“If it is ‘anti-Semitism’ to say that communism in the United States is Jewish, so be it; but to the unprejudiced mind it will look very much like Americanism. Communism all over the world, not in Russia only, is Jewish.” (Henry Ford Sr., 1922)
“The task of the proletariat is to create a still more powerful fatherland with a far greater power of resistance, the Republican United States of Europe, as the foundation of the United States of the World.” (Leon Trotzky (Bronstein), Bolshevism and World Peace, 1918)
Count Czernin, Austrian foreign minister wrote: “This Russian bolshevism is a peril to Europe, and if we had the power, beside securing a tolerable peace for ourselves, to force other countries into a state of law and order, then it would be better to have nothing to do with such people as these, but to march on Petersburg and arrange matters there. Their leaders are almost all of them Jews, with altogether fantastic ideas, and I do not envy the country that is government by them. The way they begin is this: Everything in the least reminiscent of work, wealth, and culture, must be destroyed, and the Bourgeoisie [Middle Class] Exterminated. Freedom and equality seem no longer to have any place on their program: only a bestial suppression of all but the proletariat itself.” (Waters Flowing Eastward, p. 46-47)
“Rollin, Pierred Leroux, and a group of socialists, among whom was Maurice Joly [His father was Philippe Lambert Joly, born at Dieppe, Attorney-General of the Jura under Louis-Philippe for ten years. His mother Florentine Corbara Courtois, was the daughter of Laurent Courtois, paymaster-general of Corsica, who had an inveterate hatred of Napoleon I. Maurice Joly was born in 1831 at Lons-le-Saulnier and educated at Dijon: there he had begun his law studies, but left for Paris in 1849 to secure a post in the Ministry of the Interior under M. Chevreau and just before the coup d’etat. He did not finish his law studies till 1860. [Committed suicide in 1878].
Joly, some thirty years younger than Cremieux, with an inherited hatred of the Bonapartes, seems to have fallen very largely under his influence. Through Cremieux, Joly became acquainted with communists and their writings. Though, until 1871 when his ambition for a government post turned him into a violent communist, he had not in 1864 gone beyond socialism, he was so impressed with the way they presented their arguments that he could not, if the chance were offered, refrain from imitating it.
And this chance came in 1864-1865, when his hatred of Napoleon, whetted by Cremieux, led him to publish anonymously in Brussels the Dialogues aux Enfers entre Machiavelli et Montesquieu. In this work he tells us, ‘Machiavelli represents the policy of Might, while Montesquieu stands for that of Right: Machiavelli will be Napoleon, who will himself describe his abominable policy.’ It was natural that he should choose the Italian Machiavelli to stand for Bonaparte, and the Frenchman Montesquieu, for the ideal statesman: it was equally natural that he should put in the mouth of Machiavelli some of the same expressions which Venedey had put in it, and which Joly had admired. His own view was: ‘Socialism seems to me one of the forms of a new life for the people emancipated from the traditions of the old world. I accept a great many of the solutions offered by socialism; but I reject communism, either as a social factor, or as a political institution. Communism is but a school of socialism. In politics, I understand extreme means to gain one’s ends, in that at least, I am a Jacobin.”
“Szamuelly travelled about Hungary in his special train; an eye witness gives the following description: ‘This train of death rumbled through the Hungarian night, and where it stopped, men hung from trees, and blood flowed in the streets. Along the railway line one often found naked and mutilated corpses. Szamuelly passed sentence of death in the train and those forced to enter it never related what they had seen. Szamuelly lived in it constantly, thirty Chinese terrorists watched over his safety; special executioners accompanied him. The train was composed of two saloon cars, two first class cars reserved for the terrorists and two third class cars reserved for the victims. In the later the executions took place. the floors were stained with blood. the corpses were thrown from the windows while Szamuelly sat at his dainty little writing table, in the saloon car upholstered in pink silk and ornamented with mirrors. A single gesture of his hand dealt out life or death.'” (C. De Tormay, Le livre proscrit, p. 204. Paris, 1919, The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, p. 122)
“When the Jew applies his thought, his whole soul to the cause of the workers and the despoiled, of the disinherited of this world, his fundamental quality is that he goes to the root of things. In Germany he becomes a Marx and a Lasalle, a Haas and an Edward Bernstein; in Austria Victor Adler, Friedrich Adler; in Russia, Trotsky. Compare for an instant the present situation in Germany and Russia: the revolution there has liberated creative forces, and admire the quantity of Jews who were there ready for active and immediate service. Revolutionaries, Socialists, Mensheviks, Bolsheviks, Majority or Minority Socialists, whatever name one assigns to them, all are Jews and one finds them as the chiefs or the workers IN ALL REVOLUTIONARY PARTIES.” (Rabbi J.L. Manges, speaking in New York in 1919; The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, p. 128)
The Jew Weininger, has explained why so many Jews are communists: “Communism is not only a national belief but it implies the giving up of real property especially of landed property, and the Jews, being international, have never acquired the taste for real property. They prefer money, which is an instrument of power.” (The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, p. 137)
