Der Stürmer

The official blog of the site "Der Stürmer" –

Month: May, 2015

They called it “Liberation” – I call it “Hate, War Crimes and Genocide against Germans” – YOU be the judge!


They called it Liberation-01

by George Duncan –

The merciless revenge perpetrated on the entire German civilian population of Eastern Europe during the closing stages of the war, and for many months after, took the lives of over 2,100,000 ethnic German men, women and children. For generations these Germans had lived and toiled in areas that today are part of central and Eastern Europe. Around fifteen million of these “Volksdeutsche” were driven from their homes and ancestral lands in Poland, East Prussia, Silesia, Ukraine, Belarus and Serbia and forced back into the Allied occupied zones of Germany. This was the greatest forcible evacuation of people in European history.

It is estimated that of the eight million Germans expelled from Poland around 1,600,000 died in the process. In Czechoslovakia, memories of the Lidice massacre inspired acts of revenge against German soldiers and civilians. Soldiers were disarmed, tied to stakes, doused with petrol and set alight. Wounded German soldiers in hospital were shot in their beds, others were hung up on lamposts in Wenzell Square and fires were lit beneath them so that they died the gruesome death of being roasted alive. These ethnic Germans lived in fear of the Russians but no one thought that the dreadful fate which awaited them would not even emanate from the Soviets at all but from their own neighbours, the Czechs!


Thousands of innocent German residents were murdered in their homes by the Czechs, others were forced into interment camps where they were beaten and maltreated before being expelled. Bishop Beranek of Prague declared:

‘If a Czech comes to me and confesses to having killed a German, I absolve him immediately’.

The Americans, utterly blind to the political consequences of allowing the Soviets to liberate Czechoslovakia, halted at the Karlsbad-Pilsen-Budweis line. The Sudeten Germans now had no protection from the torrent of bestiality vented on them by the Czechs. In Brno, 25,000 German civilians were forced marched at gun-point to the Austrian border. There, the Austrian guards refused them entry, the Czech guards refused to re-admit them. Herded into an open field they died by the hundreds from hunger and cold before being rescued by the US 16th Tank Division on May 8th 1945. In the Russian occupied zones of Eastern Europe and in Germany, hundreds of thousands of civilian men and women, Poles, Czechs, Romanians and Germans, were transported to the Urals in the Soviet Union and used as slave labourers until released in the late 40s. Mostly ignored by the world’s press, the unimaginable suffering experienced by the expellees is largely unknown outside Germany, yet it was systematically carried out in a brutal fashion as official Allied policy in accordance with the decisions formulated at Yalta and Potsdam.

Around the small Bavarian village of Postberg (Postoloprty) in the province of Saazerland on the Bavarian-Czech border, hundreds of German men, women and children were shot to death during the Czech ‘ethnic cleansing’. All German civilian residents in the province were rounded up by Czech soldiers and communist partisans and marched to a collection point in Postberg. There they were interned and beaten, many were executed. On September 17, 1947, a number of mass graves were discovered in and around Postberg. Thirty-four bodies were found in the village itself, another four nearby at Weinberg and twenty-six in an old sandpit at Schuladen. At Lewanitzer, 349 corpses were unearthed and another 103 bodies were exhumed from another mass grave. Ten corpses were found in a sand pit at Kreuz along with another 225 bodies in a mass grave at the local school.

At the military barracks five bodies were found and seven were buried under house No. 74. During investigations only one Czech, Vojtech Cerny, admitted to participating in the shooting and killing of four Germans. In all, a total of 763 Germans were murdered. A law, passed by the Czech authorities (The Benesch law: No115/1946) stated that all Czech crimes against Germans were not legible to penalty.


Churchill said to the Germans in January, 1945:

“We Allies are no monsters. This, at least, I can say, on behalf of the United Nations, to Germany … Peace, though based on unconditional surrender, will bring to Germany and Japan immense and immediate alleviation of suffering and agony.”

Against that false claim, the late Dr. Austin App proclaimed the truth:

“Those Allies who were “no monsters” literally raped more European women than had ever before been raped in the history of the world. They put Germany on a starvation-level diet. Under direct orders from Dwight Eisenhower, they killed more than a million German POWs. They looted 12 million people of their homes, goods, food, and even clothes and drove them from their homelands. They took one-fourth of their farmland, they took their ships and their factories and their farm implements and then told them to live by farming. They abused and starved to death more German babies than there ever were Jews in Germany. They raped and debauched hundreds of thousands of German, Austrian, and Hungarian girls and women from eight to eighty. They brought to their death five times as many Germans in one year of peace as died during five years of war.

They called it Liberation-02

A TOTAL OF MORE THAN 17 MILLION GERMANS PERISHED, OF THOSE MORE THAN 12 MILLION GERMANS WERE KILLED AFTER THE END OF THE WAR.  Source:  Huttenbrief fuer Volkstum, Kultur, Wahrheit und Recht – Herausgeber (Publisher): Freundenkreis Ulrich von Hutten e.V. Note:  in the above graphic “Sowjet” is the German word for “Soviet”

Yes, yes, of course, these men of the United Nations, these men of the ‘New World Order’ are no monsters!

Quite apart from any ethnic or ideological considerations, World War II was a war between, on the one side, the elitists who created Communism as a way-station on the road to their New World Order; and on the other, those who opposed that New World Order. It is a tragedy of millennial proportions that America and Britain were induced to fight on the side of Communism and Communism’s masters.” ~  Dr. Austin J. App (as quoted by Kevin Alfred Strom)

Yes, they “liberated” us alright … from peace,  from our legitimate form of government which represented the will of the German people, from our freedom and autonomy, our lives, our individual rights and human dignity, our land and personal property,  our industry, ideas, patents, our identity as a nation, and our pride.  And THEN came permanent occupation and the “cultural genocide” of the Germans.  More to come on that!

Rest in peace all my beloved German people who perished, and all of that generation who were victimized by these heinous crimes against humanity. No people ever deserved such  a fate.  And to the High Perps who planned these things, made them happen, or allowed them to happen, and those who carried them out … may you rot eternally in  HELL!


For everyone else it is “history” from which we ALL must learn.

Quotes about Jews You Will Never Hear in Schools


“Anti-Semitism is a disease – you catch it from Jews” – Edgar J. Steele

CICERO (Marcus Tullius Cicero). First century B.C. Roman statesman, writer. “Softly! Softly! I want none but the judges to hear me. The Jews have already gotten me into a fine mess, as they have many other gentleman. I have no desire to furnish further grist for their mills.”

DIO CASSIUS. Second century Roman historian. Describing the savage Jewish uprising against the Roman empire that has been acknowledged as the turning point downward in the course of that great state-form: “The Jews were destroying both Greeks and Romans. They ate the flesh of their victims, made belts for themselves out of their entrails, and daubed themselves with their blood… In all, 220,000 men perished in Cyrene and 240,000 in Cyprus, and for this reason no Jew may set foot in Cyprus today.” (Roman History)

AQUINAS, THOMAS, Saint. 13th century scholastic philosopher. In his “On the Governance of the Jews,” he wrote: “The Jews should not be allowed to keep what they have obtained from others by usury; it were best that they were compelled to worked so that they could earn their living instead of doing nothing but becoming avaricious.”

H.H. BEAMISH, in New York Speech, October 30, 1937: “The Boer War occurred 37 years ago. Boer means farmer. Many criticized a great power like Britain for trying to wipe out the Boers. Upon making inquiry, I found all the gold and diamond mines of South Africa were owned by Jews; that Rothschild controlled gold; Samuels controlled silver, Baum controlled other mining, and Moses controlled base metals. Anything these people touch they inevitably pollute.”

HUGHES, Premier of Australia, Saturday Evening Post, June 19, 1919: “The Montefiores have taken Australia for their own, and there is not a gold field or a sheep run from Tasmania to New South Wales that does not pay them a heavy tribute. They are the real owners of the antipodean continent. What is the good of our being a wealthy nation, if the wealth is all in the hands of German Jews?”

POPE CLEMENT VIII: “All the world suffers from the usury of the Jews, their monopolies and deceit. They have brought many unfortunate people into a state of poverty,

FRANZ LISZT, famed composer quoted in Col. E. N. Sanctuary’s Are These Things So?, page 278: “The day will come when all nations amidst which the Jews are dwelling will have to raise the question of their wholesale expulsion, a question which will be one of life or death, good health or chronic disease, peaceful existence or perpetual social fever.”

JESUS CHRIST, speaking to the Jews in the Gospel of St. John, VIII:44: “Ye are of your father the devil, and the lust of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is not truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar and the father of it. – then answered the Jews – ” (which makes it clear that Christ was addressing the Jews.)

MARTIN LUTHER, Table Talk of Martin Luther, translated by William Hazlet, page 43: “But the Jews are so hardened that they listen to nothing; though overcome by testimonies they yield not an inch. It is a pernicious race, oppressing all men by their usury and rapine. If they give a prince or magistrate a thousand florins, they extort twenty thousand from the subjects in payment. We must ever keep on guard against them.”

MARIA THERESA, Queen of Hungary and Bohemia (1771 – 1789): “Henceforth no Jew, no matter under what name, will be allowed to remain here without my written permission. I know of no other troublesome pest within the state than this race, which impoverished the people by their fraud, usury and money-lending and commits all deeds which an honorable man despises. Subsequently they have to be removed and excluded from here as much as possible.”

