The only thing they left us was a little grain that was allowed to remain on our fields. When night fell, we slept as beggars under one roof, which also no longer belonged to us. The village councilman only remained a few days. When the last cow, the last horse and the last wagon, loaded high with furniture and clothing, left our village, he also disappeared. ”

Hunger! Hunger!

Under this distress the peasant resorted to the only means still remaining him: he only cultivated as much as he himself desperately needed. The field produce sank and finally hunger reigned over the countryside as well as in the city. Between 1920 and 1922 at least five million people died from starvation (according to Soviet figures). But the Jew did not only need the grain for nourishment, he wanted to arm and arm more, and so the grain was supposed to bring in currency.

So the Soviet regime decided on a step that was diametrically opposed to one of the Bolshevik teachings as well as the former policy. In 1921 it introduced the NEP, the “New Economic Policy”. Now Lenin wanted to “satisfy the wishes of the peasants at any price”. A tax on natural goods was introduced. What remained to the peasant after delivering this tax, he could freely sell, and grain production now immediately rose again.

“For four years one left us in peace ”, so does a peasant tell our German soldiers about this period, “in that period we started over again from the very beginning and did not let ourselves be gotten down. Gradually, prosperity returned to our village. We again had horses, chickens, cooks, and we had furniture again, if even it was primitive, which made our farms liveable. The women laughed again, and we boys were again ready to have fun. ”


When Stalin came to power in 1924, he clearly saw the danger that a strong peasantry had to constitute for the Jew state. He often brags that he is an Asian, and so he again started the fight of the nomad against the settler.

Furthermore, Stalin had realized that a world revolution could only be achieved through a new world war. So it was necessary to build up industry to produce the weapons.

At whose cost should this industrialization come, if not that of the peasant? Where should the work force come from, if not from the land?

Therefore, “elimination” of the peasants!

The rural “great collective” was supposed to replace the “backward peasant small-scale economy”. The limited free trade allowed under the NEP was again abolished.

After the expansion of the infamous GPU, the Jewish clique around Stalin felt strong enough to crush the expected resistance against this campaign of annihilation and to carry out the “socialization” of the peasants.

Peasant without Rights

The peasant was supposed to first lose his rights. Stalin did it through an election reform. The industrial worker got five votes, the peasant one. Thus the “numerically weaker city was guaranteed the same rights as the countryside”. But any peasant who employed more than two strangers as workers, was no longer a peasant, rather an “exploiter”, a kulak. He lost the right to vote. Stalin thus crushed the political influence the peasantry might have been able to win. For according to the opinion of the Soviet big-shots, the peasants are

“the most dangerous class enemies. It does not hurt if some tens of millions of peasants are exterminated. Before the peasant, our mortal enemy, devours us, we must finish him off forever. Collectivization is our means to subjugate the peasant. We will not rest until the last peasant is either put into our collects or neutralized forever. ” (Albrecht, page 248)

The path into the collective was the peasant’s path into slavery!

The Ideal: Agricultural Worker without Land

Agriculture workers without land were certainly easy to bring into the collective. They came with the prospect of a carefree life and without the slightest chance to lose anything. But the capable peasant – and he had delivered the surpluses in the previous years – did not go there. They again left their fields uncultivated, and again since 1929 hunger came to the land. Stalin then resorted to the most severe means, “the elimination of the kulak as a class”. He saw the only escape in the extermination of the kulaks. In 1930 he sent assault troops of the party into the countryside, and the number of state owned properties increased. A peasant describes this service of the assault troops:

Mass Extermination

“Jewish scoundrels and functionaries plundered our farms anew and did not leave us one nail. Later we were driven together on the village square. A Jew put up a list of everybody who had attended a higher school or been abroad. Hours later gun shots revealed what had been done with the innocents. The Soviets were suspicious of anybody who possessed some intelligence. After days of hungry travel, were we resettled about 100 kilometres from our village. The area we were supposed to cultivate was a real desert. The residences they gave us were miserable clay caves. At the beginning there was nothing, not even a board, in these miserable caves. The hole, in which 11 people lived, was five meters long by four meters wide. That is how we became collective peasants. ”

Suffering from hunger and cold, these people, who had been degraded to slavery, made the land fertile.

Even where the collective was established on land that had once come under peasant’s plough, the peasants did not have it better. They no longer had any claim to the harvest from the yield of the soil. Aside from a tiny, few square meter lot of their own, they had totally become boarders of the state, which treated them as it pleased, and above all always tightened the hunger belt when it seemed appropriate.

For their work, the peasants were paid by workdays, whereby a workday is not the same as a day of work, because there are workdays that do not qualify to be figured as a day of work. So the peasant only has about 195 workdays per year. In Slupzer Rayon he is paid for that 300 grams of grain per workday, which is 120 kilograms per year. In addition, the peasant also receives payment in currency, which is however calculated differently based on harvest yield, province and region. Its calculation is done centrally. The swindle by the heads of the organization is hence rampant. The peasant receives between 120 and 150 rubles, hence a sum that corresponds to the purchasing power of 12 to 15 Reichsmark. That is in an entire year!

Double Swindle

But what does the government also do? It pays the collective peasant for the grain it takes from him 1 1 rubles per hundred kilograms. The same government, however, sells the backed bread to the same peasant for 0,90 to 1,20 ruble per kilogram.

Here the double swindle that is perpetrated against the peasant becomes apparent: In practice, the official Bolshevik takes from 120 million peasants in the countryside the yield of their work without payment, sells the bread back to the peasant at a tremendously inflated price, and the profit goes into the great account of the world revolution.

But that is just one of the paths along which the peasant is driven into misery. A large percentage of the peasants was simply declared kulaks and sent to gigantic labor camps in the undeveloped regions of the Soviet Union. From one village south of Smolensk, 68 out of 200 peasants were deported as kulaks; from another, 54 out of 1 12 peasants.


The scope of these deportations is revealed by a dispute that broke out in 1930 between local authorities and the central administration of the transportation system.