“The socialist intellectual may write of the beauties of nationalization, of the joy of working for the common good without hope of personal gain: the revolutionary working man sees nothing to attract him in all this. Question him on his ideas of social transformation, and he will generally express himself in favor of some method by which he will acquire something he has not got; he does not want to see the rich man’s car socialized by the state, he wants to drive about in it himself. The revolutionary working man is thus in reality not a socialist but an anarchist at heart. Nor in some cases is this unnatural. That the man who enjoys none of the good things of life should wish to snatch his share must at least appear comprehensible. What is not comprehensible is that he should wish to renounce all hope of ever possessing anything.” (N.H. Webster, Secret Societies and Subversive Movement, p. 327; The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, p. 138)
“In our decrees, it is definitely proclaimed that religion is a question for the private individual; but whilst opportunists tended to see in these words the meaning that the state would adopt the policy of folded arms, the Marxian revolutionary recognizes the duty of the state to lead a most resolute struggle against religion by means of ideological influences on the proletarian masses.” (The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, p. 144)
“In 1923, Trotsky, and Lunatcharsky presided over a meeting in Moscow organized by the propaganda section of the Communist party to judge God. Five thousand men of the Red Army were present. The accused was found guilty of various ignominious acts and having had the audacity to fail to appear, he was condemned in default.” (Ost Express, January 30, 1923. Cf. Berliner Taegeblatt May 1, 1923. See the details of the Bolshevist struggle against religion in The Assault of Heaven by A. Valentinoff (Boswell); The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, p. 144-145)
“In that which concerns the Jews, their part in world socialism is so important that it is impossible to pass it over in silence. Is it not sufficient to recall the names of the great Jewish revolutionaries of the 19th and 20th centuries, Karl Marx, Lassalle, Kurt Eisner, Bela Kuhn, Trotsky, Leon Blum, so that the names of the theorists of modern socialism should at the same time be mentioned? If it is not possible to declare Bolshevism, taken as a whole, a Jewish creation it is nevertheless true that the Jews have furnished several leaders to the Marximalist movement and that in fact they have played a considerable part in it.
Jewish tendencies towards communism, apart from all material collaboration with party organizations, what a strong confirmation do they not find in the deep aversion which, a great Jew, a great poet, Henry Heine felt for Roman Law! The subjective causes, the passionate causes of the revolt of Rabbi Aquiba and of Bar Kocheba in the year 70 A.D. against the Pax Romana and the Jus Romanum, were understood and felt subjectively and passionately by a Jew of the 19th century who apparently had maintained no connection with his race!
Both the Jewish revolutionaries and the Jewish communists who attack the principle of private property, of which the most solid monument is the Codex Juris Civilis of Justinianus, of Ulpian, etc…are doing nothing different from their ancestors who resisted Vespasian and Titus. In reality it is the dead who speak.” (Kadmi Kohen: Nomades. F. Alcan, Paris, 1929, p. 26; The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, pp. 157-158)
“It would however be incomplete in this respect if we did not join to it, cause or consequence of this state of mind, the predominance of the idea of Justice. Moreover and the offset is interesting, it is the idea of Justice, which in concurrence, with the passionalism of the race, is at the base of Jewish revolutionary tendencies. It is by awakening this sentiment of justice that one can promote revolutionary agitation. Social injustice which results from necessary social inequality, is however, fruitful: morality may sometimes excuse it but never justice.
The doctrine of equality, ideas of justice, and passionalism decide and form revolutionary tendencies. Undiscipline and the absence of belief in authority favors its development as soon as the object of the revolutionary tendency makes its appearance. But the ‘object’ is possessions: the object of human strife, from time immemorial, eternal struggle for their acquisition and their repartition. This is Communism fighting the principle of Private Property.
Even the instinct of property, moreover, the result of attachment to the soil, does not exist among the Jews, these nomads, who have never owned the soil and who have never wished to own it. Hence their undeniable communist tendencies from the days of antiquity.” (Kadmi Cohen, pp. 81-85; Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon de Poncins, pp. 194-195)
The following 88-page booklet published by the government of the Third Reich contains Adolf Hitler’s speech to the German people concerning his decision to declare war against the Soviet Union, and the official diplomatic message sent to the Soviets, outlining in great detail their crimes and plots against Germany, which violated the terms of the mutual Non-Aggression Pact. These violations are documented and a number of secret intelligence reports provided to Hitler which formed the basis of his decision to declare war on Stalin are also included in this must-read booklet.
This document shows clearly the true, legal basis concerning the war against the USSR in 1941, which support and justify the actions of Adolf Hitler, who had obviously been deceived and betrayed by the treacherous, double-dealing war monger Stalin. Hitler adopted the only attitude and course of action which a responsible German leader and representative of European culture and civilization could take.
