Der Stürmer

The official blog of the site "Der Stürmer" –

Month: August, 2014

The Führer is with the People, and the People is with the Führer!

by Julius Streicher


 Adolf Hitler&Julius Streicher

My dear fellow people’s comrades

If those who wished me ill had had their way, I would not be here. It was not easy for me to lie still in bed for eight weeks and follow the doctor’s orders. My longing for Nuremberg, and for you, kept growing. I wanted to return and look into your honest faces.

Passing through the row of torches held by your youth moved me deeply. Whenever one thinks of the reward that we old fighters want and hope to receive for our work, for our loyalty to the Führer, I can only say this: Our reward is not in material things, but rather in the love of the people for whom we have fought. The best reward for me has been the smiling faces of your children, your cheers, and everything else I experienced on the way here!

At this festive moment, our thoughts turn to larger matters. A few days ago on June 28 we remembered that day twenty years ago when we were forced to sign the Versailles peace dictate. We remember with pride the men who rejected this so-called peace treaty, which we were forced to sign. There were others like Hershberger who signed their names to it. That did not surprise us, since those who grew up in a parliamentary system had no character left, no feeling for the nation’s honor.

The German people was told that the treaty would bring with it democratic justice. The misled masses believed that the Treaty of Versailles would create the foundation for world peace. Even in this ancient German city, people rejected those who protested against signing the dictates of Versailles. Citizen opposed citizen. In those days, a Frenchman could write: “The German people is wallowing like sow in its filth.” Years of hatred between brothers, years of shame and misery followed.

Then Adolf Hitler rose up and presented his program! It was a program that did not advance the prosperity of a class or a party, but rather one whose fulfillment would bring blessing to the entire German people. The German people’s community grew out of hard, unceasing battle. This people’s community gave us the strength to once more find the path.

If we ask today what has become of Adolf Hitler’s program, we have to say that it has largely been fulfilled. Just a few examples. We promised to destroy Jewry. Today, the Jew has been defeated! The Reich Bank, once in private hands, represented the interests of International Jewry rather than those of the German people. Now, it has returned to Reich ownership. Then there were the Nuremberg Laws. They were announced in this city and carry its name. You Nurembergers can be forever proud of that.

We have learned from the Führer that one must wait if he wants to accomplish one goal after another. It was first necessary to create a new Germany army. Under its protection, one point after another of the party program was fulfilled. Although we still do not have our colonies back, that is not our fault. One thing, however, is sure: The day will come when we are once again a great colonial power. He who is honest has to grant that we have done what we promised to do!

Because of Adolf Hitler we have become a people once more, and a nation that no longer has to go begging to other nations, but rather one that can demand its rights with its own strength. Adolf Hitler has made us so strong in just a few years that other countries no longer dare to attack us.

Just as today in England a Jew can receive the title of lord, so, too, the former German Kaiser ennobled his court Jews.

Just as the German imperial house was ruined by its relations with Jewry, so, too, will the English people, who have long been ruled by the Jews, be destroyed by them. Proud England will meet the same end that it prepared for the Kaiser! Today England agitates against a new Germany, seduced by the Jews. One gets very excited about each Jew who commits suicide, thereby entirely forgetting that England’s blockade starved thousands of German women and children during the World War. Today, no one in England wants to remember that it continued the blockade after the war despite all the promises of the Treaty of Versailles!

We know that the English and French peoples do not wish for war with Germany. The Jew is the one who wants war! To those attempting to encircle us by building anew the same alliance one brought against us in 1914 we say: What was possible then is no longer possible today! The German people is different today than it was in 1914, and its leadership is different than it was in 1914. In the British Isles, too, people realize that in the age of the air force, there are no longer any islands. Thus, they turn for help to where the Jew, as the Devil incarnate, rules. Who would have thought that once proud Albion would beg for support for months in Moscow?

In recent weeks, we have seen people abroad trying to make a distinction between the German people and its leadership, just as they did in the period just before the takeover of power. Then they said: The German people is being raped! It wants nothing to do with Nazism! Today, they promise wonderful things to the German people if they will only desert Adolf Hitler.

However, the German people has learned from the past. It knows that such promises are lies. The German people and its leadership are united. It is ridiculous to attempt to separate the people from Adolf Hitler. The Führer is with the people, and the people is with the Führer!

There have always been alliances between peoples, but never before one like the one that unites the German and the Italian peoples! This alliance is without guile. The other side, however, has no trust. The negotiations in Moscow prove that each is ready to betray the other. We have our Führer, and the Italian people has its Duce. Providence sent these two men at the right moment. They will bend the world to their wills!

I am happy that 120 people’s comrades from Danzig are with us today. Let me assure you: Danzig will become German, and we in Nuremberg will support you when you need us.

It is wonderful to see how other peoples are growing nervous about the Jews, even as their governments seek to encircle us. We are completely at ease, and trust our leadership completely. Poland can be as crazy as it wishes. We know that fear is behind all the noise. If Polish newspapers write that two regiments of Polish cavalry would be enough to drive Gauleiter Forster from Danzig, we can only laugh. We know Gauleiter Forster. He comes from our Gau and went to our school! It is just as ridiculous when Poland attempts to denigrate German blood, saying that men like the immortal Field Marshall Hindenburg or Commander of the Army von Brauchitsch have Polish blood only because they come from the eastern part of the Reich.

We believe that all those who rise against us today will be defeated. With this faith we march into the future, proudly, calmly, and trusting fully in the Führer. I am happy that I had the opportunity upon returning to Franconia to speak seriously, but also confidently, to you. We have always seen clearly at critical moments, and in hard times we have always proven ourselves strong men and women. Today we can say: Should something happen that we do not wish for or want, we will stand together in an unbreakable community.

Never again during hard times will it be possible for a few to live well while others suffer. In such times, we will be sure that the same duties, and the same rights, apply to all. I urge you: March with us whom fate has made the political leaders of our wonderful Franconia. Follow the Führer with the same faith as always. Give to him your floral bouquets at the coming Reich Party Rally of Peace. Our greeting to the Führer should rise up to the heavens like a prayer: Our Führer: Sieg Heil!

The Jews or Us…

by Robert Ley


 Robert Ley

In human life, a leader must emerge who can win others with his faith and make them happy. That is where leadership comes from. The same is true of nations. A nation and a race are called to make the others happy. One nation must rise above the others, and raise the others as well.

What we often saw in our meetings before the seizure of power is repeated here. Then we would enter the hall with a small group of supporters. Once, in fact, I was alone: speaker, treasurer, meeting chair, and protection all in one person. We naturally could not hope to win everyone in the hall to National Socialism. We were happy when the mass in the room was moved, when there was lively response and exchange of opinions. We knew that the swastika never released those it came in contact with, not even the most bitter opponent. They complained and fought us, but they had been reached. That is how we move people today.

Roosevelt speaks about us more than anything else, and his men and ministers speak only about us. England always held its reserve, but cannot do so any longer. France is in the same situation. Even the election of the pope stood in the shadow of the swastika, whether the gentlemen liked it or not. I am sure they spoke of nothing else than how to find a candidate for the chair of St. Peter who was more or less up to dealing with Adolf Hitler.

National Socialism concerns the leaders of the world, it moves the peoples. Germany is at the center of the world, and the world asks: “What is Adolf Hitler doing?” That is their nervous question. My party comrades, today the swastika forces the world to take a position for or against us. The world must decide, it has no choice. There can be no compromise. The Jew leads the other world. It is all or nothing. There is no going back.

Our idea is moving the world, it is forcing humanity to choose for us or against us. It forces the Jews from behind their lackeys. They must fight. We want that fight, for we know that if we do not succeed in winning enough ground for our people, everything we have done will be in vain.

Do you think that the Christian Reich would have been strong enough to gain the conquests of the Führer, even if its army were ten times as strong? It was only possible because these 80 million people had been largely freed from that “blessing.” 80 million slaves had become masters, because these 80 million no longer fight about little things.

England built its empire when our cultural history was already 1500 years old. We led the world for a thousand years before English history even began. Then William the Conqueror arrived. He had to be a foreigner, for the English were not able to find one of their own who was able to make history. They built their empire when Germany was going through the 30 Years War, a time when we Germans were stupid enough to fight about Holy Communion and whether one should take one or both elements. As Germans were breaking each other’s heads, these thieves took over the world. Today England’s “prime minister” speaks of our Führer as traitor. Enough of that!

If we look back on our history, we know what the trouble is. We should not begin with the Hohenzollerns or the Wittelsbachs. Our people was already a thousand years old when they arrived. The royal houses thought that history began with them, for example with Wilhelm II. Thank God, our people’s history is thousands of years older than the history of minor royal families, kings, and kaisers. But we have always been able to appreciate what in our past that is truly great, as for example Frederick the Great, one of the best in German history. Frederick was not a great German because he was a Hohenzollern, but rather because he was a man of iron, energy, and toughness who lived only for Germany. We esteem everything great, but cannot allow a few potentates to claim that history began with them. We must take a broad view of history, and see everything that German culture has accomplished. It is childish of England to want to play our baby-sitter. We cannot allow that. We must see our enemies clearly. Their worldview is Christian and negative. Of course Roosevelt does not imagine himself only a liberator of the Christian world; he knows the Jew is at the root of it all.

If the Jew wants to fight, it is fine with us. We have wanted that fight for a long time. There is no room in the world for the Jews any more. The Jew or us, one of us will have to go. We know that the Jew will lose, that he and his devilish, life-denying and destructive doctrines will be destroyed (vernichtet), Look around and see how the emigrants are increasing; even London has noticed. In Rome, they found the smartest Jesuit they had. A brutal butcher sits in Moscow. They form the front, and the Jew is behind them all. That no longer worries us, but we must see what is happening clearly and talk about it openly. Believe me, our enemies in the political confessional churches know that the hocus pocus they show to the world is only a bluff. They bluff anyway, and it depends on whether they can find enough idiots to believe them.

They may say the world is crazy. Well, it is a crazy world, but that is not the decisive thing. The important thing during the decisive battles of the coming months and years is whether or not we can make our people immune to such hocus pocus so that the enemy can no longer reach them. Our people must simply laugh at their doctrines and magic words. Just as we did not overcome Marxism only through negation, so too we will not overcome these enemies only through struggle and explanations. The Führer once said: “If you take an idol from people, you must replace it with a true god.” Our god is the wonderful law of creation, whose amazing unity of all things shows itself in wonderful flowers, in growing trees, in new born children, in the secrets of a mother, in the growth of our people, in work and accomplishment and creation, in life itself. It is the joy we have in everything. How beautiful everything is. Do you feel the same way? I am so happy to be alive.

A priest recently asked me: “But what about eternity…?”

I replied: “A day in National Socialist Germany is better for me than all of your heaven.”

This life is where we build the eternity of the nation. What happens to me when I die? I do not know. One thing I do know. I will return to the earth and will belong again to the wonderful Mother Earth. Isn’t that enough? If only a blade of grass of a flower grows from my grave, that is enough for me. I am happy with what I have done so far. It was both hard and beautiful, and I am thankful for these 48 years. And if I remain alive long enough to finish my work, I can die in peace. Death will hold no terrors for me. I have seen many people for whom it was hard to die. I am sure that we will die in a worthy manner. I hope to have the strength not to die like a weakling, but rather to die with the satisfaction of knowing I have done something. Eternity? I do not want to live forever, but I want my people to live on eternally. I want my people to be eternal, and to live forever so that in 2,000, 3,000 and 100,000 years it will look just as it does today. I do not want it to be bastardized or corrupted, but rather that the same sound race, the same manliness, and the same men are present, that the same battalions of men march through Germany.