The local authorities accused the transportation leadership of sabotage, because they did not get enough trains for the deportation of the kulaks. The central administration pointed out that 18,000 rail cars had been demanded in the year 1930 alone, but that nothing of that scope had been envisioned in the plan, and that they could not tie up all their rolling stock and throw off all their travel schedules!

But what was the success of the collectivization? Into the most fertile regions of the Soviet Union came the spectre of famine. The harvest had to be secured with the help of the Red Army. Any peasant who kept a mere handful more grain than allowed was shot.

How do tractors and agricultural machinery help, when neither sufficient trained workers were there nor the necessary spare parts could be obtained. And even if enough ploughs, seed, tractors and trained workers had been there, there would always still be the passive resistance of the dispossessed peasants.

Again and again, it was a struggle to secure the harvest – This struggle was in 1934 “waged like a military offensive”. The folk starved and stole, stole in order to preserve life.

The Famine Catastrophe of 1932/1933

About six million people fell victim to the great famine in the winter of 1932/1933.

In that same winter the Soviet Union exported almost two million tons of grain! The Jews exported, even though that meant that even more peasants had to starve.

The grain brought in currency, currency brought machines and certain raw materials for heavy industry, heavy industry delivered weapons for the future global Soviet Union.

“Let us presume”, said the representative of the American communists, Sklar, “that another six million people had died of hunger, what is that supposed to mean? It is just the price of communism!”

Raw Material or World Revolution

For the Jew, the peasants are the raw material of the world revolution, nothing more. Since they were, as peasantry, a danger for the Jew, he exterminated millions of them. Any peasant feeling was broken in the ones who remained. So did the Jew mold the empty model of Soviet mass-man, who knows nothing of his own, no joy of creation, no responsibility.

With the extermination of the leadership and intelligence, the Jew created the mass “man”, the type of Soviet man.

Chapter Seven

The Soviet Family


Destruction of the Family

Workers and peasants were squeezed as empty components into the gears of the Soviet state machinery. The Jewish hatred against everything that grows organically also destroys the cell of any healthy state, the family. The Jew’s aversion to all emotions that spiritually elevate man and bind him inwardly must by nature undermine family life, if the Bolshevik state is supposed to survive. The Jew had clearly realized that. “The revolution is powerless as long as the concept of family and family ties exist.”

Hence seeing in marriage a bond of spiritual or moral kind was sharply fought as a bourgeois or capitalist prejudice.

Unbridling the Woman

In accordance with the Stalin constitution of 1936, the woman was given the same rights as the man in all spheres of life. She was supposed to help fulfill the proletarian revolution. That means nothing other than that the woman was surrendered, unnerved and adapted to the machine. Her own consciousness for mortal values was slowly killed.

The great ally of the Bolsheviks was the economic need, the small wage of the worker. Just in order to barely survive, the woman had to go into the factory, and since she had the same rights as the man, she could also perform heavy male labour.

“If you go to a factory or a tractor works, go to a hall where machinery parts are processed at blast furnaces, and who do you see there? Robust workers? — No! — Women! Women, who are lightly dressed with bare arms and legs are at work at the blast furnaces. And if you express your amazement to them, then one tells you that is the great conquest of the woman, that she has won the right to perform male labour ”.

(Viktor Boret, “Leparadis infernal”)

And what does the home of the woman look like after exhausting labour? Millions of dispossessed peasants had been sent into the cities in order to balance the lack of industrial workers. The cities were not up to this influx. The Soviet government did not think at all about caring for the housing of these people. Indeed, here and there some new living barracks were built, but they are far from sufficient. In the new industrial centres, miserable barracks are the home of the Soviet workers.

According to Soviet figures, in Moscow only four squares of living space per resident are available. In other cities the conditions are even less favourable.

Catastrophic Living Conditions

The tremendous shortage of living space has a consequence, that often several families share one larger room. Frequently, three or four families must live and sleep in one room. A Spanish wall, a chalk line or window blinds then separate the individual living spaces. That is the domestic environment of the Soviet family. Furthermore, due to overtime and plant assemblies, the eternal standing in lines for the simplest commodities even in times of peace and the deficient transportation conditions, the leisure time of the workers and women is extremely limited, and so the domestic life of the worker family is totally undermined.

Unrestrained Sex Life

With his so-called marriage laws and the law for freedom of abortion, the Jew put the axe to the roots of the family. Man and woman can change marriage partner whenever they want. An unprecedented promiscuity spread. The wantonness became a frivolous self-destruction. The desire become uninhibited to compensate oneself for everything that one had lost precisely through this freedom. The loyalty of conscience, responsibility and duty had become obsolete capitalist concepts.

When the birth rate then sank alarmingly, the Bolshevik rulers did indeed attempt through modification of the laws (abortion was banned in 1936) to secure the offspring for military and political purposes. But the foundation of the folk had been ripped open, life unrooted. And that was also how it was intended to be.

Child Misery

The decades long promoted dissolution of the family caused the number of abandoned and roaming children to increase so alarmingly that it became a danger to the county. Today these hordes are the soldiers of the Soviets. But even the introduction of the death penalty for children over 12 years did not help much against this. But how can a state resume to educate children, when it itself misuses children as informers against the parents?! Triumphantly, Bucharin declared:

“The children strive, with their weak little hands, to undermine the family, this most conservative refuge of all the perversions of the old life order. They run away from their parents, spy on and denounce them, and force them to join the communist party. What ingenuity and gift of persuasion must these young beings summon up in order to accomplish all that. ”

So are the souls of the children poisoned. Whether in the school, which has the precise task to undermine the influence of the parents, or elsewhere in public life, everything is aimed at this:

“to educate the children to be social functionaries, who carry on the cause of Lenin-Stalin and who will achieve the victory of communism in the whole world. ”

(Lenin’s widow 1938)

The woman, next to the abandoned youth and the dispossessed peasant, has become the pitiful victim of the Bolshevik regime. She lives – without duty toward the family – apparently free. The natural energy field of her life rivers has been paralysed. She has already long since lost the feeling for joy.

The gun moll in the Bolshevik army is the final result of this development: deformation and vegetation, the no longer curable state of being delivered to the powers of destruction and annihilation.

