Der Stürmer

The official blog of the site "Der Stürmer" –

Month: September, 2014

The Jew as World Parasite


The Jew wins with the lie and dies with the truth.

Adolf Hitler

 The source: G. G. Otto, Der Jude als Weltparasit (Munich: Eher Verlag, 1943). It was issued by Alfred Rosenberg’s office. I am translating from the edition provided to the military, with thanks to Ken Fields, who provided scans of the original.

 Der Jude als Weltparasit


In this war for the very existence of the German people, we must daily remind ourselves that Jewry unleashed this war against us. It makes no difference if the Jew conceals himself as a Bolshevist or a plutocrat, a Freemason or uses some other form of concealment, or even appears without any mask at all: he always remains the same. He is the one who so agitated and spiritually influenced the peoples that stand against us today such that they have become more or less spineless tools of International Jewry.

The ways in which the Jew has brought large peoples and states against us has already been made clear in two previous pamphlets, The Fateful Battle in the East and Europe and America. These proved the case for those two states. Both are, therefore, the introductions to this pamphlet, The Jew as World Parasite, At the beginning of the war’s sixth year, we may not permit ourselves to neglect the Jewish question in any way. First of all, we must always combat the remnants of past education, the once general view in which Jewry is seen only as a religious denomination. Instead, the racial mixture that is Jewry must be emphasized. The religious beliefs of the Jews are completely irrelevant. Instead, we must focus solely on blood, on the racial foundation.

From the beginning of its existence, the National Socialist German Workers’ Party has always attempted to educate the German people about these facts. As early as 1922 the Führer said: “We were also those who for the first time made major efforts to explain to the people a danger that had crept up on us, and which millions of people did not recognize, even though it threatened to ruin us all: the danger of the Jews.” In his book Mein Kampf (p. 335), he said: “Over the long term, he can preserve his existence within other peoples only if he succeeds in persuading them that he is not a people, but only a ‘religious community,’ albeit a peculiar one.”

The first and greatest lie, that Jewry is not a racial question, but a religion, inevitably leads to further lies. Another lie concerns the Jew’s language. It is not a way for him to express his thoughts, but rather a means to conceal them. Although he may speak German, French, or some other language, he thinks in a Jewish way. He may spout German poetry, but he remains a member of his race. Heinrich Heine is the best example.

The importance of such comprehensive educational activity, which was carried out even before the NSDAP by some decent Germans, can best be seen in our people’s recent history. Past generations saw even the mention of the Jewish Question as impolite. One intentionally ignored all these questions, even if the individual Jew was usually perceived instinctively as a foreign body.

Why do we Germans, and almost we alone, fight Jewry so energetically? Why in the course of German history have there always been times when the German element turns against Jewry? Alfred Rosenberg, in his book The Path of the Jew throughout History, provides the answer: “There is probably no nation in Europe in which people’s inner nature is so deep, and so influential, as in the German people. In its depths, therefore, it is the spiritual opposite of the Jews…”

Despite that, the power of Jewry and its supporters grew so great in the German people that it lead to the collapse in 1918. The primary cause for this was the large increase in the population of our people, combined with growing liberal tendencies, which led more and more Germans to misperceive the fact of the racial problem, and thus become indifferent to the Jewish danger.

The National Socialist worldview has in recent years opened the eyes of the greater part of our people to this problem. The German people has recognized that the Jew has crept in like a parasite not only into our people, but into all the peoples of the earth, and that it is attempting to corrupt the original racial characteristics of the peoples in order to destroy them both racially and as states, and thereby rule over them.

It is, nonetheless, false if one German or another concludes that since the Jew has been eliminated from German politics, that Jewish influence has also been entirely eliminated from our thinking and conduct. One even sometimes hears the superficial view that things are the same in other peoples of the world, since they have followed our example. That is true in only a few cases. Instead, we must remember that according to reliable statistics, there are about 16 million religious Jews in the world, 10 million of whom live in Europe alone, almost three fifths of the total. Another 4.5 million live in America, 800,000 in Asia, 530,000 in Africa, 25,000 in Australia. These figures alonge prove that the Jewish danger is particularly great in Europe. It is also clear why the dramatic growth of Jewry in America is such a danger for us. The Jew is establishing his main forces in the Western Hemisphere, from where he believes he will be able to continue to wage war against us from a secure position.

Despite the fact that he feels so secure, at least for the moment, the Jew is thinking hard about why the awakened peoples of Europe are defending themselves against him. Nothing reveals his uncertainty about the path his laws dictate to world denomination than what we often read in the works of Jewish authors.

It is in part this uncertainty that drives the Jews to pursue their goal of world domination more quickly and more consistently. Even Goethe wrote: “The Jew will not spare us.” We can be sure that this is more true today than ever before. In the book by the Jews Zangwill and Roth titled Now and Forever, a conversation reveals what the Jewish world parasite sees as its final goal, world domination [the book referred to is Now and Forever: a Conversation with Mr. Israel Zangwill on the Jew and the Future (New York: R. M. McBride, 1925)]. With all the passion in the Jewish breast, the book tells the story of a Jew out for revenge. He wanders from country to country, gathering his forces, at the head of which he ruins Europe with sadistic horror and lust for destruction, this Europe that will not bow to the Jew, but instead stands in the way of his path to world domination.

We National Socialists believe the Führer when he says that at the end of the battle, unleashed on us as his strongest adversary by the Jewish world parasite, the Jewish race in Europe will be destroyed. Until this destruction occurs, we must always remember that the Jew is our absolute enemy who will shrink at nothing. He knows but a single goal: our complete destruction.

Part I

The Nature of the Parasite
1. What is a parasite?

This section outlines the evils of parasites in nature.

  1. The Jew is the Parasite of Humanity

The so-called educated classes mocked and scorned the NSDAP as it began its struggle, particularly when the Führer repeatedly said that the Jew was a parasite. They rejected the Führer’s statement that all of decent humanity suffers today under Jewish parasitism. At best, they laughed about such “fanatics.” Of course, one had often had bitter experiences with the business practices of individual Jews, but people did not realize that Jewry concealed itself as a religious community. Their own religious sentiments prevented them from drawing the logical conclusion. They did not want to recognize the true nature of this so-called religious community.

If the Führer said that “A man who believes he can come to a satisfactory agreement with parasites is like the tree that thinks it will benefit from concluding an agreement with a medlar,” some found this awkward. There were already too many connections to Jewry, one could no longer break free. One more or less let the Jew go his way, as the Führer said in the same connection: “He goes his way, sneaking into every people to hollow them out, using lies and slander, poisoning and disruption, intensifying the battle until the bloody extermination of his hated enemy.”

Today, therefore, it is still necessary to reveal the Jew as world parasite, to make him visible, to rightly understand him.

We therefore state:

The Jew is the parasite of humanity. He can be a parasite for an individual person, a social parasite for whole peoples, and the world parasite of humanity.

To understand his full nature, we must investigate his existence, which means examining his character, his views on the values of life, his claim to world domination, and his ability to assimilate.

Part II

The Nature of the Jewish Person
II a. The Racial Origins of the Jews

  1. Jewry — a Counter-race

If we thoroughly study the racial nature of the Jew, we conclude that Jewry is not a race in the ordinary sense of the word. Instead, as Houston Steward Chamberlain wrote, it must be seen as a counter-race, although the term “counter-race” cannot be understood in a biological sense. From a biological standpoint, Jewry is a stable, inbred mixture of extreme races and racial rubbish. The concept of “counter-race” primarily means the destructive and disruptive effect of Jewry within natural races. The distinguishing mark of Jewry within human races has to do on the one hand with the racial makeup of the Jews, who have been scattered for millennia, and on the other hand in their stubborn adherence to the crassest materialism, based on their so-called religious laws.