When Romulus founded Rome he killed the priests, saying: “I do not want the Romans to fear God.”

The priests then seem to have had the same weapons as their counterparts today: they count on human weakness and cowardice. We, however, build on human courage and manliness. That is the difference. We want to tell the people the truth, not console them with hopes of a better tomorrow. We want to make the world beautiful, to hold high the concept of work. We want to say that one can’t take problems away from people, that life is struggle.

No one has greater reverence for god and creation than we do. The priests do not hate us because we are “godless,” since they get along nicely with the godless in Russia and Spain. They hate us because we are the only ones who believe in god. We are finding god, indeed we have already found him. Where does the desire for god come from, where does faith come from, or true piety, if not from god? I know only one way to tell: If a person quietly and contemplatively faces events. One must be confident and self-assured, not afraid and nervous. Then I can say: “You have a god. You are not worried, you do not run around like chicken with its head cut off, but rather you stay calm.”

Look at our people today, and remember how they were ten or twenty years ago. If that is the measure of whether one believes in god or not, if one faces everything that fate brings, if faces war or peace calmly, if one faces life calmly and lives it the same way, then one has god. To have god means to have a fixed point in life, to have god means to have faith. I do not know what the future will bring, since I am only a man, but I am not concerned. English newspapers write: “Germany will gain no advantage from Bohemia and Moravia.” One doesn’t know which is more astonishing: the Führer’s pace or the peace with which 80 million Germans accept what happens. That means we have god: we are calm, we have faith and confidence — just like the priests always say. Yes, the Führer gave confidence to every German, and therefore peace and faith. We have found god.

We have become a people that believes in god. This is what our idea of life and of affirming life has accomplished, becoming the idea of Germany. We will be able to do everything if that grows from its small beginning into a religion, to something holy to the German people. It will not be a false religious mysticism, but rather it will be frank, honorable, military, manly, disciplined and tough. The Church founded two realms: the sacred and the secular. They claimed that they ruled the sacred, the devil the secular. They ruled counts and kings for two thousand years that way, destroying worlds and building states as they wished. They brought Negroes and Whites together because it suited them and their desire to rule. We are building our new state on the basis of race and community, our race, the German people. We believe that god gave us our blood not to ruin it, but to keep it pure and pass it on to our children and our children’s children. That is eternity. That is our defense against the dark powers of Marxism, Bolshevism, liberalism, Free Masonry and a belief in the Messiah, the Jewish doctrine of salvation. That is a teaching that affirms life. It is the idea of race, blood, and soil, the idea of this life and the beauties of the earth, Mother Earth, that is our fatherland. The world makes sense, nothing is arbitrary. Everything has its meaning, and is related to other things. Everything goes according to plan, each star is in its place, each man has his place, each people has its tasks. We will overcome the doctrines of our enemies. The Jews must know that. We also know both the material and ideological means. Our prayers are better than the biblical prayers. Our idea has seized the people, converting and transforming them; the idea is preached every day, and I must ask you, my party comrades, to continue preaching it day after day. No one is too small or too great to do that. I ask you to speak and preach as you did during the struggle for power;we may not slow down or say: “Today I am a government minister and have a lot to do.” The files won’t go away, but such an attitude will drive the people away.

Remember in all we do that the Führer created the foundation for everything we have today, that he gave the people the weapons, for in the end worldviews, too, are decided by weapons. The Church may say its only weapon is peace. There is no institution more bloodthirsty than the Church. No state, no count, no world ruler has spilled anywhere near as much blood as the Church. It says it was all for a higher cause, and that the end justifies the means. No, that was not for the glory of God, who created humanity so that it could live. It was only for the glory of the pope and to satisfy the power lust of the priests. The Führer drew the proper conclusions, and built an army that today is the best in the world. He built not only a West Front but an East Front, the West was not enough. We have the same wall to the East. We do not want to drive the nation into war, but we do want to put an end to bluffing. Strengthen the propaganda for our idea, particularly in the next weeks, months and years. Go to the villages, from restaurant to restaurant. Do not weary of preaching the idea, for the idea is the main thing. Preach to the people again and again, gradually preparing the people for the final decision. Use all your energy to see to it that the factories produce. County leaders, it is your task to double productivity. The Führer says there will not be war, he does not believe it will happen. We have in fact already won a war — the workers through their industry — and we may not slow down. Our enemies will not succeed. We are watching them carefully, and know know that steel production in France has fallen in the last year from 7 million to 5 million tons, in England from 13 million tons to 10 million. But in Germany it has risen from 19 million to 24 million tons. Those are the statistics we must keep in mind. It is easy for them to approve 50 billion for armaments, but they can’t build cannons with the money, even if it were pure gold, certainly not from banknotes. People have to build them. And even if they succeed in eliminating unemployment, something we have succeeded in doing but they have not, we have rescued the German worker from his weakness as a proletarian creature. That had nothing to do with making him a contented slave, but rather with freeing him from slavery and stupidity. I hope we will continue to care for workers in this way. On the one hand we have to speed up labor, demand more work, since nothing will be given to us. We cannot get by with an 8 hour day, for the cannons have to be built, the coal must be mined, the gasoline and the vehicles have to be produced if we want to prevent war.

On the other hand, we must do everything we can to care for people. The people must have the feeling that the leading men are paying attention to everything, that their lives are not a comfortable, but that they are driving and flying across the country to care for people. Of course they won’t be able to solve every problem. The nation is like a child, and a child does not ask if its mother is rich or poor, but it demands that it be cared for. The people do not serve Adolf Hitler because they understand his brilliance, but rather because they feel safe. We must give the people this feeling. County leaders, that must be your goal, the goal of every local group office and section of your county office. If the local group is an organically living part of the NSDAP, its education will be of a worldview nature. There may be only one school in a Gau, the Gau school. There must be a big Gau school, and each county must also have its county school in which everything is taught that is necessary for a party leader to understand our worldview. Specialized training is necessary, but the county leader or the Gauleiter must know that he is being trained within the framework of the party and our goals. If we do these three things: not weary of speaking, continue to build our organization, and continue to train in our worldview, then we will meet the challenge.

Jewish Hegemony in the Music World


The Jews who dominated Tin Pan Alley and the turn-of-the century vaudeville world were also central in the popularization and propagation of profoundly demeaning African-American stereotypes. Pamela Brown Lavitt notes Tin Pan Alley and the many onstage Jewish “coon callers”:

“Jewish women vaudevillians at the turn of the century popularized what is now a little-discussed and misunderstood performance venue, known as “coon shouting” … Trying to break into the entertainment business, [Tin Pan Alley entrepreneurs’] aesthetics were circumscribed in a vehemently antiblack and xenophobic milieu. By the mid-1880-s they had formed a tight-knit Tin Pan Alley industry that came to dominate vaudeville and early black musicals … Intended as comedy, coon song ranged from jocular and dismissive to cruel and sadistic … Coon song sheet music and illustrated covers proliferated defamatory images of blacks in barely coded slanderous lyrics. For example, the ‘N’ word and associated inferences were dispatched in words like ‘mammy,’ ‘honey boy,’ ‘pickinniny,’ ‘chocolate,’ ‘watermelon,’ ‘possum,’ and the most prevalent ‘coon.'” [LAVITT, P., 2000, p. 253-258]

Especially well known Jewish “coon callers” included Sophie Tucker, Stella Mayhew, Fanny Brice, Anna Held, Eddie Cantor, and Al Jolson.

Jews have long gravitated to an entrepreneurial exploitation of the Black cultural scene and jazz music. As Burton Peretti notes:

“Aside from the hazards of the mob [organized crime] environment, the exploitation faced by jazz players was rather typical for this era [1930s and 1940s]. Jazz, like minstrels and ragtime before it, came under the control of professional promoters who sought to make music profitable. [They adapted] the technique of advertising, song plugging, and vaudeville … Some promoters, like Joe Glaser (who managed Louis Armstrong in the thirties) were associates of organized crime who left the underworld when prohibition was repealed. Glaser apparently had overseen Al Capone’s profits from the Sunset Cafe and a prostitution ring before he became Armstrong’s manager in 1935. Many more promoters, however, were veterans of Tin Pan Alley, Manhattan’s song-publishing industry, including Irving Mills, a former singer and songwriter who managed Duke Ellington’s and other black bands in the thirties.” [PERETTI, p. 147]

Glaser ran the Associated Booking Corporation, often “the exclusive agent for many of the top Black performers. He became a close associate of many of the top underworld figures in Chicago and New York, whom he met through his band-booking agency.” [MOLDEA, p. 14] Glaser had been an early partner in the company with eventual MCA chief Jules Stein. In 1962, mob-linked attorney Sidney Korshak, also Jewish, gained control of the ABC company. [MCDOUGAL, p. 141] Mills and Paddy Harmon, owner of Chicago’s Dreamland Cafe, “sought and gained spurious renown, as Mills took partial credit for many Ellington compositions and Harmon patented and gave his name to a trumpet mute that had long been popular among Joe Oliver and other black players.” [PERETTI, p. 148]

The rip-off of Black artists was a norm for the era. As Al Silverman notes in the case of Fats Waller: “In his time Fats wrote the melodies to over 360 songs. Not that many bear his name today, unfortunately, because when money was needed he’d write the music and sell all rights to unscrupulous Tin Pan Alley characters.” [SILVERMAN, p. 129-130] “That practice of show business share-cropping … in the 1920s and 1930s,” notes the director of Harlem’s Apollo Amateur Night, Ralph Cooper, “existed right on through the fifties and sixties. Its bitterness still exists among many performers to this day — a bitterness from the theft of their songs, their sound, their talent.” [COOPER, p. 199]

Jewish singers “Sophie Tucker, Eddie Cantor and Al Jolson,” notes Donald Fischer, “performed in blackface at the beginning of their careers, singing black songs. They later built on their successes in this medium to develop national statures and professional sucesses with other music. However, their early songs were for the most part borrowed or plagiarized from African-American sources, with little or no public recognition — or monetary reward — for the creative talents that produced them.” [FISCHER, D., 6-30-2000, p. 21A]

Jews were also prominent in the overseeing of the Black community’s jazz life, including the control of musical clubs in Black neighborhoods in a variety of American cities. “The invasion of the Black community by organized crime lords with connections to downtown money,” notes Ted Vincent, “was certainly the most sensational contribution to the loss of Black oversight of neighborhood dance halls and theatres.” [VINCENT, p. 176] “Slumming resorts” served a largely non-Black audience and “were noted for their riverboat decor, fake magnolia plants, and nearly nude dancers … Perhaps the nationwide pioneer in the resorts was Isadore Shor’s Entertainment Cafe.” [VINCENT, p. 78] In Harlem, such clubs included Connie’s Inn (owned by Connie Innerman) and the famed Apollo Theatre. “From the opening of the [Apollo] building in 1912 until 1934,” notes Vincent, “the theatre was a showcase for white [i.e., largely Jewish] vaudeville burlesque shows, with white strippers coming to be the main attraction.” [VINCENT, p. 189] The Apollo was eventually sold by “Burlesque Kings Hurtig and Seaman” to Sid Cohen and Morris Sussman, and then to Frank Schiffman and Leo Brecher. Brecher also owned the Douglas, the Roosevelt, the Lafayette Theatre (“the prime showcase for black talent in America”) [COOPER, p. 44], and the Harlem Opera House located a block from the Apollo. [VINCENT, p. 189-192] Jay Fagan, and Moses and Charles Gale (Galewski), founded the popular Savoy Ballroom in 1926.