Chapter Eight

Terror and Forced Labour



The all-dominating feature of Jewish Bolshevism is terror.

Lenin was fully aware that the criminal system of Bolshevism could only keep power, if it annihilated its opponents with the means of the most brutal terror. He demanded a Bolshevik institution whose sole task had to be to mortally strike the class enemy at any place and at any time, to “bite into him lethally”. “Surely you don’t think that we can emerge as victors without the most gruesome terror?” so did Lenin agitate the whipped up mob to murder.

In the period of the civil war of 1917 to 1922, everything was annihilated – the Bolsheviks says “liquidated” – that stood over the dregs of the people. For, again according to Lenin, the communist moral lies in the “murdering and annihilating” of all opponents.

The number of the murdered is not the decisive thing. It cannot be even roughly approximated.

Decisive, however, is that the terror did not cease for even one day as long as the Jewish-Bolshevik clique in the Kremlin has had power; decisive is that the Jewish sub-human, even in the 20th century, could commit these monstrous crimes. Decisive is finally, that a small, unscrupulous group of rulers could have the leadership stratum of an entire folk butchered in order to mold this folk into a will-less, animalistic, agitated, uniform mass, which is supposed to, beyond Europe, conquer the whole world for the Jew.

When the first five year plan was introduced in 1928, a huge wave of terror again started to Hood across the land. This time the peasantry was subjected to the special rage of Jewish lust for murder. “The bullet”, says Jagoda, Chief of the GPU, “is the very best means of struggle against the class enemy.” Any peasant who owned a middle-sized or even larger-sized holding, was liquidated, that means shot, without further investigation.

“Light Cavalry”

The Jew Steingart had the privilege to think up a special baseness in the organization of the “light cavalry”. He formed groups of peasant children, who as young “pioneers of socialism” are employed in agriculture. They have the task to watch and spy on the peasants. Any field theft, any holding back of supplies and any anti-collective comment must be reported by these children to the GPU. The children are rewarded for the denunciation. Yes, Steingart even holds competitions among the children brigades for the highest number of denunciations.

“Iswestijd”, the government organ, was the first newspaper to publish photos of youths who had denounced their parents for theft of collective property and delivered them to Jewish executioners.

The worker is subject to the same terror, if he does not allow himself to be used as a will-less exploitation object.

The infamous murder cellars of the GPU, most gruesome torture and forced labour, are the means of the Bolsheviks to stay in power.

No citizen of this land may have the feeling of being unobserved by another for even one hour of day or night. This constant fear of spies and GPU executioners paralyses the people and makes them unable to revolt. So does each become the other’s enemy. The most base denunciations advance the informant, until fate one day catches up with him as well.

Forced Labour

The greatest slavery, however, occurs in the forced labour camps of the Soviet Union. The construction of new armaments centres and the extraction of new raw material deposits demand a massive utilization of workers, who usually most be resettled in the most distant and inhospitable areas of the Soviet Union. In the Kremlin they solve this huge task very simply and with the usual brutality. One turns these regions into penal camps. Political expellees and criminals were sent into the camps by the millions. Enduring a cold down to 50 degrees minus centigrade, these slaves of the 20th century have to live their miserable existence in tents.

Slave Acquisition Post

In Moscow there is a slave acquisition post, the so-called “Gulag”, whose head is simultaneously the Chief of the GPU. In order to quickly deliver the slave material demanded by the camps, the GPU started its arrest waves. Through their flourishing business, this “Gulag” has grown into a downright paradise for swindlers, where the packs of Jews nested in there not only earn huge sums, they are also morally honoured in Soviet society through presentation of special awards. The “Gulag” makes contracts with the state bank, from which it is paid for the mass utilization of the worker material.

This human capture in the USSR is done under changing slogans. There was the government campaign for “dekulakization” (annihilation of large and mid-sized farmers) in the years 1923 to 1926, whereby millions of peasants were sent into the primeval forests of Siberia and Karelia. Then there was the battle for the “collectivization of the Soviet economy” in 1926, whereby hundreds of thousands of so-called pests of the collective economies were arrested. Campaigns against pests of industry were also conducted. For that way one acquired skilled workers and engineers for the new armaments centres. And so the human capture was carried out in the red slave paradise with changing slogans and increasing success.

Forest Worker Misery

But the life of these forced labourers in the great forests of Northern Russia defies any description. People who had never seen a forest, who came from the Southern Russian steppe regions, had to perform work that even a trained lumberman could have never done. Certainly, each banned man had a claim to certain food rations. But they could only be handed out, if the demanded total work performance of the entire “colony” was met. And that was impossible. Hunger and exhaustion, illness and death were the result of this deficient nourishment.

In the middle of the most severe frost period, these unfortunates had to work in the forest without proper shoes and warm clothing.

Medical care, medicine and bandages did not exist. These forced labours were intentionally annihilated. K. Albrecht writes about their housing:

“In a row of low earth caves, whose roofing consisted of branches and twigs, peasants from all of Russia were housed with their families. Although these earth holes serving as housing were located in the middle of the forest, so wood for heating was plentiful, they were unheated. These unfortunates sat or lied on the cold ground, totally broken by hunger and deprivations, cares and grief, apathetically starring in front of themselves. Many of them had not eaten a piece of bread for days, to say nothing of having brought something warm to their lips. Trembling from cold, the already half-starved children huddled against their mothers and fathers with tired, mournful gestures, begging me for bread. During my four war years at the front I had certainly seen much misery, and I had seen much pitiful misery during the long years of my Soviet life, but this horror surpassed everything that a human brain can come up with in terms of maliciousness, baseness and senseless cruelty. ” (Albrecht, pages 158 and 162)

Sex Orgies of the Youth

But Stalin still was not satisfied with it. He made sure that even youths of both genders aged 14 to 18 were sent to the forest labour camps. Year after year, larger numbers of these youths were sent into the forests, it order to remove them from the influence of their parents and through allowance of “the most free sexual behaviour” to win them for the communist party.