Hitler’s intentions, from the time he first came to power in 1933 had always been peaceful and his actions honorable. He had always worked towards these objectives in good faith and with great patience. It was the WWI western allies and their international financial masters who wanted war all along and who would settle for nothing less, and who preferred to back a well-known murderous beast, namely Joseph Stalin, and to have the bloody horrors of Bolshevism be poured out upon European soil, than to have peaceful coexistence with a strong, free, independent and prosperous Germany.
Hitler and his Axis nation partners realized in 1941 that they had to now face this very real threat to Western Europe head on, as Stalin had been planning to attack all along, when Germany had her hands full on the western front. Hitler’s declaration of war was legally and morally justified by any reasonable standard of international warfare and justice, and only a multi-national effort could hope to prevent the Bolshevik takeover of all of Europe.
Source: American Dissident Voices broadcast, May 1999
by Dr. William L. Pierce
Today, before we begin talking about the murders being committed by our government overseas, let’s note a few things about some murders committed recently in America. I’m thinking of the murders at Columbine High School in Littleton, Colorado, last week, in which two students killed 12 other students and a teacher and then committed suicide. Right after the shootings rumors of all sorts were flying. The students who did the shooting were homosexuals who wore black trenchcoats and belonged to a homosexual gang called “the trenchcoat mafia,” according to one rumor. Another rumor had it that the killers sought out Blacks and athletes as their victims, and that most of the victims were Blacks. And it also was said that they were fans of the “shock rock” musician who uses the name “Marilyn Manson,” and that they were acting out some morbid Marilyn Manson performance. It also was rumored that as many as 25 students had been murdered.
I get most of the raw news that goes into these American Dissident Voices broadcasts from the Internet, but I also watch the NBC Nightly News with Tom Brokaw every evening that I can. I watch Brokaw not so much to learn what’s happened in the world during the past 24 hours, but to learn what the Jewish spin is on what’s happened. I’m interested in knowing what the Jewish party line is. By watching Tom Brokaw mouth his lines every evening I get some idea of what Brokaw’s Jewish boss, Neal Shapiro, the executive producer of the NBC Nightly News, wants us to think about the news.
Well, I was out of town on business on the day of the Colorado shootings and didn’t have a chance to see the NBC Nightly News, but on the day after the shootings, April 21, I watched the news with special interest to see what spin Shapiro would put on the previous day’s high school murders in Colorado. Tom Brokaw reported directly from Columbine High School, where he had been busy all day checking out the rumors and interviewing everyone in sight. So by the time of the evening news broadcast he knew how many victims there were, who they were, and just about all the other facts.
Brokaw began his report with the rumors — or rather, with one rumor: the rumor that the killers were neo-Nazis who had chosen April 20 for the shooting because it was Adolf Hitler’s 110th birthday, and that they were targeting Blacks and athletes — especially Blacks. Then Brokaw interviewed a parent of one of the victims — exactly one parent from among all those of the 12 students and one teacher who had been murdered. He was the father of a Black student, and he sobbed out the statement: “My son had two strikes against him from the beginning [sob]. He was Black, and he was an athlete.” It really sounded as if he’d been coached. And the television screen filled with a snapshot of the Black student who had been killed. No portraits of other victims; no interviews with other parents. No mention of the homosexual rumors; no mention of the Marilyn Manson rumors; just neo-Nazis targeting Blacks. And especially no mention of the fact that only one of the 13 victims was Black. There were 12 White victims and one Black victim; Tom Brokaw and his boss knew this; and yet Brokaw’s instructions were to make the viewers of the NBC Nightly News believe the rumor that the shootings were White-on-Black “hate crimes” by “neo-Nazis.”
Oh, yes, and also no mention that one of the killers was a Jew. Although his father was a Gentile, 17-year-old Dylan Klebold’s mother, Susan Yassenoff, was a synagogue-going, shul-trained Jewess. She attended Temple Israel. That makes her son a Jew according to Jewish law, although we would consider him only a half-Jew. But Brokaw and the other TV reporters never mentioned this. All we heard was that the two killers were neo-Nazis who liked German music and German insignia.
Now, this sort of deliberate deception happens all the time, unfortunately. Most Americans believe that the media are biased, but they don’t understand how blatant the bias is. They don’t understand how arrogantly and deliberately they are lied to by the media bosses. The NBC Nightly News program of April 21 is a good example. Perhaps you saw it yourself and remember the details I have just described for you. If you didn’t see it, you can order a video cassette of the program and view it. An outfit called Burrelle’s — that’s B-u-r-r-e-l-l-e-apostrophe-s — in New Jersey, which is in the business of recording and selling television news programs, will sell you a copy of the April 21 edition of NBC Nightly News for a reasonable price.
