I will in my life possess no greater pride than to one day at the end of my life be able to say: I have won for the German Reich the German worker!
Speech of May 10, 1933 in Berlin
It will be the firm goal of the movement, which I and my fellow fighters represent, to elevate the word „worker” to the German nation’s great title of honor.
Speech of May 10, 1933 in Berlin
Against him (the worker) no state should be formed, no, it should rise with him!
Speech of May 10, 1933 in Berlin
I lead the struggle for the million masses of our good, industrious, working, productive folk.
Speech of November 10, 1933 in Berlin
The appeal must be directed ever anew to the nation and socialist feeling.
Speech of April 17, 1934 in Berlin
The social idea (must) be the unconditional fundament in a state, otherwise a state cannot hold out in the long-run.
Speech of April 12, 1922 in Munich
Genuine socialism, however, is the doctrine of strictest fulfillment of duty,
Appendix to „Adolf Hitler’s Speeches“: Adolf Hitler’s Sayings
If…the word socialism is supposed to have any meaning at all, then it can only have the one, with iron justice, that means in the deepest insight, to burden each – in terms of the preservation of the entirety – with that, which is appropriate to him thanks to his born talent and hence his worth.
Speech of September 3, 1933 in Nuremberg
For the German worker we National Socialists will from now on open the path to that, which he can demand and claim.
Reply to Weis (SPD) in the Reichstag on March 23, 1933
This broad folk…is certainly often ponderous and is certainly in many regards backward and not so nimble, not so witty and not so intellectual. But it has something: It has loyalty, it has perseverance, it has stability.
Speech of May 10, 1933 in Berlin
Whoever wants to find loyalty and faith, confidence, fanaticism and persistent devotion, must go where these virtues are still to be found; but they are only to be found in the broad mass of this folk. Only there dominates this faithful trust, this blind devotion, this attachment and this heroic courage to stand up for an ideal.
Speech of February 26, 1934 in Munich
The German worker is just like our peasant industrious and loyal!
Speech to the folk comrades in Danzig of May 17, 1933
If we want to endure as a community, then we must overcome what divides!
Speech of March 4, 1933 in Konigsberg
Genuine socialism is the highest folkdom!
Appendix to „Adolf Hitler’s Speeches”: Adolf Hitler’s Sayings
One may be active wherever – and should and must never forget that his folk comrade, who fulfills his duty just like him, is indispensable, that the nation does not exist through the work of a government, of a specific class or through the work of its intelligentsia, rather that it only lives through the common and harmonious work of all!
Speech of May 1, 1933 in Berlin
There is no socialism, which does not have the strength of intellect at its disposal, no social joy, which is not protected by the strength of a nation, yes, obtains its prerequisites.
Appeal for the election of July 31, 1932
On the day when both ideas (nationalism and socialism) merge into a single one, they are invincible.
Appeal for the election of July 31, 1932
So, May 1-st can in the life of folks only be a glorification of the national, creative will as opposed to the international idea of decomposition, of the liberation of the national spirit and also the economic removal of international contamination. That is in the final analysis the question of the rejuvenation of folks.
Speech of May 1, 1923 in Munich
We National Socialists (have) in long work…created in our factory cell institution the organizational prerequisite in order to not allow the armies of German workers, through the smashing of the old, to fall into a leaderless, disorganized confusion, rather to lead them determined with a firm hand into the world of the new facts.
Speech of January 30, 1934 in Berlin
If we win the German worker for the state, then we will also keep him as an indestructible fundament for the new Germany. I am hence of the conviction that our „Work Front” will one day be a pillar of the new Reich.
Speech of May 16, 1934 in Berlin
The „German Work Front” must secure work peace in that understanding is created among the factory managers for the justified claims of their following and among the followers understanding is created for the situation and possibilities of their factory.
Decree concerning the „German Work Front” of October 24, 1934
I want…to wish to the great „German Work Front” that its leadership and all its members never lose faith, come what may.
Speech of May 16, 1934 in Berlin
They must learn to respect each other again, the worker of the mind the worker of the fist and vice versa. Both belong together and from the both of them must a new man crystalize – the man of the coming German Reich.
Speech of April 24, 1923 in Munich
It is necessary to teach each stratum the important of the other.
Speech of May 1, 1933 in Berlin
The productive people, however, regardless whether worker of the mind or of the fist, are the noble folk of our state, that is the German folk!
Speech of April 12, 1922 in Munich
Especially the trained German worker is surpassed by no other force in the world.
Speech of May 1, 1934 in Berlin
There are many tens of thousands among us, who want to make the respect for the individual dependent on the kind of work he performs. No, not what he does, rather how he does it, must be decisive.
Speech of May 1, 1933 in Berlin
What we want is not a state of drones, rather a state, which gives to each that to which he has a right on the basis of his activity. Whoever does not honestly work, should not be a state citizen.
Speech of April 24, 1923 in Munich
The German folk of the future should give no citizen pensions for doing nothing, but give each the possibility to earn his own bread through honest work and thus help and contribute to the raising of the living standard of all.