Jewry is the result of the mixing of every possible race. It is the biggest racial mish-mash in history. This racial mish-mash is so dangerous for all peoples because it because it includes elements from every race. The bad characteristics of these races have been passed on for many generations through Jewry in ever stronger form. From this artificial, rootless, materialistic racial mish-mash, a parasitic counter-race has developed among the peoples.

The core of Jewry is the coming together of rootless, rejected, asocial, sick, and degenerate elements of the various races, predominately of Middle Eastern and Oriental origins. One should remember that in antiquity, lepers were ejected from their racial community, just as were criminal asocial elements.

  1. Asocial Elements Steadily Added to the Jewish Racial Mixture

As a result of its parasitic distribution among the peoples over thousands of years, Jewry wormed its way into almost all the races on earth. As a social parasite, it infected the lower classes, slaves, proletarians, the mob, etc. They had the least resistance to Jewish racial parasitism. These classes, which had largely lost their instincts against racial foreigners, allowed Jewish blood to infiltrate.

Already in the Old Testament, we read in Exodus 12:38 about the departure from Egypt of the Children of Israel: “Many others of the rabble left with them.”

Since these lower classes leaned strongly to criminality and asocial behavior, and were inclined to political revolution, the Jewish racial mish-mash incorporated the negative characteristics of these races, and increased them over the generations by mixing with the blood of the lowest elements of other races, passing them on in increased degree from generation to generation. Thus, the Jewish counter-race moved ever more to the negative side. The artificial Jewish racial mish-mash was held together by the force of materialistic religious laws that focused on life this side of the grave. It promised its adherents prosperity on earth, and lordship over all other peoples and nations. This Jewish racial mixture was kept strictly separate from the influence of foreign gods.

During several hundred years of the Babylonian Captivity, the Jewish racial mish-mash was strengthened by inbreeding. The inclusion of foreign elements, from this point on, was almost nonexistent. For the first time in history, a well-defined and distinct type emerged in the form of the Jewish counter-race.

This Jewish counter-race incorporated to the greatest degree the bad characteristics of nearly all races that it had inherited over the centuries by a process of negative selection. The Jewish racial mish-mash primarily carries the traits of the Middle Eastern and Oriental races, but also influences of the Eastern, Western, and Nordic races. Mongolian and Negro traits also are frequently present.

  1. The Main Groups in the Jewish Racial Mix

This section outlines the alleged racial history of the Jews.

  1. The Ashkenazi and the Shepardim

Discusses these two Jewish groups.

  1. Gentile Converts in the Jewish Religious Community

Aside from these groups belong to Jewry, there are several Gentile splinter groups that call themselves Jews because they have joined the Jewish faith, but have nothing to do with Jewry from a racial standpoint. Such splinter groups that have joined the Jewish faith include Yeminite Jews in Arabia who converted to Judaism about 450 A.D, the Falash in Abysnnia, the Caucausus Jews from the Caspian Sea, Georgian tribes of Iranian racial origins who later intermarried with Mongolians from the Volga area and probably were converted to Judaism by Jews from Persia, the black Jews of Bombay (Hindustanis presumably converted by Spanish Jews), Chinese Jews in Hunan Province, the Marambu Negroes along the Loango Coast who follow Jewish rituatls, and the Khazars.

These groups joined Jewry through prosyletism, meaning religious conversion, but do not belong to the foreign tribes that are part of the Jewish racial mixture. Although they belong to the Jewish religious community, they are not part of Jewry in the narrow sense. Its strict separatism is evidenced by these facts.

  1. Jewry and Inbreeding

This brief overview of Jewish racial origins demonstrates the uniqueness of the origin and development of Jewry, which is precisely the opposite of the origin and development of all other races. As we have seen, other races grew organically from particular situations over an ethnically-based history, through a process of contact and struggle in commerce and war with other peoples. Unlike other peoples, it did not attempt to raise its members to a higher level through industry and labor.

Jewry is neither a race nor a mixed race. It is a confusing mixture of races, racial mixtures, and racial fragments, artificially held together by its rabbis. It acts as a kind of counter-race, which can only destroy, never build. Jewry is the product of the inbreeding of asocial, criminal, sick, degenerate, and rejected elements of every possible race in the ancient world. Jewry is neither a race nor a people nor a religion in our sense of those words. It possesses no homeland, but leads a rootless, parasitic life at the expense of the host peoples. Its current homeland is largely the criminal neighborhoods of the great cities of the world, its god is money, its policy is revolution and the destruction of the cultural treasures of mankind.

II b. Physical Characteristics

  1. Outward Appearance Should Conceal Reality

[The section begins by noting that although many Jews can be identified by outward features, others learned over time to conceal themselves so as to blend in to the society they were part of.]

The great mass of Jewry, however, was incapable of overcoming their physical appearances. That became clear to each German who wanted to see as he observed Jews after 1933 from a politically trained viewpoint. This was particularly clear to those who were able to look into the concentration or labor camps.

In comparison with us, what a difference in conduct and behavior. A German who must spend a long time in a camp, perhaps as a prisoner of war, even under the most primitive of conditions, will behave as a member of the Germanic family of peoples. He will maintain his dignity and personal appearance. In particular, he will not lose his sense of the necessity of cleanliness, both physical and spiritual.

  1. Aggravating Pressures

It is exactly the opposite with the Jew. As long as he, with the help of lies, is striving for full equality with his host people, attempting to deceive them about his drive for absolute rule, he exerts himself to the fullest to resist his own drives, in order that he may behave as expected. But at the very moment that these pressures, for whatever reason, disappear, he sinks back into the filth, even if he has seemed to be a cultivated Jew for decades. In a way we cannot understand, he stops taking care of his body and manner. After perhaps only a few days, and certainly after a few weeks, he reveals once more the original appearance of his race: the stooped little filthy and greasy Jew. It had only been a facade. Even over decades, he had been unable to change his real nature, nor had he wanted to. Never has a Jew, if he was honest, had any real interest in learning from his host people. After all, he was firmly convinced that he would one day be lord of his host people, and that he could then impose his law on them, also in the physical realm.

  1. Dislike of Physical Labor

One of Jewry’s particular characteristics is a dislike of physical labor. His physical appearance alone did not predestine him to physical labor. But as the result of generations of inbreeding and of his racial mixture, the Jew made this his goal. He would rather trade, leaving work to others. His Talmud doctrines assisted him. In Germany, we hardly ever saw a Jew among miners, farmers, masons, and earth workers, or other professions that involved heavy labor. When a Jew did work, there was some sort of “big business” involved. Then he could work for quite a period. The decisive factor, however, is that the Jew has no ethical relationship to labor, as we do. For him, labor is one of various possibilities for exploitation. He does not create value, but rather his goal is to heap up money.

II c. Spiritual Manifestations

  1. The Conflict between German Genius and the Jewish Demon

We Germans have the old concept of a “cheerful” (hochgemut) person. We envision such a person as having the best strengths of character and will, guided by high ideals, and doing everything that serves the good of the whole. Alfred Rosemberg writes about the Jews in The Myth of the Twentieth Century: “Whenever the strength of the soaring Nordic spirit begins to weaken, the earth-bound Ahasver sucks on the tiring muscles; whever a wound appears in a nation’s body the Jewish demon finds the sick place and as a parasite benefits from the weak moments of the world’s great. He does not wish to achieve domination through the heroism of battle, but rather to make the world “pay” (zinsbar machen) the fantastically strong parasites. Not fight, but inflitrate, not advance values but exploit decay, that is the law that he follows and can never escape — so long as he lives.”