Now, it’s clear enough why they engage in this sort of deception. They want to make Whites feel guilty. They want to paralyze our will to resist their “multicultural” policies. They want to morally disarm us. I talked about the details of this on a number of other programs, and I bring up the Littleton, Colorado, shootings simply because it is such a blatant example of this Jewish psychological war against White Americans.
And you know, it’s a war they’re winning. If you listened to any talk-radio programs after the shootings, you certainly heard Jewish callers pushing exactly the same party line as Neal Shapiro was pushing through his mouthpiece Tom Brokaw. “We have to do whatever it takes to stop these White racist gangs,” they were saying. And guilt-stricken White women were falling into their trap right and left, agreeing hysterically with them about the big danger from White racist gangs and how we have to do something drastic soon to stop the racist slaughter, and, oh, isn’t White racism just awful? Outlaw racism. Outlaw guns. Outlaw free speech.
Yes, the Jews know exactly what they’re doing. But one really can’t blame them. That’s the sort of thing Jews always have done. It’s in their genes. What’s really disappointing and disturbing is the feminine response of our people to these Jewish lies. What’s disappointing is our gullibility.
Anyway, while we’re on the subject, let me remind you what the real reason is for this latest school massacre. You remember, we discussed this phenomenon of schoolyard killings more than a year ago. I predicted that we would see many more of them, because the social pathology that causes them is becoming worse. In a word, that pathology is alienation. Multiculturalism results in alienation. Always. You destroy a kid’s sense of rootedness, his sense of belonging to a natural community; you rob him of his sense of identity, his sense of kinship with the people around him, and you’ll have a frustrated kid. That’s true even of Jewish kids, such as Dylan Klebold. You take away a kid’s sense of responsibility to his biological community, and you’re likely to have trouble. You’re likely to have anti-social behavior.
If on top of that you destroy his respect for authority, you’re practically guaranteed trouble. And so let me ask you: who in recent memory has done more than anyone else, by his own behavior, to destroy the respect of young Americans for authority? I’ll give you a clue: he lives in Washington, at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.
Finally, we should note the effect of television on young people. Without going into a long-winded explanation, I’ll simply point out that it blurs their sense of reality. You watch television four or five hours a day from the time you’re able to talk, and by the time you’re 17 you’ve seen at least 10,000 people shot to death or otherwise killed. In the real world, before television, you might see three or four real deaths while growing up, and you would have a much better appreciation for the reality of death — and of life — than the kid raised on television does. You wouldn’t be quite so likely to confuse game-playing for real life.
Of course, multiculturalism is a religion these days: it is the Politically Correct religion. And its adherents tend to like Mr. Clinton and also to see television as a benign influence. So no one in public life is likely to place the blame for the growing plague of school massacres the way I did. They look only for Politically Correct explanations — or at least, for explanations which are not Politically Incorrect.
Actually, most people are that way, to a greater or lesser extent. They don’t want to have unpopular opinions. They don’t want to be subjected to criticism or ridicule. They want to go with the flow. They want to be popular. They want to be like everyone else and think like everyone else. That’s the lemming factor. That’s the way people are, and there’s not much we can do about that. But the problem of schoolyard killings is real, and as I predicted quite a while ago, it’s becoming worse. So it is important for at least some of us to understand what is causing the problem. So I’ll say it again: the fundamental causes of schoolyard shootings are alienation, resulting primarily from the multiculturalization of our society; loss of respect for authority; and an altered sense of reality which is the consequence of being raised on television. That doesn’t mean that everyone who is alienated will become a killer or that everyone who watches television four hours a day will lose his ability to distinguish between reality and make believe. But it does mean that as alienation and the influence of television increase in the population, schoolyard killings and other destructive behavior will continue to become more common.
This also means that there is no quick and simple solution to the problem of school violence. In the long run, alienation can be reduced only by a radical restructuring of our society. As our society is going now, alienation will only become worse. Just because the problem is difficult doesn’t mean that we have to ignore it, however; it doesn’t mean that there’s nothing we can do. One of the most important things for us to do now is to be aware of the lies that are being told about school violence and to help others become aware. I told you about the lies Tom Brokaw told on the NBC Nightly News the day after the shooting in Littleton, Colorado. What is especially important to understand is that this isn’t just a case of media bias, of Tom Brokaw giving a bit of a slant to the news because of his own political ideas. This is a case of cold-blooded, planned deception. When Tom Brokaw reported the news on April 21, he and his bosses at NBC knew who the victims were, yet they decided to tell us the lie that the killings were based on hatred for non-Whites. They deliberately created the false impression for their viewers that most of the victims were Black, when in fact only one was. They knew that one of the killers was a Jew, yet they deliberately told us that the killers were “neo-Nazis” and “White supremacists.”