Among these torments belongs also the blood terror of the guards and commandants. The GPU had decreed a reward of five rubles for every escapee brought back alive, but 500 rubles worth of flour if dead. So one of the guards, after looking around to see if he was alone, called a forced labour over during a work break, pressed a tea kettle into his hand, and ordered him to go to the creek 25 meters away and fetch water for him. Unsuspecting, the young forced labourer set off, and then the sentry grabbed his rifle and shot the unfortunate from behind. According to regulations, only forced labourers shot from the rear were recognized as “escapees shot during an escape”.

(Albrecht, page 181).

Whether at the construction of the Artic Sea canal or in forest regions or in the new industrial centres: Stalin’s executioners and his Jewish murders raged everywhere.

Chapter Nine

Final Observation


Bolshevism has ruled for 24 years. It sacrificed millions of people to the Moloch of the industrialization, it also sacrificed the material well-being of the whole folk to it.

That is only one side, and indeed the more harmless side, of the USSR.

It would have had to be the Jew ruling in Moscow to know that even the horrible misery of the mass of millions did not yet totally secure of his rule. He hence also destroyed all the prerequisites on which people can build: he waged the fight against God with fanaticism and he promoted racial chaos. It is no coincidence that Jewry throughout the whole world helped to conceal the events in Russia.

All these peaceable speeches and references to the “interesting social experiment” in Russia were only supposed to win time until it was possible to so deform a whole, huge folk, that one could dare to use this mighty mass in order to conquer the rest of the world. Aside from this deformation of the folk certainly occurred a breeding in the negative sense: the development of a new “leadership stratum” from the great dregs of the intellectually gifted sub-humanity of the Jewish ghettos and the Tartar-Slavic bastards.

We today recognize the effect of this contamination in the soldiers of the Soviet army. Up to at least the fourteen year olds of the year 1917, hence those today 38 years old, all active soldiers and reservists are 100% trained and shaped by Bolshevism. Of the rest, only those have maintained themselves who have been a thousand-fold tested by the Soviets. In fact, a totally Bolshevik armed force! And these millions had been, with all the means of mass psychology and brainwashing, with blinkers and proletarianization and the fanaticism of bestial drive, molded and turned into machines. Machines that were constructed for the attack, to crush, to kill, for blind annihilation.

Machines that are far from any humanity as dead iron and unfeeling mechanism.

Machines for whom death only means the incapacitation of an individual part, which is quickly replaced.

Machines that cannot be suddenly transformed into people again in order to be reasonable or to have compassion for the defenceless.

And these machines have at their disposal other machines, planes, tanks, guns and weapons of every kind. For 20 years, day after day, stood the overseer with the whip, the commissar with the revolver, the dictator with his executioner behind the peasants, workers and engineers.

Strategic canals and streets toward the west were built.

For the joy of man, for his peace? Hatred stood behind everything that stubbornly took place in the USSR. The hatred of the cast-out, of the Jewish pariah.

A blind, pitiless, steel wave was supposed to sweep across Germany and Europe. Triumph of materialism, which set out to gain rule over the work, triumph of Jewish rage of destruction and arrogance.

Fate wanted it otherwise. The German armies did not assemble one moment too early in order to meet the Jewish- Bolshevik threat.

The Reich has already often become Europe’s saviour against the floods of annihilation from the east. And more than ever, Germany looks with trust and gratitude to the Führer, who with the annihilation of the eternal Jewish enemy crowns his work and gives it permanence.

Marriage and White Survival


More Men and Women Must Form Successful Families

by Dr. William Pierce

Another friend of mine recently went through a very traumatic marital breakup. The breakup was worse than most because my friend and his wife have three small children. When I took an inventory of all of the people I know, well over half of them had had at least one failed marriage. Most of the ones I know who have never had a divorce are those who are over 70. I guess that about 60 per cent of my younger friends have been divorced one or more times. And I guess that the rising national statistics on divorce agree with this personal inventory: as time goes on, it’s getting harder and harder to keep marriages together.

So, what are the reasons for this? Why are men and women having a harder time getting along? I’ve thought about this problem for quite a while, and I believe that I understand the reasons. Some of the reasons for the decline of marital stability are economic, some are social, and some are psychological. Historically, marriage has been based on the bedrock economic fact that a well-defined division of labor results in greater survivability. If a man and a woman worked together as a team, with the woman keeping the home front under control while the man brought home the bacon and chased the wolves away from the door, both gained a competitive advantage over unattached singles and were more likely to survive and prosper – not to mention the fact that their children were far more likely to survive than those engendered by unattached individuals.

This economic basis for marriage survived even the enormous social changes brought about byte Industrial Revolution, but economic developments in this century began undermining it. There was the large-scale recruitment of married women into the non-domestic work force during the past 60 years, at the same time many men found that their income alone could no longer support a family. Another development was the advent of the welfare state.

When employers came to regard their employees simply as interchangeable economic units, they no longer could see any reason why they shouldn’t hire married women, even married women with children, for any sort of work women could handle – especially since doing so increased the size of the labor pool and lowered the price of labor. The transition of America from an industrial economy to a service economy during the past 30 years or so has greatly accelerated this tendency by decreasing the percentage of jobs which require a man’s strength.

At the same time that the percentage of married women employed outside the home was rising from nearly zero 60 years ago to its present level of around 70 per cent, technology was greatly reducing the burden of maintaining a home. Sixty years ago clothes were washed by hand with a washing board and a washtub. Modern fabrics hadn’t been invented, and so everything that was washed then had to be ironed. Homes didn’t have electric or gas refrigerators, and only those in urban areas where there was an icehouse even had iceboxes. Kitchen work took substantially more time and effort, and so did shopping; there was no such thing as popping a frozen dinner into the microwave.

In other words, at the same time new employment opportunities for women meant that they weren’t as economically dependent on their husbands as in the past, men were finding that a woman’s work in the home was less essential than it had been: with all of the modern appliances and shortcuts, a man could get by in reasonable comfort alone. The introduction of the welfare state after the Second World War meant that a woman dissatisfied with married life didn’t even have to worry about finding employment if she left her husband.

A century ago couples had fights just like they do today, but they had strong economic motivesfor making peace and keeping the union together. Today the tendency is just to announce, „Idon’t have to put up with this crap,“ and walk out the door.

