Der Stürmer

The official blog of the site "Der Stürmer" – http://der-stuermer.org

Month: March, 2018

Adolf Hitler about a Jewish State in Palestine

Advertisements

Jews and the Media

Part II


„Journalists, editors, and politicians for that matter, are going to think twice about criticizing Israel if they know they are going to get thousands of angry calls in a matter of hours. The Jewish lobby is good at orchestrating pressure…Israel’s presence in America is all-pervasive…You don’t want to seem like you are blatantly trying to influence whom they [the media] invite. You have to persuade them that you have the show’s best interests at heart…After the hullabaloo over Lebanon [cluster bombing civilians, etc.], the press doesn’t do anything without calling us for comment.“


„Allowing NBC to televise this matter [revelations about former Prime Minister Peres formulating the U.S. sale of weapons to Iran] is evidence that some U.S. agencies are undertaking a private crusade against Israel. That’s very severe, and is something you just don’t do to a friend.“ (Chicago Tribune 11/24/84)


Israel was caught stealing U.S. technology for cluster bombs and chrome-plating cannon barrels. Subpoenas against Israeli citizens were dropped by „our“ government after Israel pledged to „co-operate.“ (Chicago Tribune 11/24/86).


„All I had held against the Jews was that so many Jews actually were hypocrites in their claim to be friends of the American black man…At the same time I knew that Jews played these roles for a very careful strategic reason: the more prejudice in America that could be focused upon the Negro, the more the white Gentile’s prejudice would keep…off the Jew.(New York Magazine, 2/4/85)


„The role of Jews who write in both the Jewish and [American] general press is to defend Israel.“ (Commentary of Editor Norman Podhoretz)


„Much of what you have read about the war in Lebanon — and even more of what you have seen and heard on television – is simply not true.“ (New Republic Editor-in-chief Martin Peretz)


„The use of force, including beatings, undoubtedly has brought about the impact we wanted — strengthening the [occupied] population’s fear of the Israeli Defense Forces.“ (Defense Minister Yitzhak Rabin)


„If we’d like to launch a war against the Washington Post, we’ll pick the time and place.“ (Spokesman for the Israeli Embassy)


„…[Israel] is able to stifle free speech, control our Congress, and even dictate our foreign policy.“ (They Dare to Speak Out, Paul Findley)


The stage was set for the Pied Piper of Harvard to lead a parade of mesmerized youth to a new dimension of spiritual experience that science had told them did not exist. Timothy Leary’s LSD (along with the other psychedelics) turned out to be the launching pad for mind trips beyond the physical universe of time, space, and matter to a strange dimension where intoxicating nectars were abundant and exotic adventures the norm. For millions it was a ‘mind- blowing’ experience that forever changed their world view.

The Beatles played a key role in leading a generation of youth into drugs. Leary, just back from India, called them ‘the four evangelists.’ Relaxing in his tepee and listening to the Beatles’ album Sergeant Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band, Leary said, ‘The Beatles have taken my place. That latest album – a complete celebration of LSD.’ The Rolling Stones and other big-time Rock groups were evangelists also. In 1969, Life magazine quoted Rock star Jimi Hendrix: ‘…through music, you can hypnotize people…And when you get [them] at [their] weakest point, you can preach into the subconscious minds what we want to say.’ He was frank to admit, ‘Definitely I’m trying to change the world.’ Lloyd Richards, dean of the Yale School of Drama, has said, ‘The arts define whatever [the] new society is that we’re evolving…’ The awesome power of music to mold the thinking of the masses (and particularly of its youth) has been demonstrated by those who unquestionably knew what they were doing. Crosby, of the Crosby, Stills & Nash group boasted:

‘I figured that the only thing to do was to seal their minds. I still think it’s the only thing to do. …I’m not talking about kidnapping… [but] about changing young people’s value systems…’

All of the above were Jews!


„Within the studies and on the screen, the Jews could simply create a new country – an empire of their own, so to speak, one where they would not only be admitted, but would govern as well. The would create its values and myths, its traditions and archetypes.“ (An Empire of Their Own [How the Jews Invented Hollywood], by Neal Gabler (Crown Publishers, inc. N.Y. Copyright 1988, pp. 5-6)


„Television has allowed us to create a common culture, and without it we would not have been able to accomplish our goal.“ (American Story, Public Television, Dr. Morris Janowitz, Prof. of Psychology, Chicago University, December 1, 1984)


„An intelligent man, thoroughly familiar with the newspapers, can, after half an hour conversation, tell anyone what newspaper he reads…even high prelates of Rome, even Cardinals Amette and Mercier show themselves more influenced by the Press of their country than they themselves probably realize…often I have noticed that it is according to his newspaper that one judges the Papal Bull or the speech of the Prime Minister.“ (J. Eberle, Grossmacht Press, Vienna, 1920; The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, p. 171)


„The corruption does not consist in the government exercising influence on the Press; such pressure is often necessary; but in the fact that it is exercised secretly, so that the public believes that it is reading a general opinion when in reality it is a minister who speaks; and the corruption of journalism does not consist in its serving the state, but in its patriotic convictions being in proportion to the amount of a subsidy.“ (Eberle, p. 128, Grossmacht Press, Vienna, p. 128; The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, 173)


„The great telegraphic agencies of the world which are everywhere the principal source of news for the Press (just as wholesale businesses supply the retailers), which spreads far and wide that which the world should know or should not know, and in the form which they wish, these agencies are either Jewish property or obey Jewish direction. The situation is the same for the smaller agencies which supply news to the newspapers of less importance, the great publicity agencies which receive commercial advertisements and which then insert them in the newspapers at the price of a large commission for themselves, are principally in the hands of the Jews; so are many provincial newspapers. Even when the Jewish voice is not heard directly in the Press, there comes into play the great indirect influences, Free Masonry, Finance, etc.