Speech of March 21, 1934 in Unterhaching
Furthermore, it is clear to the national government that the final elimination of the distress of both the agricultural as well as the urban economy depends on the integration of the army of unemployed into the production process. Herein lies the…greatest economic task. It can only be solved through a gradual satisfaction amid execution of healthy, natural, economic principles and all measures, which are necessary, even if they, seen from the moment, cannot reckon with any popularity. Creating employment and work service obligation are hereby only individual measures within the framework of the overall attack.
Speech of March 23. 1933 in Berlin
We take here (for the elimination of unemployment) paths, for which there is hardly a historical precedent.
Proclamation of September 1, 1933 in Nuremberg
In a quarter of the time I allotted myself before the March election, one third of the unemployed have again been given useful work; the attack proceeded concentric from all sides and only thus enabled success.
Speech of January 30, 1934 in Berlin
A certain percentage of unemployed will always remain in a folk of sixty-five million. Even before the war, we had unemployment of about 800,000 people. If we manage to reduce the number of unemployed to about a million, then we can view the problem of unemployment as solved. Our whole work is initially directed fully toward this work.
Speech of April 17, 1934 in Berlin
A certain load is supposed to be intentionally placed on a portion of the folk, so that it thereby helps to make the distress of the other part more bearable.
Proclamation of the Winter Help Work 1934/1935 on October 6, 1934
The success of the „Winter Help Work” is not only to be observed domestically, rather also discernible in foreign countries. It is difficult to say how many thousands of foreigners have precisely through this social relief work become directly convinced of the value of the new order in Germany… A large part of the mood shift in the world can be traced to the successes of the National Socialist revolution, but especially to the „Winter Help Work”. For from it grew the realization of the towering social significance of the National Socialist idea in our fatherland.
Speech of April 17, 1934 in Berlin
Our task is: work, work and still more work! From the success of the creation of employment we will obtain the strongest authority.
Speech of March 20, 1934 in Munich
If in a state only the person who works honesty is a state citizen, then each also the right to demand that in his old age care and need are kept far away from him. Then the greatest social deed is accomplished.
Speech of April 24, 1923 in Munich
The national government…recognizes as its historical task to support and promote the millions of German workers in the struggle for the rights of their existence. As Chancellor and National Socialist I feel bound to them as the former companions of my youth. The increase of the purchasing power of these masses will be an essential means for the economic recovery. Under preservation of our social legislation, the first step in its reform will be undertaken. Fundamentally, however, the utilization of the whole work force in the service of the entirety should follow. The idleness of millions of human work hours is an insanity and a crime, which must lead to the impoverishment of all. Regardless what assets would be created through a utilization of our surplus labor force, they would be able to represent indispensable life goods for millions of people, who today subsist in need and misery. The organizational ability of our folk must and will succeed in solving this question.
Speech of March 23, 1933 in Berlin
We have given ourselves above all a gigantic task: to lead back the German worker into the German nation. If in the future the question is put to us: „What do you deem to be your greatest accomplishment?”, then I can only say, that we managed to again integrate the German worker into the German nation and to make clear to him: The nation is not a concept in which you have no share, rather you yourself are the bearer of the nation, you belong to it, you cannot separate yourself from it, your life is bound to the life of your whole folk, which is not just the root for your strength as well, rather also the root for your life!
Speech of October 24, 1933 in Berlin
That makes us proud that we again led into the folk, and hence made bearers of the national idea, countless millions of people, who went off to the side, in part full of envy, in part looking with hatred at the portion designating itself „national”.
Speech of October 24, 1933 in Berlin
by Dr. William Pierce
Last year I got into the business of producing and distributing music. I had a couple of reasons for doing so. A general reason is that I want to continue to build my capability for communicating with the public through every medium that can be used effectively for that purpose, and music can be a very effective medium. A specific reason is that I wanted a medium for communicating with alienated young Americans who listen to a type of music known as „resistance music.“ These young Americans have grown up in multiculturalized America.
They’ve been weaned on Jewish television programming. They’ve gone to racially mixed schools and been lied to by Politically Correct teachers about how everyone is „equal,“ about how we must all learn to get along with one another, that more and more „diversity“ and multiculturalism are the irresistible wave of the future, and that no normal person should want to resist this wave anyway because it’s good and, oh, so wonderful! The music these kids have heard while growing up has been very heavy on rock, and the media bosses are now phasing them into rap.
Instead of adapting to multiculturalism like good, little lemmings should, however, these young people have rebelled. The multicultural planners, the media bosses, have succeeded in alienating them, in cutting them loose from their roots, but the media bosses have not succeeded in making them like being uprooted; the Jews in Hollywood and New York have not succeeded in making the kids like or accept multiculturalism. The kids have rebelled in various ways that the planners of America’s destruction simply didn’t count on.