Paralleling these economic changes were social changes which also worked to the detriment of marriage. A century ago, when most of us lived in a rural environment or small towns, there was strong social pressure on a couple to stay together. A divorce was almost scandalous. In today’s urban environment this social pressure and the accompanying stigma of divorce are entirely absent.

After the Second World War the rise of feminism and so-called „women’s liberation“ also took their toll on marital stability. The feminists asserted that women were essentially the same as men, except for a few minor anatomical details, and that women didn’t need men in order to live a complete and fulfilling life. They insisted on being treated just like men. And of course, their cause was taken up by the government and by the Jewish media, which resulted in their doctrines influencing many otherwise sensible women.

Women consequently lost their special status. When they asserted that they no longer needed the protection or the support of men, many men took them at face value. Men responded by deciding that they no longer had a special obligation or responsibility to support or protect a woman.

Deciding to shed a wife became much like deciding to change roommates. Feminism has eroded the traditional complementary relationship between men and women, which was a relationship based on their natural differences, and tried to replace it with equality, which is not in accord with reality. The result of this failed effort has been very traumatic for both men and women. In many cases it has turned natural affection to hostility on both sides. Just as many women have responded by becoming less feminine, many men have become less masculine. It has played havoc with the institution of marriage.

So what’s to be done?

Unfortunately, about all we can do in the short run is try to minimize the trauma for ourselves as individuals. If you’re a man, when you’re looking for a mate steer clear of women who have been tainted by feminism; and if you’re a woman, be on your guard against men who have been “sensitized“ by the feminists.

In the long run, we can make the institution of marriage healthy again only after we have cured the social and economic problems in our society. One of the easiest things we can do is simply stop promoting the false and destructive doctrine of feminism. When our government, our schools, and our media recognize that men and women are different and complementary members of our society and have fundamentally different roles to fill, we’ll be a long way ahead.

Fixing the economic problems which beset marriage will be more difficult. It is hard to take women out of factories and offices and put them back in the home when most families have become accustomed to a life-style which requires two incomes to maintain. One of the reasons our grandmothers were able to stay at home and raise their children instead of dropping them off at a day-care center on the way to work was that our grandparents managed to do without many things that have come to be thought of as necessities today, so that one income was sufficient for them. Outlawing credit cards and other forms of borrowing certainly would cut consumption and help more people get by on one income, but that probably would cause a revolution all by itself, because our people have forgotten the old way of paying for things first and then having them.

We don’t need to go back to using washing boards and washtubs, but we can look forward to building a new society in which economic policy and employment policy are made subordinate to the primary goal of promoting the racial and spiritual health of our people. One thing we can do is get rid of government welfare programs – no food stamps, no subsidized rents, no welfare checks, nothing. If churches want to set up soup kitchens or flop houses for the homeless, that’s their business, but no one should be forced to pay for the support of those who won’t work, male or female – nor should the dole be an attractive alternative to working or to keeping a marriage together.

And a career should not be quite as attractive or available an alternative to marriage for young women as it is now. Simply doing away with the government-imposed requirements for hiring and promoting women and leaving employers free to hire whom they choose will help a lot in this direction. And women could just forget about careers as soldiers.

We don’t need governmental coercion to make marriage healthy again. We just need an end to the governmental programs which have made it unhealthy. Without feminist propaganda and without government interference, the instincts of men and women will do most of what needs to be done to get things back on a healthy track again. Their inherently different natures will reassert themselves again. Perhaps we can’t make things quite as sound as they were a century ago when most of us lived in much smaller communities, but we can make them a lot better than they are now.

Whenever I talk about the things we need to do to make a better future for our people, I hear many people telling me, „Oh, you can’t do that. You can’t just take the welfare class off the dole. They’ll riot. They’ll burn the cities. And you can’t expect women to give up their careers and become housewives. You can’t just take away all of the privileges the government has given them. You’ll lose their support if you try to do that”.

Well, let me assure you, with a healthy government in place, the welfare class will not riot – at least, not more than once. We know how to deal with rioters. All it takes is will power. It will be a good training exercise for our military people. That’s not a hard problem at all.

As for losing the support of women, I’m sure that will be true in some cases, because the enemies of our people have convinced many of them that being a housewife or a mother is a fate worse than death. Many of them believe that they absolutely have to be fighter pilots or corporate executives. And I’m not proposing making a law that they can’t be corporate executives if they want to. I’m just saying that we shouldn’t pump them full of propaganda to convince them that that’s what they should be. And we shouldn’t have laws which give them an artificial advantage in becoming corporate executives. I believe that the institution of marriage can tolerate a few female executives: just not quite so many as we have today.

One thing I must admit: it would be easier not to do anything, just to leave things as they are. If we just keep feeding the welfare class, then we don’t have to machine-gun them when they start demanding what they think they’re entitled to. And if we leave the government quotas alone, many feminists won’t hate us as much for trying to take something away from them.

But, you know, leaving things as they are really isn’t an option. If we do nothing, then our people will die. Our race will become extinct, and the earth will be inherited by the savages and degenerates of the non-White world. The birthrate for White women in America is far below the replacement level. There are fewer White Americans with every passing year. The White birthrate has fallen below the level necessary for replacement for pretty much the same reasons that the divorce rate has gone up. As more women have left the home and joined the work force, they have decided to have fewer children. Children are a hardship on mothers who are obliged to hold down a full-time job outside the home. Children can lower a father’s standard of living. Worse, the women most susceptible to feminist propaganda, the ones most likely to choose a career instead of motherhood, tend to be the brightest and most capable, the ones who most need to have children and pass on their genes to the next generation.

So we really have no choice in the matter. We either start having and raising more healthy White babies, or we die. Our race dies. Our country dies.

We will do what we have to do. We don’t want to be unpopular, we don’t want to make anyone hate us, but we will if we must. Those who hate us will be those who hate our people and want our people to die, or who have become so self-centered, so individualistic, so alienated and rootless that they don’t care what happens to our people, so long as it doesn’t inconvenience them personally. Let them hate us. It is a mark of honor, a mark of distinction.

