Jews and the Media

by Der Stürmer

Part II


„Journalists, editors, and politicians for that matter, are going to think twice about criticizing Israel if they know they are going to get thousands of angry calls in a matter of hours. The Jewish lobby is good at orchestrating pressure…Israel’s presence in America is all-pervasive…You don’t want to seem like you are blatantly trying to influence whom they [the media] invite. You have to persuade them that you have the show’s best interests at heart…After the hullabaloo over Lebanon [cluster bombing civilians, etc.], the press doesn’t do anything without calling us for comment.“


„Allowing NBC to televise this matter [revelations about former Prime Minister Peres formulating the U.S. sale of weapons to Iran] is evidence that some U.S. agencies are undertaking a private crusade against Israel. That’s very severe, and is something you just don’t do to a friend.“ (Chicago Tribune 11/24/84)


Israel was caught stealing U.S. technology for cluster bombs and chrome-plating cannon barrels. Subpoenas against Israeli citizens were dropped by „our“ government after Israel pledged to „co-operate.“ (Chicago Tribune 11/24/86).


„All I had held against the Jews was that so many Jews actually were hypocrites in their claim to be friends of the American black man…At the same time I knew that Jews played these roles for a very careful strategic reason: the more prejudice in America that could be focused upon the Negro, the more the white Gentile’s prejudice would keep…off the Jew.(New York Magazine, 2/4/85)


„The role of Jews who write in both the Jewish and [American] general press is to defend Israel.“ (Commentary of Editor Norman Podhoretz)


„Much of what you have read about the war in Lebanon — and even more of what you have seen and heard on television – is simply not true.“ (New Republic Editor-in-chief Martin Peretz)


„The use of force, including beatings, undoubtedly has brought about the impact we wanted — strengthening the [occupied] population’s fear of the Israeli Defense Forces.“ (Defense Minister Yitzhak Rabin)


„If we’d like to launch a war against the Washington Post, we’ll pick the time and place.“ (Spokesman for the Israeli Embassy)


„…[Israel] is able to stifle free speech, control our Congress, and even dictate our foreign policy.“ (They Dare to Speak Out, Paul Findley)


The stage was set for the Pied Piper of Harvard to lead a parade of mesmerized youth to a new dimension of spiritual experience that science had told them did not exist. Timothy Leary’s LSD (along with the other psychedelics) turned out to be the launching pad for mind trips beyond the physical universe of time, space, and matter to a strange dimension where intoxicating nectars were abundant and exotic adventures the norm. For millions it was a ‘mind- blowing’ experience that forever changed their world view.

The Beatles played a key role in leading a generation of youth into drugs. Leary, just back from India, called them ‘the four evangelists.’ Relaxing in his tepee and listening to the Beatles’ album Sergeant Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band, Leary said, ‘The Beatles have taken my place. That latest album – a complete celebration of LSD.’ The Rolling Stones and other big-time Rock groups were evangelists also. In 1969, Life magazine quoted Rock star Jimi Hendrix: ‘…through music, you can hypnotize people…And when you get [them] at [their] weakest point, you can preach into the subconscious minds what we want to say.’ He was frank to admit, ‘Definitely I’m trying to change the world.’ Lloyd Richards, dean of the Yale School of Drama, has said, ‘The arts define whatever [the] new society is that we’re evolving…’ The awesome power of music to mold the thinking of the masses (and particularly of its youth) has been demonstrated by those who unquestionably knew what they were doing. Crosby, of the Crosby, Stills & Nash group boasted:

‘I figured that the only thing to do was to seal their minds. I still think it’s the only thing to do. …I’m not talking about kidnapping… [but] about changing young people’s value systems…’

All of the above were Jews!


„Within the studies and on the screen, the Jews could simply create a new country – an empire of their own, so to speak, one where they would not only be admitted, but would govern as well. The would create its values and myths, its traditions and archetypes.“ (An Empire of Their Own [How the Jews Invented Hollywood], by Neal Gabler (Crown Publishers, inc. N.Y. Copyright 1988, pp. 5-6)


„Television has allowed us to create a common culture, and without it we would not have been able to accomplish our goal.“ (American Story, Public Television, Dr. Morris Janowitz, Prof. of Psychology, Chicago University, December 1, 1984)


„An intelligent man, thoroughly familiar with the newspapers, can, after half an hour conversation, tell anyone what newspaper he reads…even high prelates of Rome, even Cardinals Amette and Mercier show themselves more influenced by the Press of their country than they themselves probably realize…often I have noticed that it is according to his newspaper that one judges the Papal Bull or the speech of the Prime Minister.“ (J. Eberle, Grossmacht Press, Vienna, 1920; The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, p. 171)