We are in the middle of this great, and perhaps final, conflict between two worlds. Perhaps unintentionally, a half-Jew (Oskar Schmitz in Der Jude, 1926, special issue) discussed the conflict between German genius and the Jewish demon. He writes: “The evil demon of the Jews. . . is Phariseeism. He is both the bearer of the hope for a Messiah, but also the guardian who ensures that no Messiah comes…. That is the specific, and very dangerous, form of Jewish negation of the world. The Pharisee actively denies the world, he works to be sure that noting takes form, and is therefore driven by a daemonic force. This apparent denial is also a particularly forceful form of affirming the world, but with negative characteristics. The Buddhist would be happy if the world around him passed away, the Pharaisee would be finished if nothing around him took on living form, for then his life-denying function would no longer exist. They (the deniers) are the spirit that always denies, concealed by an ecstatic affirmation of a utopian goal that can never be realized — the coming of the Messiah. They would have to hang themselves like Judas if he really did come, since they are entirely incapable of affirmation.”

  1. The Jew Corrupts the Intellectual Products of his Host Peoples

Nothing really has to be added to those words. However, we should look at futher spiritual manifestations of Jewry.

Over the centuries, the Jews have memorized and passed on Talmudic doctrines. In religious discussions they have worked through the pros and cons of their laws, looking for loopholes that can be used to get around the laws, or ways of following them particularly well. Over the course of time, Jews have developed a mental flexibility that often impresses the naive observer. Our ancestors in particular were often unable to defend themselves against influences from the Jewish spirit. The Jews seemed able not only to understand each and every intellectual movement of thought from the German and other peoples of the world, but also use it masterfully. The German, for example, might have an idea — it was the Jew that gave it form. A great German or other thinker in the world might discover a brilliant idea — the Jew cleverly became its proponent. No one saw how hard the Jew worked to follow the thought processes of the European peoples. When it was noticed, unpolitical people were astonished at how cleverly Jewry was able to explain deep intellectual matters so clearly.

We today must recognize that the Jew was not interested in competing with the great ideas and personalities of our intellectual world, but rather that for him those intellectual labors were nothing but a political tool that he could use as a lever of spiritual destruction on the peoples he intended to rule. Spinoza is a classic example. He used the thought of Decartes and Giordano Brumo in a way that completely changed its original sense. Leading Jews have done the same with the thinking of other great Europeans; they pretended to be the real proponents of these ideas and were nonetheless greatest liars. Remember how Karl Marx falsified the German conception of socialism as a natural order of life, based deeply in German blood, and turned into the phantom of the dictatorship of the proletariat. This doctrine so deeply mirrored the nature of its Jewish inventor that the world knew only to connect it to his name: “Marxism.”

  1. The “Greatest” Jews are the Greatest Corrupters

People have allowed themselves to be blinded by Jewish intellectuals, and do so even today. How much was said in Germany about the abilities of Jewish attorneys. We need only recall the “great defender Dr. Alsberg.” What praise there was for the “great” philosopher Einstein, “the Newton of our day,” for the “great” doctors Freud and Hirschfeld. How much praise people attempted to heap up for the many Jewish university professors, for the whole so-called “intellectual world.” A look at the influence of the Jews and Jewry on German literature gives opportunity to see how the much-praised Jewish intellectualism was nothing more than the most bitter and painful expression of the destructive Jewish spirit on its host people, even when one looks at less well-known writers such as Maximilian Harden, Arthur Schnitzler, or Emil Ludwig.

  1. The Lack of a Concept of Honor

In this regard, one must note the striking lack of a concept of honor in the intellectual realm. Alfred Rosenberg (Myth, pp. 686-687) writes: “The fact that they lack a true concept of honor is shown by the religious laws that often even order deception. This is laid down in astounding ways in the Talmud and in the Schulchan Aruch. Schopenhauer, the brutal seeker after truth, called them the “great masters of lying.” Kant said: “a nation of merchants and cheaters.” Rosenberg compellingly argues that Jewry does not display a great part of what is to us normal life. One cannot speak of morality in the European sense. Aside from self-praise that rubs us the wrong way — “Just as the lamb, so are the Jews perfectly holy.” (Schir hasch-schirum suta 6, 6) —the Talmud has an abundance of doctrines that enable us to understand what the Jew thinks about Gentiles:

The Jew is your comrade, the Gentile is not a comrade. (Talmud Sanhedrin 72b, Tosafot).

As long as the Jew does the will of Jahwe, his work will be done by the hands of others. (Talmud Terakot 35b)

It is permitted to incite the sinners (Gentiles) of this world into war. (Talmud Berakot 7b, Megilla 6b)

Kill the best of the Gentiles! (Talmud Aboda zara 26b, Tosafot)

The belongings of Gentiles are like the desert, and he who first seizes them may keep them. (Talmud Baba batra 54b)

There is no honor among the Gentiles. (Talmud Sanhedrin 74b)

These few quotations provide some indication of their so-called morality, but there are many more compelling examples. We refer the reader to the books by Alfred Rosenberg and Dr. Johann Pohl.

We may conclude this secton with a quotation from the Führer, taken from his 12 April 1922 speech titled “The ‘Agitators’ of the Truth.” He clearly expressed the nature of Jewry: “Jewish World Bolshevism is an absolutely foreign body in the communuty of cultured European nations. It makes not the slightest contribution to our economy or culture, but only spreads confusion. It makes not a single positive contribution on the international stage of life in Europe or the world, but rather brings forth only propagandistic charts of lying statistics and agitational posters.”

II d. The Law of Jewry

16: The Talmud

17: Schulchan Aruch

  1. Jewish Religious Law and Preserving Jewish Blood

Part III

Jewry among the Peoples

  1. The First Jewish Migrations
  2. First Jewish Appeance in Germany
  3. The Jews Destroy the Graeco-Roman Cultural World
  4. Jews Gain Privileges in Germanic Lands
  5. New Trade Routes Help the Spread of Jewry
  6. Jewish Explusions
  7. The Jew Enters England
  8. Do the Jews have a Fatherland?

Is it actually true, one may ask, that the Jews have no real fatherland? The short summary of Jewish dispersal does not by itself answer this critical question. We cite Ferdinand Fried’s book The Rise of the Jews for the answer: “They are not rooted in any land, but they proliferate everywhere, acting as destructive parasitic bacteria in each host people. This destructive power became truly powerful only when deceitful commerce was combined with a religion suited to it. The nature of the Jewish faith — seen from this perspective — is that its adherents need no homeland, no fatherland, but rather are content with “Jerusalem” (“over there in the light”). That corresponds to their rootlessness. Their law (the Torah) is the spiritual bond that holds together all those who are racially and religiously related, even if they are scattered across the whole world. This internal force of faith favors racial relatives and generates bitter hardness and passionate hatred against everything foreign (the foreign host peoples, the Goy). They are scattered and spread out around the world, but are held together by the ethical command to undermine the detested foreigners.”