COUNT HELMUTH VON MOLTKE, Prussian general: “The Jews form a state, and, obeying their own laws, they evade those of their host country. The Jews always consider an oath regarding a Christian not binding. During the Campaign of 1812 the Jews were spies, they were paid by both sides, they betrayed both sides.”

WASHINGTON, GEORGE, in Maxims of George Washington by A. A. Appleton & Co.: “They (the Jews) work more effectively against us, than the enemy’s armies. They are a hundred times more dangerous to our liberties and the great cause we are engaged in… It is much to be lamented that each state, long ago, has not hunted them down as pest to society and the greatest enemies we have to the happiness of America.”

WILHELM II. German Kaiser: “A Jew cannot be a true patriot. He is something different, like a bad insect. He must be kept apart, out of a place where he can do mischief – even by pogroms, if necessary. The Jews are responsible for Bolshevism in Russia, and Germany too. I was far too indulgent with them during my reign, and I bitterly regret the favors I showed the prominent Jewish bankers.” (CHICAGO TRIBUNE, July 2, 1922)

CARDINAL MINDSZENTY, of Hungary quoted in B’nai B’rith Messenger, January 28, 1949: “The troblemakers in Hungary are the Jews… they demoralize our country and they are the leaders of the revolutionary gang that is torturing Hungary.”

MRS. CLARE SHERIDAN, Traveler, Lecturer in NEW YORK WORLD, December 15, 1923: “The Communists are Jews, and Russia is being entirely administered by them. They are in every government office, bureau and newspaper. They are driving out the Russians and are responsible for the anti-Semitic feeling which is increasing.”

“I fear the Jewish banks with their craftiness and tortuous tricks will entirely control the exuberant riches of America. And use it to systematically corrupt modern civilization. The Jews will not hesitate to plunge the whole of Christendom into wars and chaos that the earth should become their inheritance.” (Bismarck)

“Wars are the Jews harvest, for with them we wipe out the Christians and get control of their gold. We have already killed 100-million of them, and the end is not yet.” (Chief Rabbi in France, in 1859, Rabbi Reichorn).

“We shall drive the Christians into war by exploiting their national vanity and stupidity. They will then massacre each other, thus giving room for our own people.” (Rabbi Reichorn, in Le Contemporain, July 1st, 1880)

“There are two life-forces in the world I know: Jewish and gentile, ours and yours…I do not believe that this primal difference between gentile and Jew is reconcilable. You and we may come to an understanding, never to a reconciliation. There will be irritation between us as long as we are in intimate contact. For nature and constitution and vision divide us from all of you forever.” (Maurice Samuel, You Gentiles, Harcourt, Brace & Co., New York, 1924, pp. 19, 23).

“The Jews are more subject to diseases of the nervous system than the other races and peoples among which they dwell. Hysteria and neurasthenia appear to be most frequent. Some physicians of large experience among the Jews have even gone so far as to state that most of them are neurasthenic and hysterical.” (The Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. IX, (1905), p. 225).

“Ever since the Jews invented the libel charge of ‘anti-Semitism’ in the 1880s (The word ‘anti- Semitism’ was first printed in 1880.’ The Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. I (1901), p. 641), it has been built up with Jewish money, organizations, propaganda, and lies (such as the Holocaust- Holohoax), so that now the word is like snake venom which paralyzes one’s nervous system. Even the mention of the word ‘Jew’ is shunned unless used in a most favorable and positive context.” (Charles A. Weisman, Who is Esau-Edom?, p. 63).

“Anti-Semitism is so instinctive that it may quite simply be called one of the primal instincts of mankind, one of the important instincts by which the race helps to preserve itself against total destruction. I cannot emphasize the matter too strongly. Anti-Semitism is not, as Jews have tried to make the world believe, an active prejudice. It is a deeply hidden instinct with which every man is born. He remains unconscious of it, as of all other instincts of self preservation, until something happens to awaken it. Just as when something flies in the direction of your eyes, the eyelids close instantly and of their own accord. So swiftly and surely is the instinct of anti-Semitism awakened in a man…there is not a single instance when the Jews have not fully deserved the bitter fury of their persecutors.” (Samuel Roth, Jews Must Live, (1934), p. 64).

“The Second World War is being fought for the defense of the fundamentals of Judaism.” (Statement by Rabbi Felix Mendlesohn, Chicago Sentinel, October 8, 1942).

“Zionism is Judaism, and Judaism is unthinkable without Zionism.” (Harper’s Encyclopedia of United States History, Vol. X, “Zionists”).

“We Jews, we are the destroyers and will remain the destroyers. Nothing you can do will meet our demands and needs. We will forever destroy because we want a world of our own.” (You Gentiles, by Jewish Author Maurice Samuels, p. 155).

“We will have a world government whether you like it or not. The only question is whether that government will be achieved by conquest or consent.” (Jewish Banker Paul Warburg, February 17, 1950, as he testified before the U.S. Senate).

“Even if we Jews are not bodily with you in the trenches, we are nevertheless morally with you. This is OUR WAR, and you are fighting it for us.” (Les Nouvelles Litteraires, February 10, 1940).

“Our task is not to tell the truth; we are opinion molders.” (Walter Cronkite).

“Use the courts, use the judges, use the constitution of the country, use its medical societies and its laws to further our ends. Do not stint in your labor in this direction. And when you have succeeded you will discover that you can now effect your own legislation at will and you can, by careful organization, by constant campaigns about the terrors of society, by pretense as to your effectiveness, make the capitalist himself, by his own appropriation, finance a large portion of the quiet Communist conquest of that nation.” (Address of the Jew Laventria Beria, The Communist Textbook on Psychopolitics, page 8).

“…[We] must stop these swarms of Jews who are trading, bartering and robbing.” (US Civil War General William Sherman).

“The greatest danger to this country lies in their large ownership and influence in our motion pictures, our press, our radio and our government.” (Charles A. Lindberg, Speech at Des Moines, Iowa, September 11, 1941).

“The Gulag Archipelago, ‘he informed an incredulous world that the blood-maddened Jewish terrorists had murdered sixty-six million victims in Russia from 1918 to 1957! Solzhenitsyn cited Cheka Order No. 10, issued on January 8, 1921: ‘To intensify the repression of the bourgeoisie.’” (Alexander Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago)

“The Jews are the master robbers of the modern age.” (Napoleon Bonaparte)

“They are the carrion birds of humanity…[speaking of the Jews] are a state within a state. They are certainly not real citizens…The evils of Jews do not stem from individuals but from the fundamental nature of these people.” (Napoleon Bonaparte, Stated in Reflections and Speeches before the Council of State on April 30 and May 7, 1806)

“The Jews are the most hateful and the most shameful of the small nations.” (Voltaire, God and His Men)

“Mrs. Van Hyning, I am surprised at your surprise. You are a student of history — and you know that both the Borgias and the Mediciis are Jewish families of Italy. Surely you know that there have been Popes from both of these house. Perhaps it will surprise you to know that we have had 20 Jewish Popes, and when you have sufficient time, which may coincide with my free time, I can show you these names and dates. You will learn from these that: The crimes committed in the name of the Catholic Church were under Jewish Popes. The leaders of the inquisition was one, de Torquemada, a Jew.” (Woman’s Voice, November 25, 1953)

“I am afraid the ordinary citizen will not like to be told that the banks can, and do, create money…And they who control the credit of the nation direct the policy of Governments and hold in the hollow of their hands the destiny of the people.” (Reginald McKenna, former Chancellor of the Exchequer, January 24, 1924)

“We are living in a highly organized state of socialism. The state is all; the individual is of importance only as he contributes to the welfare of the state. His property is only his as the state does not need it. He must hold his life and his possessions at the call of the state.” (Bernard M. Baruch, The Knickerbocker Press, Albany, N.Y. August 8, 1918)

“The Jewish people as a whole will be its own Messiah. It will attain world dominion by the dissolution of other races, by the abolition of frontiers, the annihilation of monarchy, and by the establishment of a world republic in which the Jews will everywhere exercise the privilege of citizenship. In this new world order the Children of Israel will furnish all the leaders without encountering opposition. The Governments of the different peoples forming the world republic will fall without difficulty into the hands of the Jews. It will then be possible for the Jewish rulers to abolish private property, and everywhere to make use of the resources of the state. Thus will the promise of the Talmud be fulfilled, in which is said that when the Messianic time is come the Jews will have all the property of the whole world in their hands.” (Baruch Levy, Letter to Karl Marx, La Revue de Paris, p. 54, June 1, 1928

On a personal note a young Jewish woman in her 20s once admitted that the best of their people do not like us. And the only ones who like us are terrible people.

Immigration and the Moral Right to Save Europe and the West!

by David Duke

Caricatures from “Der Stürmer” – translated in English and colourized!

The Year 1937 – Part 4











Hellstorm – Exposing the Real Genocide of National-Socialist Germany

The Biggest Cover-Up In History

This documentary tells the tale that the victors still do not want you to know. Learn the terrible truth about the rape, torture, slavery, and mass murder inflicted upon the German people by the Allied victors of World Word II. This is the biggest cover-up in world history.