Mel Watkins notes the reputation in the Black community of dominant mogul Frank Schiffman:

“Schiffman was a controversial figure in black entertainment. Admired and respected by some, scorned and excoriated by others, he was rarely viewed neutrally. His Machiavellian approach to business is a matter of record, and most would admit that he was an unrepentant shark in business matters. He quickly eliminated his competitors and for decades eradicated all serious competition, which earned him the grudging esteem of other showmen. Among performers, however, the estimate was not glowing. Of his knowledge of black acts, John Bubbles [an African-American performer of the era] said, ‘Only thing he knew was how to get people cheap as he could, and work them as long as he could.’ And John Hammond, a record producer and friend, flatly declared ‘Frank had no artistic taste at all.'” [WATKINS, M., 1994, p. 386]

Samuel Charters and Leonard Kunstad note the situation of another famous nightclub:

“The Cotton Club had opened at 142nd St. and Lexington Ave. in 1922 with a strict policy of white only. The owner, Bernard Levy, had pressed his policy, despite loud protests from the Harlem community. He used Negro orchestras and a Negro revue and ran it as a tourist attraction for society people who wanted to see a little of ‘Harlem life’ … The club was forced to admit colored patrons during the next winter, but the prices he kept high and it remained predominantly a tourist attraction until the Depression.” [CHARTERS, p. 217] New York’s Latin Quarter club (with eventual branches in other cities) was also owned by a Jew, Lou Walters, father of famous newscaster Barbara Walters; Monte Kay was the founder of the famous Birdland jazz club. He too was Jewish. Mobster Morris Levy later controlled the place. As Israeli scholar Robert Rockaway notes about a common undercurrent in such night life: “Jewish Gangsters frequented nightclubs … In fact, Jewish underworld figures owned many nightspots and speakeasies. In New York, Dutch Schultz owned the Embassy Club. Charley ‘King’ Solomon owned Boston’s Coconut Grove. In Newark, Longy Zwillman owned the Blue Mirror and the Casablanca Club. Boo Boo Hoff owned the Picadilly Cafe in Philadelphia. Detroit’s [Jewish] Purple Gang owned Luigi’s Cafe, one of the city’s more opulent clubs. Jewish singers and comedians, such as Al Jolson, Eddie Cantor, Fanny Brice and Sophie Tucker played in the mob clubs.” [ROCKAWAY, R., 1993, p. 205]

Upset with outsider exploitation and degradation of the Black community (where many night clubs were located), there was an effort by the Marcus Garvey African-American movement as early as the 1920s to institute Black-owned Liberty Halls “where the musical offerings would be part of an overall effort at community uplift and not just a profit-oriented business.” [VINCENT, p. 114] (From France, even the international jet-set luxury playground/resort of “Club Med” was founded by Gerard Blitz, and built to power by Gilbert Trigano. Both are also Jewish. By 1999 the firm had 116 sites in 36 countries, now headed by Gilbert’s son Serge. [REGULY, E., 4-25-88, pl. 24; MCDONELL, E., 5-1-99, p. D10] Hollywood’s Roxy nightclub was founded by the Jewish managerial trio of David Geffen, Loud Adler, and Bill Graham. [KING, T., 2000, p. 187]

Jews have of course been prominent over the years as musical performers. These included three of the most influential band leaders of the 1930s — Benny Goodman (“the King of Swing”), Harry James, and Artie Shaw (Arthur Arshansky). More recent popular names include Leonard Bernstein, Andre Previn, Arthur Fiedler, Stephen Sondheim, and many others.

As noted earlier too, by the 1930s MCA (Music Corporation of America) was a powerful talent agency, founded by Jules Stein and built later to power by Sidney Sheinbein and Lew Wasserman, who ultimately became one of the most powerful men in Hollywood. Ronald Brownstein observes that: “By the mid-1930s, MCA controlled many of the country’s most popular bands, from Tommy Dorsey to Artie Shaw.” [BROWNSTEIN, p. 181] For years, MCA’s Jules Stein, adds Michale Pye, “ran the music business so toughly that no dance hall would stand against him.” [PYE, p. 18-19] In a 1946 antitrust trial that MCA lost, a Los Angeles federal judge “declared that MCA held a virtual monopoly over the entertainment business.” The presiding judge also stated that MCA was “the Octopus … with tentacles reaching out into all phases and grasping everything in show business.” [MOLDEA, p. 2, 3] “The one man,” notes non-Jewish band leader Guy Lombardo, “who probably more than any other solidified the business and hastened the era of the Big Bands was Jules Stein. He had started his Music Corporation of America in Chicago and to that city gravitated bands from all over the country, seeking the buildup and engagements they would get if MCA took them in the fold.” Lombardo was also under contract to Stein. [LOMBARDO, G., 1975, p. 153] Stein even wrote an introduction to Lombardo’s autobiography.

For years MCA increasingly interfaced with Chicago’s Mafia and other underworld personalities. Seemingly omnipresent in Hollywood was lawyer Sidney Korshak. “A close friend of Stein’s and Wasserman’s,” says Dan Moldea, “Korshak quickly became one of the most powerful influences in the entertainment industry and in California politics … [MOLDEA, p. 5] … Korshak … has been described by federal investigators as the principle link between the [Hollywood] legitimate business world and organized crime.” [MOLDEA, p. 2]

And rock and roll? The Jewish foundation continued. “The most famous and important [rhythm and blues disc jockey],” note Steve Chapple and Reebee Garofalo, “was … Alan Freed, the father of Rock ‘n’ Roll … Freed was credited with co-writing fifteen rock and rock hits including Chuck Berry’s ‘Maybelline,’ but he did little more than promote any of them.” [CHAPPLE, p. 56-57] A biography of Freed notes that “by 1956, there was no bigger name in rock and roll than Freed, except Elvis Presley.” [JACKSON, p. ix] (Another of America’s best known early disc jockeys was also Jewish, Murray the K, aka Murray Kaufman). In 1960, Freed was indicted for accepting $30,000 in bribes to play songs at his radio station. “[Freed] grabbed the kids and led them to the great rock candy mountain,” says Albert Goldman, “He named their music, coined its us-against-them rhetoric, created rock show biz, including the package tour … Alan Freed is really one of the principal exhibits in the Rock ‘n’ Roll Hall of Ill Fame … [He] was not only a crook but a self-righteous hypocrite. Even [Freed’s manager] Morris Levy [with deep ties to the criminal underworld, particular the Mafioso Gigante family] had to concede that the ‘Father of Rock ‘n’ Roll’ was not a nice man. Speaking as one Jew to another Jew about a third Jew, Levy said simply: ‘He could have been another Hitler.'” [GOLDMAN, p. 519-520]

In a book about the Atlantic Records empire (later swallowed by Warners), Dorothy Wade and Justine Picardie noted Morris Levy and the kinds of people that populated the rock and roll industry: “The truth is, with or without mob connections, Morris Levy was much more typical of the new music moguls than either [non-Jewish] Ahmet Ertegun or [Jewish] Jerry Wexler … The world in which Atlantic had to survive was populated largely by hoodlums and hustlers.” [WADE, p. 57] As Syd Nathan, the owner of King Records, once said, “You want to be in the record business? The first thing you learn is that everyone is a liar.” [WADE, p. 60] “The early rhythm and blues companies were run by a fraternity of Jews … They were tough and they were shrewd — some say unscrupulous — and they were alternately loved, despised, respected, and feared. The deep bond of these cultural outsiders prompted one gentile, mild rebuke in his voice, to comment that ‘Yiddish was the second language of the record business.” [COHODAS, N., p. 3-4, 2000]

“To the general public,” notes Steve Chapple and Reebee Garofalo, “the music business seems to have a tremendous amount of corruption.” [CHAPPLE, p. 226] “I think in Hollywood,” media psychologist Stuart Fischel of California State University at Los Angeles told the Los Angeles Times in 1993, “people get into a kind of mind meld. You can come in as a relatively moral and ethical person, but eventually [Hollywood] produces a re-socializing of a subculture with different norms and ethics based on hedonism and materialism. It’s hard to know what’s going to breach the bounds of acceptable criminality in Hollywood.” [ELLER, p. B8, B11] Aside from drugs, prostitution, and all the other extracurricular norms of the interrelated music, film, and television worlds of Hollywood, just at the most basic business level, “payola [bribery] has been a key factor in the establishment of major artists,” says Roger Karshner, “the evolution of publishing dynasties and the creation of recording empires. Payola, layola, and taking care of business are the ABC’s of the music industry past and present. It has taken many forms, and many publishers, artists, managers, and record people at all levels have participated in payola practices.” [KARSHNER, p. 39]

Probably the most important early rhythm and blues recording company was Chess Records, founded by Leonard and Phillip Chess, Jewish immigrants from Poland. They started out with a scrap metal business in the ghetto, then moved into the liquor business, eventually owning several bars in the Black neighborhoods of South Chicago, including the large Macamba Club, which was “reputedly a prime center for prostitution and heavy drug dealing.” [DIXON, p. 78] The Chess brothers soon recognized a profitable opportunity open to them with the many Black musical acts that played at their nightclubs; the entrepreneurs soon embarked upon a recording business, eventually producing blues, gospel, and rock and rock music. Seminal Black artists who signed on to the Chess label included Bo Diddley, Howlin’ Wolf, Muddy Waters, John Lee Hooker, Etta James, Chuck Berry, and many others. Berry’s songs were among the most influential in rock and roll history. “Some people have called Leonard and Phillip Chess visionaries who recognized the potential in the visceral blues of post-World War II Chicago, “says Don Snowden, who co-wrote the auto-biography of bluesman Willie Dixon, “A far greater number have branded the Chess brothers as exploiters who systematically took advantage of the artists who created that music.” [DIXON, p. 78] The Rolling Stones even found seminal bluesman Muddy Waters still painting the Chess’s home when they came to record in Chicago. [WADE, p. 71]

Frank Schiffman, owner of a number of musical venues in New York’s Harlem area, “was a ruthless competitor who would do anything, including take advantage of his black employees and exploit the great black artists who worked for him, in order to increase his profits and beat down the opposition.” [COOPER, p. 44]

“Remember [Black singer] Little Eva Boyd?” asks Ralph Cooper, “She worked as a babysitter for two Tin Pan Alley [Jewish] rock and roll writers, Carole King and Gerry Goffen. They wrote a song called ‘Loco-Motion’ and they asked her to sing it … Now [1990] she lives in North Carolina, where her people are from. She’s a working mother on welfare. She works in a barbeque kitchen as a cook.” [COOPER, p. 196]

In 1997, Black singer Darlene Love won a lawsuit for back royalties against famous Jewish musical producer Phil Spector. (Originally awarded $263,000, it was later dropped down to $130,000.) Love was the anonymous lead singer on a number of 1960s-era Spector productions, including He’s a Rebel, Da Do Ron Ron, He’s Sure the Boy I Love, and other hits. In the early 1980s Ms. Love found herself cleaning toilets for a living, but her singing career later flourished anew. [WILLMAN, C., 10-15-88, CALENDAR, p. 10; WARRICK, P., 11-2-98]

“I didn’t know anything about the record business,” said early rock and roll sensation Little Richard (of “Tutti Frutti” fame) about his rock and roll career. ” I was very dumb … I was just like a sheep among a bunch of wolves that would devour me at any moment. I think I was taken advantage of because I was uneducated. I think I was treated inhumane … I think I was treated wrong and many people got rich out of the style of music I created. They are all millionaires, writ many times, and nobody offered me nothing.” [WADE, p. 74] Dorothy Wade and Justine Picardie note Little Richard’s lamentation, then add: “To which many, if not most, of his black musical contemporaries would add: Amen.” [WADE, p. 74] Among others, Richard had in mind the Jewish owner of Specialty Records, Art Rupe, who many years ago bought the rights to his songs for a paltry $10,000.