The healthiest elements among these young people have responded to their tribal instinct and have sought to reestablish their racial roots in one way or another. Resistance music has played an important role in this quest for roots and community and meaning. Some of the music expresses very explicit defiance of those who have attempted to force the kids into a multicultural life-style. It expresses anger against the government. It expresses resentment against the Jewish planners behind the government’s multicultural programs. It expresses hostility against non-Whites and against everyone who is allied to the non-Whites; it is fighting music. All of this music that expresses anger and resentment and rebelliousness is properly called „resistance“ music, and most – though not all – of it belongs to the „rock“ genre.
Back in the mid-1950s the Jews began inaugurating many of their programs to multiculturalize America. One of these programs involved moving young Whites away from traditionally White musical forms and replacing these White musical forms with Black music. The most notable aspect of this program was the use of singer Elvis Presley to popularize rock’ n’ roll among young White people. Before Elvis, rock ‘n’ roll was essentially a Black musical form, with Black roots, Black performers, and Black listeners. With their control of the popular-music industry and broadcasting, the Jews were successful in their effort to drag rock ‘n’ roll across the color line, just as they are succeeding now in popularizing another Black musical form – rap – among young Whites.
The Jews were so successful in popularizing rock among young Whites, in fact, that the kids eventually began to think of it as their music: as White music. Then young White musicians turned the tables on the Jews by writing their own rock lyrics, and their lyrics were rebellious lyrics, angry lyrics, defiant lyrics, lyrics which told the Jews, in effect, to go to hell, that young Whites would not permit the Jews any longer to force Whites to multiculturalize. The Jews responded by labeling the music with these defiant lyrics „hate music.“
Despite the label, and despite the efforts of the Jews to suppress it by denying it access to the mass media, resistance music continued to attract new fans among young Whites. And the music evolved. The genre broadened. Resistance lyrics were written for some country music. My company, Resistance Records, sells this country music under the label „Johnny Rebel.“ Resistance music also incorporated other music from the past which had nothing to do with rock. Resistance Records, for example, also sells march music and other patriotic music from the very racially conscious Third Reich. On the Internet you can see a listing of all of the resistance music I distribute at resistance.com.
And all of this music, whether rock or country or German march music, is denounced by the mass media as „hate music“ so long as it shows any trace of racial consciousness or resistance to multiculturalism. But as I said a moment ago it was the healthiest elements among our young people who gave expression to their tribal feeling in their music. Others have expressed their alienation in different ways – in less healthy ways. Some have rebelled against the unnatural environment of multiculturalism without really understanding fully what they are rebelling against. Instead of having a positive alternative to the Jews’ programs, they have simply rejected everything – or at least, everything traditional. They have become nihilists.
Some have turned to Satanism as a way of expressing their anger against the traditional world they feel has let them down, a multicultural world in which they feel they have no place. Their music is full of Satanic imagery and mumbo-jumbo. There are pentagrams and goat’s heads and cabalistic characters from the Hebrew alphabet in the graphics accompanying their music.
Satanism is almost a parody of traditional Judaeo-Christianity, with chanting and rituals and priestly hocus-pocus and so on.
Satanic music should not be mistaken for pagan music. Pagan music is much more serious music, and its purpose is not so much to express resentment against Christianity as it is to give expression to the healthy religious feelings of pre-Christian Europe and to express an awareness of blood and soil and very deep racial roots. It is not nihilistic, and it really belongs with the other positive forms of resistance music: that is, with what the Jews denounce as „hate music.“
The nihilistic music, on the other hand, is fine with the Jews. They would prefer, I believe, for everyone to be a good, little multicultural lemming, but if one must rebel against that, then the rebellion should take a nihilistic form. And of course, Satanism isn’t the only form of nihilism. For example, there’s a whole category of rock music which is called „Death Metal,“ and let me tell you, it is very sick stuff. It is totally hedonistic, like Satanic music – you know, everything goes; if it feels good do it; you have no responsibility to anyone or anything but yourself; nothing is sacred; nothing is worthy of respect; nothing matters but your own personal pleasure. But Death Metal goes beyond hedonism: far beyond it. It is music that glories in perversity, music that seeks to defile, music that exalts sickness and unnaturalness and pain and decay and destruction and death. Its lyrics deal with cannibalism, with necrophilia, with bestiality, and with every other perversion imaginable. Torture and mutilation are very common themes. It’s morbid, twisted stuff.
The concerts put on by these nihilist musical groups are quite extreme. They may involve people urinating or defecating on each other on stage. Sexual intercourse of various types may take place in the background. And real or simulated genital torture and mutilation may be part of the show. I know a fellow who plays in a rock band called „Genitorturers.“ And that’s what they do: genital torture, live and on stage.
Now, you might wonder why I’m telling you about these things. First, I want you to know that I don’t distribute such music and have no intention of doing so. Everything produced or distributed by my company, Resistance Records, is positive, healthy, racially oriented resistance music: what the Jews call „hate music.“ If the Jews hate it, I produce it and distribute it; if the Jews like it, I have nothing to do with it. But I do have two interests in nihilist music. My first interest is why this sick music, this Satanic and Death Metal music, is increasingly popular among young White people in America and in Europe. Why is it attractive to so many young people? I have some ideas about that, and I’ll share them with you in a moment.