  1. The Ghetto
  2. Migration of the Jews across the Seas
  3. Palestine as a Jewish State
  4. The Soviet Jewish Republic in Birobidschan

Part IV

The Jewish World Parasite in the Bloodstream and Organs of the Peoples

  1. The Creeping Poison
  2. The Economy — Battleground and Domain of Jewry
  3. The Jews Achieve Emancipation
  4. The Emancipated Jew as Destroyer of Ethnic Life
  5. Jewry at the Head of the Workers’ Movement
  6. The Communist Manifesto: Jewry’s Declaration of War on the World
  7. “Everything German is Like an Emetic to Me”
  8. The Bourgeoise Fails
  9. Jewish Blood Enters German Families
  10. Freemasonry as an Organ of Jewry
  11. The Jewish Press Dictatorship
  12. Jewry and the Parties
  13. The Jews Influence Culture
  14. Jewry’s “Great Days” During Germany’s Decline
  15. The Role of Jewry among Other Peoples

Part V: Ideas on Jewish World Domination

  1. Striving for World Domination is a Religious Duty for the Jew
  2. Jewish World Domination Would Mean Tyranny and Slavery

Jewish world domination would in no way be the world-wide rule of equals or the solution to social tensions, but rather following the doctrines of Jewish law all of Gentile humanity would be exploited, tyrannized, enslaved, and thrown back into the darkest misery in ways we can today hardly imagine. Russia’s fate provides at least some examples. It is therefore no accident that the Jews have their greatest hope in Russia with its human masses and its territorial wealth, seeing it as the springboard to reach its goals.

From the Midrash Talpiot, published in Warsaw in 1875, we can see how Jewry envisions ruling Gentiles: “God created the Gentiles in human form, although they are the same as animals… However, he created them for no other purpose than to serve the Jews day and night in never-ending toil. It is not becoming for Jews to be served by animals in the form of animals, but rather by animals in human form (p. 255).” According to the Talmud tractate Berakot 54b: “The belongings of Gentiles are wile the desert, and may be taken by the first who seizes them.” According to Talmud tractate Berakot 35b: “As long as the Jews follow the will of Jahwe, others will do their work for them.” And finally, tractate Aboda zara 26b Tosafot states: “Killing the best of the Gentiles is the surest way to achieve world domination.”

  1. The Protocols of the Elders of Zion

Here we should mention the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, World Jewry’s conspiratorial plan, which can be seen as Jewry’s general staff plan for world domination. It shows Jews how to infiltrate the bloodstream and organs of Gentile peoples. It reveals how Gentile states are to be undermined to make them completely subject to the Jewish parasite.

Through control of finance and the press, by inciting the workers, by promoting class conflict, by destroying the rights of property owners, by inciting war and conflict between peoples, by fighting against religion, by eliminating Gentile intelligentsia, Gentile governments and the Gentile world will be replaced by Jewish world domination, by a reign of terror.

Here are several examples from this Jewish plan:

“Therefore we must not stop at bribery, deceit, and treachery when they should serve toward the attainment of our end.”

“It [the Jewish empire] must institute a reign of terror….”

“Thanks to the press, we have got gold in our hands, notwithstanding that we have had to gather it out of the oceans of blood and tears.”

“We will turn countries into battlegrounds of insurrections.”

“These mobs will rush delightedly to shed the blood of those whom, in the simplicity of their ignorance, they have envied from their cradles, and whose property they will then be able to loot.”

“To control public opinion, we must sow doubt and discord.”

“In the place of the rulers of today we shall set up a bogey which will be called the super-government administration.”

“We shall destroy the importance of the family and its educational value.”

“We will know how to prevent highly gifted persons from rising from among the Gentiles.”

“God has granted to us, His Chosen People, the gift of dispersion, and in this which appears in all eyes to be our weakness, has come forth our strength, which has now brought us to the threshold of sovereignty over all the world. There now remains not much more for us to build upon the foundation we have laid.”

These protocols are obviously to be seen as a secret Jewish document. It was a major political catastrophe for World Jewry when the Protocols became known to Gentiles peoples. The Jews used every possible means of deception and falsehood to argue that they were not genuine. That was a useless attempt; anyone viewing world events could see that the Jews were strictly following the guidelines of the Protocols. The whole body of Jewish literature provides the countless mosaic stones from which the Protocols came and which provide abundant proof for the genuineness of this Jewish world conspiracy.

The wind of the Talmud spirit blows toward us from the Protocols. We hear the Zohar, we find filthy passages from the Old Testament of Jewish history, in a somewhat different form. At its foundation, the Protocols is the product of Jewish thinking across the ages. They took form once World Jewry felt strong enough to organize itself politically. At about the same time the “Alliance Israélite Universelle” was founded, the first world-wide Jewish organization, and at the beginning of the 1860s Mordechai (Karl Marx), the apostle of class struggle, appeared. A few years later the whole civilized world looked to the Paris Commune.

The founder of the “Alliance Israélite Universelle” was the Jew I. A. Crémieux, a French government minister who was a friend of Karl Marx and Prime Minister Gambetta. He was also Grand Master of the Grand Orient de France.

French author Maurice Joly (probably of Jewish background) belongs to this group.

Maurice Joly wrote a brief pamphlet that at first glance seemed to be directed against the then French government. In reality it contained a significant part of the Protocols, and most probably was understandable only to the initiated among the Jews. Th. Herzl, founder of the Zionist world organization, worked with the same material in his novel The Old New Land. There is no doubt that such thinking developed, even if expressed clearly only within a small circle of Jews and also Freemasons.

It is obvious that Maurice Joly was inspired by his leading revolutionary Jewish friends. After the center of international Jewry moved to London, the first Zionist World Congress met in Basel in 1897. From this point on, Jewry grew stronger and more organized, a development that had to attract the notice of the Gentile world. Ever more of Jewry’s most insolent political demands appeared in Jewish literature, and Jewish insanity and Jewish arrogance became steadily more obvious. Certain of victory over the Gentiles, they sometimes incautiously talked too openly.

  1. Jews Lack Creative Abilities
  2. The “Alliance Israélite Universelle”
  3. Jewish World Domination Would Be the End of the World

Part VI.

The National Socialist Battle against the Jewish World Parasite

  1. “In fighting the Jews, I do the work of the Lord.”


The pamphlet concludes with an appendix of thirty-two anti-Semitic quotations. Most are from Hitler, but some are from Rosenberg, Luther, Goethe, and others.

George Lincoln Rockwell speaking at UCLA 16.05.1967

Freud, Zionism and Sexual Revolution


Sigmund Freud is credited as being the father of the Sexual Revolution. He sated repeated that he found sexual morality “contemptible.” In fact Freud was a Jewish supremacist and Stalwart Zionist who saw himself like Hannibal conquering Rome, (Rome signifying the Church and European morality. This video show how the Jewish dominated media has promoted a destruction of higher human values It shows from mainstream Jewish sources hows how resentment against Europeans and Christians is a motivating factor in promoting sexual degeneration and even pornography.

Caricatures from “Der Stürmer” – translated in English and colourized!

The Year 1934 – Part 2











DNA Analysis Proves That Serial Killer “Jack The Ripper” was a Jew



A few of the suspects that were alleged at one time or another to have committed the nasty killings of more than a century ago. Genetics tests have proven that the killer was a Polish-born Jew, shown on the right of this image.

A criminal forensics case more than a hundred years old has at long last been solved using the latest DNA analysis techniques and technology, ending the speculation surrounding the identity of Britain’s most vile serial murderer.

Jack the Ripper was both hated and feared throughout London during his reign of terror at the turn of the twentieth century, with his string of homicides made all the more gruesome by mutilations and sexual perversions that still make one’s stomach uneasy after the passing of generations.

The results obtained from the study of well-preserved crime scene evidence shocked many researchers, matching genetic markers highly prevalent among Jews of Eastern European origin. When compared to the list of suspects, Aaron Kosminski, a creature described as an “insane Polish Jew,” appeared as the almost certain culprit. This was further verified by comparing the samples with those of his living descendants, unfortunately still contaminating English territory.