Terror Bombing

Winston Churchill: German cities . . . will be subjected to an ordeal the like of which has never been experienced by a country in continuity, severity and magnitude . . . To achieve this end there are no lengths of violence to which we will not go. [Garrett, Stephen A. Ethics and Airpower in World War II—The British Bombing of German Cities. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1993. Page 31]

19-year-old Kate Hoffmeister: I struggled to run against the wind in the middle of the street . . . We . . . couldn’t go on across . . . because the asphalt had melted. There were people on the roadway, some already dead, some still lying alive but stuck in the asphalt. . . . They were on their hands and knees screaming. [Middlebrook, Martin. The Battle of Hamburg—Allied Bomber Forces Against a German City in 1943. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1981. Pages 266–267]

Author Vera Brittain: The ruthless mass bombing of congested cities is as great a threat to the integrity of the human spirit as anything which has yet occurred on this planet . . . There is no military or political advantage which can justify this blasphemy. [Sorge, Martin K. The Other Price of Hitler’s War—German Military and Civilian Losses Resulting from World War II. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1986. Page 108]

A RAF Crewman: There were people down there being fried to death in melted asphalt in the roads, they were being burnt up and we were shuffling incendiary bombs into this holocaust. I felt terribly sorry for the people in that fire I was helping to stoke up. [Garrett, Stephen A. Ethics and Airpower in World War II—The British Bombing of German Cities. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1993. Page 82]

A Rescue Worker: Never would I have thought that death could come to so many people in so many different ways . . . [S]ome times the victims looked like ordinary people apparently peacefully sleeping; the faces of others were racked with pain, the bodies stripped almost naked by the tornado; there were wretched refugees from the East clad only in rags, and people from the Opera in all their finery; here the victim was a shapeless slab, there a layer of ashes. . . . Across the city, along the streets wafted the unmistakable stench of decaying flesh. [Irving, David. The Destruction of Dresden. London: William Kimber & Co., LTD. Page 189]

A Rescue Worker: One shape I will never forget was the remains of what had apparently been a mother and child. They had shriveled and charred into one piece, and had been stuck rigidly to the asphalt. They had just been prised up. The child must have been underneath the mother, because you could still clearly see its shape, with its mother’s arms clasped around it. [Irving, David. The Destruction of Dresden. London: William Kimber & Co., LTD. Page 189]

A Red Cross Worker: I went down on my knees, trembled and cried . . . Several women lay there with their bellies burst open . . . and one could see the babies for they were hanging half outside. Many of the babies were mutilated. . . . Scenes like that one I saw everywhere and very slowly one became numbed. One acted like a zombie. [McKee, Alexander.Dresden 1945—The Devil’s Tinderbox.New York: E.P.Dutton, 1982. Pages 252-253]

A RAF Crewman: To just fly over it without opposition felt like murder. I felt it was a cowardly war. [McKee, Alexander.Dresden 1945—The Devil’s Tinderbox.New York: E.P.Dutton, 1982. Page 66]

The Rape of Germany

A Horrified Witness: In the farmyard further down the road stood a cart, to which four naked women were nailed through their hands in a cruciform position. . . . Beyond . . . stood a barn and to each of its two doors a naked woman was nailed through the hands, in a crucified posture. In the dwellings we found a total of seventy-two women, including children, and one old man, 74, all dead . . . all murdered in a bestial manner, except only a few who had bullet holes in their necks. Some babies had their heads bashed in. In one room we found a woman, 84 years old, sitting on a sofa . . . half of whose head had been sheared off with an ax or a spade. [De Zayas, Alfred M. Nemesis at Potsdam:The Anglo-Americans and the Expulsions of the Germans—Background, Execution, Consequences. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1977. Page 63]

Ilya Ehrenburg: Kill them all, men, old men, children and the women, after you have amused yourself with them! Kill. Nothing in Germany is guiltless, neither the living nor the yet unborn. . . . Break the racial pride of the German women. Take her as your legitimate booty. Kill, you brave soldiers of the victorious Soviet Army. [Lutz, Elizabeth. “Rape of Christian Europe—The Red Army’s Rampage in 1945.” The Barnes Review 3, no. 4 (Apr. 1997): 9–16.]

A Rape Victim: The Russians were coming and going the whole time and they kept eyeing us greedily. The nights were dreadful because we were never safe for a moment. The women were raped, not once or twice but ten, twenty, thirty and a hundred times, and it was all the same to the Russians whether they raped mere children or old women. The youngest victim in the row houses where we lived was ten years of age and the oldest one was over seventy. . . . [Kaps, Johannes, ed. The Tragedy of Silesia, 1945–46—A Documentary Account with a Special Survey of the Archdiocese of Breslau. Munich: Christ Unterwegs, 1952/53. Page 136]

A Witness from Neisse: These atrocities were not committed secretly or in hidden corners but in public, in churches, on the streets, and on the squares. . . . Mothers were raped in the presence of their children, girls were raped in front of their brothers. [Kaps, Johannes, ed. The Tragedy of Silesia, 1945–46—A Documentary Account with a Special Survey of the Archdiocese of Breslau. Munich: Christ Unterwegs, 1952/53. Page 228]

German Soldier: We had never seen anything like it—utterly, unbelievably monstrous! Naked, dead women lay in many of the rooms. Swastikas had been cut into their abdomens, in some the intestines bulged out, breasts were cut up, faces beaten to a pulp and swollen puffy. Others had been tied to the furniture by their hands and feet, and massacred. A broomstick protruded from the vagina of one, a besom from that of another. . . . The mothers had had to witness how their ten and twelve-year-old daughters were raped by some 20 men; the daughters in turn saw their mothers being raped, even their grandmothers. Women who tried to resist were brutally tortured to death. There was no mercy. . . . The women we liberated were in a state almost impossible to describe. . . . [T]heir faces had a confused, vacant look. Some were beyond speaking to, ran up and down and moaned the same sentences over and over again. Having seen the consequences of these bestial atrocities, we were terribly agitated and determined to fight. We knew the war was past winning; but it was our obligation and sacred duty to fight to the last bullet. [Testimony of “H. K.”, Bergisch-Gladbach, Germany (copy in possession of the author).]

The Baltic Massacre

A Young Mother: It was so terribly cold, and the wind was like ice… the snow was falling and nothing warm to eat, no milk and nothing. I tried to give Gabi the breast, behind a house, but she didn’t take it because everything was so cold. Many women tried that, and some froze their breasts. [Thorwald, Juergen. Flight in the Winter: Russia Conquers—January to May, 1945. New York: Pantheon, 1951. Pages 48-49]

Juergen Thorwald: Every alley, every street was packed with their vehicles. People were waiting in every harbor shed, in every wind-sheltered corner. Among them stood their beasts, bleating, snorting, lowing. . . . The pregnant women giving birth somewhere in a corner, on the ground, in a barracks. Some of them had been raped on their flight . . . [and] now they were trembling for fear they would give birth to a monster. The strangely pale faces of girls going up and down the streets asking for a doctor. The wounded and the sick, in constant fear they would be left behind, concealing weapons under their blankets to force someone to take them along, or to end their own lives if the Russians came. The orphans who had been saved from their asylum somewhere at the last moment and tossed onto carts with nothing around them but a blanket, and who were now lying on the floors with frozen limbs. The Russian prisoners of war, brought west under orders from above, walking on wooden soles, their tattered overcoats held together with paper strings. The old people who had lain down in some doorway at night, and had not awakened… And the wild-eyed insane ones who rushed from house to house, from wagon to wagon, crying for their mothers or their children. . . . Over it all the gray sky, snow, frost, and thaw . . . and thaw and frost and snow, and the chill, killing wet. [Thorwald, Juergen. Flight in the Winter: Russia Conquers—January to May, 1945. New York: Pantheon, 1951. Pages 127-128]

Defeat in The West

A US Soldier: [T]he men were deliberately wounding guards. A lot of guards were shot in the legs so they couldn’t move. They were then turned over to the inmates. One was beheaded with a bayonet. Others were ripped apart limb by limb. [Buechner,Howard A.Dachau—The Hour of the Avenger.Metairie, Louisiana: Thunderbird Press, 1986. Page 104]

Amy Schrott: They just opened up the camps and let them go. The Russians and Poles were looting the houses and killing the shopkeepers. Then they began raping the girls. [Amy Schrott Krubel interview, Jan. 9, 1997, Topeka, Kansas.]

A US Sergeant: Our own Army and the British Army . . . have done their share of looting and raping . . . [W]e too are considered an army of rapists. [Kelling, 61; Time Magazine, Nov. 12, 1945; Life Magazine, Jan. 7, 1946.]

A US Soldier: Hunger made German women more ‘available,’ but despite this, rape was prevalent and often accompanied by additional violence. In particular I remember an eighteen-year old woman who had the side of her face smashed with a rifle butt and was then raped by two GIs. Even the French complained that the rapes, looting and drunken destructiveness on the part of our troops was excessive. [Brech, Martin.“In ‘Eisenhower’s Death Camps’: Part I—A U.S. Prison Guard’s Story.” The Journal of Historical Review 10, no.2 (Summer 1990). Page 165.]