My second interest in this sick music is the Jewish connection. I mentioned that I know a fellow who plays in a Death Metal band. He sent me a CD he had produced, complete with Satanist symbols in the accompanying graphics for the jewel case. I was surprised to note that the CD had a Time Warner copyright. Marilyn Manson is probably the best-known performer in the Satanist music genre. His records are distributed by Interscope, which is a property of Universal Studios, which is owned by Jewish liquor-and-media billionaire Edgar Bronfman, Jr. One obvious reason the Jews produce and promote and distribute this sick music is simply greed. They pay to have it produced, they put their labels on it, and they sell it in their big record stores in New York and Los Angeles and San Francisco because they make money on it. An appallingly large number of White teenagers are attracted to the stuff.
Well, greed is just one reason. It is not surprising that where there is a market for something, the Jews will come crowding in and elbow everyone else aside in their eagerness to grab the profit for themselves. But why not try to make money from real resistance music also? There’s a big, largely undeveloped market for that music too. Why do they leave that market to me and focus their own efforts on the necrophilia and Satanism and genital torture? They never permit any real resistance music to be sold in the big record stores where they sell their sick music.
You see, both resistance music and nihilist music, Death Metal music, are in a sense rebel music, music which expresses a rejection of what we might call the „mainstream“ world. Resistance music fans reject the mainstream world because it has been multiculturalized, because it no longer is a White world, and they want to make it White again. Death Metal fans reject the mainstream world simply because they have become alienated and no longer have an attachment to anything but themselves. The Jews attempt to suppress the former music and promote the latter. And that fits right in with the general Jewish tendency: always promote that which is destructive and destroy that which is healthy.
And if you doubt that Death Metal music is really destructive, then you just haven’t been exposed to it. You’ve led too sheltered a life to understand how much really nasty stuff is out there. Go to a Death Metal concert sometime. Read the lyrics to a few Death Metal songs. In fact, listen; I’ll read to you a few lines from one of the more popular Satanist bands, Deicide. This is from a Deicide song called „Sacrificial Suicide“:
Lust into reality
Satan angel of the black abyss, Satan lord I hail
Insane blasphemous – Satan Sacrificial suicide,
Ritual to end my life
Behemoth incess my fate – Satan Damned to tell, end of my life Wrath of God – Satan
Sin my soul, blesses with fire Throne of stone – Satan
I must die, in my wake Seventh gate – Satan Suicide, end my life
I must die – Satan
Suicide sacrifice, thrust of evil deep inside Lucifer never lies, take away thee mortal life Demigod, Satan son, commend to body to the ground Father Satan, I’ll find peace when I am God.
Well, of course, much of that is simply gibberish and non-words, but the flavor is quite clear. The Jews understandably are a little shy about publicizing their involvement in this stuff where middle-class parents might find out about it and become alarmed. They’d just as soon you not ponder too much on the involvement of Time Warner’s boss Gerald Levin or Universal Studios boss Edgar Bronfman in the production and promotion of Satanic music. But they’re certainly not shy about rubbing your kids’ noses in it. The Jews peddle this filth to confused White teenagers as shamelessly as any Black crack dealer selling his poisonous wares on a school playground.
I want to stress this point: the people promoting this filth are not just sleazy, marginal Jews in trenchcoats fresh off the boat from Russia. They are filthy-rich, billionaire Jewish media bosses, respectable Jews, the leaders of the Jewish community, Jews who own Hollywood film studios and arrive in long limousines at the White House for state dinners and have every politician in the Congress in their pockets. They are the Jews behind the multiculturalizing of America, the Jews who planned forced racial integration and open borders and Affirmative Action. They are the Jews whose programs have uprooted and alienated millions of young, White Americans.
They are the Jews who, in response to the alienation and anger they themselves have caused, now sell Satanic and Death Metal music to American teenagers. That’s an example of what they proudly call chutzpah.
And now the other question: why do any White kids tolerate this filth? Why is there a market for it? Why do 15-year-old White boys and girls from good families listen to lyrics with very explicit descriptions of sex with corpses? Why do they pay to go to concerts where they watch a woman on stage having her genitalia sewed shut with a needle and thread, to the screeching and thumping accompaniment of a rock band?
Part of the answer is obvious. Kids will do anything – and I mean absolutely anything – which is fashionable. They will put safety pins through their nipples or studs through their tongues without having a clue as to what it’s all about, except that other kids in their peer group are doing the same thing. If the Jewish media bosses promote it, a substantial portion of the kids will do it without a second thought. And really, Death Metal is no worse than the rap music that the Jews also are promoting among young Whites. The young White lemmings, who are more or less acclimated to multiculturalism, go for the rap. Alienated young Whites without a clue tend toward the Death Metal. One advantage the latter music has is that it will shock their parents, even liberal parents, whereas liberal parents hardly can be shocked by rap without running the risk of seeming to be racists.