Daily Mail:

It is the greatest murder mystery of all time, a puzzle that has perplexed criminologists for more than a century and spawned books, films and myriad theories ranging from the plausible to the utterly bizarre.

But now, thanks to modern forensic science, The Mail on Sunday can exclusively reveal the true identity of Jack the Ripper, the serial killer responsible for  at least five grisly murders in Whitechapel in East London during the autumn of 1888.

DNA evidence has now  shown beyond reasonable doubt which one of six key suspects commonly cited in connection with the Ripper’s reign of terror was the actual killer – and we reveal his identity.

A shawl found by the body of Catherine Eddowes, one of the Ripper’s victims, has been analysed and found to contain DNA from her blood as well as DNA from the killer.

Before buying it, I spoke to Alan McCormack, the officer in charge of the Crime Museum, also known as the Black Museum. He told me the police had always believed they knew the identity of the Ripper. Chief Inspector Donald Swanson, the officer in charge of the investigation, had named him in his notes: Aaron Kosminski, a Polish Jew who had fled to London with his family, escaping the Russian pogroms, in the early 1880s.

Kosminski has always been one of the three most credible suspects. He is often described as having been a hairdresser in Whitechapel, the occupation written on his admission papers to the workhouse in 1890. What is certain is he was seriously mentally ill, probably a paranoid schizophrenic who suffered auditory hallucinations and described as a misogynist prone to ‘self-abuse’ – a euphemism for masturbation.

McCormack said police did not have enough evidence to convict Kosminski, despite identification by a witness, but kept him under 24-hour surveillance until he was committed to mental asylums for the rest of his life. I became convinced Kosminski was our man, and I was excited at the prospect of proving it. I felt sure that modern science would be able to produce real evidence from the stains on the shawl. After  a few false starts, I found a scientist I hoped could help.

Kosminski was 23 when the murders took place, and living with his two brothers and a sister in Greenfield Street, just 200 yards from where the third victim, Elizabeth Stride, was killed. As a key suspect, his life story has long been known, but I also researched his family. Eventually, we tracked down a young woman whose identity I am protecting – a British descendant of Kosminski’s sister, Matilda, who would share his mitochondrial DNA. She provided me with swabs from the inside of her mouth.

Amplifying and sequencing the DNA from the cells found on the shawl took months of painstaking, innovative work. By that point, my excitement had reached fever-pitch. And when the email finally arrived telling me Jari had found a perfect match, I was overwhelmed. Seven years after I bought the shawl, we had nailed Aaron Kosminski.

The first strand of DNA showed a 99.2 per cent match, as the analysis instrument could not determine the sequence of the missing 0.8 per cent fragment  of DNA. On testing the second strand, we achieved a perfect  100 per cent match.

Because of the genome amplification technique, I was also able to ascertain the ethnic and geographical background of the DNA I extracted. It was of a type known as the haplogroup T1a1, common in people of Russian Jewish ethnicity. I was even able to establish that he had dark hair.

Yet again, we are provided with a historical instance that can be roughly summed up in the phrase, “The Jews did it.” Such a series of brutal crimes can be laid square at the feet of a member of the racial group that has wrought so much damage within our societies.

The comical part of this piece is that the personality profile of the killer is actually quite common among Jew populations, with mental illnesses, especially schizophrenia, and sick perversions, more prevalent within their race than among any other people.

One has to imagine the feelings of the White women unfortunate enough to encounter this disgusting creature during their final hours. One cannot reason with a beast that lacks the ability to feel empathy or concern, again a rather “ordinary” trait among the Jews.

Lev Mekhlis: Stalin’s Grand Inquisitor

A Review

By Daniel W. Michaels


 Lev Mekhlis

Yuri Rubtsov, Alter Ego Stalina (Based on declassified archival documents), Svonnitsa-MG, Moscow, 1999, 302 pp.

Yuri Rubtsov, Iz-za spiny vozhdya: poli ticheskaya i voyennaya deyatel’nost L. Z. Mekhlisa (Behind the Leader’s Back; The Political and Military Activities of L. Z. Mekhlis), Kompaniya Ritm, Moscow, 2003, 253 pp.

Until the appearance of two recent Russian political biographies by Yuri Rubtsov,[1] too little was known about the specific criminal activities of individual Stalinist henchmen like Lev Zakharovich Mekhlis – one of those shadowy figures that helped eliminate Stalin’s political enemies before they could threaten the leader himself. The NKVD and its successor organizations of course controlled security matters in general. But in the Red Army itself, it was Mekhlis’ main responsibility, as assigned by Stalin himself, to search out – as a kind of grand inquisitor – potential political enemies within the Red Army. At the peak of his power in the period 1937-1945, Stalin appointed him Commissar of the Army 1st Rank, Head of the Political Directorate of the Workers and Peasants Red Army (PURKKA), and USSR Deputy Peoples Commissar of Defense, with the rank of Colonel General.

Theoretically the political commissars and the military commanders ran the Red Army jointly. In reality, however, the political commissars, who among their other duties (agitation and propaganda) evaluated the officer staff and reported their evaluations through channels and the PURKKA directly to Stalin, were the true bosses. In effect, the military commanders, including the generals, were at the mercy of the political commissars, the head of whom was Lev Zakharovich Mekhlis.

Mekhlis, born in Odessa in 1889, was a Jew of modest material means and little formal schooling. Although not of proletarian origins he was nevertheless endowed with an irrepressible revolutionary zeal to which he brought great stamina, boldness, a shrewd intellect, and a born disciple’s search for an infallible master whom he eventually found in Stalin. At a very early age he joined the Jewish Social Democratic Workers Party, a Zionist organization, where he was active until 1911 when he was called up to serve in the Tsarist Army. During World War I (1914-1917), he mostly served on the southwestern front against the Germans and Austrians.

With an abiding hatred of the old Tsarist regime and its institutions and a thirst for power, Mekhlis joined the Bolshevik faction of the Russian Communist Party in March 1918 where his “talents” were immediately recognized. He was quickly appointed a political commissar in the Revolutionary Military Council with the power to identify perceived enemies of the state, which is to say, Stalin’s enemies. Perhaps because of this hatred, Mekhlis soon became one of Stalin’s favorite executioners. Nicknamed “the shark” and the “gloomy demon” by the dictator’s inner circle, Mekhlis was one of those subhuman creatures among Stalin’s entourage who seemed not only blasé about killing, but actually enjoyed and boasted of his accomplishments. He started by murdering former Tsarist officers, then progressed to executing captured White Russian officers in the civil war, and culminated with the murder of countless Russian officers in World War II.

In the early 1920s Mekhlis had already proved his worth to Josef Stalin whom he early served as an assistant secretary in the Secretariat of the Central Committee. He remained unquestionably loyal and helpful to Stalin in the many internecine factional Communist feuds and wars (especially Trotskyites, but also left- and right-wing deviationists, etc.) the latter was engaged in before assuming absolute power.

By 1926-27, seeing in Mekhlis certain qualities valued by the Communist Party, namely, a fanatical belief in Marxism-Leninism, a total absence of any bourgeois ethical or moral code of behavior, and an innate ruthlessness guaranteed to pave the road ahead, the Central Committee agreed to send the “shark” to the Communist Academy and the Institute of Red Professors to hone and polish the skills he would need in his future propagandistic work. As in Catholicism, the word propaganda is used in the sense of spreading the true faith.