Chuck Berry remembers being cheated by the Chess brothers: “[Phil Chess finally acknowledged] in writing that no songwriter royalties had been paid for three years on my Chess Records product … [And in a review of Chess documents] I was surprised to learn that I had been paid the same songwriter royalties for an LP as I was receiving for a single record. Chess claimed to be unaware of this ‘mistake,’ as if they had never noticed that LPs had between eight and ten songs on them.” [BERRY, C., p. 246-247]

“In 1974 Howlin’ Wolf filed a lawsuit against Arc Music [the publishing wing of Chess Records, it was co-owned by the Chess brothers and two brothers of Jewish band leader Benny Goodman] [COHODAS, N., 2000, p. 37] asking for $2.5 million for unpaid royalties from his songs … In 1976 Muddy Waters and Willie Dixon filed identical lawsuits against the publishing company, alleging fraud and conspiracy and asking to paid money damages and to have their publishing contracts voided.” [COHODAS, N., 2000, p. 308]

In 1972, Martin Otelsberg became the manager of African-American musician Bo Diddley. Suspecting in later years that he had been swindled, Diddley filed suit against Otelsberg’s estate in 1994 and recovered $400,000. As Diddley’s lawyer (also Jewish) John Rosenberg noted, “This is a typical story that’s happened time and again to musicians like Bo.” [MORSE, S., 6-18-94, p. 28] Diddley complained of being cheated by the Chess brothers as well. “To me every nationality has a reason for bein’ here,” said Diddley, “an’ mostly all the Jewish people own everything. They got all the money. Give him a thousand dollars, he’ll turn it into ten million. How the heck they do it, I don’t know.” [COHODAS, N., 2000, p. 110]

The Jewish agent-producer exploitation of Black recording artists in the early rhythm and blues era of the 1940s and 1950s (and later) was predominant and widespread, entrenching a Black hostility among many to their Jewish financial controllers to the present day. The following Jewish entrepreneurs were among those who founded record labels featuring mainly Black talent: Herman Lubinsky (Savoy Records); the Braun family (DeLuxe Records); Hy Siegal, Sam Schneider and Ike Berman (Apollo Records); Saul, Joe, and Jules Bihari (Modern Records); Art Rupe (Specialty Records– its biggest hits were those of Little Richard); Lev, Edward, and Ida Messner (Philo/Aladdin Records); Al Silver and Fred Mendelsohn (Herald/Ember Records); Paul and Lilian Rainer (Black and White Records); Sam and Hy Weiss (Old Towne Records; Sol Rabinowitz (Baton Records — Rabinowitz eventually became vice president of CBS International); and Danny Kessler (head of OKeh Records, a “cheap” branch of Columbia Records). Sydney Nathan controlled both the King and Federal record labels and Florence Greenberg owned the Mafia-influenced Scepter Records (featuring the Shirelles and Dionne Warwick). “Those illiterates,” Hy Weiss of Olde Towne once said about his recording artists, “they would have ended up eating from pails in Delancey Street if it weren’t for us.” [WADE, p. 70]

“The record producers were white,” says Nadine Cohodas in her book about the Chess brothers, “their talent for the most part black, many from impoverished backgrounds and few with much formal education, living in a society that regarded them as second-class citizens. The deals between the two parties were not the negotiations of peers. The relationship coluld be paternalistic, even condescending. At Chess it sometimes looked as though Leonard and Phil gave their musicians an allowance rather than a salary.” [COHODAS, N., 2000, p. 4]

The history of rock and roll is, of course,” notes Rich Cohen, “riddled with pioneering white record men who built careers recording, and sometimes, exploiting black artists: Morris Levy, that burly, cigar-smoking product of the Brill Building, allegedly stealing writing credits from Frankie Lyman; Herman Lubinsky, the founder of Savoy Records in Newark, New Jersey, throwing around nickels as if they were manhole covers.” [COHEN, R., 6-21-01]

In Philadelphia, in 1984 lawsuits were swirling around WMOT, a company that “developed a reputation as an aggressive independent record producer specializing in the ‘Philly sound.'” Formerly owned by Steve Bernstein, Alan Rubens, and David Chacker, it was acquired by Michael Goldberg, Allen Cohen, and Jeff and Mark Salvarian. Lawsuits even named Israel’s Bank Leumi among defendants in a scheme to use the record company to launder drug money. The central player in this accusation was Larry Lavin, who was indicted as the “kingpin of a 13-member [drug] ring that allegedly sold $5 million of cocaine a month.” [DAUGHEN, 1984]

By 1978 president Oscar Cohen of the Associate Booking Corporation presided over “the country’s biggest black talent booking agency.” [SHAW, A, p. 419, p. 133] Recurrent, “mobbed-up” Morris Levy even eventually owned Birdland in its heyday, the famous jazz club. [WEXLER, p. 130] Levy also controlled the Roulette Record label. Nat “the Rat” Tarnopol headed the Brunswick label (Jackie Wilson was one of its most prominent African-American stars). Tarnopol was indicted twice in the 1970s “for using payola, drugola, and strong-arm goons to get radio airplay for Brunswick recording artists.” [MCDOUGAL, p. 366]

An early and important supporter of disc jockey Alan Freed and his own empire was Leo Mintz, who owned a large record store near Cleveland’s Black ghetto. Even earlier, Eli Oberstein founded Varsity records in the 1930s, Joe Davis launched Beach records in 1942, and “Jake Friedman had Southland, one of the biggest distributing outfits in the South.” [SHAW, A., Honkers, p. 236] “The whole history of rock ‘n’ roll,” noted the London Guardian in a review of Jewish author Michael Billig’s book about the subject, “has been portrayed as white artists ‘ripping off’ black music. Only now [with Billig’s volume] has the major Jewish contribution been acknowledged.” [ARNOT, C., 10-4-2000, p. 6] Atlanta-based Mark Shimmel, for instance, is the CEO of LaFace Records, which headlines TLC, Usher, Tonik Braxton, GoodiMob, “and a raft of hot hip-hop artists … He built his own company, managing talents as varied as John Denver and Broadway composer Frank Wildhorn … He doesn’t worry much about what he calls ‘the white guy in the black music business.'” He has also worked with Huey Lewis, Harry Belafonte, Ray Charles, and former Eagle Don Henley. [POLLAK, S., 1-7-00]


Joseph Heller, formerly of Heller-Fischel, booked acts like Styx, the Electric Light Orchestra, Boz Scaggs, and a variety of others. “He represented top-drawer rock talent like Van Morrison, the Guess Who, Marvin Gaye, War, Elton John and Pink Floyd.” [SNYDER, N., 2-19-01] Stretching out as dangerously as possible to make a buck, Heller eventually gravitated towards a relative goldmine in the Black ghetto-based “gangsta rap.” He cofounded Ruthless Records and managed the pioneer rap group NWA (Niggaz With Attitude) from early in their careers. The musical genre of gangsta rap, notes Jory Farr, “thrives on misogyny, as well as homophobic and race-baiting rage … [It] was the perfect music for [a] lifestyle loaded down … with warnings of betrayal, murder, revenge, and a short life.” [FARR, p. 70] “I believed that rap would become the most important music of the nineties,” said Heller, “… [But] you can’t sell two million rap records to kids in the inner city. That’s a way to sell 200,000. You have to market it to the white kids.” [FARR, p. 68, 71]

Heller hired Ira Selsky as his corporate attorney and an Israeli-born security chief named Michael Klein to ward off angry, exploited Blacks who quite literally walked into his office threatening to kill him. Rap star Ice Cube even threatened Heller in one of his recorded songs, prompting the Anti-Defamation League to flag it as anti-Semitic. Ruthless Records released a Jewish rap duo called Blood of Abraham. As Chuck D, the lead vocalist for the Black rap group Public Enemy, noted, “There’s no way to get trained on the seamier elements of the music business being on the street — that element is reserved for boardrooms.” [D, CHUCK, p. 85] Those in Chuck D’s reminiscences about “boardroom” behavior include Lyor Cohen (manager of Rush Productions, and an Israeli); Al Teller, an executive at MCA whose parents died in the Holocaust; Steve Ralbovsky of CBS; Bill Adler (a publicist); and Rick Rubin of Def Jam Records. (Jewish diamond dealer Jacob Arabo has made the news as a favored jewelry merchant to the Black rap crowd that seeks to symbolize wealth and power, or, as the New York Times put it, “the jeweler who gives most of today’s leading rappers their shine.” [CENTURY, p. 1]

In 2001, Heller was named the “Godfather of Latin Rap” by the Los Angeles Business Journal; he was joining in attempting to build a rap movement in the Latino market via Hit a Lick records. As the Journal noted:

“If Heller is convinced that Latin rap will emerge as the next big thing, it probably will be, said other music industry veterans … Indeed, Heller is widely acknowledged as one of the key forces behind gangsta rap’s crossover into the music mainstream … While Heller has the second-tier title of chief operating officer, he acknowledges that the other partners ‘generally run everything by me because of my experience and expertise.'” [SNYDER, N., 2-19-01]

By 2001 too, the aforementioned Lyor Cohen had catapulted to power in the Rap world. Rolling Stone even magazine featured an article about him, sub-titled How Lyor Cohen — the White, Jewish Israeli-Raised President of Island Def Jam Records — Became One of the Most Important Men in Hip-Hop, and Why He May Now Become One of the Most Important Men in Rock & Roll.” Cohen started out promoting punk rock acts like the Circle Jerks, Social Distortion, and the Red Hot Chili Peppers. He then became president of the rap music label Def Jam in 1988 and soon had become “perhaps the most powerful white executive in an African-American business.” (Def Jam was bought out by the Jewish-owned Polygram company in 1999). Irv Gott, a Black record producer, notes that Cohen is

“a white Jewish guy, but I think everybody respects him like he’s black. He knows how to carry it too. He knows how to get gangster, how to fall back, when to shut the fuck up, whento say something. That’s why other white executives are scared of him. He knows how to deal with the hoods, the criminal element.”