Since April 21, of course, most of the facts have leaked out to the public. Perceptive people already have learned the things I’ve just told you: the race of the victims, the Jewishness of one of the killers. But many elements in the mass media are continuing to talk about the shootings as being racially motivated and about the shooters as being “neo-Nazis” — and that’s what the lemmings still are absorbing. It’s hard to overcome first impressions, and the media bosses, clever propagandists that they are, understand that quite well.
The killers apparently were Marilyn Manson fans and also liked to use some of the jargon of the Third Reich. So of course, Tom Brokaw and the rest of the media spokesmen have been saturating us with the claim that the two teenagers were “neo-Nazis,” when in fact one of them was a Jew and there is no evidence at all to indicate that they had the least interest in the ideology or politics of National Socialism. On the other hand, after the first wave of rumors subsided there has been almost no further mention of Marilyn Manson. Could that be because Marilyn Manson is under contract to Jewish media boss Gerald Levin, who runs Warner Brothers, among other things?
I’m reminded of the schoolyard killings in Jonesboro, Arkansas, last year, in which four students and a teacher were murdered — all of them White, incidentally. One of the killers, 13-year-old Mitchell Johnson, had recently succumbed to the multicultural influence of gangsta’ rap, a type of Black music which glorifies pimping and drug dealing and drive-by shootings and other forms of Black criminality. His English teacher, Debbie Pelley, testified before a Congressional committee in Washington after the killings that a few months before the massacre young Johnson had become obsessed with gangsta’ rap. He would play the music on the school bus and even try to listen to it in class, his teacher said. His favorite rapper was Tupac Shakur, who himself was killed in a drive-by shooting in Las Vegas. His English teacher told the Congressional committee that she had seen Mitchell Johnson’s behavior change after he began listening to the gangsta’ rap. And yet Debbie Pelley’s testimony was never mentioned by the mainstream Jewish media. Instead we heard the same sort of Politically Correct explanations for the Jonesboro murders that we are hearing for the Littleton, Colorado, murders. Again, perhaps the reason the media chose not to mention the testimony of Mitchell Johnson’s English teacher about the effect of gangsta’ rap on him was that the boy’s favorite rapper, Tupac Shakur, was under contract to Interscope Records, a label owned by the Jewish media conglomerate MCA, which had been headed by Lew Wasserman, one of Bill Clinton’s biggest financial supporters.
Anyway, that’s the way it goes. The mass media bosses give us the news which fits, and they ignore the news which doesn’t fit. More than that, they consciously and deliberately lie, when it suits their purpose, as in the case of the NBC Nightly News broadcast I cited a minute ago.
And you know, this cold-blooded, calculated, deliberate lying by the news media isn’t restricted to schoolyard shootings. We’re being lied to massively and deliberately by the Jewish media about the war against Yugoslavia, for example. The Jewish media deliberately concocted the story that Serb soldiers were engaging in the mass rape of Muslim women and then cutting their throats. The media have portrayed the Albanians as harmless, inoffensive, peace-loving people and the Serbs as bloodthirsty monsters. The media bosses have sat down, made a deliberate plan for the lies they would tell, and now they’re telling them. They want to turn American public opinion against the Serbs and Slobodan Milosevic, and they’re lying in order to do that.
The facts are leaking out, of course. The perceptive observer can learn that the Albanians were committing atrocities against the Serbs long before this current crisis in Kosovo developed. The perceptive observer can learn that the Kosovo Liberation Army is more like a mafia organization than an army of patriotic freedom fighters, but Tom Brokaw and the rest of the controlled media will never tell you that. They tell us only what suits their purpose. And that’s all that the mass of the American voters, the lemmings, ever will know.
The cover of Newsweek magazine two weeks ago had a picture of Slobodan Milosevic on it with the legend in big letters: “The Face of Evil.” Really. They could more honestly have put Madeleine Albright’s face on the cover with that legend. But that wouldn’t suit their purpose, which is to demonize Milosevic, demonize the Serbs, portray the Albanians as innocent victims, and build public support for Albright’s murderous war to beat Serbia into submission to the New World Order.
You know, it often has been said that in war, the first casualty is truth. Governments justify their lies in wartime in terms of the need to mislead the enemy and build patriotic fervor for an all-out effort to win the war. In the war against Yugoslavia the Clinton government certainly can’t claim patriotism as an excuse for its lies, because it already has abjured patriotism as a motive; it already has told us that this is not a war to defend American national interests. And in this war the enemy, the government and the media are trying to deceive with their lies is us, the American people. We are the enemy. They certainly aren’t fooling the Serbs.