In May 1930 Stalin assigned Mekhlis to the editorial office of Pravda, which had been run by N. I. Bukharin until 1929. The “shark” was soon appointed main editor with the task of politically purging the paper of leftover Bukharinites and turning Pravda into a mouthpiece for Stalin. During the period of the Great Terror, Pravda served to expose and condemn the “heretical” views of Stalin’s opposition – L. B. Kamenev, G. Ye. Zinovyev, and N. I. Bukharin, and represent Stalin as the true heir of Lenin and sole interpreter of Marxism-Leninism.

In December 1937, with Stalin’s full trust and support, the Politburo appointed Mekhlis deputy peoples commissar of the USSR Defense Ministry, Army Commissar 2nd Rank and head of the PURKKA. The “shark” proved indispensable to Stalin in the purge of the Red Army where he undertook the role of the Grand Inquisitor. Working together with his NKVD colleagues, it is estimated that by the end of 1938 the Red Army had almost been decapitated.[2] In 1937-38 seven of the nine top military figures (Ya. B. Ga­mar­nik, I. E. Yakir, V. K. Blyukher, A. S. Bulin, A. I. Yegorov, M. N. Tukhachevskiy, and I. P. Ubor­evich) were declared enemies of the people and participants in a military conspiracy. K. Ye. Voroshilov and S. M. Budenniy were exonerated. Marshal Zhukov later wrote that Mekhlis and others had also tried to implicate him. Of 36 highly placed commanders and political officers, 30 were declared enemies of the people. Only 10 of 108 members of the Military Council under the USSR Ministry of Defense escaped punishment. Of the 408 leading military figures arrested in1937-38, the Military College of the USSR Supreme Court sentenced 401 to death by firing squad and seven to the Gulag. The exact number of lower ranks, estimated in the tens of thousands, also involved in the purge, is not known with certainty nor is the number of suicides among the accused. Mekhlis, the “gloomy demon” presided over this massive witch-hunt, intended primarily to eliminate politically undesirable elements (political opponents of Stalin) from the army.

When, owing to Mekhlis’ objectivity and impartiality in these matters, Jewish heads also rolled during the Great Terror and Red Army purge, some highly placed ethnic Russians publicly rejoiced. For example, General Viktor Filatov wrote years later:[3]

“Glorious 1937! In that year Stalin finally came to understand that it was Zionism, not Communism, which was being built in the USSR, and he destroyed it. After 1937, Suvorov and Kutuzov, Nakhimov and Ushakov, Bogdan Khemelnitskiy and the ‘Knight in the Tiger Skin’ became the national symbols. And the Russians, Ukrainians, Belorussians – all those whom the Zionists had wanted to destroy and left to rot in prisons, labeled ‘nationalist’ or ‘anti-Semite’ – returned.”

Despite, or perhaps because of, Mekhlis’ controversial “cleansing” activities during the period from January 1938 to May 1940, Rubtsov notes, the total number of Stalinist brand Communists increased by a factor of 3.5 to a total of half a million.

According to David I. Ortenberg (as cited by Rubtsov), a friend of Mekhlis and editor of Krasnaya zvezda, the newspaper of the Soviet Armed Forces, the “shark” did not hesitate to use his authority to protect some of his friends, including the deputy head of PURKKA F. F. Kuznetsov and Ortenberg himself. Both Mekhlis and Ortenberg, as editors of the major military newspapers were responsible for publishing much of the hate-filled wartime propaganda, characterized by incitement to murder and rape of Germans, supplied by Ilya Ehrenburg and others of his ilk.

Mekhlis had also at times to defend himself. As Rubtsov relates it, in autumn 1938 a letter addressed to Mekhlis, postmarked New York City, arrived in NKVD offices. It was signed “your brother Solomon” and referred to business friends and relatives of Mekhlis in NYC. The “shark” immediately went to Stalin and (apparently) convinced him that the letter had been sent by provocateurs to discredit him. Nothing more was heard of the matter.

Because Stalin trusted Mekhlis explicitly as his political commissar to the Army, Mikhlis’ services were called on in the various wars and military conflicts the Soviet Union was involved in commencing in the Far East in the later 1930s. Thus, the “demon’s” presence was felt at the battle of Lake Khasan in July/August 1938, at the Khalkin-Gol River (otherwise known as the “incident at Nomanhan”) a year later (May-August 1939), in the western areas of Ukraine and Belorussia in September 1939, in Bessarabia and the northern Bukovina in June 1940, and the invasion of Finland in 1939-1940. Mekhlis’ reports, evaluations, and recommendations sent to Stalin concerning the performance of the Soviet generals and the effectiveness of the political officers in Finland and the Far East resulted in many executions. For his services, Mekhlis was promoted to Army Commissar 1st Rank.

On the eve of the German invasion, on June 21, 1941, Stalin appointed Mekhlis head of the main directorate of political propaganda while retaining his position of deputy peoples commissar of USSR defense and member of the Military Council of the Western Front. When the war broke out the following day, Rubtsov maintains, Mekhlis was among the first of the dictator’s closest associates to meet for consultations with Stalin. As one after the other of the Soviet armies disintegrated before the German onslaught, Stalin authorized Mekhlis to use whatever force (terror) was needed to consolidate the front.

“Mekhlis was to show his courage, his indefatigable energy, and devotion to Stalin throughout the course of the war. He remained a member of the military council of the 6th Army until September 1942, after which he undertook analogous responsibilities on nine fronts: Voronezh (September-October 1942); Volkhov (October 1942-to April 1943; Bryansk (July-October 1943); Baltic (October –December 1943; Western (December-April 1944); Belorussian (April-July 1944) Ukrainian (August 1944-11 May 1945).”

Another reason for Mekhlis’ many transfers from front to front during the war was the fact that the “shark’s” presence was resented and unwanted by most military commanders who saw him as a threat to their own commands. He was considered by most of the military to be personally obnoxious, odious, extremely dangerous, drunk with power and destructive of unit morale. Mekhlis was feared and despised by the military.

From the Bryansk front, a Major Koroteyev wrote the Central Committee about Mekhlis:

“They (the troops) fear him, they do not like him, and in fact they hate him. This hatred originates from the news about the sharp punishments and executions meted out by Mekhlis in the south, on the Voronezh and Volkhov fronts, that has reached us.”

The writer Konstantin Simonov described Mekhlis:

“He was cold and merciless to the depths of soul … like a hatchet that falls on a neck because that is what a hatchet does. Even if the hatchet does not want to chop off a head, it cannot stop in mid-air because it is the nature of a hatchet to chop.”

Early in the war Mekhlis, owing to his arrogance and exaggerated self-confidence, had overstepped his authority and incurred the wrath (short lived however) of his patron Stalin. The “shark” had arrived in the Crimea on January 20, 1942 to stiffen Red Army resistance to the German assault on the peninsula. Mekhlis immediately issued his standard orders that panic mongers and deserters were to be shot on the spot, soldiers guilty of self-inflicted wounds were to be shot in front of the assembled military unit. When the “shark” took it upon himself to assume the role of military commander, disaster followed. General Manstein’s forces, with half the strength of the defending Russian forces, overran the entire Crimean area, taking the heavily defended Sevastopol as well. Stalin was so furious at the debacle that he chastised Mekhlis and ordered him not to interfere with strictly military concerns of the unit commanders.