In many places Jews content themselves with this hidden influence, just as in economic life they consider Joint-Stock companies as the most profitable. The editors may quite well be Aryans, it is sufficient that in all important questions they should stand for Jewish interests, or at least that they should not oppose them. This is achieved nearly always by the pressure of advertisement agencies.“ (Eberle, Grossmacht Press, Vienna, p. 204; The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, p. 174)


„The Jewish Press of Vienna sold everything, put everything at a price, artistic fame as well as success in business. No intellectual production, no work of art has been able to see the light of day and reach public notice, without passing by the crucible of the Jewish Press, without having to submit to its criticism or to pay for its approval. If an artist should wish to obtain the approbation of the public, he must of necessity bow before the all powerful Jewish journals. If a young actress, a musician, a singer of talent should wish to make her first appearance and to venture before a more of less numerous audience, she has in most cases not dared to do so, unless after paying tribute to the desires of the Jews. Otherwise she would experience certain failure. It was despotic tyranny re-established, this time for the profit of the Jews and brutally exercised by them in all its plentitude.

Such as it is revealed by its results, the Viennese Press dominated by Judaism, has been absolutely disastrous. It is a work of death which it has accomplished. Around it and outside it all is void. In all the classes of the population are the germs of hatred, the seeds, of discord and of jealously, dissolution and decomposition.“ (F. Trocase, L’Autriche juive, 1898, A. Pierret, ed., Paris; The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, pp. 175-176)


„When I first began to write on Revolution a well known London Publisher said to me; ‘Remember that if you take an anti-revolutionary line you will have the whole literary world against you.’ This appeared to me extraordinary. Why should the literary world sympathize with a movement which, from the French revolution onwards, has always been directed against literature, art, and science, and has openly proclaimed its aim to exalt the manual workers over the intelligentsia? ‘Writers must be proscribed as the most dangerous enemies of the people’ said Robespierre; his colleague Dumas said all clever men should be guillotined. The system of persecutions against men of talents was organized…they cried out in the Sections (of Paris) ‘Beware of that man for he has written a book.’ Precisely the same policy has been followed in Russia under moderate socialism in Germany the professors, not the ‘people,’ are starving in garrets. Yet the whole Press of our country is permeated with subversive influences. Not merely in partisan works, but in manuals of history or literature for use in schools, Burke is reproached for warning us against the French Revolution and Carlyle’s panegyric is applauded. And whilst every slip on the part of an anti-revolutionary writer is seized on by the critics and held up as an example of the whole, the most glaring errors not only of conclusions but of facts pass unchallenged if they happen to be committed by a partisan of the movement. The principle laid down by Collot d’Herbois still holds good: ‘Tout est permis pour quiconque agit dans le sens de la revolution.’

All this was unknown to me when I first embarked on my work. I knew that French writers of the past had distorted facts to suit their own political views, that conspiracy of history is still directed by certain influences in the Masonic lodges and the Sorbonne [The facilities of literature and science of the University of Paris]; I did not know that this conspiracy was being carried on in this country. Therefore, the publisher’s warning did not daunt me. If I was wrong either in my conclusions or facts I was prepared to be challenged. Should not years of laborious historical research meet either with recognition or with reasoned and scholarly refutation?

But although my book received a great many generous appreciative reviews in the Press, criticisms which were hostile took a form which I had never anticipated. Not a single honest attempt was made to refute either my French Revolution or World Revolution by the usual methods of controversy; Statements founded on documentary evidence were met with flat contradiction unsupported by a shred of counter evidence. In general the plan adopted was not to disprove, but to discredit by means of flagrant misquotations, by attributing to me views I had never expressed, or even by means of offensive personalities. It will surely be admitted that this method of attack is unparalleled in any other sphere of literary controversy.“ (N.H. Webster, Secret Societies and Subversive Movements, London, 1924, Preface; The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, pp. 179-180)

Dr. David Duke – “Exposing the Jew World Order”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=19RW48FbHDs&bpctr=1521792873

Talk given 5-22-16 (approx. 1 hr. 30 mins)

Topics included in this talk: the Jew Problem, David’s new upcoming book, awakening and educating the sheeple, The Jews and the Immigration crisis, Jew Zuckerberg and his Facebook censorship, ISIS deception, current state of the USA, elections, Trump, message of Fatima and Russia crucial to Counter Revolution, Jew gun grab, Jews and communism/socialism, Anti-Zionists are “Neo-Nazis”?, Catholic Resistance, Bishop Williamson, Fr. Coughlin, Benjamin Freedman, Vatican II, apostasy, New Mass and the Jews, quotes from Scripture and Tradition against the Jews, Holohoax, Anti-Semitism farce, Jews and Revolution, Jew Control of society at every level in every sector, gentile collaboration, Pope St. Pius X against the Jews/Zionism and MUCH more…. This is a can’t miss talk!