The truly unfortunate fact now is that those who hate our people and want us to die are in control of most of the organs of influence, the media of influence. On our side we have American Dissident Voices and we have a growing presence on the Internet, but those who hate us have nearly everything else. They have the television networks, and they have Hollywood and Madison Avenue, and they have the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal and the Washington Post, and Time and Newsweek, and they have all of the slick, trendy, shallow, feminist-oriented magazines available at every magazine rack. Because they control the media, they also control the government. No politician, from Bill Clinton down to the least significant Congressman, dares to contradict them.

If we are ever to have any hope of making the institution of marriage healthy again, any hope of getting the White birthrate up to the replacement level again, any hope of keeping our people from becoming extinct, then we must gain for ourselves a much greater influence: eventually more influence than the enemies of our people have. The only way to do this is to build our own media for communicating with our people: to reach more of our people with American Dissident Voices broadcasts, Free Speech, and our other media.

Our enemies would like for everyone to believe that the only people who are concerned about the things I have talked about today – the decay of our marriage institution and the declining White birthrate – are what they like to call „right wing extremists“ or „White supremacists.“ Ordinary people, they will tell you, don’t share my concerns, my feeling that we must do something about what is happening to our people.

But our enemies are wrong. I know that a great many thoughtful people share my concerns. I know that a great many decent people are just as distressed as I am about what has happened to our marriage institution. I know that a great many of our most intelligent and perceptive people are as alarmed as I am over the catastrophic decline in the White birthrate. Not all of them have been quite so rude as I have in placing the blame for these things where it belongs. Not all of them are willing to be shrieked at by the controlled media as „anti-Semites“ and „racists,“ so they keep quiet. But they are concerned; they are distressed.

My task – our task – is to persuade them to speak up, to persuade them to give voice to their concerns, to stop letting themselves be intimidated by those who want to destroy our people. And it also is to make many more of our people think about these things. So many of our people today are so busy, so wrapped up in their own affairs, that they haven’t taken time to look at what is happening to our society and to think about it, to try to understand its long-range implications: its implications for their children and their grandchildren. I believe that when they do understand these implications, they too will share my concerns.

We need to continue talking with them, to talk with more and more of them. We need to get our radio program on more and more stations and our publications read by more and more people. Everything counts on it. You can help. I hope that you will.

WW2 The Bad War – Dr. David Duke and Mike King

Dr. David Duke and Historical Writer Mike King have an amazing discussion of the origins of the The Second World War. It’s called a good war. Is it really? If 60 million dead men, women children constitute a good war, pray tell what a bad one is like. Could it have been avoided? The answers and much food for thought in in this video.

How Zionists Divide and Conquer

by Dr. David Duke

This is a fresh look at why the same powerful Jews who support Israel as a “Jewish State” do everything they can to create a fractured society in nations they live in outside of Israel.

Why Zionists preach one thing for Jews and the direct opposite for Gentiles. Mass immigration, multiculturalism and diversity makes any society vulnerable to the most organized, aggressive, ethnic people on earth. Their leaders know that that their team effort gives a huge advantage over a fractured, atomized society. Diversity is a weapon.

In this video, I give direct evidence of the Zionist technique for dominating a society.

The Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith

by Dr. William Pierce
10 October 1998

Last week I mentioned a recent attack on me by a Jewish organization, the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith. I gave this as an example of the way the Jews are able to use the mass media in America to serve their purposes. The specific point I made was that it is not necessary for all of the newspaper owners and editors and all of the local television station owners to be Jews in order for all of them to slavishly follow the Anti-Defamation League’s party line. This is a very important point, a point essential for us to understand if we want to have a free society, and I’ll elaborate on it now.

I mentioned last week that when the Anti-Defamation League – or ADL for short – handed out press releases on September 24 to newspapers and other media in which they said that the organization I head, the National Alliance, is „the single most dangerous organized hate group in America,“ and that we are „linked“ to bank robberies, bombings, and murders all over the country, virtually all of the media simply printed these wild charges without checking them for accuracy. Of all the hundreds of newspapers which printed the ADL’s charges, only one – West Virginia’s Charleston Gazette – even bothered to call me first and ask for my comments. Some of the newspapers, in paraphrasing the ADL’s press release, even managed to exaggerate the ADL’s lies. For example, the Tampa Tribune began its news story on September 25 with the line: „A domestic terrorist group with a following in Tampa poses an ongoing threat of violence, the Anti-Defamation League said in a report issued Thursday.“ The ADL’s words „most dangerous organized hate group“ have been transformed by the Tampa Tribune into „domestic terrorist group.“ That’s a significant change. „Hate group“ is an ill-defined term which you can apply to any organization with whose policies or doctrines you disagree. Groups opposed to abortion, for example, have been called „hate groups“ by feminists and their supporters. „Terrorist group,“ on the other hand, really suggests a group which actually engages in terrorist activity, such as bombings, assassinations, and the like.

Then there’s the Los Angeles Times, which in its September 25 story based on the ADL’s press release stated: „The group’s activities [that is the National Alliance’s activities] – including violent crimes such as robberies and bombings – have been uncovered in at least 26 states.“ I’ll repeat that: „the group’s activities – including violent crimes such as robberies and bombings.“ The Los Angeles Times certainly makes it sound as if I’m the head of an organization which actually commits violent crimes such as robberies and bombings as a matter of course, doesn’t it? That was the Los Angeles Times’ interpretation of the ADL’s list of „criminal incidents linked to the National Alliance and its propaganda.“ What the ADL’s list actually suggests is that the perpetrators of various bombings and murders may be „linked“ to the National Alliance by having read a book or a pamphlet published by the National Alliance or perhaps by having listened to one of my broadcasts. For example, one of the „incidents“ in the ADL’s list of „criminal incidents linked to the National Alliance“ reads: „December 1995, Fayetteville, North Carolina: Two soldiers stationed at Fort Bragg, who were avowed neo-Nazis and reportedly read National Alliance propaganda, murdered an African-American couple.“ As I pointed out last week, neither I nor anyone else in the National Alliance had ever heard of James Burmeister before he shot a convicted Black drug dealer and the dealer’s girlfriend to death in Fayetteville in December 1995. But it certainly is possible that Burmeister listened to an American Dissident Voices broadcast or read some publication of the National Alliance. There are a lot of our publications in circulation. Burmeister also may have read Reader’s Digest or the Bible or Newsweek magazine, for all I know; there’s certainly a lot of criminal activity described in those publications. Anyway, the Los Angeles Times’ interpretation of the ADL’s claim that the National Alliance is linked through its publications to various criminal acts is that we did it: we committed the criminal acts ourselves. The paper said flatly that our activities include „violent crimes such as robberies and bombings.“ And nobody from the Los Angeles Times even bothered to check with me first!