„The corruption does not consist in the government exercising influence on the Press; such pressure is often necessary; but in the fact that it is exercised secretly, so that the public believes that it is reading a general opinion when in reality it is a minister who speaks; and the corruption of journalism does not consist in its serving the state, but in its patriotic convictions being in proportion to the amount of a subsidy.“ (Eberle, p. 128, Grossmacht Press, Vienna, p. 128; The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, 173)


„The great telegraphic agencies of the world which are everywhere the principal source of news for the Press (just as wholesale businesses supply the retailers), which spreads far and wide that which the world should know or should not know, and in the form which they wish, these agencies are either Jewish property or obey Jewish direction. The situation is the same for the smaller agencies which supply news to the newspapers of less importance, the great publicity agencies which receive commercial advertisements and which then insert them in the newspapers at the price of a large commission for themselves, are principally in the hands of the Jews; so are many provincial newspapers. Even when the Jewish voice is not heard directly in the Press, there comes into play the great indirect influences, Free Masonry, Finance, etc.

In many places Jews content themselves with this hidden influence, just as in economic life they consider Joint-Stock companies as the most profitable. The editors may quite well be Aryans, it is sufficient that in all important questions they should stand for Jewish interests, or at least that they should not oppose them. This is achieved nearly always by the pressure of advertisement agencies.“ (Eberle, Grossmacht Press, Vienna, p. 204; The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, p. 174)


„The Jewish Press of Vienna sold everything, put everything at a price, artistic fame as well as success in business. No intellectual production, no work of art has been able to see the light of day and reach public notice, without passing by the crucible of the Jewish Press, without having to submit to its criticism or to pay for its approval. If an artist should wish to obtain the approbation of the public, he must of necessity bow before the all powerful Jewish journals. If a young actress, a musician, a singer of talent should wish to make her first appearance and to venture before a more of less numerous audience, she has in most cases not dared to do so, unless after paying tribute to the desires of the Jews. Otherwise she would experience certain failure. It was despotic tyranny re-established, this time for the profit of the Jews and brutally exercised by them in all its plentitude.

Such as it is revealed by its results, the Viennese Press dominated by Judaism, has been absolutely disastrous. It is a work of death which it has accomplished. Around it and outside it all is void. In all the classes of the population are the germs of hatred, the seeds, of discord and of jealously, dissolution and decomposition.“ (F. Trocase, L’Autriche juive, 1898, A. Pierret, ed., Paris; The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, pp. 175-176)


„When I first began to write on Revolution a well known London Publisher said to me; ‘Remember that if you take an anti-revolutionary line you will have the whole literary world against you.’ This appeared to me extraordinary. Why should the literary world sympathize with a movement which, from the French revolution onwards, has always been directed against literature, art, and science, and has openly proclaimed its aim to exalt the manual workers over the intelligentsia? ‘Writers must be proscribed as the most dangerous enemies of the people’ said Robespierre; his colleague Dumas said all clever men should be guillotined. The system of persecutions against men of talents was organized…they cried out in the Sections (of Paris) ‘Beware of that man for he has written a book.’ Precisely the same policy has been followed in Russia under moderate socialism in Germany the professors, not the ‘people,’ are starving in garrets. Yet the whole Press of our country is permeated with subversive influences. Not merely in partisan works, but in manuals of history or literature for use in schools, Burke is reproached for warning us against the French Revolution and Carlyle’s panegyric is applauded. And whilst every slip on the part of an anti-revolutionary writer is seized on by the critics and held up as an example of the whole, the most glaring errors not only of conclusions but of facts pass unchallenged if they happen to be committed by a partisan of the movement. The principle laid down by Collot d’Herbois still holds good: ‘Tout est permis pour quiconque agit dans le sens de la revolution.’

All this was unknown to me when I first embarked on my work. I knew that French writers of the past had distorted facts to suit their own political views, that conspiracy of history is still directed by certain influences in the Masonic lodges and the Sorbonne [The facilities of literature and science of the University of Paris]; I did not know that this conspiracy was being carried on in this country. Therefore, the publisher’s warning did not daunt me. If I was wrong either in my conclusions or facts I was prepared to be challenged. Should not years of laborious historical research meet either with recognition or with reasoned and scholarly refutation?

But although my book received a great many generous appreciative reviews in the Press, criticisms which were hostile took a form which I had never anticipated. Not a single honest attempt was made to refute either my French Revolution or World Revolution by the usual methods of controversy; Statements founded on documentary evidence were met with flat contradiction unsupported by a shred of counter evidence. In general the plan adopted was not to disprove, but to discredit by means of flagrant misquotations, by attributing to me views I had never expressed, or even by means of offensive personalities. It will surely be admitted that this method of attack is unparalleled in any other sphere of literary controversy.“ (N.H. Webster, Secret Societies and Subversive Movements, London, 1924, Preface; The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, pp. 179-180)

Advertisements