Our Struggle

Germany and America

Source: American Dissident Voices broadcast, November 13th 1999

by Dr. William L. Pierce

Last week we talked about conditions in Germany, where I had been to address a congress of the National Democratic Party of Germany. I emphasized two things: the racial and cultural degradation of Germany during 54 years of rule by an Occupation government and the lack of freedom of Germans today: specifically, their lack of freedom of speech and freedom of assembly. That’s as good a place as any to start today.

What I want to talk about today is the evidence that the same people who are degrading Germany and preventing Germans from speaking and assembling freely are degrading America and are doing their damnedest to take away Americans’ freedom as well. Much of the evidence I’ll give you is merely suggestive. With my limited investigative resources that’s all I can do. You’ll have to make your own judgment on what the evidence means.

Let’s begin with the case of Gary Lauck. Mr. Lauck is a native of Lincoln, Nebraska. For years he published materials characterized by the Jewish media here as “neo-Nazi,” and he shipped these materials to friends in Germany, who distributed them to the German public through “underground” channels, much to the annoyance of the German government, which does not permit Germans to read such materials. In fact, the German government complained long and loud about Lauck, and the Clinton government in Washington apologized and said that, unfortunately, there was nothing it could do to punish Lauck or stop his publishing activity, since, unfortunately, the U.S. Constitution permits American citizens to do that sort of thing. Well, actually there was something the Clinton government could do to stop Lauck, and that’s what it did. In 1995, when Lauck was visiting friends in Denmark, Mr. Clinton’s government, which keeps track of the coming and going of U.S. citizens, tipped off the secret police in Germany, the Verfassungschutz, that Lauck was in Denmark. The Verfassungschutz asked the Danish government, which since the Second World War has not been much better than the German government, to arrest Lauck and extradite him to Germany. And that’s what happened. The German government then put Lauck in prison for four years.

Think about it. Lauck broke no law in the United States, and he broke no law in Germany. The German government imprisoned Lauck because of his perfectly legal activities in the United States: because of his Constitutionally protected activities. And the Clinton government helped the German government do it. The Jews and the other Clintonistas like to talk about “freedom” and “civil rights” and so on, but what they mean is freedom for homosexuals to flaunt their life-style in public and become Boy Scout leaders, freedom for Haitians and Mexicans to pour across our borders unchecked, freedom for feminists to make rules which everyone else must obey, freedom for Blacks to mug and rape Whites in the secure knowledge that the Whites can’t defend themselves because the government has taken away their guns. That’s what they mean by “freedom.”

The Clintonistas do not mean freedom for White Americans to exercise their Constitutional rights. They hate the idea of civil rights for heterosexual White males. That scares them. Heterosexual White males are the enemy. They don’t deserve freedom. That is what the Clintonistas really believe. They couldn’t figure a way to lock up Lauck themselves, so they arranged for the German government to do it. And then they grinned and sat on their hands for four years while Lauck rotted in a German prison. Not a word in the mass media over here and not a word of protest from the Clinton government to the German government: not a single letter from Madeleine Albright or any of the other Jews running our State Department.

Can you imagine the hullabaloo Madeleine Albright would have raised if a Jew from the United States, while visiting Jordan, say, were arrested by the Jordanian government and extradited to Iraq at the request of Saddam Hussein, and then were sentenced to four years in an Iraqi prison because while in the United States he had published unkind things about Saddam? Can you imagine how that horrid, old Jewess would shriek until Saddam released the Jew and apologized? I mean, really, the Clinton State Department would have threatened war and would have been happy to blast Baghdad with more cruise missiles. But when precisely the same thing happens to an American citizen who is a heterosexual White male like Lauck, the Clinton government ignores it, and the mass media ignore it. They really believe that Lauck shouldn’t have freedom of speech, because he publishes Politically Incorrect things. The Jews and their collaborators in the Clinton government are really happy that they were able to punish Lauck for publishing things they don’t approve of.

Well, Gary Lauck served his four years in a German prison and returned to the United States earlier this year. Then he decided to buy a handgun and applied for a pistol permit as required by Nebraska law. On the application he answered “no” to a question as to whether or not he is a convicted felon, because he has never been convicted of a felony in the United States, and he considered his conviction in a German court for his exercise of his Constitutional rights in the United States to be spurious and of no legal validity. The state of Nebraska routinely checks all applications for pistol permits with the FBI, and the FBI reported back that Lauck was indeed a convicted felon because of the German government’s charges against him. He was arrested last week and charged with swearing falsely on his application for a permit. He faces up to five years in prison and a $10,000 fine. The Jews in the Clinton government are really giggling over this one, but I’ll bet you haven’t even heard about it before this broadcast, unless you happen to live in Lincoln, Nebraska. What this amounts to is an affirmation by the U.S. government of the German government’s treatment of Lauck.

You know, what was done to Gary Lauck is really outrageous. It shouldn’t happen to an American citizen. The Clinton government not only permitted it to happen without protest but actually caused it to happen because the Clintonistas don’t like what Lauck publishes. They really do want to have the same sort of laws in the United States which the Jews have imposed on Germany, so that only Politically Correct speech is protected by the Constitution. They lie about it. They put on a big show of defending free speech, but it is all pretense and deception.