Cohen, continued Rolling Stone, has broadened his musical base and “oversees an empire that includes hundreds of artists performing in dozens of genres, a roster that features PJ Harvey, American Hi-Fi, Shelby Lynne, Lionel Richie, Bon Jovi, Melissa Etheridge, Saliva, Ludacris, Kelly Price and Sisquo.” Cohen’s nickname is “Little Lansky” (after famed Jewish mobster Meyer Lansky). He was born in New York City “where his father, an Israeli, worked in the consulate.” He was later raised on an avocado farm near Tel Aviv. [COHEN, R., 6-21-01]

Cohen has also been active in trying to readjust Black consciousness of Jewish exploitation of the African-American community. “In the late Eighties,” notes reporter Rich Cohen,

“when [Public Enemy’s] album It Takes a Nation of Milions to Hold Us Back was topping the charts, the group’s minister of information, Professor Griff, made several anti-Semitic statements. As a Jewish exec working with the band, Cohen found himself in the middle of a rough, formative experience. ‘When Professor Griff from Public Enemy said what he said, and it caused this whirlwind, the whole industry asked me, ‘What the fuck are you doing?’ says Cohen. ‘Every president of every record company called and said, ‘Drop them: But I believe part of being Jewish is education. And I believe I was instrumental in changing Public Enemy’s views. I said, “Your voice is being muted because you say Jews are this or that. You can’t make blanket statements. If you want your message out there” — and it was profound, I think — “stop generalizing.” And I was the only Jew in their lives. What if I resigned? They would only be more alienated. I hadn’t quite being a Jew. I can’t quit being a Jew. Instead, I tried to have an impact. I felt like I was doing the right thing. Not just as a Jew, as a person. They had a big voice da nation of millions, to quote their album I had the Holocaust Museum [the Simon Wiesenthal Center] shut down, and we had a private tour. The first thing you see is a Jewish skull plus a black person’s skull equals a baboon. The last thing is a monkey with enormous lips dressed with a Star of Daivd holding a trumpet and a sign saying, ‘It’s these Jews that are bringing in this music call jazz.'” [COHEN, R., 6-21-01]

Then there is former tax attorney Joe Weinberger who drives a Jaguar S-200, wears a diamond-studded Rolex watch and “fat gold rings,” and carries a “9mm automatic pistol tucked in his pocket.” As the Miami New Times notes about his rise to power in the African-American rap music world,

“In the early Nineties, Miami’s reigning booty-rapper, Luther Campbell, hired Weinberger away from the carpeted hallways of a swash Brickell Key law firm to help manage a growing musical empire and its attendant lawsuits. Within five years Campbell was bankrupt and Weinberger had purchased the rights to his music. Rather than return to the comfortable confines of his former life, the 42-year old lawyer, who is single and childless, opted to launch his own label, Lil’ Joe … In a post bankruptcy fire sale overseen by Richard Wolfe [Weinberger’s lawyer/partner, also Jewish], Weinberger bought the rights to 2 Live Crew music for about $800,000, plus the outstanding money he claims Campbell owed him.” [KORTEN, T., 8-10-2000]

Weinberger has even been accused of ordering a car bombing and directing death threats against an employee.

Then there is Canada-born Bryan Turner, who founded Priority Records in 1985; he is also Jewish. [JEWHOO, 2000] By 1998, Priority had yearly sales of $250 million. As the Los Angeles Times notes:

“When the pioneering gangster rap group N.W.A. was looking for its first record deal, it found a distributor in Priority Records, which released an album so obscene it prompted a letter of complaint from the F.B.I. When Ice-T left Warner Brothers Records after police groups and the company’s shareholders objected to his song ‘Cop Killer,’ he found a new home at Priority. When Suge Knight, the imprisoned head of Death Row Records, who is known for his pugnacious business tactics, was looking for his first deal, Priority gave it to him. Through all the violence and controversy of hardcore rap music — from its roots in N.W.A to its current resurrection with Master P — the Los Angeles label Priority Records has been a major player.” [STRAUSS, N., 9-3- 98, sec. E, p. 1]

And as the Times noted on another occasion: “When Time Warner first parted ways with rapper Ice-T after the ‘Cop Killer’ flap and then with rapper Paris over a song that portrayed an assassination fantasy of President Bush, Turner wasted little time signing deals with both artists.” [HOCHMAN, S., 7-30-95, CALENDAR, p. 82]

Jewish entrepreneur Steve Rifkind has also become very successful in the rap music field. In 1993, Rifkind founded and still heads Loud Records (its president is Rich Isaacson). Earlier, Rifkind began the Steven Rifkind Company, “a consulting firm specializing in Rap and R&B.” Loud acts include Wu-Tang Clan, Mobb Deep, Yvette Michelle, Funkmaster Flex, Alkaholics, Raekwon, and Xzibit. The company’s value is estimated at about $100 million. [] “Rifkind,” notes the online magazine Entrepreneur,

“who trademarked the term ‘Street Teams,’ takes marketing to the street — literally — by hiring youths to tell their communities about his artists’ music. ‘My philosophy has always been ‘You can’t stop word-of-mouth, explains Rifkind, who has street teams across cities, distributing free singles to teenagers at housing projects and schools, and scrawling the names of his albums in the dust on parked trucks, which then serve as mobile billboards.” []

Yet another major Jewish rap entrepreneur is the aforementioned Rick Rubin, who, says Jory Farr, found his “biggest stars were former gangsters who used beats and rhymes to glamorize wealth, dope, and violence. Deciding who to sign could be a moral quagmire … but Rubin wasn’t one to be bothered by the trivia of social responsibility.” [FARR, p. 126] “I could do anything I wanted,” Rubin once said about his own family life in New York, “We were always upper middle class. We were wealthy for the community we lived in. In a sense I was spoiled.” [FARR, p. 119]

Rubin’s record company Def American is now called American Recording; at one time Geffen Records distributed Rubin’s material. Earlier in his career he had signed bands like Slayer (whose lyrics exhorted “everything from virgin sacrifice and satanism to sadistic mutilations and the atrocities of Auschwitz” [FARR, p. 109]) and the Geto Boys, who “pushed misogyny and sadism to new depths.” [FARR, p. 108] Rubin’s own star rose so high that he eventually produced albums for Mick Jagger and the Red Hot Chili Peppers. Troubles, however, came from a lawsuit against him by Adam Horowitz of the Beastie Boys and threats from the Meir Kahane-founded Jewish Defense League. Outraged by Rubin’s promotion of violently anti-Jewish lyrics by Black ghetto groups, the Jewish group reportedly came looking to beat him up. Rubin couldn’t understand their anger. He told an interviewer that

“They should’ve talked to me and found out what I felt before coming to attack me, because I was a JDO [Jewish Defense Organization] supporter. When I was at NYU I saw [right wing rabbi] Meir Kahane speak and he blew me away — he was amazing … After hearing him speak, I wanted to pack my bags and go to Israel … I called the JDO several times, wanted to join, but they never returned my calls.” [FARR, p. 123]

Among the most controversial “gangsta rap” labels was Death Row Records (including Tupac Shakur, Dr. Dre, and Snoopy Doggy Dog). A noted earlier, Death Row products were distributed by the Jewish-dominated Time-Warner company until “pressure from stockholders after an outcry over the flagrantly violent and misogynist lyrics” of its stars. Time-Warner dropped the label, but eighteen months later it was picked up (for $200 million) by the Universal Music Group, a subsidiary of the Jewish Bronfman family’s Seagram company. Universal too eventually abandoned the controversial label, only after “pressure from stockholders and regulators.” [HELMORE, E., 8-29-97, p. 10]

Still another Jewish push — more recently — into the rap world is Koch Entertainment’s In The Paint record label. Koch, one of the largest “independent music distribution companies,” is headed by founder and CEO Michael Koch and President Bob Frank. []

   And lastly for the music scene, the president and CEO of the Recording Industry of America — a lobbying group (with a staff of 72) for the big record companies — is also Jewish, Hilary Rosen, who was described in 1997 by the Washington Post as “a powerful woman in an industry dominated by men. One of the most influential yet least known players in the U.S. entertainment behemoth.” [WEEKS, p. C1] Rosen became the CEO when another executive, Jason Berman, stepped down from the position.

  1. Delores Tucker, the founder of the National Political Congress of Black Women, has singled out Rosen’s organization for special condemnation:

“In terms of children, the RIAA is the most destructive lobbying force in America. It is incomprehensible that anyone with an ounce of concern for children would be demanding the promotion, distribution, and sale of gangsta-porno rap to children.” [WEEKS, p. C1].

Do Zionists Control Wall Street? The Shocking Facts!


Teacher Patricia McAllister was crucified for daring to simply say outloud that Zionists controlled Wall Street while helping in an Occupy Wall Street demo in Los Angeles. She was fired for simply telling the truth. LA talkshow host Bill Handel said on his show just a few days earlier, quote, “My Tribe Controls Wall Street why should I be upset about that?” Of course, he wasn’t fired because he is part of the tribe that runs the media.
So, what are the facts? This video lays out the facts of the Zionist control of Wall Street and International finance like nothing else! Help give this video to the world!

Jewish Hate, the Media, and the ADL

by Dr. William Pierce

William Luther Pierce 


Last week I mentioned that a record company I own, Resistance Records, was attacked in an hour-long special TV program on one of Sumner Redstone’s music television channels, VH1. Redstone, who was born with the name Murray Rothstein, is one of the most powerful of the Jewish media masters. He owns not only VH1, but also MTV and the CBS network. His MTV specializes in encouraging young Whites to mix with and act like Blacks. He promotes “hip hop” culture and rap music among White kids, persuading White boys to talk Black and wear baggy shorts and backward baseball caps — and persuading teenaged White girls to have sex with Blacks. He is probably the most destructive and hate-filled of all the Jewish media bosses.

The special VH1 program to which I referred was called “Inside Hate Rock.” “Hate rock” is what Redstone and his people call the music that I produce and distribute. Actually there’s nothing hateful at all about my music. Its purpose is to help young White people have a sense of identity and pride and purpose, all things that Redstone and company are trying to take away from them. Redstone’s aim — and the aim of the Jewish media bosses generally, whether they’re in Hollywood or on Madison Avenue, is to alienate young White people, to uproot them, to destroy their sense of racial identity, to confuse them, to make them forget their traditions and their history, and to persuade them to mix with Blacks and other non-Whites. That’s why Redstone promotes rap music so heavily. His ultimate aim is to destroy our people, our race. And because I’m trying to counter that with Resistance Records, he calls me a “hater” and calls the music that I produce and distribute “hate rock.”

Well, in addition to music, Resistance Records also produces and distributes video games. A new game that we’ve just begun distributing is named Ethnic Cleansing. The kids really love it. It’s selling like hotcakes. Not only was our music attacked in the VH1 special I mentioned, but our new video game also was denounced as “hateful.” And then one of the most powerful and hateful Jewish pressure groups, the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith, also jumped on the bandwagon and began screaming about our new game. “It’s violent!” they screamed. “It teaches children to hate!” they screamed.

Let me tell you: every video game I’ve seen is violent. Combat is the most common theme of video games. That was true even back in the days of the first, primitive video games, such as “Donkey Kong” and “Pac Man.” Most video games today involve shooting people or hacking people up with swords or other weapons. And I’m talking about games marketed by Sumner Redstone’s fellow tribesmen. I’m talking about games produced and distributed by Jewish media companies that make regular donations to the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith. The Anti-Defamation League doesn’t scream about those games.

Some parents are alarmed by the high level of violence in the video games that their children play, but the Anti-Defamation League isn’t. Perhaps violent video games aren’t good for kids. I don’t really know, but they are a fact of life. Many kids spend most of their free time playing video games.

The point is that Sumner Redstone and the Anti-Defamation League think that our game is “hateful” and “dangerous,” but not other video games. Why is that? What’s the difference?

I’ll tell you: our game — Ethnic Cleansing — is a game designed to raise the racial consciousness of the White kids who play it. That’s why Sumner Redstone and the Anti-Defamation League hate it. That’s why they are screaming about it. That’s why they’re denouncing our game as “dangerous” and complaining about the violence in it, but they aren’t complaining about other video games that are at least as violent. A game that has an American GI in the Second World War shooting Germans is OK with Sumner Redstone and the Anti-Defamation League. Likewise for a Civil War game in which Yankees and Rebels slaughter each other. They think that’s fine. But our game, which involves urban guerrilla warfare between Whites and non-Whites they call “hateful” and “dangerous.” In other words, it’s OK for Whites to fight against each other. It’s OK for Whites to kill Whites. But it’s not OK for Whites to fight against non-Whites. That’s taboo.