Two German Soldiers (combined into 1 voice over): (1) [I]t’s incomprehensible to me how we could stand for many, many days without sitting, without lying down, just standing there, totally soaked. During the day we marched around, huddled together to try to warm each other a bit.  (2) The latrines were just logs flung over ditches next to the barbed wire fences. To sleep, all we could do was to dig out a hole in the ground with our hands, then cling together in the hole. . . . Because of illness, the men had to defecate on the ground. Soon, many of us were too weak to take off our trousers first. So our clothing was infected, and so was the mud where we had to walk and sit and lie down. There was no water at all at first, except the rain. . . . More than half the days we had no food at all. On the rest, we got a little K ration. I could see from the package that they were giving us one tenth of the rations that they issued to their own men. . . . I complained to the American camp commander that he was breaking the Geneva Convention, but he just said, “Forget the Convention. You haven’t any rights.” Within a few days, some of the men who had gone healthy into the camps were dead. I saw our men dragging many dead bodies to the gate of the camp, where they were thrown loose on top of each other onto trucks, which took them away. [Pechel, Peter, Dennis Showalter and Johannes Steinhoff.Voices From the Third Reich—
An Oral History. Washington, D.C.: Regnery Gateway, 1989. Page 491] [Bacque, James. Other Losses—An Investigation into the Mass deaths of German Prisoners at the Hands of the French and Americans after World War II. Toronto: Stoddart Publishing Co., 1989. Page 38]

The Purge

Leni Riefenstahl: Neither my husband nor my mother nor any of my three assistants had ever joined the Nazi Party, nor had any of us been politically active. No `charges had ever been filed against us, yet we were at the mercy of the [Allies] and had no legal protection of any kind. [Horstmann, Lali.We Chose to Stay. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1954. Page 327]

A German Prisoner: The purpose of these interrogations is not to worm out of the people what they knew—which would be uninteresting anyway—but to extort from them special statements. The methods resorted to are extremely primitive; people are beaten up until they confess to having been members of the Nazi Party. . . . The authorities simply assume that, basically, everybody has belonged to the Party. Many people die during and after these interrogations, while others, who admit at once their party membership, are treated more leniently. [Von Lehndorff, Hans Graf. Token of a Covenant—Diary of an East Prussian Surgeon, 1945–47. Chicago: Henry Regnery Co., 1964. Page 127]

Both officers who took our testimony were former German Jews. [One] kicked me in the back and the other hit me. . . . [T]he terrible thing was, the German men had to watch. That was a horrible, horrible experience. . . . That must have been terrible for them. When I went outside, several of them stood there with tears running down their cheeks. What could they have done? They could do nothing. [Owings, Alison. Frauen—German Women recall the Third Reich.New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 1994. Pages 335-336]

George Patton: Evidently the virus started by Morgenthau of a Semitic revenge against all Germans is still working . . . I can’t see how Americans can sink so low. [Martin Blumenson, The Patton Papers—1940–1945 (New York: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1972)]

A British Witness: [S]ome of them, one-eyed or one-legged veterans of seven or so, many so deranged by the bombing and the Russian attack that they screamed at the sight of any uniform, even a Salvation Army one. [Garrett, Stephen A. Ethics and Airpower in World War II—The British Bombing of German Cities. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1993. Page 141]

American Historian Ralph Franklin Keeling: While the Germans around them starve, wear rags, and live in hovels, the American aristocrats live in often unaccustomed ease and luxury. . . . [T]hey live in the finest homes from which they drove the Germans; they swagger about in fine liveries and gorge themselves on diets three times as great as they allow the Germans. . . .When we tell the Germans their low rations are necessary because food is so short, they naturally either think we are lying to them or regard us as inhuman for taking the lion’s share of the short supplies while they and their children starve. [Keeling, Ralph Franklin.Gruesome Harvest—The Allies’ Postwar War Against the German
People. 1947. Reprint. Torrance, Calif.: Institute for Historical Review, 1992. Page 101]

Ethnic Cleansing

Winston Churchill: Don’t mind the five or more million Germans. Stalin will see to them. You will not have trouble with them: they will cease to exist. [Keeling, Ralph Franklin.Gruesome Harvest—The Allies’ Postwar War Against the German People. 1947. Reprint. Torrance, Calif.: Institute for Historical Review, 1992. Page 13]

A Viewer from Gruenberg: As they left town in an endless procession, Polish soldiers fell upon them, beating and flogging them in a blind rage. . . . Robbed of all they possessed and literally stripped of the last of their belongings, . . . these poor creatures trudged along in the wind and the rain, with no roof or shelter over their heads, not knowing where they would find a new abode. [Kaps, Johannes, ed. The Tragedy of Silesia, 1945–46—A Documentary Account with a Special Survey of the Archdiocese of Breslau. Munich: Christ Unterwegs, 1952/53. Page 428]

Austin J. App: To slice three or four ancient provinces from a country, then loot and plunder nine million people of their houses, farms, cattle, furniture, and even clothes, and then . . . expel them “from the land they have inhabited for 700 years” with no distinction “between the innocent and the guilty” . . . to drive them like unwanted beasts on foot to far-off provinces, unprotected, shelterless, and starving is an atrocity so vast that history records none vaster. [App,Austin J.“Mass Expulsions: ‘Tragedy on a Prodigious Scale.” The Barnes Review 2, no. 10 (Oct. 1996). Page 24]

Roosevelt Betrays America!

by Dr. Robert Ley

The source: Robert Ley, Roosevelt verrät Amerika! (Berlin: Verlag der Deutschen Arbeitsfront, 1942).



We stand at the threshold of a new era. An old world is used up and exhausted, a new one is knocking strongly and insistently at the doorway of the world. The young peoples, called the have-nots by the old sinking capitalist world, are demanding their right to recognition and equality. The aging world of money and democracy does not want to make room. The honorable Lord Halifax said it plainly: They want to live on in the gluttony and luxury to which they have become accustomed. Their standpoint was: “Money rules the world, and the have-nots will have to accept that fact.”

They sought the war, they provoked and maneuvered to get it. They pressed the young peoples of Germany, Italy and Japan wherever they could. They wanted war, a real world war — and now they have it.

Not only two worlds of ideas are at war here, but the whole world. This war reaches every corner of the world. The plutocrats are on the line; they have to defend themselves. The Jews and their hired lackeys, Churchill and Roosevelt, must themselves step into action. The field is cleared, and now we face our real enemy, the men behind the scenes who over the decades plunged the world into disorder, war, and revolution, but whose own valuable capitalist lives were naturally too valuable to sacrifice in war.

But finally we have forced them into the open, and we have sworn that we well not let go of them until their murderous handiwork is laid bare. This is a hard war, a matter of being or not being, of life or death, either or. We therefore must understand the strengths and capacities of our main enemy, to weigh and evaluate them insofar as it is possible within this brief pamphlet. We will consider the grounds that moved Mr. Roosevelt to drive his people into war. Aside from his deep hatred against us Germans in general and National Socialism in particular, there naturally are domestic causes and imperialist intentions that led the warmongering clique in New York to chase after war until they finally caught it.

Let us begin.

  1. Racial confusion in the USA.

We National Socialists know that every action is in some way racially determined. There is no doubt that on the one side of this struggle stand absolutely unified peoples and nations, while on the other side there are various nationalities led by the Jews, the prototype of racial decay. Germany, Italy, and Japan are unified nations, whose national unity is based on blood. The other side has only unions: the union of the states of North America, the Union of Soviet Republics and the Union Jack, the union of the English empire.

The United States was settled by nearly all the races of the earth, of which the European contingent was the largest. The common English language does not say much, for the English language won over German by only a single vote majority. Just as we could not have spoken of the North Americans as Germans had that happened, neither can we today speak of Anglo-Saxons or English. The Jew would have us believe that a new race develops when other races are mixed. He even gives it a romantic-sounding name: “the melting pot of the races.” That is, however, biologic nonsense. Such a bastardization process does not lead to a new and valuable race, but rather a corrupt racial mixture in which the bad characteristics come to the fore, and in which finally parasitic manifestations appear, such as we see in American insanity and in the ruthless business style of the ruling class in North America.

The USA became the home of the gangsters, the insanities of Hollywood, the stock brokers of New York, the orators of Washington: in brief, the land of truly unlimited possibilities, namely those of insanity and criminality produced by its racial mixing.

  1. The World View Foundations

The USA once conducted a war of independence against the British Crown. The Declaration of Independence of those freedom fighters even today is thought to be the beginning of North American freedom and independence, celebrated annually. But one today hears voices on both sides of the ocean about reuniting the Anglo-Saxon world. Churchill even makes the idea the center of this Christmas message in Washington. The sly old fox is quite right. The USA has decayed into the English world of Puritanism and Calvinism. The hypocritical lying capitalist world of Manchester and Oliver Cromwell is today the world of Roosevelt, Morgenthau, Knox, Stimson, and their consorts. One can even say that the Jew rules more fully, ruthlessly and completely in New York than in London. Remember the oft-cited quotation from Calvin that the masses of workers and craftsmen must be kept poor so that they will be obedient to God, and will work only when they are driven to it by necessity. This is a central theme of the capitalist economy, resulting in the theory of the “productivity” of lower wages. The misuse of the concept of God runs like a red thread through English history. God was always the ground for any crooked dealing. The notion of the Old Testament’s chosen people fits in here as well. This clearly proves the similarity in English and Jewish thinking. We find such nonsense repeatedly by the leading English circles over the centuries.

The original claims of chosenness, of God-willed wealth and God-ordained poverty, of dark secrets and mystic superstitions was begun by Oliver Cromwell and became the foundation of the English Empire. On can read the following about the English saint in Volume II of Wilbur Contez Abbot’s Writing and Speeches of Oliver Cromwell: “They could hardly say anything to Cromwell without him putting his hand to his heart, raising his eyes to the heavens and calling God as his witness. He will weep and lament and moan, all the while sticking the knife in your ribs.”