Here’s another example of their deceit which shows the parallels between what they’ve done to Germany and what they’re doing to America. First a little background: Since the end of the Second World War the biggest Jewish racket has been the bleeding of Germans for “reparations.” The so-called “Holocaust” has been used to extract more than 60 billion dollars from the German people supposedly to compensate Jews for the suffering and loss they claim to have experienced during the war as a result of Hitler’s anti-Jewish policies. “Oi, veh! The Nazis took all our gold and put us in gas chambers. So now you must pay us!” Well, this racket worked for more than 50 years, but many Germans were getting tired of it. They said, “The Nazis are all dead. We weren’t born until after the war. We aren’t Nazis. We don’t owe you anything.”

So the Jews shifted their tactic. They said, “Oi, veh. It vasnt chust the Nazis. It vas all the Germans. You all persecuted us.” A Jewish professor at Harvard, Daniel Goldhagen, came out with a book titled Hitler’s Willing Executioners, the theme of which was that all Germans, not just the Nazis, had hated and mistreated Jews, and so all Germans owe the Jews reparations. The book was given an inordinate amount of publicity by the Jewish media, and the browbeaten Germans began groveling and apologizing again. Just to drive the point home, the Jews and their collaborators organized a traveling photo exhibit to persuade the German people that the entire German military establishment, not just Hitler’s elite SS troops, had persecuted the Jews and committed atrocities during the war. Therefore, all the Germans still owe the Jews. The exhibit, titled War of Extermination: Crimes of the Wehrmacht, 1941-1944, has more than 800 photographs supposedly showing atrocities committed by German soldiers. During the four years this exhibit has been traveling around Germany, German veterans and other patriots have protested that many of the photographs are fakes and that the whole exhibit, in effect, is a lie intended to make Germans feel guilty and to extort more payments from them.

Despite the protests, the German lemmings continued to view the exhibit and to feel guilty as intended. And I should mention that Jews are not the only ones promoting it. Treasonous German liberals, in business, politics, and the academy, who have hitched their wagons to the Jewish star and tried to outdo one another in expressing hatred for their own people, are enthusiastic supporters of the exhibit. Its biggest financial support comes from a billionaire German cigarette maker, Jan Reemtsma. The exhibit was scheduled to begin a tour of the United States next month, opening in New York on December 2.

Well, all that was changed a few days ago, when a few courageous historians came forward with convincing arguments that the exhibit is, in fact, a lie. I say “courageous” because in Germany the government puts people in prison for contradicting any aspect of the “Holocaust” story. The historians presented irrefutable evidence that several of the “atrocity” photographs had been staged after the war, and that others, while showing genuine atrocities, were of atrocities committed by the Soviet secret police, the NKVD. The historians pointed out that piles of bodies in some of the photographs, claimed to be victims of the Wehrmacht, are in fact Polish, German, and Baltic civilians murdered by the Soviet NKVD. This is especially embarrassing to the exhibit’s promoters, because the NKVD at the time the photographs were taken was led and heavily staffed by Soviet Jews. So the exhibit has been withdrawn while the matter is studied. It will not be coming to New York next month after all. And that’s too bad, because it might do the American lemmings some good to see what the Jews — those poor, innocent, persecuted darlings — were themselves doing to non-Jews during the war. But let me tell you something: If it weren’t for the fact that the evidence of fraud uncovered by a few courageous historians is beginning to find its way into the historical journals, where it no longer can be ignored, the promoters of this anti-Wehrmacht exhibit would have brazenly continued their road show, knowingly deceiving Germans and Americans in order to promote their own Jewish agenda.

Do you begin to see what all of this is suggesting? Let me give you another recent example. Before Madeleine Albright launched her murderous war against Serbia earlier this year, Jewish television was full of atrocity stories about what the terrible, Nazi-like Serbs were doing to the poor, innocent, persecuted Albanians in Serbia’s Kosovo province. Albright’s Jewish spokesman, James Rubin, was on the air every night moaning about the “genocide” and the “ethnic cleansing” in Kosovo. Before the bombing began Rubin claimed that 2,500 Albanians already had been killed in Kosovo by the Serbs. Rubin and other Jews in the government and the media were constantly and stridently calling for war — except that they didn’t call it “war”; they called it “humanitarian intervention.”

Careful observers may have noted that many of the alleged Serb atrocities being shown to American television viewers during the prewar period had an uncanny similarity to each other. We saw the same Albanian corpse or alleged massacre site on our screens night after night, just filmed from a different angle and with slightly different commentary each time. The intent clearly was to make a few killings seem like many. And the politicians participated in the deceit. Before the bombing started, the Jews’ number one step’n’fetchit in Britain, Clinton clone Tony Blair, announced, and I quote, “We must act to save thousands of innocent men, women, and children from humanitarian catastrophe, from death, barbarism, and ethnic cleansing by a brutal dictatorship.”

Eight weeks after the bombing started, when the war was coming under increasing criticism from dissidents, in an effort to build voter support for the war, Clinton’s Jewish Secretary of Defense William Cohen announced that as many as 100,000 Albanians of military age had been murdered in Kosovo by the Serbs. Tony Blair’s ministers were not quite as hyperbolic as Bill Clinton’s, but Blair’s Foreign Minister Geoff Hoon announced on June 17, and I quote: “According to the reports we have gathered . . . it appears that around 10,000 people have been killed in more than 100 massacres. The final toll may be much worse.”