Anyway, our game, Ethnic Cleansing, is designed to break that taboo. Our game is designed to teach White kids to stick up for their own people. It’s designed to help White kids shed the racial guilt and self-hatred, the sense of racial inferiority, that Sumner Redstone and the folks in the Anti-Defamation League have worked so hard to instill in them. It’s designed to help them think in terms of Whites against non-Whites instead of Whites against other Whites. That’s why VH1 and the Anti-Defamation League hate it.

But, you know, we shouldn’t be surprised about that. VH1 is owned by a Jew. It’s a Jewish propaganda channel. The Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith is a Jewish pressure group. Their aim is to destroy White racial consciousness and to break down any feeling of White solidarity. The last thing they want is for Whites to learn to stick up for themselves. So we expect them to hate us and to denounce us. They have their agenda, and we have ours.

Everyone should understand that, but most people don’t. The reason that they don’t is that all of the mass media, even those few not yet owned by Jews, collaborate to keep the Jewish agenda concealed from the public. The media routinely refer to the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith — and from here on I’ll just call it “the ADL” — not as a Jewish pressure group or a Jewish propaganda organization or even as a Jewish lobbying group, but as a “human rights organization” or as a “civil rights group.” Really. The media want the public to believe that the ADL is an impartial group concerned with what’s good for America rather than with what’s good for the Jews. In fact, most media won’t even tell you that it’s a Jewish organization, with strong ties to Israel.

So let me tell you a little about the ADL, and you’ll understand better why they do what they do. And you’ll also see a little more clearly the crookedness of virtually all of the mainstream media in America. The ADL was organized in 1913 by a group of rich Jews specifically as a response to a notorious child-rape and murder in Georgia. Leo Frank was a Jew who owned a pencil factory in Atlanta. In 1913, he raped and murdered one of his White female employees, 14-year-old Mary Phagan. He was tried, convicted, and sentenced to death. The governor of Georgia, in response to Jewish lobbying — and, most believe, in response to a large Jewish bribe — almost immediately commuted the death sentence. Angry Georgians then seized the Jewish child-rapist and murderer and hanged him.

The Frank case was widely reported in Georgia newspapers in great detail and caused much hostile feeling against Jews. The purpose of the ADL was to deal with such matters in the future by attacking and attempting to discredit anyone opposed to Jews or Jewish policies, by generating pro-Jewish propaganda, and by exerting influence on legislators and other public officials in a more discreet manner than the rather clumsy way in which the Georgia governor had been persuaded to commute the death sentence of Leo Frank. After the formation of the state of Israel in 1948, lobbying for military and financial aid for Israel also became a major ADL activity.

The ADL still does all of those things today, and in my case the group’s principal activity has been attacking me and attempting to discredit me. In fact, the ADL devotes so much of its effort to attempts to discredit anyone who opposes Jewish policies that it is known in some quarters as “the Defamation League.” The ADL regularly refers to me as a “terrorist” and claims that I am “linked” not only to various terrorist acts, such as the Oklahoma City bombing, but also to bank robberies, murders, and other acts of criminal violence. For example, my “link” to the Oklahoma City bombing is that Tim McVeigh, whom I didn’t even know existed until I saw him on television after he was arrested — Tim McVeigh is said to have read and to have been fond of a novel that I wrote 27 years ago, The Turner Diaries. The other so-called “links” are even more tenuous. And yet the mainstream media regularly quote the ADL in saying that I am “linked” to terrorist and criminal activity, and they describe the ADL almost as if it were an official source of information.

So let me tell you: I have never been involved in any terrorist or criminal activity of any sort. But the ADL has. In November 1992, after confidential police files were stolen from the San Francisco Police Department, an investigation was begun that led eventually to search warrants being issued. On April 8, 1993, both the San Francisco and the Los Angeles offices of the ADL were searched by police teams armed with these warrants, and more than 12,000 stolen confidential police files were recovered. Most of these confidential police files didn’t have anything to do with criminal activity but instead contained personal information on individuals collected by the police in connection with driver’s license applications, pistol permits, security clearances, and other routine matters. What the individuals in all of these police files had in common is that the ADL considered them “enemies” because they had at one time or another, in some way, opposed some Jewish policy or some Jewish interest. Some of the individuals in the stolen files were legislators or other public officials that the ADL wanted to bring pressure against.

Other criminal activity by the ADL, in addition to the possession of the stolen police files, came to light in 1993. A San Francisco Police Department inspector, Tom Gerrard, who had been receiving payments by the ADL to steal the files for them, fled to the Philippines to avoid prosecution. And evidence was found during the search of the ADL’s San Francisco and Los Angeles offices that the same sort of bribery, corruption of police agencies, and illegal collection of confidential police files was occurring in New York, Washington, Chicago, St. Louis, and Atlanta.

Unfortunately, the ADL already had corrupted the judicial system in California to the point that it was able to stifle further law enforcement action, and very shortly thereafter the mass media in California, which initially had given substantial coverage to the case, were persuaded to drop the matter as well.

Some of the individuals whose confidential files had been stolen by the ADL were not ready to drop the matter, however, and they filed civil suits against the ADL for invasion of their privacy. With the enormous resources of organized Jewry behind it the ADL fought these lawsuits tenaciously, appealing every adverse decision. Finally, however, after nine years in the courts, the ADL last week paid damages of $178,000 to the last three victims of its illegal spying. I’m sure that you didn’t see anything about that in the news last week, because after the initial publicity back in 1993 the mainstream media have ignored the case. They continue to refer with respect to the ADL as a “human rights organization,” with never a mention of its criminal activity. And they continue to quote the ADL’s hints and suggestions and insinuations that I am somehow “linked” to terrorist and criminal activity. It is, of course, the ADL, not I, who is engaged in criminal activity, but you would never know that if your only source of information is the mainstream media. For those listeners who have access to good reference sources, however, find yourself a copy of the Los Angeles Times from April 9, 1993, and read all about it.

Actually, the ADL’s stealing of police files is the least of its criminal activities. It just happens to be one activity where the group made a slip and got exposed momentarily. Far more serious are the ADL’s links to organized crime: to the Jewish master swindler Marc Rich, for example, or to the Jewish gang boss Moe Dalitz. If you were following the news closely in January of last year, when Bill Clinton, just hours before leaving the White House, issued a number of pardons for criminals, an inordinately large percentage of whom were Jews, you will perhaps remember the controversy around his pardon for Marc Rich. Rich is a billionaire international commodities trader. He was indicted on a large number of criminal charges, including wire fraud and money laundering, before fleeing the country to avoid prosecution. He has given huge sums from his ill-gotten loot to Israel and to the ADL. The ADL chairman, Abe Foxman, wrote to Clinton specifically requesting a pardon for Rich — and of course, Rich got his pardon.

Moe Dalitz was the boss of Detroit’s all-Jewish “Purple Gang,” which got its start smuggling illegal whiskey into the country and then branched out into White slavery, loan-sharking, illegal gambling, and contract murder. After the Second World War, Dalitz moved into the casino business in Las Vegas and eventually became the leading gang boss there. And he gave generously to the ADL and other Jewish organizations. He was one of the ADL’s biggest donors during the 1970s and early 1980s. The ADL reciprocated by presenting Dalitz with its annual “Torch of Liberty” award at a formal dinner in his honor in Las Vegas in 1985. Dalitz and seven other gangsters were killed in a gang shootout shortly thereafter.

What’s important is not that the ADL consorts with gangsters and engages in criminal activity. What’s important is that the news media conceal that from the public and treat the ADL as a respectable “human rights organization” that can be relied on for accurate information about people like me — or about anyone the Jews consider an obstacle to their policies. That’s bad. That’s very bad, and it’s dangerous — and not just because it misinforms the public about people like me. It’s dangerous because it allows the ADL to represent itself as an authority. It gives the ADL much more power to corrupt.

It was bad enough when Jewish groups had only their money to bribe politicians and judges and law-enforcement officials, as in the days of Leo Frank. But now, with the collusion of the mass media, the ADL is able to wear a false cloak of authority. And the unfortunate fact is that whenever a military or law-enforcement person sees someone wearing a cloak of authority, his tendency is to salute and wait for orders. Most of us have at least a bit of an authoritarian streak in us, and I don’t think that’s necessarily a bad thing. Military and law-enforcement people, on the average, have a much bigger streak of authoritarianism in their personalities, and that’s not necessarily a bad thing either. But when the ADL uses its false cloak of authority to influence America’s legislative, judicial, military, and law-enforcement establishments, that’s a very bad thing — and very dangerous for the freedom and even for the survival of our people.

And in fact, the ADL is using the false cloak of authority bestowed on it by the mass media to cozy up to and corrupt military and law-enforcement people all across America. The Jewish mass media have prepared the ground by talking so much about “hate crimes” and “hate speech” that they have convinced large segments of the public that any printed material or public statement that is not Politically Correct is “hate.” Anything I publish, for example, is automatically labeled as “hate” by the media. If I criticize America’s insane immigration policy, the media will call that “hate.” If I complain about the government’s policy of putting Israel’s interests ahead of America’s interests in the Middle East, that’s “hate” too. I could publish a book on bicycle repair, and the Jewish media would call it “hate.” The media have the public sensitized to that word — and they’ve done that deliberately. And they have the more simpleminded elements of the public convinced that there’s something illegal about publishing or distributing anything that the media have labeled as “hate.”

If, for example, members of my organization, the National Alliance, distribute leaflets calling for a halt to immigration from the Third World — or even demanding that the government enforce the immigration laws it already has by stopping illegal aliens from coming across our southern border — the media invariably will use the word “hate” in every other sentence in reporting our distribution. And then some of the simpletons will call the local police or the FBI to report that our leaflets were left on their front porches, believing that a crime has been committed.

All of that is bad enough. But then somebody from the local office of the ADL will approach the local police chief and offer the ADL’s help as an authority on “hate” and “extremism.” “We will explain to you how to recognize ‘hate crimes’ and ‘speech crimes,'” the ADL will say. “We will teach your officers who the haters are, and we will explain why you should keep an eye on them and harass them and arrest them whenever you can.”

Ordinarily any self-respecting police chief would resent someone like that telling him how to do his job. He would tell the ADL busybody to buzz off — especially if he knows that the organization offering its advice is a criminal organization. But usually he doesn’t know that, because the media have kept that a secret. Usually he thinks that the ADL is an authority, almost with an official status, because the media deliberately have created that impression. And so the ADL is able to worm its way into local law enforcement and exert its destructive influence on the way the law is enforced. In many cases, it is able to persuade the police to violate the civil rights of people that it doesn’t like. For the police to let the ADL tell them how to recognize and to treat so-called “haters” is like the police going to the Mafia for advice on how to deal with organized crime.

And the ADL does the same thing with our Armed Forces. It’s like having the Pentagon hiring active, practicing al-Quaeda members to teach the military about terrorism and how to recognize a terrorist. It sounds crazy, but we actually have the greasiest of Jews whispering into the ears of police and military officials all over America, telling them how they should do their jobs. We actually have such Jews with ADL connections installed in offices in the Pentagon, in the White House, and in the Justice Department.

That’s a bad situation. Like many other bad situations in America today, it has arisen directly from the Jewish control of the mass media.

What can we do about it? Well, you know what I’m doing. I’m building alternative media as fast as I can to counter the Jewish media. I’m happy to have your support for my work.

Here’s something else you can do. If you know anyone in law enforcement, ask him whether or not his department has been approached by the ADL or has hired the ADL to give training of any sort to the personnel in his department, or whether or not any ADL propaganda has been circulating among members of his department. If his department has had any contact at all with the ADL, tell him what you know. Tell him that you are alarmed and outraged that his department is involved with a criminal, anti-American organization that is working to undermine our Bill of Rights and to destroy our Constitution. Get him to help you spread this information to other members of his department.