So what am I supposed to do: hire a bunch of lawyers and sue all of these newspapers and perhaps the ADL too? Perhaps I will – but I doubt that anyone who has actually been involved in a libel suit would suggest such a course. The civil litigation system in the United States has been designed for the sole purpose of enriching lawyers, and because of that the system gives an overwhelming advantage to the litigant who has the most money to spend on lawyers. Perhaps some experienced civil-litigation lawyer who believes this is a worthy cause will contact me and offer his services.

But while I’m waiting for that, let me draw a few conclusions from this nasty business. First, I’ll mention that I’m not especially peeved at the ADL about this new report labeling me as the most dangerous man in America. That doesn’t mean I won’t sue them, but at least I know where they’re coming from. The ADL is a professional hate organization. They are hate merchants. That’s the way they earn their living: selling hate. Along with a handful of other Jewish organizations – the Simon Wiesenthal Center and Morris Dees’s Southern Poverty Law Center, for example – the ADL makes its money by persuading Jews and wannabee Jews around the country that they are in great danger from people like me – but if everyone will just send them a nice, fat check today, the ADL will protect these Jews and wannabees from me. And so the ADL – and these other hate merchants – put out deliberately scary press releases to drum up donations. If the newspapers exaggerate things a bit, why so much the better. That’s why the press releases tend to be a little deceptive, why they are written in a way calculated to lead to misinterpretation.

The ADL is the oldest and most powerful of these Jewish hate groups in the United States. It was founded in 1913, after a Jewish factory owner in Atlanta, Leo Frank, was convicted of raping and killing a 14-year-old White girl, Mary Phagan, who worked in his factory. The killer was sentenced to death by the court, and there was a great deal of publicity about the case at the time. Powerful Jewish organizations came to Frank’s defense, and in behind-the-scenes maneuvering they were able to persuade Georgia’s governor to commute Frank’s death sentence. This blatantly corrupt act by the governor working in cahoots with his rich Jewish supporters so enraged the populace that a vigilante group of citizens took Frank out of jail and hanged him themselves. The Jews, realizing that they had bungled the Frank affair, organized the ADL for the purpose of handling such matters more skillfully in the future. In the past 85 years the ADL has grown to become the most powerful Jewish pressure group and lobbying organization in America.

Recent ADL lobbying projects have been the promotion of gun control laws and of state laws banning military-style training by patriotic groups. The ADL’s biggest project for this decade, however, has been so-called „hate crime“ legislation. Hate crime laws attempt to punish a person for what he was thinking before or during the commission of an offense against a member or a group of members of an officially favored minority. For example, if you set fire to a synagogue because you don’t like Jews, you’re liable for a much more severe punishment than you would be if you were hired by the rabbi to set fire to a synagogue so the congregation could collect the insurance. Arson is no longer simply arson. Now there’s arson, and there’s „hate arson.“ And to decide which it is, the government may look into your personal taste in reading material, check into the type of music you listen to, investigate your political and religious affiliations, ask your friends about any expressions of Politically Incorrect opinions you may have made – and then present all of this information in court as evidence against you. The whole concept of „hate crime“ is Orwellian. It turns traditional American concepts of law and individual freedom on their heads. But because the noisiest group of people pushing for „hate crime“ legislation are Jews, no politician dares speak against it. Bill Clinton is the Jews’ current point man on Federal „hate crime“ legislation.

One category of „hate crime“ is „hate speech.“ In fact, the outlawing of what the ADL people call „hate speech“ is their ultimate aim. „Hate speech,“ of course, is whatever they find offensive or dangerous to their interests. I find a lot of the films coming out of Hollywood these days offensive, and a lot of television programming, but you can be sure that’s not what the ADL has in mind when it campaigns for laws against „hate speech.“ The ADL is especially concerned about the propagation of what they consider dangerous ideas over the Internet and has been working with software developers to develop censorship programs which can be installed on any computer, so that computer users cannot find any Politically Incorrect material on the Internet.

Lobbying to stamp out the Bill of Rights isn’t the ADL’s only activity. They’re also the largest and most effective private espionage organization in America. They have their spies in every community in America where there are Jews or wannabees. Reports go from their regional offices around the country to massive data banks in New York and in Israel, where the ADL maintains dossiers on hundreds of thousands of Americans. For example, if a state legislator somewhere in America makes a speech which a Jewish listener considers unfriendly to Israel, a report goes into the ADL data bank. If a businessman at a Chamber of Commerce meeting makes a joke which might indicate a less-than-worshipful attitude toward Jews, and a wannabee informs the ADL of the joke, that businessman will henceforth have a dossier in the ADL’s files. Then if that state legislator or that businessman ever runs for Congress, say, the ADL will search its files for his name, find his record, and launch a campaign against him as an „enemy of Israel“ or as an „anti-Semite.“

And the ADL has not hesitated to break the law in its spying activity. In April 1993 police obtained search warrants and raided the offices of the ADL in San Francisco and Los Angeles, where they found hundreds of stolen confidential police files. Some of these police files were on anti-apartheid activists in the United States, and the ADL had passed copies on to the South African government in return for South African police files on pro-Palestinian groups in South Africa. This caused a stink even in liberal circles, which ordinarily are pro-ADL. And this business of the ADL’s stolen police files is still in the courts in California.