In his memoirs after the war, the Peoples Commissar of the Navy, Admiral Kuznetsov, reported that in April 1942 on the Crimean Front:

“There was total confusion in the Crimea. The commander of the Crimean Front, D. T. Kozlov, was in Mekhlis’ pocket. Mekhlis was literally interfering in all operational plan s. The chief of staff, P. P. Verchnyy, didn’t know whose orders to carry out – the commander’s or Mekhlis.’ Even Marshal S. M. Budennyy couldn’t do anything about it. Mekhlis’ said that he was taking orders directly from Stalin. When the situation in Kerch became catastrophic, Mekhlis tried to switch the blame to A. S. Frolov. He demanded that I court martial Frolov; otherwise he would have him shot. I told him he couldn’t do that.”

At the end of the war, Mekhlis found himself near Prague. In a letter written home in April 1945, the “gloomy demon” wrote:

“I have seen and have already been in the accursed German land. Now the Germans understand what war is and what Russian hatred is. They are all ready to declare themselves communists or Poles. But it won’t help.”

Shortly after the war, in February 1946, Stalin again entrusted the “shark” with another important position that of USSR Minister of State Control in which he was empowered by Stalin to exercise his inquisitorial and inspectorate skills to search out corruption and irregularities in the Soviet economy. As Stalin’s master “control-freak,” Mekhlis was empowered to inspect the activities of all governmental and societal organizations. In accepting the position, Mekhlis made it clear to one and all in Pravda that Generalissimo Stalin had personally appointed him for the position of Minister of State Control:

“I shall handle with renewed vigor all questions, as promulgated by Comrade Stalin, dealing with the need to husband the peoples’ money for the further growth of the economy, to establish a tight econo­mic regime, and to eliminate all and every waste, theft or embezzlement of state financial and material assets.”

Mekhlis held this position until December1949 when he suffered a severe stroke followed by a heart attack, which for all intents and purposes put an end to his active political life. He died in February 1953 three weeks before Stalin’s own death. With Stalin’s authorization, Mekhlis was honored with full funerary honors and his remains interred in the Kremlin wall, as later were Stalin’s. The dictator’s esteem for Mekhlis during their final years was further evidenced after the “shark’s” crippling stroke when he was unable to attend the XIX Party Congress in 1950. Stalin insisted that the name Lev Zakharovich Mekhlis be kept on the list of members of the Central Committee even though Mekhlis was hopelessly incapacitated.

As a politician, Rubtsov maintains, Mekhlis was more of an opportunist and an eclectic than a Marxist, but as a Party functionary he was very effective, displaying initiative, persistence, and conviction. Morally, of course, the “shark” was totally unprincipled, dishonest, and incapable or unwilling to distinguish between the truth and lies. Mekhlis in his public life displayed no humane instincts, no conscience, no sentimentality, no feelings, and no regrets, nothing human. Rubtsov writes:

“L. Z. Mekhlis was often oblivious to moral categories, as though they were incompatible with Realpolitik, and reviewed the results of his activities exclusively from a utilitarian point of view: did they satisfy Stalin’s directives and did they serve the interests of the political elite, who for the first time were faced by a real threat from the outside? Under the extremely difficult wartime conditions everything revolved around punishments and executions administered without due process, with an already high state of tension in society increasing, and with some segments of the country no longer believing in the slogans promulgated from the Party and the Soviet state.”

Rubtsov, the author, refers to Mekhlis as a member of Stalin’s “shadow” sub elite, all of whom owed their positions and powers to the dictator. Besides his nicknames of “the shark” and the “gloomy demon” used by other members of the Stalinist sub elite. Mekhlis was also referred to as “Stalin’s hatchet man” and “Stalin’s club,” all names identifying him as the dictator’s agent of repression and doctrinal enforcer. Others of the sub elite who were also associated specifically with repressive measures and whom Stalin retained until his death were L. P. Beria, A. Ya. Vishinsky, V. V. Ulrikh, and M. F. Shiryatov.

In the 1920s and 1930s Mekhlis was but one of the many Jews who surrounded and ardently supported the dictator. But by 1953, after successive Stalinist purges of the government, the only Jews that still remained in the dictator’s esteem and high office, and whose loyalty to Stalin was still intact, were Mekhlis and Kaganovich. With the establishment of Israel and Stalin’s fear of the close ties between Jews living in the United States, Israel, and the Soviet Union, the dictator became increasing suspicious of Jewish loyalty to the USSR. When he launched the Doctors Plot, it was generally believed that the dictator was about to launch a major purge of many of the remaining highly placed Jews in the Soviet Union. According to Rubtsov, only by convincing Stalin that he, Mekhlis, was a Communist first and a Jew second (“I Am a Communist Not a Jew”), was the “shark” able to remain in the dictator’s favor until his death – in a sense he remained more Catholic than the Pope.

Rubtsov, the author, insists that Stalin had always been a crypto anti-Semite and that the Doctors Plot proves this. Stalin believed that certain doctors were systematically murdering his closest associates and planned to murder him. Few Kremlinologists today believe that Jewish physicians actually planned the murder of some of their Nomenklatura patients, although Stalin’s death does deserve closer scrutiny. It is true that more than a few Soviet notables died while under the care of leading Soviet physicians. But it is also true that the standards of Soviet medicine have always been quite low. Some of the treatments they prescribed would probably be considered counter-indicated by Western specialists. Some of the suspicious deaths may simply have resulted from malpractice. It is not surprising that to this day individuals like Gorbachev and Yeltsin prefer to be treated by Western doctors.

Rubtsov also subscribes to the theory that the purge of the Red Army in the 1930s decapitated the Red Army, resulting in its poor showing in World War II. Viktor Suvorov, among others, has ably refuted that contention.

While it is undoubtedly true that the leadership of the Stavka and Red Army officers’ staff during World War II was quite deficient and lacking professionalism, it remains problematical as to whether the terror aimed at their own forces by the army commissars contributed much to the final victory. Even when Stalin was forced by adverse circumstances to appeal to his armies to defend the Motherland or Matushka Rus,’ and pull back the horns of the commissars, most of the workers and peasants in the Red Army also knew their country under Communism had become the land of gulags, forced collectivization, alien Communist commissars, and endless hardships.


[1] Rubtsov cites D. A. Volkogonov’s political biography of Stalin as containing much useful information on Mekhlis.

[2] This evaluation of the effect of the purge on the effectiveness of the Red Army has been refuted by Viktor Suvorov in his Ochishcheniye: Zachem Stalin obezglavil svoyu armiyu? (The Purge: Why Did Stalin Decapitate his Army. Firma Publishing House, ACT, 1998

[3] Viktor Filatov. Glorious 1937!, Zavtra, September 9, 1997

“My friend and war comrade Marshal Stalin” – Winston S. Churchill



 Marshall Stalin, your Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen, and comrades gathered here.

 I have now come to the end of a most strenuous, but at the same time most agreeable visit to Moscow. We have worked very hard. As I said last night, we have been a, we have been a council of workmen and soldiers, but the generous hospitality and cordial friendship with which we have been welcomed and sustained has left me, and my friend and colleague the Foreign Secretary Mr. Eden, with the most pleasant memories of these crowded and curious days. Most of all, has it been a pleasure to me, and an honour, to have so many long, intimate talks with my friend and war comrade Marshal Stalin, and to deal with a many difficult questions inseparable from the united forward march of great nations through the, through the many, through the many [sic] vicissitudes of war. I hope most earnestly and I believe with deep conviction that the warrior statesman at the head of Russia will not only lead the Russian peoples, all the people of Russia, through this, these years of storm, and tempest, into the sunlight of a broader and happier age for all. And that with him in this task will march the British Commonwealth of Nations and the mighty United States of America.