The Legacy of Rudolf Hess

By Mark Weber


 Rudolf Hess-1

On the evening of May 10, 1941, the Deputy Führer of the Third Reich set out on a secret mission that was to be his last and most important. Under cover of darkness, Rudolf Hess took off in an unarmed Messerschmidt 110 fighter-bomber from an Augsburg airfield and headed across the North Sea toward Britain. His plan was to negotiate peace between Germany and Britain.

Four hours later, after successfully evading British anti-aircraft fire and a pursuing Spitfire, Hess parachuted, for the first time in his life, and sprained his ankle landing in a Scottish farm field. An astonished farmer found the injured pilot and turned him over to the local Home Guard unit. [1]

Winston Churchill promptly rejected Hess’ peace offer and jailed him as a prisoner of war, even though he had arrived unarmed and of his own free will. Rudolf Hess, ambassador of peace, was to remain a prisoner until his death in August 1987 at the age of 93.

For many, the passing of the one-time Deputy Führer and last surviving member of Hitler’s inner circle simply marked the welcome end of a terrible era. But his true legacy is something far different. He spent 46 years — half his life — behind bars, a victim of a cruel victor’s justice. More than any other man, Rudolf Hess symbolizes the vindictiveness and hypocrisy of the Nuremberg Tribunal.

The Mission

Hess was deeply shaken by Britain’s declaration of war against Germany in September 1939. With Hitler’s approval, he began a secret effort a few months later to negotiate a peace agreement between the two “fraternal Germanic nations” through British officials in neutral Portugal and Switzerland. [2] When the endeavor failed, Hess began preparations for his flight to Britain, an unquestionably sincere if perhaps naive effort to end war between his beloved homeland and a nation he greatly admired.

“My coming to England in this way is, as I realize, so unusual that nobody will easily understand it,” Hess told a British official a few weeks after the flight. “I was confronted by a very hard decision. I do not think I could have arrived at my final choice [to fly to Britain] unless I had continually kept before my eyes the vision of an endless line of children’s coffins with weeping mothers behind them, both English and German, and another line of coffins of mothers with mourning children.” [3]

Though there was little chance that Hess’ mission could have succeeded, some aspects of his flight and its aftermath remain unclear. The British government took the extraordinary step of sealing dozens of Hess documents for release only in the year 2017. Sefton Delmer, the wartime head of Britain’s propaganda broadcasts to Germany, has speculated that the British government might have had good reasons for the secrecy: [4]

At the time, Churchill published nothing about the Hess case; he was passed over in silence. There was a large peace party in Britain, and Churchill probably feared that this party would throw him from his Ministerial seat because he had not agreed to Hess’ peace proposals.

Victor’s Justice

At the end of the war, Hess was taken to Nuremberg to be tried, along with other German leaders, by the United States, Britain, the Soviet Union and France as one of the “major war criminals.”

Although Hess was perhaps treated more unjustly than any other man on trial at Nuremberg, the Tribunal itself was of doubtful legal and moral standing. Many prominent men in America and Europe pointed out that the process violated two cardinal principles.

First, it was a trial of the victors against the vanquished. The former were their own law maker, prosecutor, judge, alleged victim and, in part, accomplice (in the case of the Soviets, in the division of Poland).

Second, the charges were invented for the occasion and defined after the fact (“ex post facto”).

US Supreme Court Chief Justice Harlan Fiske Stone called the trials a fraud. “[Chief US prosecutor] Jackson is away conducting his high-grade lynching party in Nuremberg,” he wrote. “I don’t mind what he does to the Nazis, but I hate to see the pretense that he is running a court and proceeding according to common law. This is a little too sanctimonious a fraud to meet my old-fashioned ideas.” [5]

Associate Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas charged that the Allies were guilty of “substituting power for principle” at Nuremberg. [6] He later also wrote: “I thought at the time and still think that the Nuremberg trials were unprincipled. Law was created ex post facto to suit the passion and clamor of the time.” [7]

Soviet participation in the “International Military Tribunal” lent it the aura of a political show trial. Judge I. T. Nikitchenko, who presided at the solemn opening session, had been a judge at the infamous Moscow show trial of Zinoviev and Kamenev in 1936. Before the Tribunal convened, Nikitchenko explained the Soviet view of the enterprise: [8]

We are dealing here with the chief war criminals who have already been convicted and whose conviction has been already announced by both the Moscow and Crimea [Yalta] declarations by the heads of the [Allied] governments … The whole idea is to secure quick and just punishment for the crime.

Besides the Tribunal’s dubious legal standing, it held Hess and the other German leaders to a standard to which the Allies were never held. In sharp contrast to his public utterances, the chief US prosecutor at Nuremberg, Robert Jackson, privately acknowledged in a letter to President Truman that the Allies [9]

have done or are doing some of the very things we are prosecuting the Germans for. The French are so violating the Geneva Convention in the treatment of [German] prisoners of war that our command is taking back prisoners sent to them [for forced labor in France]. We are prosecuting plunder and our Allies are practicing it. We say aggressive war is a crime and one of our allies asserts sovereignty over the Baltic States based on no title except conquest.

Nothing better points up the essential injustice of the Nuremberg process than the court’s treatment of Rudolf Hess.

He was in the dock primarily because of his important-sounding but somewhat hollow title of Deputy Führer. His duties as Hitler’s stand-in were almost entirely ceremonial: He delivered the annual Christmas address to the nation, welcomed delegations of ethnic Germans from abroad, appeared at charitable functions, and presented the Führer at the annual Nuremberg party congress. It is this image of the wide-eyed and ecstatic Hess that much of the world remembers best, most of all from a brief clip of him from the Leni Riefenstahl film of the 1934 Congress, “Triumph of the Will.”

Known as the “conscience of the party,” he often used what power and influence he had to intervene on behalf of victims of persecution by extremists in the National Socialist party. In his detailed study, Justice at Nuremberg, which is generally very critical of the German defendants, historian Robert E. Conot called Hess a “decent and honest” man and “a pacifist at heart.” [10]

In their Nuremberg indictment of the Deputy Führer, the four Allied powers predictably portrayed him in the most sinister way possible. [11] “Hess began his conspiratorial activities immediately upon termination of World War I by joining militaristic and nationalistic organizations,” it charged. It went on to absurdly claim that “Hess was one of the members of the [Nazi] conspiracy who professed as early as 1933 the aim of complete world domination.” The joint Allied indictment concluded with the almost ludicrous words:

All through the years from 1920 to 1941 Hess remained the most faithful and relentless executor of Hitler’s aims and designs. This complete devotion to the success of the conspiracy was climaxed by his flight in Scotland in an attempt to end the war with England [!] and to receive English support for Germany’s demands against Russia, which he had helped to prepare.

The share of Hess’ participation in the Nazi conspiracy is as great as that of the Party which he directed. The Party’s crimes are his.

In fact, the Allied case against Hess was weak. The Führer had kept his deputy in the dark about his foreign policy and military decisions. It was clearly established at Nuremberg that Hess had not been present at any of the meetings at which Hitler discussed his military plans. [12] And, of course, he could not be held responsible for German actions that took place after his flight to Britain, including those carried out during the campaign against the Soviet Union.

Nevertheless, the Tribunal declared Hess guilty of “crimes against peace” (“planning and preparation of aggressive war”) and of “conspiracy” with other German leaders to commit the alleged crimes, but innocent of “war crimes” and “crimes against humanity.”

No reputable historian today believes the Nuremberg charge that Hess was guilty of “crimes against peace.” Almost all of the criticism of Hess in recent years has focused instead on his signature on the 1935 Nuremberg laws that stripped German Jews of their rights as full citizens and banned marriage and sexual relations between Jews and non-Jews. These laws allegedly “paved the way” for the extermination of the Jews several years later. [13] Whatever the merits of this argument, Hess had nothing to do with the drafting or promulgation of these laws, and his signature on them was completely pro forma. And even so, the laws were domestic statutes that have had counterparts in numerous other countries, including the United States.

Unlike fellow defendant Albert Speer, the wartime armaments minister who did far more than the Deputy Führer to keep Germany’s war machine going but who received only a 20 year sentence, Hess refused to ingratiate himself with the Tribunal. He expressed no remorse for his loyal support of Hitler and the National Socialist regime.

In his final statement to the court on August 31, 1946, he declared:

I had the privilege of working for many years of my life under the greatest son my nation has brought forth in its thousand-year history. Even if I could, I would not wish to expunge this time from my life.

I am happy to know that I have done my duty toward my people, my duty as a German, as a National Socialist, as a loyal follower of my Führer. I regret nothing.

No matter what people may do, one day I shall stand before the judgment seat of God Eternal. I will answer to Him, and I know that He will absolve me.

When it came time to decide his sentence, the judges were not inclined to deal leniently with such an unrepentant defendant. The Soviet judge and his alternate thought he should be executed. The British and American judges and the American and French alternates voted for life imprisonment, while the French judge suggested a sentence of twenty years. The British alternate abstained. They settled on life imprisonment. [14]

The eminent British historian Professor A. J. P. Taylor summed up the injustice of the Hess case in a 1969 statement: [15]

Hess came to this country in 1941 as an ambassador of peace. He came with the … intention of restoring peace between Great Britain and Germany.

He acted in good faith. He fell into our hands and was quite unjustly treated as a prisoner of war. After the war, we could have released him.

No crime has ever been proven against Hess … As far as the records show, he was never at even one of the secret discussions at which Hitler explained his war plans.

He was of course a leading member of the Nazi Party. But he was no more guilty than any other Nazi or, if you wish, any other German. All the Nazis, all the Germans, were carrying on the war. But they were not all condemned because of this.

That Rudolf Hess — the only one at Nuremberg who had risked his life for peace — was found guilty of “crimes against peace” was certainly the Tribunal’s most ironic perversion of justice.


From 1947 until his death, Hess was held in West Berlin’s Spandau prison, which was run by the four Allied powers. Regulations stipulated that “imprisonment will be in the form of solitary confinement” and forbad prison officials to ever call Hess by name. He was addressed only as “prisoner No. 7.”

Conditions were so bad that French chaplain Pastor Casalis protested to the prison Directorate in 1950: “It can safely be said that Spandau has become a place of mental torture to an extent that does not permit the Christian conscience to remain silent …” [16]

For 20 years, Hess at least had the limited company of a few other Nuremberg defendants, but from October 1966 until his death 21 years later, he was the only inmate in the fortress-like prison originally built for 600. He was, in the words of Spandau’s American Director, Lt. Col. Eugene Bird, “the loneliest man in the world.”

Keeping this one man in Spandau cost the West German government about 850,000 marks a year. In addition, each of the four Allied powers had to provide an officer and 37 soldiers during their respective shifts, as well as a director and team of warders throughout the entire year. The permanent maintenance staff of 22 included cooks, waitresses and cleaners.

In the final years of his life, Hess was a weak and frail old man, blind in one eye, who walked stooped forward with a cane. He lived in virtually total isolation according to a strictly regulated daily routine. During his rare meetings with his wife and son, he was not allowed to embrace or even touch them. [17]

Long before his death, Hess’ imprisonment had become a grotesque and absurd spectacle.