So as I said, I understand where the ADL is coming from. I’m not surprised that they consider my broadcasts dangerous. I’m not surprised that they want to shut me up and are trying to do that with their current smear campaign, claiming that I am „linked“ to bombings and murders. I expect that sort of behavior – I expect lies of that sort – from the ADL. What’s really disappointing is the enthusiastic collaboration the ADL receives from the politicians and the media. The two newspapers I cited a minute ago, the Tampa Tribune and the Los Angeles Times, for example, are essentially Gentile newspapers, as far as I have been able to determine. I may be mistaken, but I believe that the editors and publishers of these two newspapers are not Jews. So why do they go out of their way to exaggerate the ADL’s lies about me? Why does the Tampa Tribune call the National Alliance a „domestic terrorist group“? Why does the Los Angeles Times say that the activities of the National Alliance include „violent crimes such as robberies and bombings“? Why did neither of these newspapers contact someone in my office and ask about the ADL’s claims before printing them? Why didn’t any of the newspapers which carried the ADL’s attack on me mention the ADL’s history of illegal activity?

Let me tell you what I think about that. I believe that in general there are two factors at work here. I’ll call them the corruption factor and the lemming factor. Let’s look at the corruption factor first. It’s the factor which motivates virtually all of the non-Jewish politicians, but also many non-Jews in the media. It’s the factor which has led Bill Clinton to pack his cabinet with Jews and to promote every Jewish policy they have presented him with. It’s the factor which has led New York’s Senator Alphonse D’Amato to serve as front man for the Jews’ huge extortion effort against the Swiss. These politicians don’t work for the Jews because they love Jews. Nobody loves Jews. They do it because they’re corrupt, because they’re willing to sacrifice the interests of their own people in order to serve the Jews if they believe that they can advance their careers by doing that. And many businessmen are just as corrupt as the politicians. They will do whatever they think is good for their business, whatever will give them the biggest profit. And some businessmen are in the media business. They understand that Jews buy more advertising than any other group. They understand that Jews own a bigger chunk of the media than any other group. They understand which side their bread is buttered on.

And so when the ADL attacks me these media businessmen are ready to fall on me like a pack of starved Dobermans in order to curry favor with the Jews. But you know, the interesting thing about these corrupt people, whether they’re in politics or in the media business, as soon as they believe that the balance of power is shifting, they’ll jump. They’d as soon tear apart the Jews as they would the enemies of the Jews. That’s something to keep in mind as our struggle proceeds.

Now, the lemmings in the media are more interesting than the corrupt businessmen. I’ve dealt with a lot of media people over the years, and one of the observations I’ve made is that they are the trendiest single occupational group in our society – even trendier than people in police work. I don’t think I’ve ever met a journalist who had an original idea or who didn’t follow the Jewish party line with a truly religious devotion. They all march in ideological lockstep.

I think it wasn’t always this way. Back before the Second World War there were a few journalists in America who could think for themselves. H.L. Mencken is one who comes to mind. Nowadays, of course, the party-line journalists shrink in horror and embarrassment from the mention of Mencken’s name. Mencken – gasp! – didn’t like Jews and occasionally said so.

I can’t say that I really understand why journalists today are such lemmings, but I am sure that it’s more than the fact that Jews are so powerful in the media: I’m sure that it’s more than corruption, as in the case of the politicians and businessmen. I suspect that today’s journalists are people who have been more intensely socialized than most of the rest of the population. They are people who have been subjected to stronger group pressures to conform and have been selected according to how well they adapted to these pressures. Perhaps the journalism departments at our universities don’t accept students who don’t fit the lemming mold. Anyway, journalists certainly do have a very strong tendency to stick close to the herd and to regard with suspicion and hostility anyone who has strayed very far from the herd.

Now, this is an oversimplification, but I believe that the reason so many media people fell in love with Bill Clinton as soon as he appeared on the political scene back in 1991 or so is that they saw him as one of their crowd, their herd. „Bill marched with us for the Viet Cong,“ they thought. „Bill partied and smoked dope with us. He’s one of us.“

And they look at me and they think: „This guy Pierce is from the other side of the tracks. Instead of helping us trash the dean’s office, he joined the John Birch Society. He doesn’t belong to our crowd, so let’s trash him too.“ Anyway, I believe that there’s an element of that sort of thinking in the average journalist’s mentality.

Now, the bright side of this picture is that people who think like lemmings and have been conditioned by group pressure to have certain views can very easily be conditioned to have quite different views by the simple application of group pressure in a new direction. You won’t be able to change an independent thinker’s opinions this way, but if you put 100,000 typical journalists in a labor re-education camp and then select out 1,000 of them with leadership potential, straighten out the thinking of this 1,000 with two-by-fours, then put them in charge of the others, and put all except the 1,000 reoriented commissars on a diet of 300 calories a day, in a year every journalist in the camp will be reoriented: skinny, but sincerely reoriented. You can turn them loose with complete confidence that they’ll follow the new party line just as slavishly as they followed the old party line, even after they’ve regained their former weight. That’s the way lemmings are.

There’s one other aspect of the ADL’s operation which merits scrutiny, and that is its program of corrupting police departments around the country. At the press conferences they held in their regional offices last month when they promoted me to „most dangerous man“ they had a number of local police officials with them. The appearance of these police officials on the platform along with the ADL’s Jews tended to give the press conferences a sort of quasi-official or quasi-governmental atmosphere, and that undoubtedly encouraged the reporters present to accept the ADL’s lies without question.

Some of the police officials were there because they have political ambitions. They’re planning on running for the state legislature some day, and they want the Jews’ backing. Others were there because the ADL has assiduously been cultivating its relationships with police agencies for many years. The ADL offers „anti-terrorist“ seminars to police departments and indoctrinates policemen with its hate propaganda under the guise of teaching them how to recognize and combat „domestic terrorists“ – such as William Pierce. The ADL gets away with this despite its own record of criminal activity. The ADL has been able to persuade the cops to overlook its having been caught with stolen police files. That’s a little frightening. If we had a government with integrity, the ADL would be dangerous enough. But with a government like we have in the United States today, every decent citizen must regard with horror the subversion of our police agencies by the ADL.

Israel: The Promised Land for Organized Crime

By Dr. David Duke