After Slobodan Milosevic finally caved in and permitted NATO to send its troops into Serbia, the media continued to announce huge numbers of Albanians supposedly murdered by the Serbs. When NATO had occupied all of Kosovo province, we still were hearing figures of 44,000 butchered Albanians, hundreds of mass graves, etc. Then the figure of murdered Albanians dropped to 22,000, then to 11,000. Bernard Kouchner, the United Nations chief administrator in occupied Kosovo, announced that 11,000 bodies already had been found in mass graves throughout Kosovo. Altogether 20 forensic teams were sent in to dig up the mass graves and count the bodies.

Well, that was more than four months ago, and somehow all of the body-hunters, including a team from the FBI, actually have found a grand total of 670 bodies of Albanians, and not all of those were killed by Serbs. It’s beginning to look as if that’s all they will find. That’s fewer Albanians than Madeleine Albright killed accidentally, when her “smart” bombs went astray or her trigger-happy pilots shot up refugee columns. And of course, it’s a lot less than the number of Serbs murdered by KLA gangsters under NATO protection since the bombing stopped in June. Those murders, by the way, are continuing on a daily basis, but the Jewish media no longer bother to report them.

I mean, it’s becoming a bit embarrassing for them. If they begin reporting the continuing murder of Serb civilians by the KLA, that might remind people to ask how many Albanians the Serbs killed, how many mass graves have been uncovered, and so on. It’s hard enough to keep the more independent-minded UN inspectors from blurting out the facts. The chief Spanish forensic inspector, Juan Lopez Palafox, told a Spanish newspaper, and I quote “They told us that we should prepare ourselves to perform more than 2,000 autopsies. The result is very different. We found only 187 cadavers, and now we are going to return [to Spain].”

Inspectors were told that there was a mass grave near the town of Ljubenic containing 350 bodies. They dug everything up and found just seven bodies. They were told that the bodies of 700 Albanians had been dumped down mine shafts at Trepca, in northern Kosovo. After an exhaustive search inspectors concluded that there were no bodies at all there.

It might seem a bit reckless of the Jews to try to justify an unpopular war, such as the recent one against Serbia, with lots of phony atrocity stories they knew wouldn’t stand up to scrutiny. But just consider the way it has worked out. Madeleine Albright, Bill Clinton, and Tony Blair still are able to claim in public that their murderous bombing of Serbia was a “humanitarian mission,” that they saved the lives of many thousands of Albanians by chasing the Serb Army out of Kosovo, and that their so-called “peacekeeping” troops have brought peace and security to the region. They are able to claim these things despite the facts I have cited, because only a few voters know the truth. Only a few voters are interested in the truth. Most voters know only what they see on network television, and network television isn’t about to make Madeleine or Bill or Tony look bad. It was a Jewish war, and so it had to be a good war, a justified war.

I’ll reiterate: in a democracy like we have in the United States, the truth isn’t really important. What’s important is what the mass of voters believe to be true, and since the mass of voters never investigate anything or even do any independent reading, whoever controls television controls what they believe. Someone like Gary Lauck can have his Constitutional rights violated, and the voters never will know about it, because it won’t be on network television.

The Jews can cook up the most outrageous atrocity stories, whether about what supposedly happened to them during the Second World War or what the Serbs supposedly did to the Albanians before Madeleine began her bombing, and the stories don’t really have to hold water in order to be effective. They can be the flimsiest and most transparent lies, because the average voter simply isn’t discriminating enough to see through them. They believe whatever Tom Brokaw or Dan Rather or Peter Jennings tells them to believe.

I’m really surprised that the phony Wehrmacht atrocity exhibit was pulled just because a few historians were raising hell about faked photographs and NKVD Jews murdering Gentile civilians and blaming it on the Germans. The sports fans and soccer moms, who learn what’s going on from Tom Brokaw, Dan Rather, and Peter Jennings, certainly never would have learned what the historians were saying. If the German liberals weren’t so wishy-washy, the historians simply could have been thrown in prison for “hate speech,” the exhibit could open in New York as scheduled, and the lemmings would have believed everything they were told.

One thing that may have played a role in killing the phony Wehrmacht exhibit, is that information about the faked photos in it has been circulating on the Internet during the past couple of weeks. The Jews are working hard to keep what they call “hate” off the Internet. The Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith, the Simon Wiesenthal Center, and other Jewish groups are lobbying to make it mandatory to have what they call “hate filters” installed on all school and library computers, so that the kiddies can’t have their minds polluted by inconvenient facts about phony Wehrmacht atrocities or phony gas chamber stories or phony Serb massacres of Albanians.

Well, my point today is that what is happening in Germany and what is happening in the United States are connected. They are connected by the same lies told by the same liars. Many of the things that have been done to Germany-mass immigration by non-Whites, the cultural degradation, the non-White crime, and so on-also have been done to the United States. The loss of our freedom of speech and assembly will be next.

Thanks for being with me again today.

New World Order – Communism by the Backdoor – Part 5

By Denis Wise

This episode shows the infiltration of the Roman Catholic Church.

Part 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XSYOyNvCFPQ
Part 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpfBiwub-LQ
Part 3: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cYhcbDnemLY
Part 4: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8_bqHGIDo9U

The 80-th anniversary of the Anschluss – Austria is Awaken!

The Awaken Austria!