There’s more than cluelessness and a desire to shock parents involved in the growing popularity of Death Metal, however. The music reflects a growing morbidity in the outlook of young White people. The growing suicide rate among young Whites also reflects this. Alienation is not a normal, healthy condition. When a large number of young people are uprooted and no longer have a clear sense of identity or a clear sense of belonging to a natural community, to a racial community, one should not be surprised at the development of various pathologies, such as hedonism and the fascination with death.
One also should not be surprised at the various forms of destructive behavior – especially self- destructive behavior – which are becoming much more common among young White people.
One should not make the mistake of blaming bad behavior on the music, however. The kids who listen to this music already had problems. The music is a symptom of their pathology, not the cause of it. The Jews have destroyed their world, have cut them off from their roots, and that is what the kids are reacting badly to, not the music. When a kid who listens to Satanic or Death Metal music carves up a neighbor’s pet – or his own little sister – in some sort of Satanic ritual, the music didn’t make him do it; the Jewish media bosses and the politicians in the government who destroyed his world with their multicultural programs made him do it. And exactly the same thing can be said about White teenagers who plan and carry out massacres at their schools. The Columbine High School killers were Marilyn Manson fans, but Marilyn Manson didn’t make them slaughter 13 people. Edgar Bronfman, Jr., who sells Marilyn Manson’s music, made them do it: Edgar Bronfman, Jr., and his fellow filthy-rich Jews, who consciously and deliberately, with malice aforethought, planned the destruction of the White world we used to have in America, where White teenagers could grow up with roots in a healthy and natural way.
Perhaps you can understand now why I thought it worthwhile to talk with you about the rather distasteful subject of Satanic and Death Metal music. It’s not an obscure, underground little phenomenon. It’s big business for the Jews who are pushing it. Time Warner and Universal Studios don’t waste their time with little, underground phenomena. And it is about as clear and unambiguous an indicator as you can find of what is happening to our people, of the sickness that is overtaking us. I want to rub your noses in it. I want you to smell the stink of death that is in it. And I want you to understand who is behind it and why they’re behind it.
You know, there are a lot of mainstream Christian preachers who have railed against Satanic music from time to time, but not one of them has breathed a word about the Jewish connection. Oh, my goodness, no! That would be anti-Semitic! They would have you believe that this sickness just sprang up of its own accord, out of nowhere, for no good reason. And of course, if you approach it that way, it just doesn’t make sense. It doesn’t seem real. You have to understand the Jewish connection before you can take this sickness seriously.
I’m telling you that you’d better take it seriously. I’m telling you that you’d better understand what it’s all about and how it fits in with everything else that is happening these days.
And I want to give you some positive news too. The number of people who listen to real resistance music – the positive, healthy kind of resistance music that I produce and distribute – the kind the Jews call „hate music,“ is growing fast. One of these days soon there will be enough of us to make some changes in this world. And by God, when that day comes we’re going to have very little patience with the soft, pampered middle-class folks who didn’t pay attention to what was happening because they were too busy at the shopping mall or too busy watching the ball game or too afraid of being labeled „haters“ by the Jews and their allies. The anger is building, the rage is building, and it’s going to break loose.
By Jason Collett
The unexpected views of four key diplomats who were close to events. Just consider the following:
Joseph P. Kennedy, U.S. Ambassador to Britain during the years immediately preceding WW2 was the father of the famous American Kennedy dynasty. James Forrestal the first US Secretary of Defence (1947-1949) quotes him as saying „Chamberlain (the British Prime Minister) stated that America and the world Jews had forced England into the war“. (The Forrestal Diaries ed. Millis, Cassell 1952 p.129).
Count Jerzy Potocki, the Polish Ambassador in Washington, in a report to the Polish Foreign Office in January 1939, is quoted approvingly by the highly respected British military historian Major-General JFC Fuller. Concerning public opinion in America he says „Above all, propaganda here is entirely in Jewish hands when bearing public ignorance in mind, their propaganda is so effective that people have no real knowledge of the true state of affairs in Europe It is interesting to observe that in this carefully thought-out campaign no reference at all is made to Soviet Russia. If that country is mentioned, it is referred to in a friendly manner and people are given the impression that Soviet Russia is part of the democratic group of countries Jewry was able not only to establish a dangerous centre in the New World for the dissemination of hatred and enmity, but it also succeeded in dividing the world into two warlike camps President Roosevelt has been given the power… to create huge reserves in armaments for a future war which the Jews are deliberately heading for.“ (Fuller, JFC: The Decisive Battles of the Western World vol. 3 pp 372-374.)
Hugh Wilson, the American Ambassador in Berlin until 1938, the year before the war broke out, found anti-Semitism in Germany ‘understandable’. This was because before the advent of the Nazis, „the stage, the press, medicine and law [were] crowded with Jews among the few with money to splurge, a high proportion [were] Jews the leaders of the Bolshevist movement in Russia, a movement desperately feared in Germany, were Jews. One could feel the spreading resentment and hatred.“ (Hugh Wilson: Diplomat between the Wars, Longmans 1941, quoted in Leonard Mosley, Lindbergh, Hodder 1976).