This does make a problem for those of us who are more interested in knowing the truth than in being Politically Correct. I mean, we know that the Jewish media over here lie to us massively on just about everything. But it’s probably safe to assume that the Russian media and the Serb media also lie. The Russians are claiming now that more than 40 U.S. warplanes have been shot down over Serbia. The Jewish media over here are claiming that only one U.S. warplane, an F-117, has been shot down. How do we determine the truth? I’ve been a little suspicious about the Jewish claim of only one U.S. plane downed by the Serbs, because the A-10s the Americans are using now for attacking Serb armor are a lot easier to shoot down than an F-117; they fly lower and slower. But Tom Brokaw and the other spokesmen for the Jewish media over here are claiming no losses. I simply don’t believe it. But I really don’t know what the truth is. When I find out, I certainly will tell you.
Meanwhile, don’t count on learning the truth from Tom Brokaw or any other spokesmen for the Jewish media bosses. As long as Madeleine Albright is able to keep running around from one country to another with her big checkbook in hand, writing out bribes to keep the politicians in the little NATO countries in line, promising her kinsman Primakov that if he keeps the Russians out of it the IMF loans will keep coming, the killing in Europe will go on, and the lying about it over here will continue.
About all that decent people everywhere can hope for is that the Serbs will make good use of one of their submarines and take out a U.S. aircraft carrier in the Adriatic, or that they will get enough modern anti-aircraft missiles from somewhere to make the continued bombing of Belgrade prohibitively expensive for Albright and her Jewish crew.
And you know, that’s a terrible thing for me to have to say. If this war were being fought to defend America, I could never say that. But when America’s armed forces are being used by the enemies of the American people as a mercenary force to commit mass murder in Europe, that is how I and many other patriotic Americans feel.
* * *
(Neon Nettle) Rothschild’s Buy Up Remaining Gold Signalling World Banking Collapse :
Jacob Rothschild has just announced that he is to buy up all remaining gold to replace stock market and currency exposure, due to the world’s central banks being “out of control”, signalling what could be the biggest financial crisis since the Lehman Brothers crash in 2008.
The biggest bank in Germany is on the verge of collapse which is set to send massive verberations throughout the EU, the US and around the world. The predicted global banking collapse seems even more imminent as the Rothschild’s signal more warning signs by buying up gold.
FreeThoughtProject reports: The prospect of a cataclysmic global banking collapse of this nature has not been seen since the implosion of Lehman Brothers in 2008, and subsequent fallout in the global banking world.
But these events haven’t taken place in a vacuum, as earlier this year savvy international investor Lord Jacob Rothschild, during a semi-annual address to RIT Capital Partners, announced that they are reducing stock market and currency exposure and increasing their gold holdings, warning that the world is now in “uncharted waters” and the consequences are “impossible” to predict.
“The six months under review have seen central bankers continuing what is surely the greatest experiment in monetary policy in the history of the world. We are therefore in uncharted waters and it is impossible to predict the unintended consequences of very low-interest rates, with some 30% of global government debt at negative yields, combined with quantitative easing on a massive scale.”
The collapse of Deutsche Bank would most likely begin a cascade of Western banking institutions falling like dominos (which could include Barclays in London and CitiGroup in the U.S.). According to the same expert who valued Lehman’s worth at its collapse, Deutsche Bank’s current value of $1 trillion dollars is significantly more than Lehman Brothers’ valuation during their collapse in 2008.
The contagion from a collapse of this magnitude could potentially trigger a systemic banking collapse the likes of which the world has never seen. The EU would almost certainly disintegrate upon a collapse of this magnitude, as Deutsche Bank is the largest bank in Germany – which is essentially the financial heart and soul of the EU.
When Jacob Rothschild says that he is buying gold because the central banks are out of control, you begin to understand the scope and magnitude of what is transpiring, as his family has been in de facto control of the world’s central banks for centuries.
Deutsche Bank shares have fallen sharply on the news that German Chancellor Angela Merkel won’t bail out the struggling bank, with shares falling by as much as six percent in early week trading, turning in their worst performance since 1992. Since just January, the bank’s shares have lost over 52 percent of their value.
Merkel has also refused to provide state financial assistance to Deutsche Bank in its legal battle with the U.S. Department of Justice. The chancellor made her position clear during talks with Deutsche CEO John Cryan, according to Focus magazine. The German-based lender may be fined up to $14 billion over its mortgage-backed securities business before the 2008 global crisis.
The German Chancellor also noted that Deutsche Bank will not be getting a bailout from the European Central Bank – the lender of last resort for European banks.
Revealing the truly dangerous threat the German megabank poses to the international banking system, a report from the International Monetary Fund in June implied that Deutsche Bank was a systemic risk to the global financial system.
Many fear that in the wake of Merkel’s refusal to bail out Deutsche Bank, Germany may now be considering a bail-in instead?
According to Investopedia:
A bail-in is rescuing a financial institution on the brink of failure by making its creditors and depositors take a loss on their holdings. A bail-in is the opposite of a bailout, which involves the rescue of a financial institution by external parties, typically governments using taxpayers money. Typically, bail-outs have been far more common than bail-ins, but in recent years after massive bailouts, some governments now require the investors and depositors in the bank to take a loss before taxpayers.