Does that not remind one of our contemporaries Churchill and Roosevelt when they together sang “Onward Christian Solders” on the since-sunken “Prince of Wales”? Or when they sing in a Methodist church in Washington. They are Cromwell’s pious, hypocritical successors.

Oliver Cromwell always called on God n the midst of his atrocities, his bloodthirsty orgies against the Irish and the Scottish, and viewed his devilish soldiers as the chosen people of God. Churchill and Roosevelt have learned the methods of the bestial hypocrite Cromwell by heart, and have proven that nothing, absolutely nothing has changed in the English-American world over the past three hundred years. That is the lying capitalist world that calls God as its witness to every shameful act and enslaves and exploits humanity in its dreadful superiority. Its father was Calvin, its sword Oliver Cromwell and its benefactors and successors are Churchill and Roosevelt. They are so proud and self-confident that they call the USA God’s Own Country. As the Jews use Jehovah, they use the Lord God!

III. The Actual Nature and Real Strength of the USA.

The Jew in the USA. The original citizens of the USA were anti-Semites, and the emancipation of the Jews in America took a long time. But just as a young and growing organism is more easily infected by parasites and bacteria than a more mature and stronger one, so too the North American national body was overwhelmed by Jews from everywhere in the world. According to American statistics, over 5 million Jews lived in the USA in 1926. They were concentrated in the big cities. Since public opinion in democracies, and especially in the USA is made in the big cities, and since the Jews in the USA control all elements of public opinion such as the press, publishing, radio, parties, clubs and so on, one can affirm that the Jews control public opinion in North America. The following table presents the distribution of Jews in the USA:

New York has 2,000,000 Jews, 33% of the population

Philadelphia has 280,000 Jews, 15% of the population.

Cleveland has 12,000 Jews, 8% of the population

Chicago has 260,000 Jews, 8% of the population

Boston has 85,000 Jews, 12% of the population

Baltimore has 70,000 Jews, 17% of the population

Pittsburgh has 60,000 Jews, 17% of the population

Saint Louis has 60,000 Jews, 18% of the population

New Orleans has 55,000 Jews, 16% of the population

Detroit has 50,000 Jews, 17% of the population

Hartford has 27,000 Jews, 17% of the population

The increase in the number of Jews since the turn of the century is particularly clear in the case of New York. The number of Jews there has increased as follows:

From 225,000 in 1877

To 597,674 in 1900

To 1,252,135 in 1910

To 1,643,012 in 1920

To 1,876.545 in 1930

To over 2 million in 1935 (counting only religious Jews).

Some areas of New York business life are Jewish monopolies. They have taken over the clothing industry and a substantial part of the cigarette industry. They are heavily involved in some light industries. The big New York department stores are owned by Jews. The American magazine National American gives the following illuminating figures:

The Jews control:

98% of the financial markets

99% of the banking industry

69% of the food industry

100% of the theater and movie industry

99% of the press

82% of the radio, telephone, and telegraph industries

75% of the transportation industries

85% of real estate.

The following Jews have key positions in the economy, government, legal system, state and local governments, labor unions, etc.:

The Jew Bernhard Mannes Baruch was the most influential man in the USA during the World War. He had dictatorial power over the whole war economy and its approximately 40 varied industrial branches. Even today he has a leading role in Roosevelt’s inner circle. Felix Frankfurter is a member of the Supreme Court, Henry Morgenthau Jr. is Secretary of the Treasury, Herman Lehmann is Governor of the State of New York, La Guardia leads the Jewish metropolis New York. Numerous Jews have leading positions in the American labor movement. One need mention only the Jews Volman, Sidney Hillmann, Schloßberg, and Matthew Woll. Wherever one looks he sees nothing but Jews and genuine Hebrews! The words of the Russian-born Jew Baruch Chareny Vladek describe precisely the position of the Jews in America: “We are numerically in the minority, but our fingers tip the scales.”

That is how it is: He who is fed by the Jews dies, particularly when the national body is still so young, disunified and weak as the USA. We see all the manifestations of the Jews that always accompany the Jews. For example, the USA is the leading country for lodges, secret societies, the Ku-Klux-Klan, sects and spiritualists. There are about 4,178,000 Free Masons in the entire world; 3.3 million of them live in the USA. All leading men of the government, from the president on down, belong to lodges, and all the lodges of course belong to and are led by the Jews. There are 49 major lodges in the USA with 16,518 branches. One cannot even count the sects and secret societies. We see that the Jew has understood how to break the USA down into individual particles and atoms, killing any kind of national life. The parties belong to him entirely, for over half of those in Congress — 213 members of the House — and more than half of the Senators, 48 in all — are Free Masons.

Gangsters and criminals along with stock brokers are other manifestations of decay brought about by Jewry. The legal system in the USA is fragmented and disunified. The benefactors are the plutocrats, corrupt politicians and businessmen without consciences. Judges are elected to their offices for a limited time. It is clear than they are dependent on the corrupt parties. Major insurance swindles, corrupting juries, and making false statements under oath are the order of the day.

According to Century Magazine of July 1910: “American lawlessness begins in children’s rooms and schools and ends in courthouses and lawmaking bodies.” The legal uncertainly is called a “national burden,” which is made even worse by the fact that cooperation is also lacking in the police system. It is not surprising that crime rates are higher in the USA than anywhere else in the world. The following figures from 1939 demonstrate the fact. There was:

a robbery every 9 minutes

a break-in every 1 3/4 minutes

a theft every 40 seconds

a car theft every 2 1/4 minutes

a murder every 39 minutes

Leading gangsters in Chicago included John Dillinger, who was overpowered and shot by the police at a theater at the close of 1934 and Al Capone, who had a bodyguard of 185 men, each of whom he paid $300 to $400 a week. Two thirds of Chicago unions had to pay protection money to these criminal organizations. Al Capone was so connected to America’s leading men that he went to jail not because he was the leader of a gangster organization, but because the federal authorities caught him for tax fraud. He lives as a multimillionaire today in a palace on a sunny beach in Florida.

The Coster-Musica scandal aroused considerable excitement in the American business world at the end of 1938. Coster-Musica had carried out swindles on a widespread scale, including drug smuggling, weapons sales, and crooked dealings, and was a member of many prominent clubs. Coster-Musica had been in jail for fraud as yearly as 1906. He was convicted in a huge financial scandal in 1913. Given his connections to “high society,” he did not serve time in prison. His company collapsed when the fraud was discovered. 13,500 stockholders lost over $100 million. He committed suicide because he feared his well-placed friends were no longer able to protect him from the wrath of those he had cheated.

American capital developed in the course of the 18th and 19th centuries either through land speculation, railroad enterprises, or big industry. The ship owner Girard, J. J. Astor, Peter Golet, and the Schermerhorns, Fealds, Vanderbilts, Goulds, Sages, Morgans, Hills, Carnegies, Roosevelt, Morgenthau, and so on were typical of those who amassed their wealth with bribery, cheating, plundering, lawbreaking, tax evasion, swindles, extortion, and piracy.

The first great fortune was Vanderbilt’s, which grew out of the railways. Cornelius Vanderbilt, born in 1794, at age twelve could hardly write his own name, but he was greedy, ruthless, and power-hungry. He began with passengers and freight. He was never particularly creative, though he was presented as such in books. He was certainly the leading merchant pirate and scoundrel of his day. His first millions were primarily the result of extortion, cheating, and theft. The mail his steam ships carried won not only foreign postage payments, but also substantial government subsidies. The postal subsidies were the real foundation of his wealth. The Civil War put an end to his shipping career. He began a railroad enterprise at the age of 69, though he knew nothing at all about the technology and administration of this branch of transportation. Cornelius Vanderbilt knew how to present himself as a leading patriot during the Civil War. When the Union government decided to send a fleet to New Orleans in 1862, it bought the very ships from Vanderbilt that government subsidies had built. He even lent one of his unused ships to the government. By means of manipulation Vanderbilt succeeded in driving down the stocks of the New York and Harlem railroad at the end of 1863, and bought the majority of the shares, which rose from $9 a share in the middle of April 1863 to $50. It was also the usual practice to bribe the New York City council to secure certain railroad lines.

They are all the same, Dillinger, Al Capone, Vanderbilt, Carnegie, Morgan, and so on: gangsters, pirates, stock traders, businessmen. They have a single ideal: money-making, and still more money-making. American lawlessness and the double morality of Calvinism and Puritanism conceals it all

  1. The Dollar Devours Everything

There is not a country in the world where money is as important as it is in the USA. The ideals of family, fatherland, culture and manliness are all dominated by the desire to “make money.” While the peoples of Europe bled during the World War of 1914-1918, North America knew but one principle: to earn as much as possible through the war. The enormous sums earned by the North American armaments industry are shown in the following table

Net Profits of the American Armaments Industry 1914-1918

(Figures in Dollars)

Company Average profits in the last pre-war year Average profits during the four war years
U. S. Steel  105,331,000 259,653,000
Du Pont 6,092,000 58,076,000
Bethlehem Steel  6,840,000 49,427,000
Anaconda Copper 10,649,000 34,549,000
Utah Copper 5,776,000 21,622,000
American Smelting 11,566,000 18,602,000
Republic Iron and Steel 4,177,000 17,548,000
Internationale Mercantile 6,690,00 14,229,000
Atlas Powder 485,000 2,374,000
American and British Man. 172,000 325,000
Canadian Car & Foundry 1,335,000 2,201,000
Crocker Wheeler 206,000 666,000
Hercules Powder 1,271,000 7,430,000
Niles, Bement Pond 656,000 6,146,000
Scovill Mfg. Co. 655,000 7,678,000
General Motors 6,954,000 21,700,000

The stock prices climbed into the heavens. A rise from $20 to $1000 was no rarity. And these crazy profits did not stop after the World War. The armaments tycoons bought back the airplanes, weapons, and munitions for a song, and then sold them at a fat profit to other customers. Profiteering without end.