Sir Neville Henderson, British Ambassador in Berlin ‘said further that the hostile attitude in Great Britain was the work of Jews and enemies of the Nazis, which was what Hitler thought himself’ (Taylor, AJP: The Origins of the Second World War Penguin 1965, 1987 etc. p 324).
Is all of this merely attributable to terrible ‘anti-Semitism’?
The economic background to the war is necessary for a fuller understanding, before casting judgement on the originators of these viewpoints.
At the end of the First World War, Germany was essentially tricked [see Paul Johnson A History of the Modern World (1983) p24 and H. Nicholson Peace making 1919 (1933) pp13-16] into paying massive reparations to France and other economic competitors and former belligerent countries in terms of the so-called Treaty of Versailles, thanks to the liberal American President Woodrow Wilson. Germany was declared to be solely responsible for the war, in spite of the fact that ‘Germany did not plot a European war, did not want one, and made genuine efforts, though too belated, to avert one.’ (Professor Sydney B Fay The Origins of the World War (vol. 2 p 552)).
As a result of these massive enforced financial reparations, by 1923 the situation in Germany became desperate and inflation on an astronomical scale became the only way out for the government. Printing presses were engaged to print money around the clock. In 1921 the exchange rate was 75 marks to the dollar. By 1924 this had become about 5 trillion marks to the dollar. This virtually destroyed the German middle class (Koestler The God that Failed p 28), reducing any bank savings to a virtual zero.
According to Sir Arthur Bryant the British historian (Unfinished Victory (1940 pp. 136-144):
‘It was the Jews with their international affiliations and their hereditary flair for finance who were best able to seize such opportunities… They did so with such effect that, even in November 1938, after five years of anti-Semitic legislation and persecution, they still owned, according to the Times correspondent in Berlin, something like a third of the real property in the Reich. Most of it came into their hands during the inflation.. But to those who had lost their all this bewildering transfer seemed a monstrous injustice. After prolonged sufferings they had now been deprived of their last possessions. They saw them pass into the hands of strangers, many of whom had not shared their sacrifices and who cared little or nothing for their national standards and traditions. The Jews obtained a wonderful ascendancy in politics, business and the learned professions (in spite of constituting) less than one percent of the population.
The banks, including the Reichsbank and the big private banks, were practically controlled by them. So were the publishing trade, the cinema, the theatres and a large part of the press all the normal means, in fact, by which public opinion in a civilized country is formed.. The largest newspaper combine in the country with a daily circulation of four millions was a Jewish monopoly.. Every year it became harder and harder for a gentile to gain or keep a foothold in any privileged occupation.. At this time it was not the ‘Aryans’ who exercised racial discrimination. It was a discrimination that operated without violence. It was exercised by a minority against a majority. There was no persecution, only elimination.. It was the contrast between the wealth enjoyed and lavishly displayed by aliens of cosmopolitan tastes, and the poverty and misery of native Germans, that has made anti-Semitism so dangerous and ugly a force in the new Europe. Beggars on horseback are seldom popular, least of all with those whom they have just thrown out of the saddle.“
Goodness gracious, Sir Arthur! What made you get out of the wrong side of the bed?
Strangely enough, a book unexpectedly published by Princeton University Press in 1984, Sarah Gordon (Hitler, Germans and the „Jewish Question“) essentially confirms what Bryant says. According to her, ‘Jews were never a large percentage of the total German population; at no time did they exceed 1% of the population during the years 1871-1933.’ But she adds ‘Jews were over-represented in business, commerce, and public and private service.. They were especially visible in private banking in Berlin, which in 1923 had 150 private Jewish banks, as opposed to only 11 private non-Jewish banks.. They owned 41% of iron and scrap iron firms and 57% of other metal businesses.. Jews were very active in the stock market, particularly in Berlin, where in 1928 they comprised 80% of the leading members of the stock exchange. By 1933, when the Nazis began eliminating Jews from prominent positions, 85% of the brokers on the Berlin Stock exchange were dismissed because of their „race“.. At least a quarter of full professors and instructors (at German universities) had Jewish origins.. In 1905-6 Jewish students comprised 25% of the law and medical students.. In 1931, 50% of the 234 theatre directors in Germany were Jewish, and in Berlin the number was 80%.. In 1929 it was estimated that the per capita income of Jews in Berlin was twice that of other Berlin residents..’ etc etc.
Arthur Koestler confirms the Jewish over-involvement in German publishing. ‘Ullstein’s was a kind of super-trust; the largest organization of its kind in Europe, and probably In the world. They published four daily papers in Berlin alone, among these the venerable Vossische Zeitung, founded in the eighteenth century, and the B.Z. am Mittag, an evening paper.. Apart from these, Ullstein’s published more than a dozen weekly and monthly periodicals, ran their own news service, their own travel agency, etc., and were one of the leading book publishers. The firm was owned by the brothers Ullstein – they were five, like the original Rothschild brothers, and like them also, they were Jews.’ (The God that Failed (1950) ed. RHS Crossman, p 31).