Essentially, this entails the bank stealing deposited funds, with virtually no recourse for those individuals who have their savings stolen.
It’s not at all beyond the realm of possibility, as it has happened before in very recent history. To keep the bank solvent, the Bank of Cyprus took almost 40 percent of depositor’s funds – leaving customers with essentially nothing they could do about having their money stolen. Assets were frozen and ATM machines were not refilled.
Perhaps this explains why in mid-August Germans were told by their government to stockpile 10 days worth of water, and five days worth of food in case of a “national emergency” hitting the country, with the Czech Republic following suit and making a similar announcement within days of the German warning.
Deutsche Bank’s unbelievably risky portfolio and its exposure to the derivative markets, which stands at over $40 trillion dollars, would undoubtedly cause exponentially more damage than the Lehman Brothers collapse did back in 2008, which precipitated the Great Recession of 2008.
This risk of failure has now gotten so threatening that a number of funds that clear derivatives trades with Deutsche Bank AG have withdrawn excess cash and positions held at the lender, according to Bloomberg.
While the vast majority of the banks, more than 200 derivatives-clearing clients have made no changes, the hedge funds run on cash highlights serious concern. The paranoia of an imminent collapse spread to the US on Thursday, as 10 hedge funds that are Deutsche Bank clients have decided to withdraw cash and listed derivatives positions from the bank, according to a Bloomberg News report.
Millennium Partners, Capula Investment Management and Rokos Capital Management are among about 10 hedge funds that have cut their exposure, said a person familiar with the situation who declined to be identified talking about confidential client matters.
The hedge funds use Deutsche Bank to clear their listed derivatives transactions because they are not members of clearinghouses. Millennium, Capula and Rokos declined to comment when contacted by phone or e-mail.
Highlighting the contagion banking effect, news that some hedge funds were pulling positions and excess collateral from Deutsche Bank caused shares of U.S. banks to quickly reverse early gains, according to Bloomberg.
Just as Lehman Brothers disingenuously claimed they were financially solvent as the upcoming financial storm brewed in 2008, only to file for bankruptcy, Deutsche Bank has attempted to allay investor concerns by claiming that their financial fundamentals are sound. One would be wise to be very suspicious of any statements made by a failing banking institution.
When the government warnings start, you can be assured that it’s already too late, as the availability of supplies in the case of emergency would be severely constrained after a warning due to the large number of people attempting to procure an extremely limited amount of supplies.
Will Germany become the powder keg that implodes the global economy? Only time will tell, but all signs point to a very similar situation to 2008 – but without central banks having much recourse, as negative interest rates and quantitative easing were some of the last arrows in the quiver being used to prop up the global economy.
What is certain is that an ounce of prevention, ahead of any potential collapse, is the most viable solution for those looking to safeguard themselves and their families. The key is to stock up on food, water and other necessities in advance of the actual crisis fully manifesting. A minimal amount of effort put into preparing early for the side effects of a major economic disaster could be the difference between surviving the crisis, or not, for your family.
Please share this extremely important information to help others be prepared for this potentially dangerous crisis, the severity of which is largely being covered up by mainstream media!
By Denis Wise
This episode shows the roots of the NWO and how it works today. It also shows the connection with the occult.
Dr. Stanley Monteith (Narrator) Sarah McKechnie (Lucis trust) interview.
If anyone does not believe my work … please be my guest and prove me wrong. I have shown my evidence. Please provide yours.
The USS Liberty (AGTR-5) has been called the most decorated United States Naval ship for a single action.
But if this is true, why have so few Americans ever heard of the Liberty?
The reasons are many, but have everything to do with who attacked the Liberty and who covered up the attack, an ongoing and disgraceful coverup for nearly 50 years.
Though attempts have been, and continue to be made, to bring the truth about the attack on the Liberty to a wider audience, those responsible for the attack and the coverup have many resources available to keep this national tragedy buried.
And the most shocking part of this story, is that the country who attempted to sink the Liberty with all those aboard, Israel, on that beautiful, sunny day in the Eastern Mediterranean in June, 1967, not only continues to erase the true history of what happened, but our own country, the United States of America, and those public officials sworn to uphold and defend the U.S. Constitution, initiated the coverup and continue, to this very second, to dishonor those 34 men viciously slaughtered and the 174 wounded, who are forced to live knowing their own country abandoned them on the altar of political expediency.
The coverup has been so thorough that this is the only maritime attack in U.S. history not afforded a Congressional investigation, as required by the U.S. Constitution.
Based on the new book by Liberty survivor Phillip F. Tourney, Erasing the Liberty: My Battle to Keep Alive the Memory of Israel’s Attack on the USS Liberty, some of the ship’s survivors and supporters decided the most effective way to bring the story of the Liberty to the widest possible audience was through a full-length feature film.