Two days ago was the 80-th anniversary of the Anschluss (the unification) of Austria with the German Reich! 99,7% of the Austrian Germans supported the unification! The private footage in these videos unconditionally proves it!

 Heil Hitler!

Adolf Hitler – proclamation for the Anschluss of Austria to the Great German Reich – 12.03.1938

(broadcast read by Dr. Goebbels)

Germans!

For years we have witnessed the fate of our fellow Germans in Austria with deep distress. An eternal historical bond, severed only by the events of the year 1866 but forged anew in the World War, has from time immemorial destined Austria to take its place in the German national community and share its fate. The suffering which was imposed on this country, first from outside and then from within, we experienced as our own, and we know that the misfortunes of the Reich caused millions of German Austrians similar anxiety and concern!

When the German nation regained the proud self-confidence of a great People, thanks to the triumph of the ideals of National Socialism, in Austria a new period of suffering and most bitter adversity began. A regime with no legal mandate was attempting by means of the most brutal terror and physical mistreatment as well as punitive and destructive economic measures, to maintain an existence which was rejected by the vast majority of the Austrian People. Thus, we as a great People saw how a numerically small minority, which had simply been able to seize the necessary instruments of power, was suppressing more than six million people with whom we share a common origin. Their political disenfranchisement and the deprivation of their freedom was accompanied by an economic decline which was a shocking contrast to the blossoming of new life in Germany.

Who could blame these unfortunate fellow Germans if they looked toward the Reich with longing eyes? To that Germany with which their forefathers had been united for so many centuries, with which they had once fought shoulder to shoulder in the most terrible of all wars, whose culture was their culture and to which they themselves had contributed their most cherished values in so many areas. To suppress these longings was to condemn hundreds of thousands of people to the most profound spiritual distress. Whereas years ago, this suffering was still borne patiently, as the prestige of the Reich steadily increased, the determination to end this oppression became stronger and stronger.

Germans! In recent years I have tried to warn the former rulers in Austria not to continue on this path. Only a maniac could believe that suppression and terror can deprive human beings of their love of their own People. European history proves that this causes nothing but more intense fanaticism. This fanaticism then forces the suppressor to employ ever more cruel and violent methods, which in turn only increase the revulsion and hatred felt by the victims of this violence.

I also tried to convince those in power that in the long run it is impossible, because it is unworthy, for a great nation to be forced constantly to watch as a People of the same nationality are persecuted and incarcerated merely because of their origin, or their allegiance to a People, or their dedication to an idea. Germany alone has had to accept more than 40,000 refugees, 10,000 others have been in jails, prison cells and holding camps in this small land. Hundreds of thousands have been made beggars, reduced to misery and poverty. In the long run no nation in the world could tolerate such conditions on its borders without itself deserving same disrespect.

In 1936 I tried to find some way which could offer the prospect of alleviating the tragic fate of this German brother nation, and in this way perhaps achieve genuine reconciliation. The Agreement of July 11 was signed only to be breached a moment later. The vast majority remained deprived of their rights. Their humiliating position as a pariah in this state was in no way changed. Anyone who openly supported the ideal of one German nation continued to be persecuted, no matter whether he was a National Socialist street labourer or an old meritorious army commander who had fought in the World War.

I tried a second time to reach an understanding. I attempted to explain to the representative of this regime, who without any legitimate mandate of his own stood before me in my capacity as the elected leader of the German People, I tried to explain to him that in the long run this situation would become intolerable, since the growing outrage of the Austrian People could not be suppressed forever by the increasing use of force, and that from a certain point in time the Reich would find it impossible to continue to stand idly by and silently observe such outrageous treatment.

Today, when even the solution to colonial problems must take into consideration the right of inferior nations to self-determination, it is intolerable that six and a half million members of an old and great civilized People are in practical terms deprived of these rights by the nature of the governing regime. Hence in a new agreement I wanted all Germans in this country to be granted the same rights and be subject to the same obligations. This agreement was to fulfil the terms of the Treaty of July 11 1936.

A few weeks later it unfortunately became obvious that the men of the Austrian government in power at that time had no intention of complying with the terms of this agreement. However, in order to acquire an alibi for their continued failure to grant equal rights to the Austrian Germans, a plebiscite was devised which was intended to finally deprive the majority in this country of its rights! The modalities of this procedure were to be unique. A country which has not had an election for many years, which lacks all the documentation required to compile voters’ lists, announces a vote which is to take place within just three and a half days.

There are no electoral lists. There are no voters’ cards. There is no scrutiny of the eligibility to vote. There is no obligation to preserve secret ballot. There is no guarantee that the voting will be conducted with impartiality. There is no method of ensuring fair counting of the votes, and so on. If these are the methods to give a regime legality, then we National Socialists in the German Reich were utter fools for 15 years! We went through a hundred election campaigns and took great pains to gain the approval of the German People!

When the late Reichspräsident finally called upon me to form the government, I was the leader of the party which had by far the strongest support in the Reich. Since then I have repeatedly sought to have the legality of my existence and my actions confirmed by the German People, and it was confirmed. If the methods Herr Schuschnigg wanted to use were the right ones, then the plebiscite we once held in the Saar can only have been a device to harass a People whose return to the Reich we wanted to make more difficult. We, however, do not subscribe to that view. I believe we can all be proud that it was in this very plebiscite in the Saar that we received such an indisputable vote of confidence from the German People.