60 Families Rule America

  1. Lundberg’s book appeared in 1937, and is seen by American politicians as a reliable source. He begins with the blunt assertion: “The United States of America is owned and controlled by a hierarchy that at its core consists of the 60 richest families of the country, to which at most 90 families of somewhat lesser wealth may be included. These families are the center of the modern industrial oligarchy that controls the United States. They function discretely under a de jure democratic form of government, behind which a de facto government of abolutistic and plutocratic nature has existed since the Civil War.” This hollowing out of democracy was possible only because enormous fortunes developed in the United States that have no parallel in the rest of the world.

The extent of the wealth controlled by the “golden ring,” the sixty richest families in America, is astonishing. Rockefeller’s personal income in 1924 was $30-50 million, though his taxable income was only $18 million. His total fortune certainly exceeds a billion dollars, and those of the Melons and the Ponts is surely no less. Such a concentration of wealth by itself is extraordinarily powerful, a state within a state, but the power of money and the dollar dynasties extends yet further. The real nature of the power of the “golden ring” is less in personal wealth as in the control that they are thereby able to exert over others. The foundation here is the expansion of so-called stock capital. In 1880 16% of the total capital of the United States was in such “liquid assets,” a figure that had reached 40% by 1930.

Stock majorities are guided, holding companies established, the various interests are so concealed and covered up in a way that enables them to become suddenly public when it is necessary. With amazing lack of scruples, huge fortunes are made in ways that put gangsters and pirates to shame.

Old Rockefeller used to say with Puritan hypocrisy, after he had taken someone’s money, that “God gave me my wealth.” J.P. Morgan the elder, however, displayed a deeper knowledge of the source of his wealth. Half in jest, half seriously, he claimed that one of his ancestors was the famous Caribbean pirate Henry Morgan. He named his black luxury yacht the “Corsair,” and loved to fly the Jolly Roger, the skull and crossbones, above the Stars and Stripes when on the high seas. His son is said to continue the custom, except that as the American financial agent of the British government during the World War, he preferred to fly the Union Jack above the Jolly Roger,

Corrupt bureaucrats over the decades understood how to transfer billions in public property to people who understood how to give a golden handshake. Some of these bubbles collapsed, giving the citizens of the United States a look at the swamp of its government. For example, the major scandal with oil reserves under the government of Harding — 1921 to 1923 — might have had something to do with the president’s mysterious death.

The extent and subtlety of the corrupt system in the freest land in the world was revealed a few years ago when a Senate committee investigated the list of favorites to whom the J.P. Morgan Company sold cheap stocks in 1929. Beside the many financial potentates were names like Calvin Coolidge, who had been president until 1929, William H. Woodin, Roosevelt’s Treasury Secretary in 1933, W. G. McAdoo, Treasury Secretary under Wilson and Senator from California, Ch. F. Adams, Naval Secretary and Bernard M. Baruch, organizer of the war economy during the World War and also one of Roosevelt’s most influential Jewish advisors. The number of cases in which the power of money was enough to blind the eyes of justice is legion. Nowhere are as many scoundrels running around loose as in the United States. When a scandal stinks so badly that one of the “greats” must be punished, for example Samuel Insull or Van Swerigen, it is always a fringe figure, an agent of the leading families, never a member of the “golden ring” itself. Senator Norris, with the healthy instincts of a Nebraska farmer, was outraged when in the 1939 scandal the two most heavily implicated figures, the Interior Secretary Fall and the Industrialist Sinclair were acquitted. He said sarcastically: “We should pass a law that says that a man who is worth $100 million may not be brought to trial. Then our laws would at least correspond to reality.”

This unimaginable wealth stands in contrast to enormous poverty. In the end, those who are betrayed are the millions of workers and farmers, the broad masses of the people. The American people will be the victims of this war as well. They will pay the price for the increased profits of the upper ten thousand. 21,000 new millionaires came out of the last war, and the previous ones became a lot richer. The same will happen in this war. The American armaments industry will earn a lot and the poor stupid people will pay the bills. It will also have to pay a price in blood, and not a small one.

Just as in England, the people have a limited role in the “democracy.”

Unfortunately, the common impression that American workers have a high standard of living is a myth.

A Third of the Population Lives in Poverty

Roosevelt himself saw himself forced after his second election to tell Congress: “I see several tens of millions of our citizens — a significant part of our population — who even today lack much of what we consider the absolute minimum necessities of life. I see millions of families who must live with an income so modest that the pale of family disaster hangs over them day by day. I see millions in the cities and the countryside whose live under conditions that a so-called decent society would have termed indecent even fifty years ago. I see millions to whom education, recreation and the possibility of improving their lives and those of their children are denied. I see millions who lack the means to buy the products of our factories and farms, and who through their poverty deny work and productivity to millions of others.”


Roosevelt’s words clearly show the results of his efforts at “reconstruction.” And he was by no means painting too dark a picture. His statements are supported by numerous reports and statistics from official sources that prove conclusively that the common European idea of the comfortable life of the American worker is in no way accurate. That is also clear to anyone who walks through the numerous side streets in New York and Brooklyn, or who visits a sharecropper in the “cotton belt.”

Unemployment is unimaginable. Despite the New Deal and the Social Security Administration, despite the land’s riches of every variety, despite vast and fruitful soil, despite technology and the much-praised American progress, Roosevelt has not succeeded in reducing the numing it unnecessary to discuss it here. Capitalist greed has leveled the forests and produced drought and wind storms. Everything has become desert, and whole regions have been ruined. The world knows that the misery of the American farmer is a catastrophe that the government is unable to do anything about,

American workers know nothing about such social benefits as old age care, care for the handicapped or accident and health insurance. Roosevelt’s New Deal has attempted to copy the German model. The copy is a bad one. The renowned social apostle is bluffing here as everywhere else. Despite complicated regulations, only a small number of workers enjoy a decent retirement. Insurance against accidents, industries mishaps,and illness simply does not exist.

Women, children and young people are exploited in the most shameless fashion in “God’s own country.” To give only one example, girls in the tobacco industry in Ohio still work unlimited hours under dangerous conditions for $10 a week. After four or five years, most are sick with tuberculosis and are thrown out on the street because the owner would otherwise have to pay unemployment insurance. Thousands of new and cheap workers are waiting at the door, willing to sacrifice their health for low wages.

The best Americans, such as the famed American political philosopher Daniel Webster, the theoretician of the Whig Party, predicted the effects of a similarly deficient social system in these words: “The freest government will not long survive if wealth is concentrated in a few hands while the great masses of the people become dependent and poverty-stricken.”

  1. Franklin D. Roosevelt’s Complete Bankruptcy

Everything that Daniel Webster feared and despised has come to pass in the USA. Even worse! The idiocy and criminality have increased, and no one sees a way out. Franklin D. Roosevelt proclaimed a New Deal in 1933 as a way to end the misery. Since this invention of Mr. Roosevelt’s Brain Trust has caused so much confusion, I wish here to briefly summarize it and comment critically on it.

The New Deal is a collection of economic policy measures that Roosevelt implemented from 1933 to 1935, of which recent measures are a continuation.

The central points are:

Measures to increase purchasing power: (Farm Credit Act, protection of bankruptcy, public and private jobs, increased and stabilized wages, repricing of agricultural products and raw materials, devaluation to increase exports);

Establishing Unified Labor Legislation: (universal labor conditions, working hours, pay, right to organize, mediation system);

Introducing Social Security Measures: (unemployment compensation, workmen’s compensation, Social Security).

The “New Deal” presumes cooperation between employers, workers and the government. This could only result because of the severity of the crisis, and the traditional American individualism immediately sabotaged it as soon as enormous public expenditures seemed to lead to improvements in some areas.

The “New Deal” was an expression of federal economic leadership. But it lacked the necessary bureaucracy, which had until then not existed in the USA.

The political conditions necessary for the “New Deal” economic policies were also lacking. The party and Congressional systems remained unchanged, as did the other institutions (the Supreme Court), which meant that business and labor circles influenced the legislative process.

The “New Deal” tried to have a planned economy without effective planning. The various measures were not coordinated with each other. The result: bureaucratic infighting, the influence of political moods, the pressures of election propaganda, the power of unemployed voters, the misuse of tax moneys for these purposes, “the use of social misery for electoral purposes.” The “New Deal” was thus a confused liberal system. “The capitalists presented themselves as socialist!”

Fact: Roosevelt amassed $40 billion in debt prior to the beginning of the war.

The number of unemployed rose, after initial declines from 1938-1939, significantly, until the unimaginable figure of 11,300,000 was reached.

Roosevelt’s policies have failed utterly.

  1. The Background to Roosevelt’s Policies


The background to these policies is not easy to see. There are two primary explanations current in American circles:

First Explanation:

Roosevelt is a member of the American plutocratic class.

The social conditions in 1932-1933 presented the danger of revolution.

American capitalism sent one of its best humbugs to preach salvation to the masses.

He succeeded by using all the tricks of American propaganda.