Liberty survivors are dying off and need to have their story told. They and the American people deserve no less.
Help us make this dream a reality.
Today marks the launch of Britain’s first ‘Migration Museum‘, intended to reflect the ‘migratory history’ of the peoples of the United Kingdom. The enterprise, modelled on similar projects on Ellis Island, in Paris and in Germany, is long overdue if you read the opinion columns of the left-wing press. It is currently being housed across the River Thames opposite parliament, until a permanent home for its exhibitions can be built or found.
The project has been introduced by a former Labour Party Immigration Minister by the name of Barbara Roche, a Jewish woman who penned an article in today’s edition of the left-wing Guardian newspaper entitled “Why are the British so reluctant to recognise our migrant history?”. The article contains the usual drivel, of course, drawing on the so-called “immigration waves” of the first millennia to somehow justify mass migration in a contemporary context – this is an unfortunate comparison, considering the myth of Britain being a ‘mongrel nation’ has been dispelled by almost every leading geneticist and archaeologist in Europe.
But, not content with more lies to convince the British people to accept more migration, Roche goes further claiming that Britain’s vote to leave the European Union is in some way a reason why we need such a museum. She claims that central to the contemporary debate about identity should be the role of migration throughout our history.
Ms Roche obviously forgets that more people came to Britain in 2004 than throughout the entire period 1066-1945. But of course, she would forget such things, considering she was minister for immigration in Tony Blair’s Labour government that presided over organised mass migration in order to, in the words of government ministers themselves, “make the United Kingdom truly multicultural”. She laments the fact that migration is a contentious issue, yet fails to take responsibility for her government making it so.
But more startling than Roche’s sycophantic ramblings and rank hypocrisy is the overwhelming Jewish presence in this latest celebration of mass immigration. Barbara Roche is not just the primary advocate of the migration museum, but also the chair of the board of trustees. In her article, she proudly proclaims her Jewish roots in the second sentence, as if this somehow entitles her to lecture an entire race of people on the “virtues” of mass immigration.
As we delve further into the structure of the migrant museum, we find that Judaism is not simply at the head of this organisation, but at its roots and running through its very veins.
Amongst the primary financial backers of this venture, we first find the Rothschild foundation. Of course, this needs little explanation. It is a well known fact that the Rothschild family have funded numerous subversive movements in practically all European nations, along with their dangerous exploits in the banking sector. That they would get involved so explicitly in such a venture is testament to their arrogance and sense of complacency.
Next on the list there is the Kohn Foundation, who have by all accounts invested large sums of money into the migrant museum project. The Kohn foundation is the brainchild of one Ralph Kohn, a Jewish scientist who received a knighthood from the British government for services to medicine and research. According to the British government website for registered charities, the Kohn Foundations aims “to advance or promote education (of) the Jewish religion.” Kohn was born in Leipzig, as one of 4 children to an Orthodox Jewish family. They fled to Amsterdam upon the rise of Hitler and the NSDAP, then remarkably, were on the last boat of refugees from Holland to England in 1940 (making him a holocaust survivor, perhaps?)
Another source of funding and support for the migrant museum project is the Rayne Foundation, a “well-funded and influential charitable organisation”. The foundation is a product of a man named Max Rayne, a property developer and philanthropist from a Jewish family in the East-End of London. Rayne was said to be “on the governing bodies of most prominent Jewish charities” thanks to his “highly valued business skills”. Rayne’s grandfather was a Hebrew scholar.
The Alfred Caplin Charity Settlement can also be counted as one of the backers for the migrant museum. There is little to be found regarding the founding of this particular charity, except that, according to the government website; the charity “makes grants for general charitable purposes with an emphasis on charities linked to the Jewish community.”
Finally, there is the Paul Hamlyn Foundation. Paul Hamlyn, the founder of the Paul Hamlyn Foundation, was yet another escapee from “Nazi horror” when his family emigrated to England in 1933. Hamlyn, originally from Berlin, established himself as a publisher and, of course, a philanthropist. At this point it almost does not require explanation, but Hamlyn comes from a Jewish family, his surname at birth being “Hamburger”.
What we can see in this latest left-wing indoctrination project is an overtly visible Jewish presence from the top to the bottom. Why do the principle financiers of a mass migration advocacy project come from the Jewish community? Why are Jews so over represented in the open borders movement? Why do Jewish “philanthropists” feel duty-bound to advance the causes of minority groups across Western Europe?
One can only speculate, but this is a pattern that can be seen throughout the history of left-wing movements, including Communism where, in Russia, 75% of the original core clique of the Bolshevik Party were Jews. Karl Marx himself, the founder of communism, was Jewish. George Soros, profiteer and financier of the subversion of nation states from London to Budapest, is Jewish. These financiers of this latest migration advocacy project; Jewish.
Are these mere coincidences?
I invite you to draw your own conclusions…