Edgar Mowrer, Berlin correspondent for the Chicago Daily News, wrote an anti-German tract called Germany Puts the Clock Back (published as a Penguin Special and reprinted five times between December 1937 and April 1938). He nevertheless notes ‘In the all-important administration of Prussia, any number of strategic positions came into the hands of Hebrews.. A telephone conversation between three Jews in Ministerial offices could result in the suspension of any periodical or newspaper in the state.. The Jews came in Germany to play in politics and administration that same considerable part that they had previously won by open competition in business, trade, banking, the Press, the arts, the sciences and the intellectual and cultural life of the country. And thereby the impression was strengthened that Germany, a country with a mission of its own, had fallen into the hands of foreigners.’
Mowrer says ‘No one who lived through the period from 1919 to 1926 is likely to forget the sexual promiscuity that prevailed.. Throughout a town like Berlin, hotels and pensions made vast fortunes by letting rooms by the hour or day to baggageless, unregistered guests. Hundreds of cabarets, pleasure resorts and the like served for purposes of getting acquainted and acquiring the proper mood..’ (pp. 153-4). Bryant describes throngs of child prostitutes outside the doors of the great Berlin hotels and restaurants. He adds ‘Most of them (the night clubs and vice-resorts) were owned and managed by Jews. And it was the Jews.. among the promoters of this trade who were remembered in after years.’ (pp. 144-5).
Douglas Reed, Chief Central European correspondent before WWII for the London Times, was profoundly anti-German and anti-Hitler. But nevertheless he reported: ‘I watched the Brown Shirts going from shop to shop with paint pots and daubing on the window panes the word „Jew“, in dripping red letters. The Kurfürstendamm was to me a revelation. I knew that Jews were prominent in business life, but I did not know that they almost monopolized important branches of it. Germany had one Jew to one hundred gentiles, said the statistics; but the fashionable Kurfürstendamm, according to the dripping red legends, had about one gentile shop to ninety-nine Jewish ones.’ (Reed Insanity Fair (1938) p. 152-3). In Reed’s book Disgrace Abounding of the following year he notes ‘In the Berlin (of pre-Hitler years) most of the theatres were Jewish-owned or Jewish-leased, most of the leading film and stage actors were Jews, the plays performed were often by German, Austrian or Hungarian Jews and were staged by Jewish film producers, applauded by Jewish dramatic critics in Jewish newspapers.. The Jews are not cleverer than the Gentiles, if by clever you mean good at their jobs. They ruthlessly exploit the common feeling of Jews, first to get a foothold in a particular trade or calling, then to squeeze the non-Jews out of it.. It is not true that Jews are better journalists than Gentiles. They held all the posts on those Berlin papers because the proprietors and editors were Jewish’ (pp238-9).
The Jewish writer Edwin Black notes ‘For example, in Berlin alone, about 75% of the attorneys and nearly as many of the doctors were Jewish.’ (Black,The Transfer Agreement (1984) p58.
To cap it all, Jews were perceived as dangerous enemies of Germany after Samuel Untermeyer, the leader of the World Jewish Economic Federation, declared war on Germany on August 6 1933. (Edwin Black The Transfer Agreement: the Untold Story of the Secret Pact between the Third Reich and Palestine (1984) pp272-277) According to Black, ‘The one man who most embodied the potential death blow to Germany was Samuel Untermeyer.’ (p 369). This was the culmination of a worldwide boycott of German goods led by international Jewish organizations. The London Daily Express on March 24, 1933 carried the headline Judea Declares War on Germany. The boycott was particularly motivated by the German imposition of the Nuremberg Laws, which ironically were similar in intent and content to the Jewish cultural exclusivism practiced so visibly in present-day Israel (Hannah Arendt, Eichmann in Jerusalem p 7).
Hitler saw the tremendous danger posed to Germany by Communism. He appreciated the desperate need to eliminate this threat, a fact that earned him the immense hatred and animosity of the Jewish organisations and the media and politicians of the west which they could influence. After all, according to the Jewish writer Chaim Bermant, although Jews formed less than five percent of Russia’s population, they formed more than fifty percent of its revolutionaries. According to the Jewish writer Chaim Bermant in his book The Jews (1977, chapter 8):
‘It must be added that most of the leading revolutionaries who convulsed Europe in the final decades of the last century and the first decades of this one, stemmed from prosperous Jewish families.. They were perhaps typified by the father of revolution, Karl Marx.. Thus when, after the chaos of World War I, revolutions broke out all over Europe, Jews were everywhere at the helm; Trotsky, Sverdlov, Kamenev and Zinoviev in Russia, Bela Kun in Hungary, Kurt Eisner in Bavaria, and, most improbable of all, Rosa Luxemburg in Berlin.