The capitalist clique was ready to intervene at the proper moment,

The program was torpedoed at the proper moment by means of a bribed Supreme Court. The measures had served their purpose, namely to conceal the growing social misery. To guarantee armaments profits, the humbug Roosevelt was put to work on foreign policy. The methods were hate propaganda, war hysteria, and armaments.

Second Explanation:

Roosevelt, a plutocratic son, is a confidante of American Jews and Free Masons.

The catastrophic economic situation in 1932-1933 offered the Jews the opportunity to take over both the industrialists and the workers.

Roosevelt was put to work with his plan of salvation.

Labor and management became involuntary captives of the “New Deal,” and helped bring about its failure.

Foreign policy was the only way out. The Jews were out for revenge against Greater Germany. Once again, hate propaganda, war hysteria, and armaments.

Both views are true. Roosevelt, the son of plutocrats, served American capitalism, and as a Jewish product served them, too. Since American capitalists are mostly Jews, both are in the end the same.

VII. Ancestry and Relatives of F. D. Roosevelt and his Wife.

This picture of current conditions in the USA would be incomplete without considering the ancestry and relatives of the warmonger Roosevelt. I will therefore discuss the matter briefly here. I hold to strict facts, without making any assumptions.

The Detroit Jewish Chronicle, a Jewish newspaper, reported in 1935 that Roosevelt was descended from the Spanish Jew Rossocampo. In 1939 Adolf Schmalix concluded in his “Are the Roosevelts Jewish?” that Roosevelt is the descendant of a Dutch family whose earliest member is the farmer Claes Martensen, who was named after his farm, called “Het Roosevelt.” On the other hand, it is clear that the Roosevelts took on Jewish blood through marriage once in the United States. Schmalix proves that as early as the second generation on American soil (from the 17th to the 18th Century), a Jewess Sarah Salomons joined the Roosevelt family. The mother of President Roosevelt was Sarah Delano, who Schmalix maintains was a descendant of the Italian or Spanish Jewish family Delano (Dillan, Delan, or Dillano).

The President held a press conference on 20 March 1935 on the matter of his presumed Jewish ancestry (Neue freie Presse, Vienna). Roosevelt said: “My ancestors came to America from Holland over 300 years ago. I am not worried about whether or not they were Jewish.” Schmalix notes: “This is a clear case of Talmud morality.” Schmalix says that Mrs. Roosevelt’s mother was Anna Rebekka Hall, and notes: “There are many families named Hall in the USA, some of Jewish origin, others of Christian origin from Germany or England.” (p. 17)

The oldest son James Roosevelt, formerly the president’s private secretary, is vice chairman of Samuel Goldwyn’s well-known Jewish film company. Roosevelt’s Jewish environment and the influence of Jewry on the USA has already been sufficiently discussed.


When Roosevelt became president, not only millions of Americans, but people around the world asked “What does Roosevelt want?” Many hoped that the new American president would combat the need and misery, gangsterism and plutocracy, the power of Jewry. Those who put their hope in him did not realize his Jewish connections. Roosevelt disappointed their hopes and went in the opposite direction. Roosevelt has sworn allegiance to Jewry.

Jewry has had two centers in recent decades: New York and Moscow, London, Paris, Prague, Warsaw, Geneva, and other Jewish centers were of secondary importance. In Moscow the Jew ruled with GPU methods: murder and the most blatant exploitation. In New York, he used his financial strength. To win over America for the Jewish war against Germany, Jewry infiltrated plutocratic circles. They believed that they had finished off Europe for good through the Treaty of Versailles, since they had defeated Germany, the heart and soul of the continent, once and for all. They believed they had eliminated it as a factor. The plutocrats wanted to inherit the wealth of our ancient part of the world. They thought the time had come when for a few dollars they could buy all the European culture that had had been built with so much effort and sacrifice over a time span of 4500 years. Who could stop them? The American newcomers were already imagining themselves in possession of our splendid and immortal cultural values. In a few years everything would be forgotten and everything would be Americanized. That is what these cultural ignoramuses thought, who themselves have no culture or traditions.

They are mistaken!

Their time is far distant. In fact, it will never come! This war that Roosevelt and Churchill are waging on behalf of Jewry will end with the victory of the young peoples who the plutocrats have mocked as have-nots, whose last possessions they wanted to steal.

A new world order is coming! Jewry will have nothing to say about it. The power of the plutocrats will be broken forever.

The judgment on Roosevelt and Churchill will be as follows: Not only have they plunged foreign peoples into a world war, they have sacrificed and betrayed their own people in the interests of Jewry.

Disney and the Jews: Eisner and His Kind Must Stop Harming Our Children

by Dr. William Luther Pierce

We’ve spoken about the Jewish control of the news and entertainment media before, but it’s a matter of such urgency that we need to talk about it again and again. It is absolutely essential for us to understand who controls our mass media and how they use their control to undermine America.

Very recently a major rearrangement in the media world took place when the Walt Disney company paid $19 billion to take control of Capital Cities/ABC, the company that owns the ABC television network. That makes the Disney company the biggest of the media conglomerates. And it makes the man who controls Disney, Michael Eisner, the most powerful media boss in the world.

What does this mean for the future of our people? Should we be concerned that the company which brought us Mickey Mouse, Donald Duck, and Snow White will in the future be playing a much bigger role in forming the opinions of American television viewers and setting the moral and cultural standards of our nation?

I’ll answer that question: Yes, we certainly should be concerned, because the Walt Disney company is not what it used to be. It has been transformed from a wholesome producer of children’s entertainment into a malign instrument of subversion, whose purpose is to weaken and destroy our people.

To understand how this happened, let’s go back to the beginning. Walt Disney was born in 1901 in a working-class, Midwestern American family. He spent his early years on the family farm in Missouri. As a teenager he helped support his family by delivering newspapers. He later attributed his ability to overcome obstacles and achieve success to the work discipline that he developed as a boy with the newspaper route.

Although young Walt came from a typical American background, with no advantages or privileges, he was a person of exceptional talent and drive. He felt a strong artistic urge while he was still in grade school, and he took a correspondence course in drawing. He continued to develop his drawing skills in high school as a cartoonist for his school paper. He dropped out of school at 16 and served in the First World War. After the war, instead of finishing high school, he and another young artist began experimenting with animated films in a tiny studio of their own in Kansas City. Using very primitive equipment, they made short, animated cartoons based on fairy tales. They tried to market their films through a New York film distributor, but the New Yorker took advantage of the struggling, young filmmakers: he stole their work and left them destitute.

In 1922, at the ripe age of 20, Walt Disney decided to make a fresh start in Hollywood. He sold his camera to raise enough money to make the trip to California. There he enlisted the support of his brother Roy as a business manager, and he persuaded his fellow artist in Kansas City to come join him. With Walt’s drive and determination, they opened a new film studio. They invented a film character they called Oswald the Rabbit, and a series of animated cartoons featuring Oswald enabled the small studio to gain a foothold in the film business.

Later, when sound films were introduced in 1927, Walt invented Mickey Mouse. Walt himself provided Mickey’s voice. Mickey Mouse was an enormous success and helped Walt Disney Productions prosper and grow.

Over the years Walt Disney’s fertile imagination gave us Donald Duck, Goofy and Pluto, Dumbo the elephant, and a score of other animal characters which have fascinated children all over the world for more than 60 years. In 1937 Disney produced his great masterpiece, Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs. This beautifully animated fairy tale appealed to adults as well as to children. Like many fairy tales its roots lie deep in the racial consciousness of our people.

After Snow White came Pinnochio, Fantasia, and Bambi. Walt Disney Productions became a major power in the American film industry. And it was unique, in that it was the only major film producer in Hollywood not owned or controlled by Jews. The fact that Walt Disney was not a Jew caused problems for him, however. He was surrounded by Jews who resented his influence on American culture. A whispering campaign was organized against him. Stories were spread that he was a fascist. He began having labor problems.

The real problem, of course, was that Walt Disney’s vision of the world, as reflected in the films he produced, was wholly different from that of the Jewish film producers around him. As long as Walt was making Mickey Mouse or Donald Duck cartoons, this problem could be overlooked. When he began animating feature-length fairy tales like Snow White and Cinderella, the Jews in Hollywood became increasingly nervous. The world of Snow White was an entirely White world, a European world. It stirred racial memories in White Americans, and the aim of the Jewish media bosses then as now was to make White Americans forget their roots. They wanted to begin promoting multiculturalism as soon as the Second World War was over, and Walt was in their way. They couldn’t push racial mixing in their films and have someone as popular as Walt Disney refuse to go along: the contrast would be obvious to the public. Even Disney’s extremely popular Nature films were resented by the rest of Hollywood. Films which promoted a love for animals and the natural world were viewed with suspicion by men whose view of life was entirely economic and urban.

These may seem like subtle differences, and in fact most people outside of Hollywood were oblivious to the ideological and cultural conflict between Walt Disney and the other film producers. The closest that the conflict came to attracting public attention was during the 1940s and early 1950s, when Walt Disney’s total lack of sympathy for Communism and his refusal to let Communist propaganda be introduced into any of his productions set him apart from the rest of Hollywood. While Walt was alive, however, there wasn’t much that Hollywood could do about him. He was too popular with the American people.