 – Prime Minster Winston S. Churchill at the conclusion of the Tolstoy Conference in Moscow, October 19 [probably], 1944.

Caricatures from “Der Stürmer” – translated in English and colourized!

The Year 1934 – Part 1











In the Shadow of Hermes


The documentary “In the Shadow of Hermes” by Jüri Lina shows how freemasons, international bankers, and communists joined forces in an unholy alliance and through the Bolshevik Revolution of November 1917 established in Russia the most brutal and dehumanizing slave society the world has ever seen.

The film “In the Shadow of Hermes” is an important documentation of those financial masonic (VN: Khazar international Zionist banking) forces that cold-bloodedly worked behind the scenes through communism to profit from the suffering of others.

The director, Jüri Lina, stresses that it is his duty to tell the truth about communism and its grey eminences, and not just superficially treat its psychopathic symptoms, while the truth today is not highly valued.

‘How the Jewish Lobby Controls Congress’–Revelations in The New Yorker


In yet another staggering display of Jewish chutzpah, the Jewish Supremacist-owned New Yorker magazine has published a detailed and lengthy exposition on how exactly the Jewish Lobby controls the US Congress and Senate, even giving actual—and sometimes shocking—examples of this power at work.


The New Yorker magazine—owned by Jewish Supremacist Samuel Irving Newhouse—who, along with his brother Donald, owns Advance Publications, whose holdings include the worldwide Condé Nast publications—has carried the article in its September 2014 issue, supposedly written to answer the question “The lobbying group AIPAC has consistently fought the Obama Administration on policy. Is it now losing influence?”

The lengthy article does not ultimately answer its own question, most likely because the evidence that it then amasses, shows incontrovertibly that the American Israel Public Action Committee (AIPAC) completely controls Congress through its ability to fund the campaigns of all would-be Congressmen and Senators—from both parties.

The article starts off by boasting with the astonishing revelation that the most recent additional $225 Million “in emergency aid to Israel” for the “Iron Dome” system was passed almost in secret by just five (5) US Senators!

The article explains:

On July 22nd, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel had sent a letter to Harry Reid, the Senate Majority Leader, seeking an immediate payment of $225 million. . . The Senate, preparing for its August recess, hastened to vote on the Iron Dome funding. . . At first, the appropriation was bundled into an emergency bill that also included money to address the underage refugees flooding across the Mexican border.

But, with only a few days left before the break began, that bill got mired in a partisan fight. . . The next morning, with the halls of the Senate all but empty, an unusual session was convened so that McConnell and Reid could try again to pass the bill; Tim Kaine was also there, along with the Republicans John McCain and Lindsey Graham.

“There were five senators present and literally no one else!” the staffer said. “They reintroduced it and passed it. This was one of the more amazing feats, for AIPAC.”

Thus even the allocation of nearly a quarter of a billion dollars of US taxpayers’ money is made almost behind closed doors—at AIPAC’s demand.

The New Yorker then boasts article then that an AIPAC reception during its annual policy conference draws most congressmen and senators than any other government meeting except a joint session of Congress or a State of Union address:

AIPAC is prideful about its influence.  Its promotional literature points out that a reception during its annual policy conference, in Washington, “will be attended by more members of Congress than almost any other event, except for a joint session of Congress or a State of the Union address.”


The article then reveals exactly how the Jewish Lobby accomplishes such control, by making sure that anybody seeking office has to get AIPAC approval before they even start.


Thomas Dine.

Quoting Jewish Supremacist Thomas Dine, a former executive director of AIPAC, the New Yorker reveals that AIPAC is always careful to stay in the background while arranging funding for its candidates:

 “We made the decision to be one step removed,” Dine said. “Orrin Hatch once said, ‘Dine, your genius is to play an invisible bass drum, and the Jews hear it when you play it.’ ”

 Because of their regional funding system—where the money collected to fund pro-Israeli candidates is dispersed through a number of Political Action Committees, the New Yorker says that it is “difficult to track the amount of money they channel to political candidates.

This issue aside, the New Yorker continues:

But everybody in Congress recognizes its [AIPAC’s] influence in elections, and the effect is evident. . . AIPAC’s hold on Congress has become institutionalized.

“If you have a dream about running for office, AIPAC calls you,” one House member said. Certainly, it’s a rarity when someone undertakes a campaign for the House or the Senate today without hearing from AIPAC.

In 1996, Brian Baird, a psychologist from Seattle, decided to run for Congress. Local Democrats asked if he had thought about what he was going to say to AIPAC.

“The difficult reality is this: in order to get elected to Congress, if you’re not independently wealthy, you have to raise a lot of money. And you learn pretty quickly that, if AIPAC is on your side, you can do that. They come to you and say, ‘We’d be happy to host ten-thousand-dollar fund-raisers for you, and let us help write your annual letter, and please come to this multi-thousand-person dinner.’ ”

Baird continued, “Any member of Congress knows that AIPAC is associated indirectly with significant amounts of campaign spending if you’re with them, and significant amounts against you if you’re not with them.”

For Baird, AIPAC-connected money amounted to about two hundred thousand dollars in each of his races—“and that’s two hundred thousand going your way, versus the other way: a four-hundred-thousand-dollar swing.”

Baird, who is now retired from Congress, continued:

The contributions, as with many interest groups, come with a great deal of tactical input.

“The AIPAC people do a very good job of ‘informing’ you about the issues. It literally gets down to ‘No, we don’t say it that way, we say it this way.’ Always phrased as a friendly suggestion—but it’s pretty clear you don’t want to say ‘occupied territories’! There’s a whole complex semantic code you learn. . . . After a while, you find yourself saying and repeating it as if it were fact.”

Baird also said that soon after taking office, he went on a

“[V]irtually obligatory” trip to Israel: a freshman ritual in which everything—business-class flights, accommodations at the King David or the Citadel—all paid for by AIPAC.


The effect of such strict control upon Congress was detailed by Baird on how Congressmen vote when resolutions relating to Israel come up. Baird said that he had seen first hand the “devastating destruction of hospitals, schools, homes, industries, and infrastructure” in Gaza during Israel’s 2009 “Operation Cast Lead.”

When an AIPAC-sponsored resolution to condemn a UN report on the atrocity was introduced in the House, and three hundred and forty-four members voted in favor of the Jewish Lobby’s demands. Baird told the New Yorker:

When we had the vote, I said, ‘We have member after member coming to the floor to vote on a resolution they’ve never read, about a report they’ve never seen, in a place they’ve never been.’

When key votes are cast, the question on the House floor, troublingly, is often not ‘What is the right thing to do for the United States of America?’ but ‘How is AIPAC going to score this?’

There’s such a conundrum here, of believing that you’re supporting Israel, when you’re actually backing policies that are antithetical to its highest values and, ultimately, destructive for the country.

In addition to controlling Congressmen while in office, the New Yorker reveals, the power of the Jewish Lobby extends to their post political career as well.

Staff members fret about whether AIPAC will prevent them from getting a good consulting job when they leave government.

“You just hear the name!” a Senate aide said. “You hear that they are involved and everyone’s ears perk up and their mood changes, and they start to fall in line in a certain way.”

Just like the Jewish Supremacist boasts about how they control the media, or Hollywood, this frank admission about how the Jewish Lobby controls the government of the United States will not be condemned by the ADL, SPLC or other Jewish organizations as “antisemitic” –because it is Jews making the claims.

If however, any non-Jew were to write such an article, these Jewish pressure groups would be screaming for blood—because no-one except Jews can write about Jewish power.

It is the old rule: one set of standards for Jews, another set for non-Jews.