The German People of Austria themselves finally rose up in protest against this unprecedented attempt at election fraud. If, however, it was again the intention of the regime to simply crush the protest movement with brute force, the result could only be a new civil war. The German Reich will, however, henceforth not permit Germans to be persecuted in this territory because of their membership in our nation or because they profess certain views. It wants peace and order.

I have therefore decided to offer the millions of Germans in Austria the assistance of the Reich. Since this morning soldiers of the German armed forces have been crossing all of the German-Austrian borders. Armoured units, infantry divisions and SS units on the ground and the German Luftwaffe in the skies, summoned by the new National Socialist Government in Vienna, will ensure that the Austrian People are within the very near future finally given the opportunity to determine for themselves their future, and thus their fate, through a genuine plebiscite. And these units are supported by the will and determination of the entire German nation.

I myself, as Führer and Chancellor of the German People, will be happy once again to be able to enter the country which is also my homeland as a German and a free citizen. The world, however, shall see for itself that for the German People in Austria these days are filled with hours of blissful joy and deep emotion. They regard their brothers who have come to their aid as saviours who have rescued them from great distress!

Long live the National Socialist German Reich! Long live National Socialist German Austria!

Berlin, March 12, 1938
Adolf Hitler

Caricatures from “Der Stürmer” – translated in English and colourized!

Unknown Date – Part 5

The ADL & SPLC and the War on Free Speech

Source: http://www.renegadetribune.com/adl-splc-war-free-speech/

Every morning when I arrive at work, I check the websites of some of the local news organizations as a matter of routine. On this particular day, the front page of one of these news sites had a story about all the “hate groups” that operate in the region, and naturally cited the ADL and SPLC for their “facts.” This got me thinking about these groups, and reaffirmed by the comments section of the article, how no one seems to question who they actually are and how exactly they “provide a service” to the public.

The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) are not necessarily well-known entities to most of the public at large. They are names that most have heard in passing but have elicited little meaningful thought for most. This is tremendously problematic for those of us who are well aware of who they are and what they do. The ADL and SPLC are, for all intents and purposes, foreign espionage operations that are given the green light to operate on American soil, intimidating and threatening American citizens and exercising extra-judicial censorship authority, in blatant violation of the First Amendment. The ADL in particular is an extension of B’nai B’rith, a Jewish-Masonic “philanthropic organization” established by “German” Jewish immigrants to the United States. B’nai B’rith operates under the guise of an advocacy organization but is in actuality an overseas branch of the Israeli intelligence agency Mossad. While openly striving to further explicitly Jewish interests, the ADL functions as an unaccountable, unmonitored intelligence-gathering operation, exercising extra-legal, extra-judicial authority over American citizens’ first amendment rights. The manner in which the ADL wields its influence over a supposedly-sovereign people, completely free of the constraints that would normally apply to such a group, should be unconscionable to every American citizen. Yet their reign of anti-white terror rolls on unabated.

Anyone who has used Twitter even semi-regularly over the past year or two knows very well the type of free-speech-be-damned squashing of first-amendment-protected speech these two groups have helped facilitate. I personally have scaled back my use of the platform dramatically during this time period, and have thus been relegated to the Twitter gulags on only two occasions. But countless others who have similarly taken it upon themselves to voice truths deemed inconvenient and impermissible by the Jewish supremacist establishment, have been banished thoroughly and permanently. These two anti-white hate groups have firmly entrenched themselves as the driving force behind these virtual lynch-mobs, publicly declaring their gratification in doing so. Being all too familiar with the dynamic that has been cultivated and yielded all its rotten fruit within the halls of power and channels of influence within the occupied USA, we need not look very far to understand why the hierarchy of the various platforms of social media and information-distribution all roll over without so much as a whimper. With hardly any push-back from other groups not being conspired against and targeted in this coordinated assault on free speech, dangerous precedents are being set left and right, and the groundwork for European-style thought-crime prosecution is being laid.

It can be somewhat easy to lose sight of the absolute havoc the Jewish censorship machine has wreaked on the European continent, because for the most part and in most regards, we here in the US are far-removed from it. But the thought-crime legislation that abounds throughout most of Europe should serve as a constant reminder to us here in the US of what things will look like if groups like the ADL and SPLC, and the people who serve as their contingent, get their way. Additionally, it’s likewise also easy to lose sight of the sacredness of the remaining freedom of speech we still enjoy here. There was a time I took this freedom for granted, as I’m sure many have. But developments of recent memory, substantially attributable to these very two subversive organizations, have made the threat impossible to ignore. All the safeguards put in place to protect us from precisely this type of corrosive influence have at this point gone by the wayside; the foresight shown by the men who instituted these safeguards has been proven prescient beyond imagination; and the ramifications of these protections being broken down and smashed have now been laid bare for all to see. From the founding fathers themselves to even the overwhelmingly liberal (by that period’s standards) JFK, the American people were given more than enough guidance and warning about exactly this type of undermining of our country and its principles, and yet here we are: the only voices resisting the erosion of our rights as American citizens belong to those of us being personally attacked. The same forces responsible for this subversion have convinced almost everyone else that their war on free speech is a just one, and that without the presence of the voices they wish to stamp out, the nation as a whole is better off – all in the name of sparing people’s feelings. Those who acknowledge a rightful place in our lives for things such as racial differences, traditional values and adherence to moral norms are said to be undeserving of the same courtesy and rights afforded to everyone else. Intolerance in the name of tolerance. Regression in the name of progress. Ignorance in the name of understanding. Those are the characteristics our country has taken on as a result of the thought-crime attitudes groups like the ADL and SPLC have worked tirelessly, and largely successfully, to instill into the public conscience.