Even Winston Churchill expressed regret over his treatment. In 1950 he wrote: [18]

Reflecting upon the whole of the story, I am glad not to be responsible for the way in which Hess has been and is being treated. Whatever may be the moral guilt of a German who stood near to Hitler, Hess had, in my view, atoned for this by his completely devoted and frantic deed of lunatic benevolence. He came to us of his own free will, and, though without authority, had something of the quality of an envoy. He was a medical and not a criminal case, and should be so regarded.

In a 1977 interview, Sir Hartley Shawcross, who was Britain’s chief prosecutor at Nuremberg, called the continued imprisonment of Hess a “scandal.” [19]

The injustice against Hess was not something that happened once and was quickly over. It was, rather, a wrong that went on, day after day, for 46 years. Rudolf Hess was a prisoner of peace and a victim of a vindictive age.


  1. Ilse Hess, Rudolf Hess: Prisoner of Peace (Torrance, Calif.: IHR, 1982), pp. 31-38, 25-27; Wolf R. Hess, My Father Rudolf Hess (London: W.H. Allen, 1986), pp. 17-24; Eugene K. Bird, Prisoner # 7: Rudolf Hess, (New York: Viking Press, 1974), pp. 184, 200, 209-210.
  2. W. R. Hess, My Father Rudolf Hess, pp. 50, 66-67; Ilse Hess, Rudolf Hess: Prisoner of Peace, pp. 15, 24.
  3. Hess statement to Sir John Simon, June 10, 1941. Quoted in: Ilse Hess, Rudolf Hess: Prisoner of Peace, p. 14.
  4. Quoted in: W. R. Hess, My Father Rudolf Hess, pp. 391-392.
  5. Alpheus T. Mason, Harlan Fiske Stone: Pillar of the Law (New York: Viking, 1956), p. 716.
  6. William O. Douglas, An Almanac of Liberty (1954), p. 96. Quoted in: William J. Bosch, Judgment on Nuremberg (Chapel Hill, NC: Univ. of North Carolina, 1970), pp. 132-133.
  7. Quoted in: H. K. Thompson, Jr. and Henry Strutz, eds., Dönitz at Nuremberg: A Reappraisal, (Torrance, Calif.: 1983), p. 196.
  8. Report of Robert Jackson, United States Representative to the International Conference on Military Trials, London, 1945 (Washington, DC: US State Dept., 1949), pp. 104-106, 303.; Whitney R. Harris, Tyranny on Trial: The Evidence at Nuremberg (Dallas: S.M.U. Press, 1954), pp. 16-17.
  9. Jackson letter to Truman, Oct. 12, 1945. Quoted in: Robert E. Conot, Justice at Nuremberg (New York: Harper & Row, 1983), p. 68.
  10. R. Conot, Justice at Nuremberg (New York: Harper & Row, 1983), p. 44.
  11. Office of the United States Chief of Counsel for the Prosecution of Axis Criminality, Nazi Conspiracy and Aggression (11 vols.), Washington, DC: US Gov’t., 1946-1948. (The “red series.”), Volume 2, pp. 466, 469, 477-478.
  12. R. Conot, Justice at Nuremberg, pp. 347-348, 501; W. R. Hess, My Father Rudolf Hess, p. 229.
  13. See, for example: “Rudolf Hess,” Washington Post (editorial), August 19, 1987; Letter by Marvin Hier and Abraham Cooper, The New York Times, May 1, 1984.
  14. R. Conot, Justice at Nuremberg, p. 487; W. R. Hess, My Father Rudolf Hess, pp. 235-236.
  15. Sunday Express, London, April 27, 1969. Quoted in: W. R. Hess, My Father Rudolf Hess, pp. 392-393.
  16. W. R. Hess, My Father Rudolf Hess, pp. 265-266.
  17. Eugene K. Bird, Prisoner # 7: Rudolf Hess, p. 152 and passim.
  18. Winston S. Churchill, The Grand Alliance (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1950), p. 55.

19. Interview with Bild am Sonntag, April 10, 1977. Quoted in: Wolf R. Hess, My Father Rudolf Hess, p. 402.

Caricatures from “Der Stürmer” – translated in English and colourized!

The Year 1933





Alfred Rosenberg didn’t believe in gas vans


On November 5, 1945, just over a fortnight before the International Military Tribunal commenced, Alfred Rosenberg was interrogated at Nuremberg by the Soviet Major General Alexandrov. They had the following exchange:

ALEXANDROV: How about the mass extermination of thousands of innocent people, for instance, Jews in the Ghettoes of Warsaw and other cities. Did you hear about such things; did you hear about the gas vans?

ROSENBERG: I have heard about them but I don’t believe it.

ALEXANDROV: But it is a fact. We have documents which prove that all this was done. We also have people that are still alive who witnessed these atrocities. There is no question but that these things are true. How do you feel about them?

ROSENBERG: I would assume that in such a gigantic struggle there would be many victims but I still don’t believe this part where you allege to prove that deliberate mass extermination was practiced in this manner. I did, of course, know that in connection with our struggle there were many executions. I did not know anything about mass extermination to the extent and in the manner as you say.

ALEXANDROV: We could prove all this to you.

ROSENBERG: When we marched into Riga I was told that there had been a torture chamber of your MKVD.

ALEXANDROV: That is not true, but we have at our disposal documents of the German Police which show that the most bestial measures were applied against the people in the East.

ROSENBERG: Did you, General, ever see a report on Winnitza? It deals with a great number of executions. This matter was investigated by experts from neutral countries; thousands of dead Ukranians [sic] were found and many of those were identified by their relatives.

ALEXANDROV: Who killed them?

ROSENBERG: The Soviet Police.

ALEXANDROV:  The German authorities always tried to make the German crimes appear as though they were Soviet crimes. I have here another order in which the Fuehrer gave the following instructions. In this directive the Fuehrer approves of the most cruel methods, including the killing of children if used to cover the partisans. In such cases German officers and non—commissioned officers should be permitted to open fire against such women and children and should not have to be afraid of subsequent punishment. Such instructions were issued by the Fuehrer. I am going to tell you now what Jodl’s reply was in that conference. “There is no question that our troops may do whatever they wish; if necessary, they may hang people by their feet or cut them in four.” What do you think of these things?

ROSENBERG: I must say that setting afire houses with women and children in them–that was what partisans did many times in their fight against us–it is nothing extraordinary.

ALEXANDROV: We are not talking about partisans; the partisans were active in the German rear–but here you were in control–the German Government was controlling these territorities?

ROSENBERG: Where we were in control no such incidents happened, but such things did happen where the partisans were active.

Interrogation of Alfred Rosenberg, conducted by Major General Alexandrov, Nuremberg, Nov 5, 1945, pp. 16-18.

In an earlier interrogation, on September 22, 1945, future Nuremberg prosecutor Colonel John Amen had asked Rosenberg whether Germans who had worked in the concentration camps were justified in claiming they were merely following orders when carrying-out Hitler’s inhumane orders, when they had known his orders were unlawful. Rosenberg replied:

I think that such orders for inhuman conduct in concentration camps could not ever have been given, […] My personal opinion is that such inhuman things ought not and could not have been ordered.

Interrogation of Alfred Rosenberg, conducted by Thomas S. Hinkel and John Amen, Nuremberg, 1100-1200, Sept. 22, 1945, p. 7.

Later the same day, Rosenberg claimed that he’d heard that “some Jews” had been shot by the German police in the occupied territories; that he knew nothing nor had put no effort into discovering what went on in Himmler’s concentration camps, and had the following exchange with American Colonel Thomas S. Hinkel:

HINKEL: You knew it was Himmler’s policy to exterminate the Jews, didn’t you?

ROSENBERG: In this shape or manner, I did not believe it until the end.

HINKEL: You had been informed of that, had you not?

ROSENBERG: No; I was not.

HINKEL: Everybody else seems to have known it. Why didn’t you know about it?

ROSENBERG: I learned about it the first time by the radio which mentioned and cited speeches of Jews abroad.

HINKEL: Didn’t you receive the Hitler order, wherein Himmler was appointed the person in charge of Jewish affairs?

ROSENBERG: No; I haven’t seen it, but I have been told of it.

HINKEL: And when were you told about it?

ROSENBERG: In the ’30s.

HINKEL: You knew what Himmler’s policy was towards the Jews?

ROSENBERG: Well, those things must hove become rather acute during the war because before the war such things didn’t happen. Himmler only mentioned once that he had to drive away the Jews from Dusseldorf, and that they were in a camp where in about a fortnight they set up a cabaret.

Interrogation of Alfred Rosenberg, conducted by Thomas S. Hinkel, Nuremberg, 1415-1800, Sept. 22, 1945, p. 24.

Rosenberg denied he’d had knowledge of the alleged plan to kill all of Europe’s Jews throughout the Nuremberg trial:

DR. HAENSEL: Do you know that the SS, as far as the Jews were concerned, followed secret aims and objectives, others than those that were published officially?

ROSENBERG: That I learned here.

DR. HAENSEL: You do not know that from your own knowledge?


IMT, vol. 11, p. 528.

Annihilate Gaza: Israeli official

 Moshe Feiglin

Israeli Knesset’s deputy speaker Moshe Feiglin has called for the “annihilation” of the Palestinian territory of the Gaza Strip.

Feiglin, who is also a member of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s ruling Likud Party, wrote about the plans in a post on his Facebook page at the weekend, the British Daily Mail reported on Monday.

The Israeli official also called for “the conquest of the entire Gaza Strip.” He spoke of plans for the destruction of Gaza, which would include expelling residents and shipping them across the world.

Feiglin also wrote about his plans in a letter addressed to Netanyahu, in which he said he wanted the measures to be enforced as soon as possible.

In the letter, Feiglin said he wanted Israeli military forces to find areas on the Sinai border to set up “tent encampments… until relevant emigration destinations are determined.” Furthermore, he wants Gaza’s electricity and water supplies to be disconnected before shelling the besieged area “with maximum fire power.”

The Israeli forces would then “exterminate” resistance centers and Israeli law would be extended to cover the entire Gaza Strip and “the city of Gaza and its suburbs will be rebuilt as true Israeli touristic and commercial cities.”

The Israeli military launched its recent offensive against the Gaza Strip on July 8. At least 1,867 Palestinians, including around 430 children, have so far been killed and over 9,500 others injured during the onslaught. Tel Aviv says 64 Israelis have been killed in the war, while Hamas puts the number at more than 150.

The Illustrated Protocols of Zion


by David Duke

This is a video preview of Dr. David Duke’s new book, The Illustrated Protocols of Zion is an historical and literary valuation of the original Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.

He presents the case that Protocols of Zion could well be titled the Protocols of “Zionism” in that it predicts many of the horrific wars and conflicts right down to the issues in the Israel or “Zion” of today and associated with Zionist power and influence that goes far beyond the borders of Israel.

In this video and and his book upon which it is based, he shows that many of the most radical claims of the Protocols are today proclaimed by Zionists themselves around the world. such as domination of media, banking, and extensive power and influence in America, the EU and in many governments around the world.

He quotes leading and influential Zionists and Zionist media in showing that many of the most important underlying themes can be be documented in historical and contemporary terms.

Dr. Duke points out its true history. He argues that the Protocols is obviously not the secret meeting of earlocked “Elders of Zion” anymore than 1984 is a true account of Big Brother or Oceania.

He examines it as dystopian literature that is amazingly prescient and predictive since its publishing well over a century ago.

This video and the powerful underlying book The Illustrated Protocols of Zion are essential materials to understanding the Zionist issue from all perspectives.

A Phd in History, Dr. Duke shows how vital assertions of the Protocols can be historically and contemporaneously documented and that many of the most shocking claims of the Protocols can be found in even more extreme expression by modern Zionism.