After Walt died in 1966, however, the situation changed. His company had depended on his genius for its prosperity, and without him it had a difficult time keeping up with the competition. After Disney company profits had declined for several years, Jewish corporate raiders Saul Steinberg and Irwin Jacobs moved in for the kill. In 1984, after Steinberg had milked the company of $32 million, Disney family shareholders were too weak to resist a takeover by Michael Eisner, the Jewish boss of Paramount Pictures. Eisner in turn brought in as his second in command another Jew, Jeffrey Katzenberg. The company that Walt Disney built — the company that gave us Snow White and Fantasia — has been in Jewish hands ever since.

During his first day as chairman of the Disney company — his first day, believe it or not — Eisner ordered the production of an R-rated film, about the kinky sexual misadventures of a typically neurotic Jewish family in the Los Angeles area. This was the first R-rated film ever produced by the Disney company — but certainly not the last.

Now, no one who knows me considers me a prude. I believe that there’s a place for adult films. I also believe that there should be a place for childhood innocence and childhood fantasy and childhood imagination: that is, a place for the sort of films, which Walt Disney used to produce. And there ought to be a place in America for a company which produces such films. There ought to be a place for a filmmaker with an artistic vision and artistic talent instead of merely the craving for profit.

Actually, what Michael Eisner has done to the Disney company is far worse than cutting the soul out of it. He has transformed it into another instrument in the Jewish campaign to multiculturalize America. He has made it into a spiritually destructive propaganda instrument aimed at our children.

There are no better examples of this than a couple of recent children’s films produced by the Disney company under Eisner: The Jungle Book and Pocahontas. Actually, in 1967, the year after Walt Disney’s death, the original Disney company made an animated film based on Kipling’s Jungle Book stories of India. It was a film in the Disney tradition, made to entertain children and not to brainwash them. Last year Mr. Eisner produced a new, Politically Correct version of The Jungle Book. The new version, which uses live characters instead of animation, promotes interracial sex. In Mr. Eisner’s version, White males are portrayed as contemptible, cowardly, inept, and disloyal. The White heroine rejects her British-officer fiancee‚, and lets herself be wooed and won by an Indian jungle boy, played by a Chinese actor. And, of course, it bears no resemblance at all to anything written by Rudyard Kipling. I hardly need comment on the film Pocahontas, which has received so much publicity recently, except to say that its message is the same as that of Eisner ‘s version of The Jungle Book: namely, that racial mixing is A-OK, that there’s absolutely no reason why a White man should not marry an Indian woman or why a White woman should not have an affair with a Chinaman.

It took Mr. Eisner ten years to drag the Disney company down to the Pocahontas level. He is a careful man. He knows that there is a lot at stake. He certainly doesn’t want to move too fast and cause a negative reaction from the American public. He didn’t want to alert the American public to his intentions ten years ago. So he started with R-rated sex films and gradually moved to films which tell White children that miscegenation is fine and noble, and that non-Whites really have much more character than Whites. But I believe that Mr. Eisner had this outcome clearly in his mind from the first day that he took over the Disney company and began degrading it.

And now Mr. Eisner will have the ABC television network under his control too. I don’t expect that to change the party line at ABC very much. ABC, like the other TV networks, has been pretty solidly Jewish from the beginning. It was headed by Jewish media boss Leonard Goldenson for more than 30 years. The fact that Capital Cities Communications, whose chairman is Thomas Murphy, a Gentile, merged with Goldenson’s ABC ten years ago didn’t really have much influence on programming. Goldenson’s people remained in the policy-making positions. Eisner’s buyout of ABC just consolidates things in Jewish hands a bit. It takes Murphy out of the picture and makes it easier for ABC to become even more Politically Correct than it was. It means that we will be seeing programs on the ABC television network promoting miscegenation and undermining White self-confidence a little more frequently than before. It speeds up the schedule a bit for introducing even more destructive propaganda than before. It means that our children will be subjected to somewhat more intense brainwashing than before.

The situation with the rest of the mass media of news and entertainment isn’t really different, of course. Just as Jews took over Hollywood in the 1930s, they also took over the other media, and today they have such an overwhelming influence that even those who are not Jews go along with their policies in order to get along.

Often when I point out this fact of Jewish media control to persons who are Politically Correct, they will respond by saying that it makes no difference who controls the media. Why does it bother me that Jews run Hollywood, they ask in a sneering, condescending tone. I know that people who respond in this way aren’t being honest. They would certainly think it made a difference if I controlled the media, for example. And actually I’d be concerned if any group with an agenda of its own had control of the media. I’d be concerned if all of the media were in the hands of Southern Baptists, for example, or radical vegetarians.

I am especially concerned about the Jewish control of the media, however, for two reasons. First, the people who control the media also control the political process in America: they control, in effect, the policies of our government and the course taken by our society. That’s because the politicians, whether they’re Democrats or Republicans, will not stand up to the Jews. Instead they grovel at the Jews’ feet. Every politician knows that he must be portrayed favorably by the media if he is to be elected, and every politician knows who controls the media.

The second reason why Jewish control of the media is such a disaster for us is based in the unique nature of the Jews. If Baptists controlled the media perhaps they’d persuade the government to have a law against making love on Sunday. If radical vegetarians controlled the media, we might have to eat soyburgers instead of hamburgers.

But we can survive those things. We might not be happy, but we could survive: our people could survive. Neither the Baptists nor the vegetarians would be trying to corrupt us spiritually or to destroy our race.

But corrupt and destroy are exactly what Mr. Eisner is doing. That’s the purpose of films like The Jungle Book and Pocahontas. They are aimed, first, at the spiritual corruption of our children and, ultimately, at the destruction of our people.

I know that statement sounds extreme to some people who are not familiar with the facts of Jewish media control. They think that two recent children’s films from the Walt Disney company which promote racial mixing aren’t enough evidence to condemn all of the people who control our news and entertainment media. And I must agree. One needs much more evidence than that. But the evidence is there, for anyone who is not afraid to look at it, for anyone who is not so determined to be Politically Correct that he refuses to see it.

For example, consider what has happened to the popular music industry in recent years. It’s not just the “gangsta rap” that we’ve heard a few Republican politicians complaining about because the media people who’ve been pushing “gangsta rap” moved a little too fast and caused a negative reaction from the American people. It’s the whole trend of popular music away from traditional White forms and toward non-White forms. I don’t have to tell you who controls the popular music industry in America, but I will anyway. In particular, the biggest music companies promoting Black “rap” music among White children — companies like Time Warner and MTV — are solidly Jewish. A Jew named Gerald Levin is to Time Warner what Michael Eisner is to Disney. And MTV is owned by Sumner Redstone, another Jew, through his Viacom Corporation. These three companies that I’ve just mentioned — Disney, Viacom, and Time Warner — are America’s three biggest producers of mass entertainment — they’re number one, number two, and number three, respectively — and they’re all controlled by Jews. Is that just a coincidence? Think about it!

I could spend the next hour talking about the genealogy of the biggest media bosses. What you really need to do to be convinced, however, is to study the matter for yourself. I’ll be happy to send you enough facts to get you started. Just write to me.

The idea I want to leave you with today is this: In this era in which the mass media have such a powerful influence over our people’s ideas and attitudes and values, it is essential that we take the control of those media away from a group which is utterly alien to us. It’s a group whose primary aim is to deaden our sense of identity and kill any sense of racial consciousness among us, so that we will not be able to resist the poisonous doctrines which they’re promoting. These doctrines are multiculturalism and cosmopolitanism and egalitarianism — and, of course, “diversity” — all of the racially destructive “isms” of Political Correctness.

In this era when the single most important influence on the development of a child’s self-image is television entertainment, it is essential that people like Michael Eisner and Sumner Redstone not be the ones setting the tone for that entertainment.

We all know that America has lost its sense of purpose and is drifting. We all know that American society is coming apart. We all know that our traditional values, our traditional lifestyle, our traditional heroes and role models have been disparaged and ridiculed by the controlled media. We all know that the idea of White racial guilt, the idea of deferring to minorities, the idea that we should tolerate perversion and accept it as “normal” — all of these ideas have been pushed by the mass media. Alienation and delinquency among our young people are increasing. The traditional American family is in serious decline. Racial intermarriage is on the rise. Non- White immigrants are pouring across our borders, and no serious effort is being made to stop them. Our political system has become hopelessly corrupt.

The only way that we can even begin to cure this illness is to regain complete control of our mass media. Our media must be used to give our people a sense of identity; a sense of racial community; a sense of kinship, of belonging; a sense of racial and national purpose. We must take control away from the people who are using the media now to confuse and alienate and mislead us. Only when our own people are setting the standards for the media, only when our own people are deciding what attitudes and values should be taught to our children, can we become strong and healthy again — and that means breaking the Jewish control of the media. Let me hear from you on this most important of all the issues facing our people.

Caricatures from “Der Stürmer” – translated in English and colourized!

The Year 1937 – Part 3











May 9th – the real face of the “liberation”

Artworks of Herbert Smagon

Herbert Smagon-Dresden1945_1

Herbert Smagon-Dresden1945_2

Herbert Smagon-US-Gangster

Herbert Smagon-Prag-18.5.45

Herbert Smagon-Wenzelplatz-20.5.45

Herbert Smagon-Bolschewiken

Herbert Smagon-Rote Pack

1919: 6,000,000 Jews, victims of German terror


Six Million in 1919

“The American Jewish Relief Committee is endeavouring to save from starvation six million Jews who are the helpless victims of the German Terror.”

 – Daily Kentucky New Era, Wednesday, April 9, 1919, p.4-5