In a sane society of free-thinking individuals, both of these organizations and others like them would be dismantled and never again permitted to operate on American soil. That they remain in operation, unchecked, is an indictment on not just the philosophical direction we’ve veered in as a nation, but an indictment on our collective ability as a nation to determine our own destiny and make independent decisions free of the need to be told what is in our own best interest. It is a symptom of a society which has lost its will to not only fight, but it’s collective will to even survive. Demanding accountability for groups such as these, and placing clearly-defined restrictions on the extent to which such groups are permitted to exert influence over legislation and public discourse in what is supposed to be a sovereign nation, is a more than reasonable proposition. Such a demand is the furthest thing from an extreme position to take; yet in this currently upside-down, Talmudic version of reality we’ve found ourselves trapped in, that is exactly the way such a position is viewed by a majority of the public. What the Semitic merchants of information have set out to do – and been largely successful in doing so – in order to be in a position to stymie free speech to this extent, is program the slave-goy public to believe, speak and act against their own interests, while not even being cognizant of their doing so. As a matter of pure fact, no one stands to benefit from obliterating free speech, except for tyrants and others who seek to take advantage of others. This objective, undeniable fact is nevertheless lost on most of those around us. If it weren’t, there wouldn’t be a foreign intelligence operation functioning on American soil, in plain sight, and in a manner that is unmistakably at odds with the best interests of the citizens of this country.

Advocating for a private company such as Twitter – technically not subject to the stipulations of the first amendment – to clamp down on ostensibly offensive speech is one thing. If their tactics of silencing disagreeable speech were limited to the arena of social media, it would be alarming, to be sure; but its implications would not be so far-reaching necessarily. Unfortunately, their social media crackdown is but one expression of the larger campaign being waged. A campaign which finds leverage with the prospects of threats, intimidation, extortion, social-pariah designation and loss of livelihood, if not quite yet actual legal prosecution. The importance of pushing back against their attacks on free speech via social media lies in preventing a total monopoly on the dissemination of information. Social media such as Twitter – for better or worse – represents the single most advantageous means of sharing information and formulating alliances. As much as I can’t find it in me, more often than not, to utilize it the way I once did, its value in conceiving, shaping and directing unified movements is undeniable. The loss of such a tool represents a huge blow to our ability to share and coordinate with one another, and also a precedent we want to avoid being set at all costs.

We certainly didn’t arrive at this juncture overnight; it has been a gradual yet deliberate process that has unfolded over the past century or so. But a look back through the annals of history show that the warning signs were evident throughout the course of this transformation. Turning nearly the entire population against the very people who brought that nation and all the advantages that came with it into existence is not a task that can be realized overnight. Nor is it possible to hastily undertake the project of prompting a nation of people to eat itself alive. But while most seemed to be looking the other way, that’s where we’ve been led. And now in a profoundly bizarre turn of events, the people with whom the claim to this nation can be properly laid, are forced to justify and answer for every word they speak and every move they make. All as if to secure the approval of people who did nothing to earn such a status and who in fact can be rightly credited with achieving nothing except figuring out how to reap the rewards of others’ labor. Adding insult to injury, we are browbeaten by those very same usurpers into embracing a Brave New World where the reality of this situation is not even to be spoken of, lest we “offend” them as they pretend none of this ever happened – because what good is this newfound status of privilege if a completely fabricated notion of injustice against them that got them so far cannot continue to be brandished against the white man? Indeed, what good is the seat at the throne if it cannot be henceforth used to kick the defeated subject while he’s down?

I’ve always said it and I remain convinced to this day: The white man, representing the most formidable opposition to the Jew’s current grip on power and his prospects for ultimately keeping it, may very well be exclusively in the crosshairs at the present time. Because the Jew needs that army of non-white grievance-mongers in order to have any chance at disposing of the white man for good. We are at the top of the hit list because without enlisting the help of the other races, nurturing and harnessing their collective enmity directed against the common enemy constructed for their simple minds, they would stand no chance at ultimately emerging victorious over us. But as is always the case with the Jew, it is a scheme, and the superficial alliances forged with non-whites are only meant to last as long as they are of specific use; in this case, pawns in the service of conquering the white man. The Jew looks out for no one, only the Jew. The grand plan of subservience and slavery for all Gentiles is and always will be the bottom-line. As we’ve seen, Europe has already been conquered, for the most part. The takedown of the United States would mean one of the very last strong white nations capable of disrupting these aims would be eliminated, and with that context in mind this particular front in our battle assumes a much greater significance. Calling to task groups whose aim is to further anti-white attitudes and denigrate us as a people, while systematically silencing any and all voices asserting our right to fight back, means the difference between preserving our status as a free people, and being neutered as much of Europe has been, and spiraling ever further into the abyss of Jewish servitude. I wholeheartedly believe that once this nation sinks to the depths of countries such as Germany and France, there will be no coming back from it. Not for us here in the United States, and not for anyone else. And one of the only things standing between where we are now and going the way of a France or a Germany, is the authority of the first amendment and what’s left of our willingness to uphold it.