‘To many outside observers, the Russian revolution looked like a Jewish conspiracy, especially when it was followed by Jewish-led revolutionary outbreaks in much of central Europe. The leadership of the Bolshevik Party had a preponderance of Jews.. Of the seven members of the Politburo, the inner cabinet of the country, four, Trotsky (Bronstein), Zinoviev (Radomsky), Kamenev (Rosenfeld) and Sverdlov, were Jews.’ Other authors agree with this:
„There has been a tendency to circumvent or simply ignore the significant role of Jewish intellectuals in the German Communist Party, and thereby seriously neglect one of the genuine and objective reasons for increased anti-Semitism during and after World War 1.. The prominence of Jews in the revolution and early Weimar Republic is indisputable, and this was a very serious contributing cause for increased anti-Semitism in post-war years.. It is clear then that the stereotype of Jews as socialists and communists… led many Germans to distrust the Jewish minority as a whole and to brand Jews as enemies of the German nation.“ (Sarah Gordon Hitler, Germans and the ‘Jewish Question’ Princeton University Press (1984) p 23).
„The second paroxysm of strong anti-Semitism came after the critical role of Jews in International Communism and the Russian Revolution and during the economic crises of the 1920s and 30s Anti-Semitism intensified throughout Europe and North America following the perceived and actual centrality of Jews in the Russian Revolution.. Such feelings were not restricted to Germany, or to vulgar extremists like the Nazis. All over Northern Europe and North America, anti-Semitism became the norm in ‘nice society’, and ‘nice society’ included the universities.“ (Martin Bernal, Black Athenavol. 1 pp. 367, 387).
„The major role Jewish leaders played in the November (Russian) revolution was probably more important than any other factor in confirming (Hitler’s) anti-Semitic beliefs.“ (J&S Pool, Who Financed Hitler, p.164).
Hitler came to power in Germany with two main aims, the rectification of the unjust provisions of the Versailles Treaty, and the destruction of the Soviet/ Communist threat to Germany. Strangely enough, contrary to the mythology created by those who had an opposing ethnic agenda, he had no plans or desire for a larger war of conquest. Professor AJP Taylor showed this in his book The Origins of the Second World War, to the disappointment of the professional western political establishment. Taylor says, „The state of German armament in 1939 gives the decisive proof that Hitler was not contemplating general war, and probably not intending war at all“ (p.267), and „Even in 1939 the German army was not equipped for a prolonged war; and in 1940 the German land forces were inferior to the French in everything except leadership“ (p104-5). What occurred in Europe in 1939-41 was the result of unforeseen weaknesses and a tipping of the balance of power, and Hitler was an opportunist ‘who took advantages whenever they offered themselves’ (Taylor). Britain and France declared war on Germany, not the other way around. Hitler wanted peace with Britain, as the German generals admitted (Basil Liddell Hart, The Other Side of the Hill 1948, Pan Books 1983) with regard to the so-called Halt Order at Dunkirk, where Hitler had the opportunity to capture the entire British Army, but chose not to. Liddell Hart, one of Britain’s most respected military historians, quotes the German General von Blumentritt with regard to this Halt Order:
„He (Hitler) then astonished us by speaking with admiration of the British Empire, of the necessity for its existence, and of the civilisation that Britain had brought into the world. He remarked, with a shrug of the shoulders, that the creation of its Empire had been achieved by means that were often harsh, but ‘where there is planning, there are shavings flying’. He compared the British Empire with the Catholic Church saying they were both essential elements of stability in the world. He said that all he wanted from Britain was that she should acknowledge Germany’s position on the Continent. The return of Germany’s colonies would be desirable but not essential, and he would even offer to support Britain with troops if she should be involved in difficulties anywhere..“ (p 200).
According to Liddell Hart, „At the time we believed that the repulse of the Luftwaffe in the ‘Battle over Britain’ had saved her. That is only part of the explanation, the last part of it. The original cause, which goes much deeper, is that Hitler did not want to conquer England. He took little interest in the invasion preparations, and for weeks did nothing to spur them on; then, after a brief impulse to invade, he veered around again and suspended the preparations. He was preparing, instead, to invade Russia“ (p140).
David Irving in the foreword to his book The Warpath (1978) refers to „the discovery… that at no time did this man (Hitler) pose or intend a real threat to Britain or the Empire.“
This gives a completely different complexion, not only to the war, but to the successful suppression of this information during the war and afterwards. Historians today know only too well where the boundaries lie within which they can paint their pictures of the war and its aftermath, and the consequences of venturing beyond those boundaries, irrespective of the evidence. Unfortunately, only too few of them have been prepared to have the courage to break out of this dreadful straitjacket of official and unofficial censorship.
By Denis Wise
David Irving discusses the inevitable slow demise of the “Battleship Auschwitz”, flagship of the Holocaust legend.
Disclaimer: This video is from an Orthodox Christian YouTube channel, which has reuploaded a talk by a jewish man exposing Israel’s hatred of “goyim”.
Jews pretend to be the world’s greatest humanitarians, fighting hard for the rights of women and oppressed groups, yet how do they conduct themselves in Israel?